
The U.S. dollar has fallen to its lowest value since 1973. Here's what that means.
Over the past six months, the dollar has declined more than 10% compared with a basket of currencies from the U.S.' major trading partners — something it has not done since 1973. Today, it sits at a three-year low.
The simplest explanation for the decline is that global investors now expect the U.S. economy to no longer outperform the rest of the world as a result of Trump's tariffs and worsening fiscal issues. Even with U.S. stocks returning to record highs, the return on other countries' equities has been even stronger. Meanwhile the return on lending to the U.S. is expected to decline as growth here slows.
It wasn't supposed to be this way. Many, including members of Trump's own Cabinet, assumed his tariffs strategy would strengthen the value of the dollar relative to foreign currencies. The thinking behind it was that as American consumers began to purchase fewer foreign goods, those other countries' currencies would weaken relative to the dollar.
Instead, the opposite has occurred. U.S. growth prospects have weakened — in part because of Trump's tariffs. That has made U.S. debt relatively less attractive for foreign investors, especially compared with the returns on lending to other countries, like Germany and Japan, that are now expected to experience higher growth.
In theory, the advantage of a weaker U.S. dollar is that it makes goods produced in the U.S. more attractive to foreign markets.
Yet it is too soon to say whether that is occurring. In anticipation of Trump's tariffs, U.S. firms massively increased their imports in the first three months of this year to avoid paying the new duties, and it will be weeks before second-quarter data is released.
Even then, that data will likely only show a snapback effect from the first quarter's upswing. And while Trump has announced a flurry of new investments designed to beef up U.S. production capacity, many of those endeavors are months or even years from coming on line.
One obvious effect of a weakening U.S. dollar is that it becomes more expensive for Americans to go to popular destinations abroad, since the greenback will be worth less than local currencies. In essence, your money won't stretch as far. Of course, such excursions tend to be taken largely by travelers who are less worried about increased costs.
At home, a bigger concern is inflation, and lost purchasing power for U.S. consumers and businesses, who still remain heavily reliant on imports. Until America is able to sustainably produce more goods on its own at higher volumes, purchasing power will decline as it becomes relatively more expensive to import goods from abroad.
In the meantime, analysts say, a more alarming trend may be taking root: Foreigners are no longer buying U.S. financial assets, like stocks and bonds, at the levels that have allowed the U.S. to finance its trade deficit in the first place. Although U.S. stocks have returned to record levels, on a relative basis, they've underperformed their counterparts in Europe and elsewhere.
'It's often forgotten that the U.S. is not only reliant on foreigners' goods, but we're also meaningfully reliant on foreign capital to support our financial markets,' said Bob Elliott, chief investment officer at Unlimited Funds financial group. 'Your bonds are bought by European investors, your stock is bought by European investors — that is making you feel wealthier.'
A weaker dollar, he said, could weigh on foreign investors' willingness to buy U.S. financial assets, 'which are so critical to supporting U.S. household balance sheets.'
'An emerging theme in asset management is the rotation out of US assets into Europe as investors seek non-US exposure,' Bank of America's Hubert Lam and Christiane Holstein said in a late June note. 'Sentiment toward US markets has turned negative due to mounting concerns over protectionist trade measures, abrupt policy shifts, a rising deficit, and a proposal for taxes targeting foreign investors in the US.'
'As such, investors are starting to diversify out of the US in both public and private markets,' they said.
The Bank of America analysts added that many international investors are reallocating their investment choices to their home markets, especially in Europe, 'for policy stability' and 'patriotic' reasons.
On the other hand, a handful of analysts say fears of continued U.S. dollar weakness are overblown, and that U.S. economic exceptionalism will ultimately prevail. The U.S. has always outperformed on growth thanks to its dynamic markets and pro-growth regulations, and Trump's bill cementing massive tax cuts — plus initial data showing the U.S. labor market remained relatively sturdy in June — have already provided a brief rally in the dollar's value this week.
But assuming U.S. growth does weaken, the Federal Reserve will likely start cutting interest rates, further making U.S. financial assets less attractive to outside investors. That will cause the value of the dollar to decline even further, making it even more expensive to buy goods from abroad.
'It's a doom loop,' said Danny Dayan, an investor and former hedge fund manager.
'So far, the inflation data have been quite benign,' Dayan said. 'But we know tariffs will raise prices to some degree.' A weakening dollar will only contribute to accelerating price growth, he said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Trump interest in Russia sanctions raises Ukraine allies' hopes
WASHINGTON, July 12 (Reuters) - A bipartisan U.S. bill that would hit Russia with sanctions in a bid to pressure Moscow into good-faith peace negotiations with Ukraine has gained momentum this week in Congress, but it still lacks the presidential push it needs to get over the finish line. Now, Ukraine's supporters in Washington and Kyiv, who have for months hoped for President Donald Trump to throw his weight behind the bill, are anxiously awaiting what the Republican president has said will be a "major statement" on Russia on Monday. Trump, who vowed during his election campaign to end Russia's invasion of Ukraine, has given no details on what his planned announcement would entail, but over the past few weeks he has grown increasingly and publicly frustrated with Russian President Vladimir Putin over his reluctance to accept a ceasefire and the growing civilian death toll of Russian attacks. On Tuesday, Trump approved sending U.S. defensive weapons to Ukraine. Two days later, he came closer than ever to endorsing the sanctions bill, although he has not yet signed off on the legislation's text, according to a person with knowledge of his thinking. Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters earlier in the week that the Senate could vote on the bill this month. Mike Johnson, the top House Republican, has expressed similar optimism, while Republican Senator Lindsey Graham and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have privately told European diplomats that the bill will move imminently, according to a source with direct knowledge of the matter. "The Senate will move soon on a tough sanctions bill – not only against Russia – but also against countries like China and India that buy Russian energy products that finance Putin's war machine," Graham wrote on X on Tuesday. Still, it was unclear if Trump had given up on pushing for diplomacy with Russia. And the extensive veto power on sanctions that the White House is demanding could render the bill more symbolic than substantive, some supporters acknowledge. Speaking to reporters in Kuala Lumpur on Friday following his second in-person meeting with Russian Foreign Sergei Lavrov, Rubio said "a new idea" was discussed that he would be taking back to Trump for further consultations. He declined to give further details. "That new concept is – this new approach is not something that automatically leads to peace, but it could potentially open the door to a path," Rubio said. But he also reiterated Trump's frustration over Moscow's unwillingness to be more flexible and said Americans had told the Russians weeks ago that a sanctions bill could well pass. The bill, whose lead sponsors are Graham and Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal, would levy extensive sanctions against various Russian individuals, government bodies and financial institutions. It would also punish other countries that trade with Moscow, imposing 500% tariffs on nations that buy Russian oil, gas, uranium and other exports. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has repeatedly urged Ukraine's Western allies to impose tougher sanctions on Moscow to force the Kremlin to agree to a ceasefire as a step towards reaching an end to the war, now 40 months old. Work on the bill has picked up pace over the last week, according to two U.S. officials. One person familiar with Trump's thinking said the text still needs work. The current version, that person said, does not give the president enough flexibility to carry out his foreign policy agenda independent of Congress. The White House was working with Congress and the bill's sponsors to ensure it would be "an enhancement to the president's foreign policy objectives," that person added. One person with knowledge of the drafting process said congressional staff had been ironing out technical issues in recent days, such as how to keep any sanctions from affecting the operations of the U.S. embassy in Moscow. A spokesperson for Graham told Reuters the bill would probably not come to the floor until the week of July 21 at the earliest, due to other legislative priorities. The House of Representatives, which will need to vote on the measure, leaves for August recess in two weeks, meaning floor time is at a premium. That is particularly true if a Trump request to slash $9.4 billion in spending on foreign aid and public broadcasting - which passed the House and is currently in the Senate - heads back to the House following any changes. Some supporters of the bill acknowledge that the legislation is largely symbolic, given that Trump would have broad authority to veto the sanctions, and in any case could simply issue sanctions from the executive branch if he wishes. "The president already has all these authorities," said one Republican Senate staffer.


The Herald Scotland
6 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Here's when parts of "Big Beautiful Bill" will affect your finances
USA TODAY's got you covered. Here are some of the bill's tax and spending highlights most Americans want to know about and when they start and finish, if they do. Some provisions are permanent. We cover everything from no tax on overtime and tips, auto loan interest deductions, senior deductions, Trump accounts, charitable contributions to the child tax credit, 529 expansion, tax brackets, standard deductions and state and local property taxes (SALT). Our version is much smaller than 870 pages. Unable to view our graphics? Click here to see them. When key provisions will start in Trump's new tax and spending law Some of the provisions in the law essentially start at the beginning of 2025. Others don't begin until 2026. Some begin this year, but only last through 2029. Here are all the provisions that could affect your finances in the coming weeks and months: CONTRIBUTING Janet Loehrke/USA TODAY This story was updated to add new information.


The Herald Scotland
6 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump administration ramps up pressure on Fed chair Jerome Powell
In June, Trump called Powell a "stupid person" who has "done a poor job," adding that he's called the Fed chair "every name in the book" to try to get him to cut rates. He added, "Nothing works." Powell has also come under fire from Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought, who suggested Powell has "grossly mismanaged the Fed" and misled Congress about an "ostentatious" headquarters remodel. Powell has previously defended the project, calling some of the more extravagant descriptions "misleading and inaccurate" during a June testimony before the Senate Banking Committee. The administration's pressure tactics appeared to continue July 11, when William Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and chairman of the Board of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, said in a statement Powell's resignation would be "the right decision for America, and the economy will boom." Buying a house: Fannie and Freddie may use new credit scores. Will it help you get a mortgage? Pulte referenced "reports" that Powell is "considering resigning." When asked for confirmation, the Fed declined to comment but directed USA TODAY to the many times Powell has said he intends to serve his term, set to end May 2026. Pulte's statement comes ahead of the central bank's July 29-30 meeting. The CME FedWatch, which tracks the likelihood of a rate cut based on futures prices, says there's a roughly 93% chance rates hold steady at 4.25% to 4.5% after the meeting. In June, the Fed held interest rates steady for its fourth straight meeting and kept its forecast for two cuts in 2025. Officials project they'll lower rates by a half percentage point this year to a range of 3.75% to 4%. While lower rates would juice the economy and help reduce federal debt interest payments, Powell has said the Fed wants to see how tariffs impact inflation before cutting rates. Trump in June said he's already looking for Powell's replacement, but he may have to wait if Powell doesn't step down voluntarily. A May Supreme Court ruling downplayed Trump's ability to fire Powell, noting that the Fed is "a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity" and unlike other independent agencies with members subject to terminations decided by the president.