Researchers took a whiff of Egyptian mummies for science — they ‘were surprised by the pleasantness of them'
But researchers who indulged their curiosity in the name of science found that well-preserved Egyptian mummies actually smell pretty good.
'In films and books, terrible things happen to those who smell mummified bodies,' said Cecilia Bembibre, director of research at University College London's Institute for Sustainable Heritage. 'We were surprised at the pleasantness of them.'
'Woody,' 'spicy' and 'sweet' were the leading descriptions from what sounded more like a wine tasting than a mummy sniffing exercise. Floral notes were also detected, which could be from pine and juniper resins used in embalming.
The study published Thursday in the Journal of the American Chemical Society used both chemical analysis and a panel of human sniffers to evaluate the odors from nine mummies as old as 5,000 years that had been either in storage or on display at the Egyptian Museum in Cairo.
The researchers wanted to systematically study the smell of mummies because it has long been a subject of fascination for the public and researchers alike, said Bembibre, one of the report's authors.
Archeologists, historians, conservators and even fiction writers have devoted pages of their work to the subject — for good reason.
Scent was an important consideration in the mummification process that used oils, waxes and balms to preserve the body and its spirit for the afterlife.
The practice was largely reserved for pharaohs and nobility and pleasant smells were associated with purity and deities while bad odors were signs of corruption and decay.
Without sampling the mummies themselves, which would be invasive, researchers from UCL and the University of Ljubljana in Slovenia were able to measure whether aromas were coming from the archaeological item, pesticides or other products used to conserve the remains, or from deterioration due to mold, bacteria or microorganisms.
'We were quite worried that we might find notes or hints of decaying bodies, which wasn't the case,' said Matija Strlič, a chemistry professor at the University of Ljubljana. 'We were specifically worried that there might be indications of microbial degradation, but that was not the case, which means that the environment in this museum, is actually quite good in terms of preservation.'
Using technical instruments to measure and quantify air molecules emitted from sarcophagi to determine the state of preservation without touching the mummies was like the Holy Grail, Strlič said.
'It tells us potentially what social class a mummy was from and and therefore reveals a lot of information about the mummified body that is relevant not just to conservators, but to curators and archeologists as well,' he said. 'We believe that this approach is potentially of huge interest to other types of museum collections.'
Barbara Huber, a postdoctoral researcher at Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology in Germany who was not involved in the study, said the findings provide crucial data on compounds that could preserve or degrade mummified remains.
The information could be used to better protect the ancient bodies for future generations.
'However, the research also underscores a key challenge: the smells detected today are not necessarily those from the time of mummification,' Huber said. 'Over thousands of years, evaporation, oxidation, and even storage conditions have significantly altered the original scent profile.'
Huber authored a study two years ago that analyzed residue from a jar that had contained mummified organs of a noblewoman to identify embalming ingredients, their origins and what they revealed about trade routes.
She then worked with a perfumer to create an interpretation of the embalming scent, known as 'Scent of Eternity,' for an exhibition at the Moesgaard Museum in Denmark.
Researchers of the current study hope to do something similar, using their findings to develop 'smellscapes' to artificially recreate the scents they detected and enhance the experience for future museumgoers.
'Museums have been called white cubes, where you are prompted to read, to see, to approach everything from a distance with your eyes,' Bembibre said. 'Observing the mummified bodies through a glass case reduces the experience because we don't get to smell them. We don't get to know about the mummification process in an experiential way, which is one of the ways that we understand and engage with the world.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
a day ago
- CNBC
Yoga, Zumba or HIIT? The best way to exercise, based on your personality type
Curating your fitness routine to better match your personality could help you get the most out of your workouts, a new study shows. The paper, published last month in Frontiers in Psychology, shows that certain personality traits may indicate which type of exercises people enjoy and how likely they are to stick with them. "We found that our personality can influence how we engage with exercise, and particularly which forms of exercise we enjoy the most," Flaminia Ronca, one of the study's co-authors and an associate professor at University College London, said in a press release. "It's OK if we don't enjoy a particular session," Ronca said. "We can try something else." Ronca and her fellow researchers recruited 132 adults, and placed them into two groups. One group was told to follow at-home workouts of cycling and strength training, and the other group was asked to follow their usual routines. Participants were given a questionnaire to determine their personality type and stress levels. By the end of the study, a total of 86 participants completed their group's assignment and surveys which asked which workouts they enjoyed the most before and after the experiment began. The paper focused on the Big Five personality traits used in psychology: Here are the workouts that each personality type found the most exciting. People who scored high in extraversion seemed to enjoy high-intensity workouts (HIIT) and team sports. Some exercises that extroverts should try are: Those who got high scores for conscientiousness tended to like goal-oriented exercises. They really enjoyed activities like training for a marathon or joining a run club. Exercises that conscientious people should explore are: People that scored high in neuroticism, or those who often experienced mood swings and anxiety, preferred light, one-on-one workouts. "This group might appreciate being given space for independence and privacy during an exercise program," Ronca said. Anxious people may benefit from having private sessions with a personal trainer or a Pilates instructor, and would likely avoid group classes. People who fall into the group of openness and agreeableness liked fun workouts and looked for variety. Exercises for open-minded and agreeable people to consider are: It is not at all surprising that introverts preferred to work out on their own and in their homes. Some exercises that introverts would likely gravitate towards are:
Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
Personality-Tuned Exercise Can Be Good For More Than Your Health
It goes back to the schoolyards of our youth: the sense that physical activities are a 'recess' from the real work of reading, writing and 'rithmetic. We grow a bit older and sports or gym class become a sidecar activity for most of us—not something we plan to build a career around. The careers we do build may place some physical demands on us, but if we take one of the 80% of jobs that are sedentary or are like most people who spend more than half of their time in front of a screen, exercising our bodies can seem unimportant or like something we 'should' do for our health but without any real bearing on our professional efficacy. So, when New Atlas recently reported on a study from University College London (UCL) on the connection between personality and physical activities, their orientation (and that of the study) was on what kind of activities each personality type would enjoy enough to stick with. That perspective is valid and matches the sidecar mentality around exercise; however, our work with FEBI patterns in the nervous system flips that around to show what kind of activities can strengthen one's personality and bring needed agility to one's leadership. Looked at this way, the UCL study further validates that personality is not some abstract, cognitive 'type' but deeply embedded in our bodies. We can run that mind-body connection in reverse, as it were, using our bodies in particular ways that give rise to four different and essential mindsets for leadership. What's more, guided by the UCL study, we can do that in ways that we're likely to stick with. The UCL study sought to establish connections between personality and preferences for different types of exercise, willingness to engage them, and results in fitness or stress levels. Participants were put through an 8-week at-home cycling and strength training program or in a control group. The cycling program varied from fast and intense to slow and easy and participants reported how much they enjoyed each part of the workout program. They also completed a Perceived Stress Survey and a personality assessment based on the Big Five traits identified by McCrae and Costa as: extraversion, conscientiousness, agreeableness, openness and neuroticism (or negative emotions). As Flaminia Ronca, PhD, lead author on the study, summarized, 'We have found that personality can influence how we engage with exercise, and particularly which forms of exercise we enjoy the most.' While fitness results did not vary significantly across personality traits, the orientation toward exercise did, as summarized in Figure 1. Looking at these findings from a FEBI perspective, we shift into a model that emerged from physiology, not psychology. In the 1930's Josephine Rathbone characterized four large-scale patterns in the nervous system relating to the order in which nerves activate opposing muscle groups and how we carry residual tension in our bodies. Years later, Hunt and Fitt measured these four patterns using electrophysiology and Fitt went on to apply them in education and dance therapy. When choreographer and movement researcher, Betsy Wetzig learned of these patterns, she was struck by the link to personality and began cataloguing the connections. Learning about these patterns from Betsy, I recognized their connection to leadership and a principle from my training in Zen and martial arts: when you make something physical, you make it trainable beyond the capacity of the mind to train itself. The patterns were a perfect framework for helping people access the range of mindsets, skills and behaviors needed for successful leadership—or a successful life. While these four patterns have gone by different names, we call them by their dominant leadership characteristic: Driver, Organizer, Collaborator and Visionary. As written about elsewhere, we developed the FEBI assessment as a validated measure of these four patterns of personality. As part of our validation process, we did a correlation study with the Big Five model, which allows for useful connections to this UCL study. We found strong correlations between the four dominant factors of the Big Five model and the FEBI patterns, while the 5th factor, neuroticism, represented a set of dysfunctional expressions found in the other four patterns. We also found that extraversion came in two flavors: extraversion toward tasks (e.g., high activity, achievement striving) mapped to Driver, while social extraversion (e.g., gregarious, warmth) mapped to Collaborator. Organizer strongly correlated with Conscientiousness, while Visionary mapped to Openness. The correlations between the FEBI patterns and the factors and subscales of the Big Five model are summarized in Figure 2. In our work with FEBI as part of Zen Leadership development, we focus less on what's enduring in personality (i.e., a rigid 'type') and more on what's available through fluid use of each pattern as it's needed. While FEBI measures one's pattern order and most preferred (i.e., Home) pattern, every pattern is essential and has unique strengths. The expansive Visionary, for example, is best at seeing the big picture, thinking strategically and imagining futures ready to happen. The disciplined Organizer is great at giving those ideas form, developing plans, processes and next steps. The Collaborator excels in relationships and playfully bringing others along. The Driver brings determination and urgency to hitting targets and breaking through barriers. A probable mapping of the UCL exercise preference findings to FEBI Home patterns would predict: We know from our research into FEBI patterns that these exercise preferences also match what puts people into each of the patterns. For example, hard and fast, intense activities put the nervous system into Driver mode and it's not surprising that someone already strong in Driver would feel at home there. Other ways to enter and cultivate each of the patterns are shown in Figure 3. Years of coaching leaders with FEBI, often alongside feedback they've received from others, have shown that it's usually the case that the area they most want to work on (or are told to work on by others) is associated with one of their weaker patterns. For example, a leader strong in Driver and weak in Visionary might be praised in multi-rater feedback for their ability to hit the numbers but told they need to be more strategic. A high Visionary, low Driver leader might have a million great ideas but struggle to set priorities or get to the point. If we do activities only based on our enjoyment of them, there are some patterns we may never develop, which means there will be aspects of leadership and situations in life we'll never rise to. On the other hand, if we try to develop a weak pattern by doing something we don't enjoy, we may not stick with it long enough to make a difference. The UCL study and our work with FEBI suggest a productive blend: use what you enjoy to stretch into a pattern that matches what you need. Returning to our examples and applying FEBI coaching, the high Driver leader preferred intense activities but needed more of the big picture expansiveness that comes with Visionary. Reviewing the physical ways to cultivate Visionary, sailing had appeal as they had done that in their youth. Slow and easy was not their style but competitive sailing was something that would keep their interest. It met their preference for intensity, while also giving them practice seeing the big picture, reading the patterns of nature and being strategic. Conversely the high Visionary, low Driver leader needed more of the Driver's focus but was unlikely to stick with a high intensity practice. One of their existing practices was Tai Chi, done in a characteristically open and relaxed way. Punctuating their practice with moments of sharp intensity and then going back to relaxed openness gave them practice in momentarily focusing into Driver and then relaxing back into the bigness of Visionary. Over time they were better able to do the same thing in their work. In ways such as these, flipping the mind-body connection around so that the body equips us with the best-suited frame of mind, our leadership becomes more agile and effective. Moreover, our physical activities move from sidecar status to giving us real horsepower, which also gives them staying power in our lives. Tuning a practice to both what we enjoy and what we need, the body becomes a deeply effective trainer of the mind—not just something for 'recess.'
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Few will remember this earthquake, but something far worse is looming
The Kamchatka Peninsula earthquake may not have brought the same devastation as previous shocks, but a far more deadly seismic event is looming for the US West Coast. A major 600-mile-long fault line known as the Cascadia Subduction Zone runs from northern Vancouver Island in Canada to Cape Mendocino in northern California. Scientists have predicted there is a 15 per cent chance of a major earthquake there in the next 50 years, which could bring a mega-tsunami hundreds of feet high to US coastlines. A study from Virginia Tech in April showed an earthquake of force eight or above could cause coastal land to sink 6.5 feet within minutes, devastating cities such as Seattle and Portland and flooding hundreds of miles of roadway, airports, schools, hospitals and power plants. Researchers determined that the most severe effects would hit densely populated areas in northern California, southern Washington and northern Oregon. Like the Kamchatka quake, the Cascadia fault line lies in the 'Pacific Ring of Fire' – a 25,000-mile horseshoe of 452 volcanoes which stretches from the southern tip of South America, along the coast of North America, across the Bering Strait, Japan and New Zealand. The ring produces around 90 per cent of the world's earthquakes. Bill McGuire, the Professor Emeritus of Geophysical & Climate Hazards at University College London, said: 'Along with many active volcanoes, great earthquakes are a feature of the so-called Ring of Fire, each one releasing strain that has accumulated over centuries, as an over-riding tectonic plate snags on the one below, and eventually lets go.' Earthquakes only rarely cause mass devastation because they tend to occur away from major populations, he said, adding: 'Although locally destructive, tsunami heights at remote locations such as Hawaii and Japan seem modest, so widespread devastation and loss of life is unlikely.' The last great earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone happened on Jan 26 1700, and geological evidence shows it caused dramatic land subsidence and drowned coastal marshes across the Pacific Northwest. Geologic evidence from the last six to seven thousand years indicates that 11 great earthquakes have happened approximately every 200 to 800 years, meaning 'the big one' may be imminent. 'This is not a distant or abstract threat,' said Tina Dura, the study's lead author and assistant professor in Virginia Tech's Department of Geosciences. 'The probability of a great earthquake is growing, and climate change is compounding the risks. We must factor these compound hazards into long-term planning now.' Earthquakes are now measured on the Moment Magnitude Scale, which is a modern development of the Richter scale, and records the amount of ground shaking and the amount of seismic energy released. The bigger the number, the worse it is. The biggest earthquake ever recorded was of magnitude 9.5 and occurred in Chile in 1960, at a fault line where the Pacific plate dives under the South American plate. It submerged an entire pine forest and farms, converting them to tidal marshes, and flooded coastal towns, killing thousands and forcing residents to abandon their homes. Earthquakes are unlikely to get much bigger because there are no fault lines on Earth large enough to generate more force. Some doubt that a magnitude ten quake could ever occur, and it would take a force 11 for true global devastation. The earthquake that struck Kamchatka Peninsula was measured at 8.8 and is the largest to have occurred worldwide since the force 9.1 Tohoku earthquake in Japan in 2011. It was powerful enough to send waves as fast as commercial jets across the Pacific and there have been at least 50 aftershocks up to a force 6.9 which will fuel the surge. Lisa McNeill, a professor of tectonics at the University of Southampton, said: 'Some fault movements don't move the seafloor much and so there is no tsunami. In the case of this earthquake, it had a very large rupture and slip, which made the earthquake large, and so a tsunami was generated. 'The waves travel across the ocean - they are small at sea but travelling fast and it is when they reach shallow water that they build in height again.' The earthquake occurred in a subduction zone where two tectonic plates meet, beneath the Kamchatka Peninsula, a huge piece of land which juts down out from the north eastern tip of Russia. Here the Pacific plate is moving in a roughly north-westerly direction about three inches a year and being forced beneath the Okhotsk plate. The area has had large earthquakes in the past, including a very large 9.1 earthquake in 1952, not far from the new earthquake. This earthquake was so powerful because it occurred at a depth of 12.8 miles, which is considered shallow, allowing it to release enormous amounts of energy into the waters above, and creating tsunami waves. Force 8 earthquakes release energy equivalent to 55 million tonnes of explosives. Tsunami waves as high as 10-13 feet were reported in Kamchatka, while four feet waves hit Hawaii, and a much smaller 12 inch surge hit a city in Hokkaido, northern Japan. Waves were expected to hit the California coast around 9am. Dr Stephen Hicks, the NERC independent research fellow and lecturer in environmental seismology at UCL, said: 'With such large earthquakes, long-period surface waves will continue travelling around the world for several days, with the planet continuing to resonate and ring like a large bell.' However it is unlikely to be as devastating as the 2011 Japanese disaster, in which 18,000 people were killed when an earthquake triggered powerful tsunami waves of up to 133ft, and instigated a major nuclear accident at the Fukushima Daiichi power station. Roughly twenty thousand earthquakes occur every year, but only a small percentage of them are classified as high magnitude. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
