Super fund took more than 500 days to approve death benefit for grieving widow, Asic says
The 'distressing' case has been highlighted by the financial regulator as one of many 'poor industry practices' by funds that have had 'devastating impacts' on members experiencing 'deep grief, vulnerability, frustration and genuine suffering'.
A 'landmark' report released by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (Asic) on Monday has made 34 recommendations to overhaul the superannuation sector. The report investigated the conduct of 10 trustees, which are responsible for 38% of all member benefits in Australia.
Asic chair, Joe Longo, said the report 'identified a range of issues including excessive delays, poor customer service, and ineffective claims handling procedures'. He called on the industry to 'take ownership of the problems and flex their muscle to fix the failings'.
'At the heart of this issue is leadership that doesn't have a grip on the fund's data, systems and processes – and ultimately it is the customers who suffer for it,' Longo said.
'This kind of disconnect is unacceptable in any area of corporate Australia, but in the superannuation sector it is particularly serious, because super affects everyone from the boardroom to the living room.'
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
A death benefit is the amount of superannuation a person has remaining in their account after they die. This can be transferred to a family member to ensure bills and expenses can be covered. This payment may also include life insurance payments.
The review of 10 superannuation funds comes after Asic lodged federal court proceedings alleging Cbus failed to process more than 10,000 claims for death and disability payments within 90 days. More than 6,000 members were forced to wait more than 12 months for payments. Cbus has apologised and promised to overhaul its processes.
The 10 reviewed funds include Australian Retirement Trust, Avanteos (Colonial First State), Brighter Super, Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation, Hesta, Hostplus, NM Super (AMP), Nulis (MLC), Rest and UniSuper. The report found some funds had performed better than others, but all needed to improve.
The review found communication with First Nations claimant was 'often not culturally sensitive' and that their death benefits often took longer to deliver.
The report highlighted the case of a First Nations woman who lodged a claim for a death benefit after her husband died. He had a death benefit of around $100,000. According to Asic, she repeatedly told an unnamed fund she was suffering financial distress and struggling to navigate the claims process.
'The trustee did not respond to the wife's concerns about financial hardship,' the Asic report said.
The woman had already raised concerns about lacking 'standard identification documents for her deceased husband'. Asic allege the fund 'took more than a year to offer the wife alternative identification options'.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'The trustee finally decided to pay the wife after more than 500 days,' the report said. 'However, as of the date we collected the claim file, the wife still had not received payment.'
Asic commissioner Simone Constant said 'grieving Australians should not have to suffer further stress because of the failure of superannuation trustees to approach claims in a timely, clear, and respectful manner'.
'Many of the complaints we read were distressing. We saw deep grief, vulnerability, frustration and genuine suffering,' Constant said.
'The money from a death benefit can make a huge difference and each day a trustee delays that payment causes real harm to families. Trustees need to do better.'
The 10 superannuation funds examined by Asic are yet to respond to the regulator's findings but have previously outlined measures to improve their performance.
In November, several of the funds mentioned in the Asic report said they had overhauled their internal processes to improve customer outcomes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 days ago
- Daily Mail
Eye-watering amount Aussie taxpayers have forked out for an Indigenous treaty as state edges closer to finalising negotiations
The Victorian government has already spent at least $382million of taxpayer money negotiating an Indigenous treaty, according to new analysis. A treaty is expected to be finalised later in 2025, nine years after the state government became the first in the country to formally commit to treaty talks in 2016. According to treaty reports and budget papers, $382.4 million has been given to the 'self-determination' process over the past decade, The Herald Sun reported. Some money has gone towards setting up the Treaty Authority, which is overseeing negotiations, with members of the panel earning up to $380,000 a year. Funding has also supported preparations by First Nations groups for negotiations, public events to inform Indigenous communities about the process, and roundtable discussions on the treaty framework. Right-wing think tank the Institute of Public Affairs suggested the total figure could be higher. Their report found that 727 meetings related to treaty development were held between July 2016 and June 2025. That number could reach 968 by June 2026 if it continues at its current pace, with one meeting taking place every two to three business days. The Institute's review of government budget papers estimated that a combined $776 million has been spent over the past decade on the treaty, 'self-determination' programs, and Indigenous community initiatives. However, the documents do not provide a detailed breakdown of spending. Institute of Public Affairs Research Fellow Margaret Chambers criticised the government's handling of the process. 'The Victorian government is not being honest and upfront with Victorians about its plan to divide the community on racial grounds,' Ms Chambers told the Herald Sun. 'With a treaty scheduled to be finalised inside the next 12 months, and despite the volume of secret meetings over the past decade, very little is known about what this treaty will entail. 'Any treaty will fundamentally change Victoria's legal structure and will likely require already financially stretched Victorian taxpayers to pay billions of dollars to activists aligned to the Allan government.' New legislation related to the treaty is expected to go before Victoria's parliament in the coming months. It is understood the bill will enshrine an expanded First Peoples' Assembly. That would effectively establish a state-based version of the Voice, which was rejected in a national referendum in 2023. The Victorian government is also negotiating separate treaties with local Indigenous groups. The details of these agreements and associated costs have not been disclosed. At the beginning of July, the Victorian government released the findings from the Yoorrook Justice Commission investigating the state's colonial roots. The Truth Be Told report detailed massacres and frontier violence, labelling it a 'genocide' and investigating the ongoing harms against Aboriginal people. A Victorian government spokesman slammed the 'cherry-picked analysis from the Liberal Party-aligned think tank'. 'If you listen to the people directly affected by policies, you get better outcomes - that's commonsense,' he said. 'Treaty is about making a better and fairer state for all Victorians - negotiations are underway and we look forward to bringing treaty to the Parliament.'
The Guardian
5 days ago
- The Guardian
Macquarie's famed pay packages under attack from disgruntled shareholders at AGM
Macquarie Group has been stung by a shareholder backlash against its executive pay plans amid disquiet over a string of regulatory prosecutions. Investors lodged votes against Macquarie's remuneration plans in excess of 25%, in a major rebuke of the company's famed pay packages, triggering a 'first strike' at its annual general meeting in Sydney on Thursday. A remuneration report requires a 25% opposing vote to trigger a strike, as opposed to the usual majority required for ordinary resolutions. Under rules designed to hold directors accountable for executive pay, shareholders will get a chance to spill the board next year if they deliver another strike. The Macquarie chair, Glenn Stevens, said at the AGM that a number of shareholders had expressed a view that the board had not adequately reflected 'risk shortcomings'. 'The board hears your message and will reflect carefully on addressing those concerns,' Stevens said. Sign up: AU Breaking News email In May, the chair of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Joe Longo, issued a stinging critique of Macquarie after announcing the fourth regulatory action against the company in just over 12 months. Longo said at the time Asic had 'ongoing and deep concerns' with Macquarie over its 'weak remediation of longstanding issues'. Asic alleged in May that Macquarie's securities business engaged in misleading conduct by misreporting millions of short sales to the market operator for more than 14 years. Short sales refer to investors taking a position on an asset they expect to fall in value. Macquarie said it had remedied those issues, implemented additional controls and was reviewing the regulator's claim. The company could not comment further on Thursday given it is a live legal matter. Macquarie is well-known for its huge pay packets, which are tightly linked to company profits. The Macquarie chief executive, Shemara Wikramanayake, earned $24m during the last 12-month reporting period, mostly consisting of bonuses, making her one of Australia's highest paid executives. While shareholders usually lodge a protest vote against executive pay when a company is performing poorly, there are times investors use it to tell the board they are unhappy about other issues. Woolworths received a remuneration strike in 2023 after shareholders over concerns with the supermarket's response to the death of two workers, one of whom was killed after being hit by pallets at a distribution centre. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Macquarie also faced a climate-focused shareholder resolution calling on the company to outline how its financing for fossil fuel projects aligned with its net zero commitments. The resolution, which did not receive majority support, asked the bank to disclose its exposure to fossil fuel companies and its plans for financing them. Activists are particularly unhappy with Macquarie's support for the planned large gas fracking project in the Northern Territory's Beetaloo basin. 'The reality is that Macquarie's fossil fuel financing activity is categorically not aligned with its climate commitments,' Kyle Robertson, an analyst at the climate activist group Market Forces, told the AGM. While many financiers have climate policies, they often allow for the development of new fossil fuel reserves, rubbing against analysis showing emissions from existing fossil fuel infrastructure are more than enough to push the world beyond its climate goals. Stevens said the company's position was in line with the policies of the federal government, which allows for the expansion of gas production during the transition to renewable energy. 'That is part of the transition; Macquarie is involved in that,' Stevens said.
Reuters
16-07-2025
- Reuters
Australia says World Heritage listing to protect Indigenous carvings
SYDNEY, July 12 (Reuters) - Securing World Heritage status for Australia's Murujuga rock art will help protect the ancient Indigenous carvings, located in an industrial hub, the government said on Saturday. The art, thought to be 50,000 years old, lies in a peninsula that has gas and explosives plants, highlighting the sensitive relationship between the nation's Indigenous culture and its economically vital resources industries. UNESCO granted World Heritage status to the site in the Burrup peninsula on Friday after a "tireless nomination process", started in 2023, said Environment Minister Murray Watt. "The Australian Government is strongly committed to World Heritage and the protection of First Nations cultural heritage," Watt said in a statement. "We will ensure this outstanding place is protected now and for future generations." Peter Hicks, chair of the Murujuga Aboriginal Corporation, said the UNESCO listing was a means to protect the "extraordinary landscape". The peninsula in the northwest of mineral-rich Western Australia state is home to two liquefied natural gas plants run by Woodside and fertiliser and explosives plants run by Norway's Yara International. Australia's government in May extended the lifetime of Woodside's largest gas plant in the region, the North West Shelf, until 2070. The extension will generate up to 4.3 billion metric tons of additional carbon emissions. Scrutiny over the impact of Australia's resources industry on Indigenous heritage sites has been magnified since Rio Tinto, the world's biggest iron ore miner, destroyed the 46,000-year-old Juukan Gorge rock shelters as part of a mine expansion in 2020.
