Street cleaner breaks his silence after being sacked for objecting to an Acknowledgment of Country
Melbourne man Shaun Turner, 60, was sacked from his role as a street sweeper for Darebin City Council in June 2024 after he questioned the ceremony at a toolbox meeting.
The council worker, whose father served in World War II, told the meeting: 'If you need to be thanking anyone, it's the people who have worn the uniform and fought for our country to keep us free.'
'It's getting out of hand and people are losing it, it is now being done at the opening of a postage stamp.'
Council officers investigated Mr Turner's alleged 'serious misconduct' but the father-of-three doubled down and he was let go.
'As far as I know half of us are born here, I don't need to be welcomed to my own country. If people don't want to be there, they can leave,' Mr Turner told the officers.
Mr Turner also told officers that Acknowledgement of Country should be reserved for more formal or international occasions.
The Fair Work Commission upheld his unfair dismissal claim, with Mr Turner believing his legal win resonated with the 'silent majority' of people in Australia.
Mr Turner, who voted Liberal at the recent election, said 'of course' the country had become too politically correct.
'I just feel like if you were a pale, stale male you can't go to work now and have a laugh,' Mr Turner told The Australian.
'If me and you are having a laugh over here, and he (a third person) takes it to management, well, next minute we're getting a warning for not being inclusive.'
Mr Turner explained he holds 'centre right' views and dislikes both Anthony Albanese and Dan Andrews.
He added the workplace was being overrun by 'programmed robots', with everyone having to be careful with what they say.
Fair Work Commission Deputy President Richard Clancy ruled in favour of Mr Turner labelling his dismissal as 'harsh' and 'disproportionate'.
The commission is set to hold a hearing to consider Mr Turner's request for reinstatement and to determine the remedy for the unfair dismissal.
Mr Turner said he would not speak about the details of his case as the commission was deliberating, however he wanted it known that his actions were not racially motivated.
'When it comes to this, the first thing that happens is you are labelled racist. I may not like a lot of people but I have no problem with Aboriginal people,' Mr Turner said.
'I played football, I was brought up with people of all races in Broadmeadows. Some you get on with, some you don't. The easy thing to throw around these days if you can't win an argument is to call someone racist.'
Mr Turner believes Acknowledgement of Country is unsuitable for small meetings and should rather be reserved for large events attended by international visitors.
Before Mr Turner was dismissed, he attended another meeting with Council Chief of People Officer Yvette Fuller.
Ms Fuller informed Mr Turner that there was a firm expectation for an Acknowledgment of Country to precede all formal meetings.
Mr Turner questioned: 'Why didn't we do it in this meeting then?,' to which Ms Fuller then asked: 'Are you saying you will continue to disrupt an Acknowledgement of Country?'.
'I won't disrupt it but I want to be asked if I would like you to give me the courtesy to step outside,' he replied.
In his termination letter, Darebin City Council alleged during the May 21, 2024 meeting that Mr Turner had said 'the Acknowledgment of Country is not necessary'.
The council further alleged Mr Turner said Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders 'do not deserve an acknowledgment at the start of meetings'.
But Fair Work Commission's Deputy President Richard Clancy found Mr Turner's statements were not delivered in the manner or tone alleged by the council.
'I am not persuaded that Mr Turner said either 'The Acknowledgment of Country is not necessary' or that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders 'do not deserve an acknowledgment at the start of meetings',' Mr Clancy said.
'I am satisfied, however, that Mr Turner made a comment to the effect that if anyone was to be acknowledged or thanked at a toolbox meeting, it should be the servicemen and women who had fought for this country (i.e. Australia) but I do not consider that expressing such an opinion constitutes a valid reason for dismissal.'
Mr Clancy said the Acknowledgement of Country would have caught the members of the street cleaning team off guard.
He added Mr Turner's specific question 'are you joking?' and his reference to the 'opening of a postage stamp' was the articulation of a reaction of surprise.
'I regard Mr Turner's various comments as having been a spontaneous expression of his opinion that Acknowledgements of Country are appropriate on special occasions but one was not necessary at the toolbox meeting,' Mr Clancy said.
'His comments were laced with his underlying frustration in relation to the various issues pertaining to his work.
'I have not been persuaded these particular comments of Mr Turner either rise to the level of having been disrespectful and aggressive in tone, or that they were perceived by anyone to be so.'
Mr Clancy labelled Mr Turner's dismissal as 'harsh' and 'disproportionate' to the context within which his comments were made.
'I reiterate that even if the reasons for the dismissal relating to the comments about Acknowledgements of Country and Mr Turner's colleague were regarded as valid, the dismissal was harsh,' Mr Clancy said.
'It was disproportionate having regard to the context within which his comments were made and Mr Turner's circumstances.'
The Council's submissions indicated that it took particular offence to Mr Turner's use of the word 'courtesy' when asked if he would be given the option to 'step outside' during an Acknowledgement of Country.
Council said the use of the word 'displayed contempt to the council's Indigenous employees and community'.
But Mr Clancy disagreed with the council's assessment.
'That Mr Turner holds a different point of view when it comes to Acknowledgements of Country does not, of itself, make him contemptuous of the Respondents.'
Mr Clancy noted that both Ms Fuller and Elizabeth Skinner, who was the city works manager at the time, were sufficiently concerned by Mr Turner's conduct that they each contacted his Indigenous support person after the meeting to offer an apology.
However, during the Fair Work proceedings, there was no evidence given to show the support person felt offended.
In his testimony for the Fair Work claim, Mr Turner said he believed he was 'being made out to be a racist'.
'I've got to say that I was brought up on Broadmeadows. I come from a family of eight,' he said.
'My best friends out at Broadmeadows happen to be Aboriginal [people], one of them marrying my sister. I have a niece and great-niece and nephews who are all Aboriginal.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Wild kangaroo harvests are labelled ‘needlessly cruel' by US lawmakers – but backed by Australian conservationists
The bill, introduced into the US Senate last month, came with plenty of emotive and uncompromising language. 'The mass killing of millions of kangaroos to make commercial products is needless and inhumane,' said the Democratic senator Tammy Duckworth, as she introduced the Kangaroo Protection Act to ban the sale and manufacture of kangaroo products in the US. With the high-profile former Democratic presidential nominee Cory Booker as a co-sponsor, the two senators said Australia's commercial kangaroo harvest was 'unnecessarily cruel' and their proposed ban would protect 'millions of wild kangaroos and their innocent babies who are needlessly killed every year'. Backed by animal rights campaigners, the move is the latest in a string of attempts in recent years in the US Congress to ban kangaroo products. A similar push is ongoing in Europe. Last week the Center for a Humane Economy, which runs the Kangaroos Are Not Shoes campaign, announced British sportswear brand Umbro was the latest to join the likes of Nike, Adidas, Puma and Asics in phasing out the use of so-called 'k-leather' that has most often been used in some of their brand's football boots. But the success of the campaigns, and the ongoing criticism of Australia's regulated kangaroo harvests, hides a complex story and one which, Prof Chris Johnson says, is 'infuriating' for many Australian conservationists and ecologists. 'The public advocacy by opponents has been very effective, but unfortunately it's all wrong, is conceptually muddled and it's not based on knowledge or experience,' says Johnson, a kangaroo expert and professor of wildlife conservation at the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage. The Nationals leader and shadow agriculture minister, David Littleproud, accused the governing Labor party of failing to 'dispel misconceptions around the use and overseas imports of kangaroo products'. 'This has allowed animal activists to spread false information that kangaroos are being killed solely for [soccer] cleats. 'It's important to note that without a commercial industry, conservation culling is still needed to occur to manage populations. 'We know kangaroos can breed easily and are not a threatened species. The practical reality of import bans in the US would be detrimental to kangaroo populations in Australia.' The government did not answer questions sent to the agriculture minister, Julie Collins. Since European colonisation, farmers have grown pasture for livestock and added watering holes across Australia's landscape, both of which help kangaroos to survive and, in times of good rainfall, have backed controls and culls of the kangaroo's natural predator – the dingo. Johnson says grazing from abundant kangaroos can take away areas that other native animals such as bandicoots and dunnarts use to hide from introduced predators like cats and foxes. 'Overgrazing can be a serious ecological threat,' he says. 'The harvest protects other native species because it protects vegetation. If the kangaroo program fails, that would be a contributor to increased extinction threat.' Regulated commercial kangaroo harvesting takes place every year in New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia. Since 2010, data collated by the Australian government shows that between 1.1 million and 1.7 million kangaroos have been killed annually under the commercial harvest. Harvest quotas are set at about 15% of the estimated kangaroo population, but the data suggests less than a third of the quota is used up each year. Kangaroo harvesting takes place at night, and a national code of practice says the animals should be killed by a bullet to the head. Ben Pearson, Australia and New Zealand country director for World Animal Protection, says this method of killing, coupled with a lack of oversight of both commercial and non-commercial kangaroo culling, which is also done under licence, is a concern. 'In other animal farming industries there is a requirement for humane slaughter which includes stunning before slaughter,' he says. 'With wild harvesting, kangaroos are shot outright and evidence suggests that many are not killed instantaneously, instead being merely wounded and thus suffering from gunshot wounds. Kangaroos that are wounded but escape could suffer over a prolonged period.' Sign up to Clear Air Australia Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis after newsletter promotion A 2021 inquiry in the New South Wales parliament on kangaroo welfare found there was a lack of monitoring at the 'point of kill' for both commercial and non-commercial shooting, but the state government supported only two of the 23 recommendations in full. The inquiry heard that kangaroo kills were deeply distressing for some Aboriginal people, and animal rights groups said kangaroos had a right to live freely without human interference. If female kangaroos are shot, harvesters can find young joeys still alive in the mother's pouch. A national code of practice for commercial kangaroo harvesting recommends joeys are killed using blunt force trauma to the back of the head, and suggests using the tray of a utility vehicle as a suitable immovable object. It's a method which Pearson says is 'barbaric'. 'On an ethical level, we are opposed to the killing of kangaroos for non-essential items like football boots, particularly given alternatives exist and are in widespread use,' he says. Neal Finch is a wildlife ecologist and executive officer of the Australian Wild Game Industry Council, which represents kangaroo harvesters. He says the codes of practice of the kind covering kangaroo harvesting do not exist in other jurisdictions. 'It is not that we are inhumane. It is that we are exemplary,' he claims. 'Over 6 million native deer are killed in the USA every year. Over-abundant herbivores need management. The code of practice for shooting kangaroos requires a shot to the brain. Virtually all deer shot in the USA are shot in the chest. 'The reason campaigners can quote how many kangaroos are killed is because we actually publish that information,' he said. Kangaroo numbers are known to boom in times of good rainfall and then crash during droughts – swings that mirror Australia's variable climate. Between 2010 and 2023, official estimates of kangaroo numbers across four states show numbers fell as low as 25 million in 2010 and went as high as 53 million in 2013. Latest figures estimate a kangaroo population of 34 million. 'We either choose to sustainably harvest these kangaroo populations or we will see kangaroos starve in their many thousands during droughts, and habitats will be overgrazed and degraded,' says Prof Euan Ritchie, a wildlife ecologist at Deakin University. 'It's a choice.' As uncomfortable as the thought may be for many, Johnson says that in lean times, many kangaroo deaths may not be as short and sharp as one from a harvester's gun. 'The natural alternatives are being killed by a dingo or dying by starvation,' he says. 'There's less suffering entailed by the harvest than by either of those alternatives.'
BBC News
8 hours ago
- BBC News
Man arrested over Caernarfon David Lloyd George statue vandalism
A man has been arrested after a statue of Wales' only UK Prime Minister, David Lloyd George, was 38-year-old has been arrested on suspicion of criminal damage after the statue in Caernarfon, Gwynedd, was spray painted on graffiti had slogans calling for a free Palestine and branded Lloyd George a coloniser, but has since been Wales Police said the man, from Penmaenmawr, Conwy county, had been released on bail while inquiries continued. The statue, next to Caernarfon Castle, was erected in 1921 while Lloyd George, who represented the town at Westminster, was still prime minister.A Liberal Party politician, he was the MP for Carnarvon Boroughs, as the seat was then called, from 1890 to 1945 and served as prime minister from 1916 to 1922, during World War One.
Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Shocking scenes as protesters storm a Israeli restaurant in Melbourne - as a Jewish synagogue is torched nearby
A group of pro-Palestine protesters have terrorised shocked diners by storming a restaurant in Melbourne 's CBD - as an arsonist targeted a nearby synagogue. The chaotic scenes unfolded at the Israeli-owned Miznon eatery on Hardware Lane, where up to 20 protesters hurled chairs, food, and glassware at the venue while chanting 'death to the IDF'. Footage shared online showed the breakaway group throwing bollards on their way to the restaurant after a separate protest involving 80 attendees in nearby Swanson Street. When the masked protesters arrived, diners can be heard screaming as furniture and tables are overturned Protesters were then seen clashing with dozens of police after they arrived on scene. One protester was arrested for hindering police and released on summons. 'Several other protestors were spoken to by police and had their identities clarified for the purpose of follow up investigation,' a spokeswoman told Daily Mail Australia. 'Victoria Police continued to support the rights of Victorians to protest peacefully but will not tolerate the kind of anti-social and violent behaviour that was witnessed this evening.' The chaotic scenes shocked diners. Other restaurants in Hardware Lane were also damaged. 'Then they started getting aggressive, throwing tomatoes, chairs, and glasses. They caused lots of damage to the businesses down here,' a diner told the Herald Sun. Just half an hour earlier, a synagogue in East Melbourne was set on fire, which police are treating as suspicious. A man entered the synagogue grounds on Albert Street about 8pm, poured a flammable liquid on the front door, and ignited it before fleeing on foot. About 20 people inside the synagogue at the time. No injuries were reported. Firefighters quickly contained the fire to the entrance, which prevented further damage. Police are working with synagogue members and Jewish community representatives to provide support following the distressing attack. An arson specialist has been called in to assist in determining the cause, and police are reviewing local CCTV footage as part of their ongoing investigations. Victoria Police stressed that anti-Semitic and hate-based behaviour would not be tolerated and that both incidents are being treated with the utmost seriousness. Australian Jewish Democratic Society has condemned both incidents. 'The AJDS utterly and totally condemns the mob action by masked people protesting against the presence of the Miznon restaurant in Melbourne,' it posted online late Friday night. 'Around the same time, there was an attempted arson of the historic Eastern Melbourne Synagogue not far away by masked people. This is an appalling act against the whole Jewish community 'We hope all those responsible are caught and prosecuted.' Police urge anyone with information, footage or CCTV of either incident to come forward.
