logo
I'm drifting from my long-term partner. Should we break-up?

I'm drifting from my long-term partner. Should we break-up?

Perth Now05-06-2025
I've been with my partner for years, and from the outside, everything looks fine, we live together, we don't fight often, and we share responsibilities. But lately, I've felt… lonely. Like we're drifting apart even though we're right next to each other. Is this normal? And more importantly, what can I do about it?
First things first: **yes, it's absolutely normal** but that doesn't mean it has to stay that way.
You can be in a long-term, committed relationship, share a mortgage, raise kids, tag each other in memes, and still feel emotionally isolated. And you're not alone: a 2023 study published in Frontiers in Psychology found that nearly 1 in 4 people in relationships experience emotional loneliness at some point, even when things seem 'fine.' This isn't about the absence of love, it's often about the absence of emotional connection.
So… why do we feel lonely when we're not alone? The answer is simpler than you'd expect: We stop being curious about each other. It's easy to fall into the trap of 'I already know them.' But relationships thrive on continued curiosity. When conversations become purely logistical, 'Did you pay that bill?' 'Who's picking up the groceries?', intimacy can quietly erode.
Secondly, our 'love languages' typically don't match up. You might crave quality time or words of affirmation, while your partner thinks doing the dishes is showing love. If you're not receiving love in the way you understand it, you'll feel emotionally undernourished, no matter how much is being given.
Finally, disconnection creeps in gradually. Emotional distance often grows in silence. When we stop checking in, stop touching base, or ignore that tiny voice saying, 'something feels off,' we build parallel lives instead of an intertwined one. You're together… but not really together.
So what can you do? Start with a gentle check-in. Say something like: 'I've been feeling a bit disconnected lately, and I miss us. I'd love to reconnect more, would you be open to talking about it?' This isn't to blame. It's an invitation. Take the time to relearn your partner's love language. Use this opportunity to ask each other: 'What makes you feel most loved by me?' You might be surprised by the answer. Then commit to small, daily actions in that language, even 5 minutes of intentional affection can go a long way.
Create micro-moments of connection. Connection doesn't require grand gestures. It's built in the tiny moments, making eye contact over coffee, touching their arm as you pass by, or sending a midday 'thinking of you' text. These small sparks add up. Don't be afraid to get support. Sometimes, disconnection stems from deeper patterns, old wounds, communication issues, stress. Couples therapy or coaching can offer a safe space to rewire those dynamics (you know where to find me!).
Feeling lonely in a relationship doesn't mean it's doomed, it means your heart is craving more. Because after all, more closeness, more being seen, more being known. And the good news? It's never too late to find your way back to each other.
You're not alone in feeling alone and reaching out is already the first step home.
Your Bestie,
Amanda
Amanda Lambros is a sexologist and relationship coach with almost two decades of experience who takes pride in her 'no b-s' approach to solving your problems. She is also a certified speaking professional and has written several books on relationships, health and business which have sold more than 150,000 copies.
Do you have a question for Amanda? Email heybestie@wanews.com.au (don't worry, we won't publish your name!)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Elon Musk Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Middle Class
I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Elon Musk Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Middle Class

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Elon Musk Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Middle Class

The wealth gap in America is staggering, but the tax gap might be even more shocking. When I asked ChatGPT to calculate what would happen if Elon Musk paid taxes at the same effective rate as middle-class Americans, the AI's response revealed numbers that will make you question everything you thought you knew about tax fairness. Explore More: Read Next: The answer involves billions in potential revenue, fundamental questions about how wealth should be taxed and a tax loophole so effective that billionaires have turned it into an art form. The Massive Tax Rate Gap Between Billionaires and Regular Americans According to ChatGPT's analysis, the effective tax rate difference between Musk and middle-class Americans is almost unbelievable. While middle-class households typically pay an effective tax rate of 20% to 25% when combining federal income tax, payroll taxes and other obligations, Musk's situation tells a very different story. Based on ProPublica's investigation of IRS files, ChatGPT revealed that Musk paid a 'true tax rate' of just 3.27% on his wealth growth between 2014 and 2018. In 2018 specifically, he reportedly paid $0 in federal income tax despite his wealth increasing dramatically. The AI explained this isn't because Musk is breaking the law — it's because most of his wealth exists as unrealized gains in Tesla and SpaceX stock, which aren't taxed until sold. He can also borrow against his equity holdings, and loans aren't considered taxable income. What $3 Billion in Extra Tax Revenue Could Actually Fund ChatGPT ran the numbers on what would happen if Musk paid a 25% effective tax rate during that 2014 to 2018 period. With his wealth increasing by approximately $13.9 billion, he would have owed about $3.475 billion in taxes instead of the roughly $455 million he actually paid. That extra $3 billion could have funded some serious public programs: Free community college for over 1 million students Universal school lunches for millions of children Clean water infrastructure projects in cities like Flint Significant boosts to child tax credits or affordable housing grants The AI shared that this represents just one person over five years, making the potential impact even greater. How the Bezos and Buffett Comparisons Make It Even More Shocking ChatGPT compared Musk with other billionaires and the results were even more eye-opening. According to the same ProPublica data: Jeff Bezos saw his wealth grow by $99 billion from 2014- to 2018 while paying $973 million in taxes — an effective rate of just 0.98%. Warren Buffett increased his wealth by $24.3 billion during the same period but paid only $23.7 million in taxes — a microscopic 0.10% effective rate. If all three paid taxes at a 25% rate on their wealth growth, ChatGPT calculated they would have collectively contributed an additional $32.85 billion to federal revenue over just five years. 'That's from three people,' the AI shared, which really puts the spotlight on the scale of potential revenue from properly taxing extreme wealth. The 'Buy-Borrow-Die' Strategy That Makes It All Possible ChatGPT explained the sophisticated but perfectly legal strategy that allows billionaires to avoid most taxes: Buy assets (stocks, real estate, businesses) that appreciate over time. Borrow against those assets at low interest rates — loans aren't taxable income. Die and pass appreciated assets to heirs, who receive a 'stepped-up basis' that eliminates taxes on all previous gains. This approach allows billionaires to fund lavish lifestyles through borrowed money while their actual wealth compounds tax-free indefinitely. The AI pointed out that regular Americans can't use this strategy because we rely primarily on taxable wages rather than appreciating assets we can borrow against. Why Current Tax Rates Miss the Real Problem ChatGPT clarified an important distinction that often confuses discussions about billionaire taxes. When billionaires do have taxable income, they often pay rates similar to or higher than middle-class Americans on that specific income. But here's the key insight the AI provided: 'The tax code isn't broken because billionaires are cheating it. The tax code is broken because it treats labor as taxable and capital as optional.' Middle-class Americans pay taxes on nearly 100% of their economic gains through wages. Billionaires pay taxes on maybe 5% to 10% of their economic gains, since most wealth growth remains unrealized and untaxed. The Market Impact Question ChatGPT Couldn't Ignore The AI also addressed potential downsides of requiring billionaires to pay higher effective tax rates. Forcing someone like Musk to sell billions in stock to pay taxes could significantly impact share prices, potentially affecting retirement accounts and institutional investors. However, ChatGPT suggested this concern might be overblown, noting that well-designed tax policies could include provisions for gradual implementation or alternative payment methods to minimize market disruption. Policy Solutions That Could Actually Change Things ChatGPT outlined several approaches that could create more tax equity: Wealth taxes that apply annual rates to net worth above certain thresholds Minimum tax rates on total income including unrealized gains for ultra-high-net-worth individuals Closing borrowing loopholes by treating large loans against equity as taxable events Capital gains reform that taxes investment profits at the same rates as wages The AI wrote that while these changes would require significant political will, they're not technically impossible to implement. What This Means for Regular Taxpayers ChatGPT's analysis revealed that the current system essentially subsidizes billionaire wealth accumulation through tax policy. While middle-class Americans pay substantial portions of their income in taxes, the ultra-wealthy can legally structure their finances to minimize tax obligations dramatically. This creates a compounding effect where wealth concentrates at the top not just through investment returns, but through preferential tax treatment that allows more capital to remain invested and growing. The AI's Bottom Line on Tax Fairness When I asked ChatGPT for its overall assessment, the AI concluded that requiring billionaires to pay taxes at middle-class rates would generate massive federal revenue while establishing important principles about shared civic responsibility. 'The federal government could collect billions more in revenue annually,' the AI explained. 'It would set a precedent for tax equity.' However, ChatGPT wrote that achieving this would require 'major changes to the U.S. tax code, especially how wealth (not just income) is taxed.' The AI's analysis suggested that while the technical solutions exist, the political challenge lies in restructuring a tax system that currently treats different types of economic gains very differently. Why These Numbers Matter Beyond Politics ChatGPT's calculations reveal something beyond partisan tax policy debates — they show how current tax structures affect public investment capacity. The AI noted that tens of billions in additional revenue could fund infrastructure, education and social programs that benefit everyone, including the wealthy. 'If Musk, Bezos and Buffett paid taxes like the middle class, tens of billions more would flow into public programs,' the AI concluded. 'It would dramatically shift the conversation about economic fairness and tax equity.' Whether you think that's good policy or not, ChatGPT's analysis made clear that the current system creates vastly different tax obligations for different types of Americans — and the numbers are bigger than most people realize. More From GOBankingRates The 10 Most Reliable SUVs of 2025 This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Elon Musk Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Middle Class Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

National Lottery sales and payouts to pause for 36 hours for 'unprecedented' upgrade
National Lottery sales and payouts to pause for 36 hours for 'unprecedented' upgrade

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

National Lottery sales and payouts to pause for 36 hours for 'unprecedented' upgrade

National Lottery sales and payouts will pause for around 36 hours this weekend for an "unprecedented" technology upgrade. All draw game sales and prize claims will be paused in shops across the UK from 11pm on Saturday after the Lotto and Thunderball draws until "late Monday morning", operator Allwyn said. The National Lottery website and app will also be down over the same period. Allwyn said the "short-term disruption for players and retailers" would allow for the biggest technology upgrade in the game's 31-year history. In a message on the National Lottery website, players are being told the upgrade is "about improving your experience over the coming months and years". Players are being advised to buy draw tickets, check results and claim prizes before 11pm on Saturday. They will not be able to log into their online accounts, buy draw tickets or claim prizes - in shops or online - until Monday. Players will still be able to buy Scratchcards from stores and view the latest draws and results on the National Lottery's YouTube channel. Allwyn said the lottery's gaming and retail systems will move to new platforms - but warned a "small proportion" of store terminals could experience delays coming back up if certain upgrade processes are interrupted. The Czech-based Allwyn group took over the 10-year licence to run the from Camelot in February last year. The upgrade will pave the way for "new, exciting games", an improved player experience and enable weekly returns to good causes to be doubled to £60m by the end of its licence, Allwyn added. It said the systems and store terminals powering the lottery dated back to 2009, "before iPads, Uber and Instagram" and needed to be modernised to allow for "ambitious" plans. Read more from Sky News: Allwyn chief executive Andria Vidler said: "This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to deliver the National Lottery that the UK deserves. "We're making unprecedented and much-needed changes, which will move us closer to achieving our vision for the National Lottery, restoring its magic and significantly increasing its positive impact on lives across the UK."

QuantumScape (QS) Drops 15% as Investors Mimic $11.6-Million Insider Selling
QuantumScape (QS) Drops 15% as Investors Mimic $11.6-Million Insider Selling

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

QuantumScape (QS) Drops 15% as Investors Mimic $11.6-Million Insider Selling

We recently published . QuantumScape Corporation (NYSE:QS) is one of the worst-performing stocks on Tuesday. QuantumScape extended its losing streak to a fifth consecutive day on Tuesday, slashing 15.48 percent to close at $9.28 apiece as investors continued to unload positions following an $11.6-million insider selling transaction. On Friday, QuantumScape Corporation (NYSE:QS) co-founder and Chief Scientific Advisor Fritz Prinz sold off 1 million shares in the company at an average price of $11.6175 apiece. The disposition of shares effectively dropped Prinz's ownership in the company by 85 percent to just over 161,343 shares, or about $1.87 million. Investors typically take insider selling in a negative light especially without any reason to justify the sale, and given the hefty drop in their remaining stake. In its latest earnings release, QuantumScape Corporation (NYSE:QS) said it narrowed its net loss attributable to shareholders by 6.8 percent to $114.7 million from $123 million in the same period last year. Net loss for the first semester of the year also shrank by 6 percent to $229 million from $243.6 million year-on-year. Loss from operations came in at $123 million during the quarter, lower by 8 percent than the $134 million in the same period last year. This put its first-half loss from operations down by 7 percent to $247 million from $266 million year-on-year. While we acknowledge the potential of QS as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store