House Democrat announces he won't seek re-election in 2026
According to a press release, the congressman indicated that he is "in good health and fully capable of continuing to serve," but has "decided that the time is right to announce that I will not be seeking re-election in 2026."
The lawmaker disclosed last year that he had a minor stroke.
Evans, who began serving in the U.S. House in November 2016, had previously served in the Pennsylvania state House of Representatives since 1981.
"After careful consideration and deep reflection over this past weekend, I have decided that I will not seek re-election in 2026. It has been the honor and privilege of a lifetime to serve the people of PA-03. I will forever be grateful to the residents of Philadelphia for the trust they placed in me," he said in a statement.
He indicated that he will work to help Democrats reclaim the House majority.
"I intend to spend the months ahead focused on increasing voter turnout in Philadelphia. Our voices matter, and our votes are our power. I will also do everything I can to help Democrats take back the majority in the House of Representatives," he said in the statement.
"Finally, I want to say this to my fellow elected officials: We must do a better job of listening — truly listening — to the people we represent. The challenges our constituents face are real, and they deserve leaders who are present and willing to act boldly on their behalf," he noted.
Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., also noted in a press release issued on Monday that he will not run in 2026.
Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., indicated in a statement issued on Sunday that will not seek re-election.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump reaches trade agreement with South Korea
President Trump announced on Wednesday that the U.S. had struck a trade deal with South Korea, which will now face a 15% tariff on its exports. Under the deal, South Korea will invest $350 billion in key U.S. industries and purchase $100 billion worth of its liquified natural gas, Trump wrote on social media on Wednesday. He added that further investments would be announced when South Korean President Lee Jae Myung visits Washington in the next two weeks. The new rate is a significant reduction from the 25% Trump had announced via a letter earlier this month, but still a blow to the longstanding free trade regime that had, for years, kept duties on goods from either country close to zero. Trump has long decried this arrangement as unfair to the U.S., which last year recorded a $66 billion trade deficit with South Korea. Read more: South Korea struggles with uncertainty over U.S. trade negotiations 'We are seeing that the negotiations happening in many countries since April are unfolding in a way that is very different from the principles of the WTO or FTA,' said Kim Yong-beom, a senior policy official for South Korea's presidential office, at a press conference on Thursday. 'It is regrettable.' Kim said that South Korean negotiators had pushed for a 12.5% rate on automobiles — one of the country's most important exports to the U.S. — but that they had been rebuffed, with Trump firm on his stance that 'everybody gets 15%.' U.S. and South Korean officials appear to be interpreting the deal — whose details are still scant — in different ways. Calling it an 'historic trade deal,' commerce secretary Howard Lutnick wrote on social media that '90% of the profits' of South Korea's $350 billion investment would go 'to the American people,' a claim that has immediately raised eyebrows in South Korea. Trump said something similar about the $550 billion investment package included in the trade deal struck with Japan earlier this month. Japanese officials, on the other hand, have said the profits would be split proportionately, based on the amount of contribution and risk from each side. At the press conference, Kim said that Seoul is operating under the assumption that 90% of the profits will be 're-invested' — not unilaterally claimed. He added that the specific terms still need to be laid out on a 'per-project basis.' 'In a normal civilized country, who would be able to accept that we invest the money while the U.S. takes 90% of the profits?' he asked. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung has framed the $350 billion investment as a boost to South Korean shipbuilding, semiconductor and energy companies trying to make inroads into the U.S. markets. Read more: The U.S. has long wanted to sell more cars in Asia. Do Asian consumers want them? 'This agreement is the meeting of the U.S.' interest in reviving manufacturing and our intention to make South Korea companies more competitive in the U.S. market,' he said in a social media post on Thursday. 'I hope that it will strengthen industrial cooperation between South Korea and the U.S. as well as our military alliance.' While Trump also said that 'South Korea will be completely OPEN TO TRADE with the United States, and that they will accept American product including Cars and Trucks, Agriculture, etc,' Kim said that agriculture was not part of the deal and that no concessions on U.S. rice or beef — two major points of contention between Seoul and Washington — were given. South Korea, which is the world's top importer of American beef, currently bans beef from cattle that are older than 30 months on concerns it may introduce bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or mad cow disease. Given its status as a staple crop and a critical source of farmers' livelihoods, rice is one of the few agricultural goods heavily protected by the South Korean government. Seoul currently imposes a 5% tariff on U.S. rice up to 132,304 tons, and 513% for any excess. 'We were able to successfully defend a lot of our positions in those areas,' Kim said. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times. Solve the daily Crossword
Washington Post
9 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Senate confirms Jan. 6 denier Joseph Kent to head counterterrorism center
The Republican-controlled Senate voted along sharply partisan lines Wednesday to confirm Joseph Kent as head of the National Counterterrorism Center, approving his nomination over objections from Democrats who cited his embrace of conspiracy theories and attempts to alter intelligence reports as disqualifying. Kent, a former Army Special Operations and CIA officer who has served as a top aide to Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, was confirmed by a 52-44 vote to head the center, created after the 9/11 terrorist attacks to analyze and integrate intelligence relating to transnational terrorism, including threats to U.S. interests at home and abroad. Republicans cited his combat experience and government posts as qualifications. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) noted that Kent's first wife, Shannon, a Navy cryptologist, was killed by a suicide bomber in northern Syria in 2019. Democrats warned that Kent's embrace of unsubstantiated theories, including that the FBI played a role in the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection, and his past association with white-supremacist groups made him uniquely unqualified to run a key intelligence unit. The core principles of intelligence are 'objectivity, nonpartisanship and fidelity to fact,' said Sen. Mark R. Warner (D-Virginia), the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee. 'Mr. Kent has shown time and again that he cannot meet that standard.' As an aide to Gabbard, Kent earlier this year pressured analysts at the National Intelligence Council, a prestigious analytic hub, to alter a report that concluded the Venezuelan government did not direct the activities of the Tren de Aragua cartel, according to emails that emerged later. That analysis undercut Trump's rationale for deporting suspected gang members without due process under the Alien Enemies Act. The intelligence report was not changed. Gabbard quickly fired Michael Collins, the head of the NIC, and his deputy. Kent past comments on Russia had clouded his nomination by Trump. Shortly after Russia's invasion, Kent described President Vladimir Putin's demands on Ukrainian territory as 'very reasonable.' His past associations with far-right extremists also came under scrutiny during two failed bids for Congress. In 2021, Kent discussed social media tactics for his campaign with antisemite and white supremacist Nick Fuentes. Separately, Kent drew praise from Joey Gibson, who founded Patriot Prayer, a far-right group known for clashing with activists on the left. He later sought to distance himself from extremist groups. Kent, who was endorsed by Trump in both of his bids for Congress, has also repeated conspiracies that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from Trump. He wrote about meeting Trump as he waited to receive his wife's body to arrive at Dover Air Force Base in a 2020 opinion piece for NBC News, saying that Trump's 'empathy and thoughtfulness on one of the worst days of my life won my gratitude.'
Washington Post
9 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Most Democrats vote for failed resolutions to block arms sales to Israel
More than half of Senate Democrats voted for two resolutions Wednesday night to block weapons sales to Israel, highlighting the party's growing frustration with Israel's handling of the war in Gaza nearly two years after Hamas's attack on Israel. The Senate rejected both resolutions introduced by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont). The first, which would block the sale of tens of thousands of assault rifles, failed 70-27. The second, which would block the sale of $675.7 million of bombs and other materiel to Israel, failed 73-24.
