What is the Gen Z stare? TikTok zoomers and millennials are bickering over facial expressions
You might have a few questions like: 1) what's the Gen Z stare? and 2) why is TikTok fighting over this? and 3) who would spend their time fighting over this? Well, we'll get into all that.
But first, the primary question.
What is the Gen Z stare?
Well, the full answer depends on who you ask. But the agreed upon facts are that it's a blank, middle-distance stare into the void often employed by Gen Z folks. (By the way, definitions vary, but, roughly speaking, Gen Z spans those born between 1997-2012.) From someone else's perspective, it's a young person staring into nowhere as you attempt to communicate with them.
We cannot, however, go much further without getting into the bickering.
What is the Gen Z stare trend on TikTok and why are people arguing about it?
First things first, most people online are not arguing over the existence of the Gen Z stare, but rather how and why it's deployed. And, another disclaimer, no generation is a monolith and no opinion or behavior is fully shared among any large swath of humans. We are complicated, silly, hypocritical, intelligent creatures who are able to hold both multiple truths and misbeliefs at once. Have you ever seen Werner Herzog wax poetic about skateboarding? The human condition is unpredictable.
Anyway, I'm generalizing, but Gen Z seems to think boomers, Gen Xers, and millennials — the cringe millennial especially — are the cause of Gen Z stare and the source of a misunderstanding about it. In this version of the Gen Z stare, the younger person is working a customer service job, and the stare is simply a reaction to a customer of an older generation doing something dumb or annoying. The Gen Z person then stares in disbelief or frustration. That's the thrust of the definition at online dictionary Know Your Meme, for instance. Here's a TikTok skit, for example, claiming the stare is for something like a boomer not understanding when to remove their credit card from a payment machine.
Or, another example, where someone might not understanding a basic fact — that a class is fully booked — leads to the stare.
Now, the arguing comes in because other folks have said that this definition of the Gen Z stare is incorrect. After all, plenty of people of all generations working customer service jobs have stared into the void when faced with a particularly incomprehensible customer. Instead, the argument goes, the Gen Z stare isn't necessarily about working a customer service job at all. It's more referencing folks' unwillingness or inability to participate in pleasantries or benign informational exchanges. This version of the Gen Z stare refers to any situation where a young person gets approached about something simple (i.e., a basic question or a friendly "hello") and stares straight ahead instead of responding. In fact, millennials and others working service jobs have said they've gotten the stare from Gen Z customers. Here's @theprincessandthepoppers breaking it down (gently) for zoomers as a service worker who's seen the stare when asking customers where they'd like to sit in a restaurant.
And here's another skit addressing a similar scenario.
So why the bickering? Well, because zoomers have pushed back on the idea they might have a slightly weird habit. Meanwhile, millennials have retorted that the generation responsible for mercilessly roasting millennial behavior should be able to acknowledge their own occasional cringe behavior.
This @xiandivyne post pokes fun at Gen Z for getting defensive, basically saying they're claiming, "we're smart and you're stupid."
Or here's even a zoomer talking about experiencing the stare at work.
Now, to be fair to zoomers, a few weeks ago there were a few posts — and a write-up from the New York Post, naturally — complaining about the Gen Z "gaze" from service workers. That's seemingly related to the "stare" debate now, but it's certainly evolved.
So... why is this a thing?
Part of the reason this trend — or debate — has been embraced with such energy is the fact that it is slightly poking fun at Gen Z. Zoomers are young and, naturally, have a habit of roasting other generations — especially millennials because, to them, millennials are cringe. Millennial cringe compilations are literally a whole genre of video and, as a millennial, I can admit that's not without a good bit of merit. But some zoomers have seemingly not liked the fact that anyone would poke fun at their behavior, which has led to the Gen Z stare pushback and even more bickering online.
I can't say for sure, but maybe the Gen Z stare is real. As some folks have floated online, small talk would be difficult for a generation that came of age during COVID isolation. Gen Z roasted millennials for the Millennial Pause — the habit of waiting a beat before talking during a recording — so maybe zoomers have the same issue, but IRL instead of on their phone.
But the real reason this is a trend, or an argument, is because it's become fertile ground for zoomers to get defensive and (mostly) millennials to poke fun or gently point out something about Gen Z. In total, it seems to be a pretty laid back argument — nobody's actually getting pissed off — but it does seem to be growing in vigor lately.
But as a millennial, I'd rather try to bridge the gap with zoomers with something we can all agree on: at least we're not boomers.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jon Bernthal's gonna punish somebody in Spider-Man: Brand New Day
Details about Brand New Day, the fourth Tom Holland/MCU Spider-Man movie, have been basically nil ever since the project went from 'thing Tom Holland was constantly getting asked about maybe happening' to 'thing Tom Holland now constantly gets asked about definitely happening.' We know Holland's in it; we known that Spidey co-stars Zendaya and Jacob Batalon would pop up in it somewhere; we knew Stranger Things' Sadie Sink was somehow on board—and that was pretty much it. Now, though, THR has a new piece of casting information, and it is, as they say, a doozy: Turns out Jon Bernthal will also be appearing in the film, suggesting somebody in this movie's definitely getting punished. Bernthal made his formal entry into the Marvel Cinematic Universe earlier this year, when he appeared as Frank 'The Punisher' Castle in Disney+ series Daredevil: Born Again. That version of the character appeared to have been imported pretty much wholesale from Bernthal's earlier Netflix turns as the character, completely with no compunctions at all about killing anyone he deemed in need of punishment. Which is going to make for some interesting contrasts, when he runs into whatever's going on with Holland's Peter Parker in this latest film. The two characters have bumped heads frequently in comics, of course: Frank debuted, back in 1974, as a Spider-Man villain, his ruthlessness contrasting with Peter's baked-in idealism. Given how much the most recent Spider-Man film, No Way Home, put its title character through the ringer, though—stripping him of loved ones and his public identity as a hero, and pushing him almost to the point of murder—it'll be interesting to see how the two approaches to ground-level superhero work conflict. (Things should presumably be more copacetic on set; Bernthal and Holland are reportedly old friends, having each helped the other rehearse for their auditions for their respective superhero roles.) Brand New Day is currently sitting on the Marvel calendar with a July 31, 2026 release date; Bernthal, meanwhile, is expected to also reprise his role as Castle for Born Again's second season, as well as a standalone Punisher feature. More from A.V. Club The Gilded Age adjusts to a new order Exclusive Screaming And Conjuring book excerpt explores the impact of 28 Days Later's running zombies The dead walk all the way to Spain in a new Walking Dead: Daryl Dixon teaser
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
WWE Raw results, highlights (July 14): Seth Rollins injury update, Roman Reigns returns
The "WWE Raw" after WWE Evolution did a perfect job of adding even more to the overall spectacle of Sunday night's event. Birmingham, Alabama was treated to a show centered mainly around the fallout from the PLE, and it was all seamless. Despite that, there was still a bigger, overarching matter to address from WWE's weekend — plus one significant return. The Seth Rollins dilemma As Paul Heyman first spoke tonight, I hatched the outline of where to go in the wake of Rollins' injury absence. Advertisement Heyman noted how it's too early to know any real updates on Rollins' timeline, mentioning he has until June to cash in. So, that leads one to believe it's staying with him — for now. I'm not in love with the idea, since it means there will be a gap of early months where we know there can't be a surprise return. But what followed was the seed to a tangible direction. Bron Breakker was hyped up by his "Oracle" to become the next World Heavyweight Champion. Imagine that. Breakker does win it while Rollins is away and eventually gets cashed in on by his recruiter. Vintage Rollins. Well, the "WWE Raw" main event contender gauntlet match resulted in a CM Punk win. So, you know what that means. Punk is winning that title, and Rollins cashes in on him instead. Advertisement The matches within the match were mostly pretty good, but the booking of this was atrocious, and you could feel the scrambled fallout of Rollins' injury. First and foremost, Gunther cut a promo beforehand that led to him staring down Breakker with Heyman hyping up a match between them. That felt like all the spoiler needed, but the swerve was admittedly a nice touch. To start things off, it was Breakker vs. Penta, which was essentially a copy and paste of the last time they wrestled. LA Knight followed, and he put on a show with Breakker. It really was the best mini-match in the heart of this — then Knight just lost clean to a single spear, killing all of the momentum he had built before WWE Saturday Night's Main Event. It was practically a burial despite him seemingly building to some big spot with that Rollins match. Brutal stuff, and that was that. He was gone from the show after taking the L. Now, here was the biggest problem with all of this. During Knight's portion of the match, Michael Cole stated on commentary that there were no disqualifications, which is news to me for this match type. Regardless, that makes zero sense when these are one-on-ones. And if that was the case, WWE could have at least booked Knight to lose with the aid of Bronson Reed — or have him come back after his loss to cost Breakker. Instead, Reed helped stop Jey Uso from beating Breakker. You know. To keep him somewhat "strong." Advertisement If that wasn't stupid enough, Reed then just didn't attack CM Punk as soon as Punk arrived to take on Breakker. WHY NOT?! The logic in non-decisions like that has been so off with the "Sethriders" and their story beats. Reed ultimately got in there at the end, and rather than Knight, it was Uso who returned to help fend off the big men and secure Punk's win with a GTS. There was still one surprise left after that, as Breakker and Reed took over and set up a sandwich Tsunami to Uso and Punk. Nope! It still wasn't Knight. Roman Reigns returned to clean up shop, helping his old Bloodline stablemate and WrestleMania 41 rival. Advertisement Reigns' return certainly adds a massive wrinkle to the title picture, and is somewhat of a Hail Mary move with Rollins out. But hey, he certainly felt needed now more than ever. Proceeding with caution "WWE Raw" kicked off with quite the epic opener to immediately follow the incredible momentum from last night's WWE Evolution 2025 PLE. The brand new Women's World Champion Naomi set the stage and received a huge ovation, along with "You deserve it" chants. It was great to see, especially with Naomi remaining in character and shutting it down, but playfully. The champ called out everyone for not "feeling the glow" and guessing wrong that she'd cash in on Tiffany Stratton. Bianca Belair then got her shot, as Naomi said she outgrew her, which keeps the roots planted for their eventual massive showdown. Before her first interruption, Naomi dropped... Advertisement 🤯 Line of the Year THE WOMAN TOLD ALL THE "RAGGEDY HEFFAS" ON "WWE RAW" TO WATCH OUT. Brothers and sisters, I lost my marbles when she said that. Incredible. It's a damn shame that WWE didn't let Naomi reach a character arc like this sooner. Rusev delivered a good contender later, saying he wants "gold, not gingers" to Sheamus. What was in the water tonight? Anyway, a proper-pissed Rhea Ripley waltzed her way out to confront Naomi after ruining her chance at earning a win over Iyo Sky. That prompted the latter also to emerge before Naomi told both to get to the back of the line. Tensions started to thicken, and "WWE Raw" general manager Adam Pearce came out to make a triple-threat match for the title official at WWE SummerSlam. Advertisement So, I love that from a pure match perspective, and it feels appropriate. Storywise, not so much, especially for SummerSlam. The first defense for Naomi would have been best fit for, oh, I don't know, this episode of "WWE Raw." Just a thought, Hunter. Presumably, Bianca Belair may not be ready to return that soon because a Naomi match would be a great starting point in this reign. However, you have to expect it to end at WWE SummerSlam because there's no way Stephanie Vaquer doesn't challenge a champion Ripley in her title shot at Clash At Paris. Remember the 2-out-of-3 falls experiment? Whenever there's a 2-out-of-3 falls match, I'm always going to think about that time Vince McMahon wanted to completely — and randomly — change the entire formula of WWE matches. On this "WWE Raw," it was Bayley vs. Lyra Valkyria. Advertisement Alright. This match was for a title shot against Becky Lynch at WWE SummerSlam. I get it. We're supposed to get to Valkyria's trilogy match, but this doesn't make sense after they both just lost at WWE Evolution. Additionally, it's now at the point where the Intercontinental title scene has been exclusively limited to these three wrestlers. No one else has even mentioned or looked at the title since before WrestleMania 41. And the last person who did was Bayley! You have to spread the love soon, Triple H. Seriously. Realistically, I can't be that mad because this was easily the... 👑 Uncrowned Gem of the Night 👑 Valkyria and Bayley freaking rule together. This match started with Bayley working over Valkyria's back before the tight roll-up for her lone pin. Valkyria scored her first with a lovely counter pin. Advertisement We saw tons of phenomenal spots like Valkyria's sit-out gut-wrench powerbomb, the sunset flip into the steps and the finishing sequence when Bayley dropped the elbow onto Valkyria's back and got a near-fall. It went into a crossface that Valkyria countered into a Nightwing. Brilliant. Just brilliant. These three are delivering some of the best overall work in wrestling right now. This two-day punch of action has been insane. 👍 MONDAY NIGHT MONEY 👍 1. This "WWE Raw" started with three women's matches, further displaying that this can just be done normally. There doesn't have to be a big women's-only show to highlight all these great wrestlers. Regardless, it was refreshing to see, and the route to take right after WWE Evolution. Advertisement 2. Karrion Kross received a video promo that continued to target Sami Zayn. I think everyone probably couldn't care less about the Zayn aspect of this. It was just wonderful to see a good promotional piece for Kross that wasn't during a commercial break. 3. Rusev and Sheamus will run it back at some point. Usually, I'd be a little on the fence about this, but these guys just have that chemistry. Let them wrestle 80 times for all I care. 🤷 IT HAPPENED 🤷 The Judgment Day (Raquel Rodriguez and Roxanne Perez) defeated The Kabuki Warriors when Perez rolled up Asuka. It was an OK match, and nothing more than a story speed bump, with Dominick Mysterio helping his faction get the win by distracting the referee. A typical Judgment Day "meh." Advertisement 👎 RAW DEAL 👎 1. Nikki Bella defeated Chelsea Green. It was not good. Green losing isn't great either. This seemed to set up a brief team of Bella and Vaquer, as she made the save after the match when Green and The Secret Hervice attacked. 2. Pearce tells The New Day he doesn't just hand out title rematches — after literally doing so earlier in the night for Sky and Ripley. 👑This was a jam-packed "WWE Raw" and the kind of show you'd hope for after a big weekend. I give this show a Crown score of: 7.5/10.👑
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Photo of Johnny Furphy's Poster Dunk in Summer League Breaks the Internet—'Poor Young Man'
New Photo of Johnny Furphy's Poster Dunk in Summer League Breaks the Internet—'Poor Young Man' originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The Indiana Pacers lost their Summer League game against the Chicago Bulls on Monday; however, they undoubtedly had the best play of the contest, thanks to second-year forward Johnny Furphy. Advertisement Furphy, who was taken No. 35 overall in the 2024 NBA Draft, finished with 15 points, six rebounds, two assists, two steals and two blocks in the Pacers' 114-105 loss to the Bulls at the Cox Pavilion in Las Vegas, Nevada. Late in the second quarter of the game, Furphy delivered a poster slam that had the whole NBA world in awe and disbelief. The 20-year-old used his crafty ball-handling to create space against a couple of Bulls defenders and proceeded to soar to the rim for a vicious dunk. Indiana Pacers forward Johnny Furphy (12) impressed in the team's Summer League game against the Chicago Mertens-Imagn Images Bulls rookie Noa Essengue, however, made the mistake of trying to stop Furphy at the rim, leading to an epic poster moment. Advertisement The Pacers, for their part, added insult to injury by posting a photo of Johnny Furphy's dunk over Noa Essengue. Taken from a low, front angle, the photo showed Essengue's hilarious facial expression as Furphy slammed the ball over him. Indiana's post quickly went viral, generating nearly 2 million views in just three hours after it was posted. It also drew plenty of hilarious reactions. "That poor young man," a commenter wrote. Another one said, "noa will never live this picture down." A viewer added, "This is going to be hard to recover from." "Nasty work! That young man has a family," a social media user shared. Advertisement A poster remarked, "oh nah did bro so dirty." "That man gotta hang it up. Aint no way they captured his facial expression like that," a sixth follower stated. Related: Fans Saddened by Video of Tyrese Haliburton on Crutches After Pacers' NBA Finals Loss This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jul 15, 2025, where it first appeared.