Vijay Sethupathi - Puri Jagannadh film begins shoot in Hyderabad
This marks the first collaboration between Puri Jagannadh and Vijay Sethupathi , generating curiosity among audiences across languages. The film is being planned as a pan-Indian release, and will release in five languages of Telugu, Tamil, Hindi, Malayalam, and Kannada.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
33 minutes ago
- Mint
23 years of Devdas: Jackie Shroff remembers iconic film with throwback post
Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], July 12 (ANI): It was the monsoon of 2002 when 'Devdas' first hit theatres, and cinema was never the same again. With Shah Rukh Khan playing the heartbroken Devdas, Aishwarya Rai as Paro, and Madhuri Dixit as Chandramukhi, the film left a strong mark on Indian cinema. As 'Devdas' clocked 23 years on Saturday, actor Jackie Shroff, who played Chunnilal in the film, shared his memories online. Taking to X (formerly Twitter), he posted a special video clip featuring some emotional scenes from the film. Along with the post, he wrote, "#23YearsOfDevdas." The video began with a powerful moment between SRK's Devdas and Jackie's Chunnilal, followed by scenes with Kirron Kher, Aishwarya Rai, and Madhuri Dixit. Devdas, directed by Sanjay Leela Bhansali, was based on the classic novel by Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay. The film was praised for its grand sets, music, and performances. It is still considered one of Bhansali's best works. Unlike movies, which have a happy ending, the main crux of 'Devdas' was its tragic ending. The sheer longing of a lover to see her beloved for one last time, as he dies on the streets, just to catch a glimpse of his 'Paro' lives rent-free in the hearts of people. The tragedy of 'Devdas' was something completely unforgettable, SRK as Devdas. Aishwarya as Paro, and Madhuri as Chandramukhi, the trio gave a flawless performance which tugged at the heartstrings of audiences. Apart from the lead actors, Kirron Kher, Jackie Shroff, Smita Jaykar, and Jaya Bhattacharya all did a commendable job in the movie. (ANI)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
34 minutes ago
- First Post
'Mistry' actor Ram Kapoor on his working hours amid Deepika Padukone's shift demand: 'When I was doing TV, I said I would only work for eight hours because...'
In an exclusive interview with Firstpost, the actor spoke about the responses he has been receiving so far, how he prepped for the complex character, and his working hours during television read more When the American series Monk has been adapted for the Indian palette, you need an actor who has the nuances to replicate what has already been done eight times over. Ram Kapoor joyfully fits the bill. And in an exclusive interview with Firstpost, the actor spoke about the responses he has been receiving so far, how he prepped for the complex character, and his working hours during television. Edited excerpts from the interview STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD I want to start by asking you that I have really enjoyed the show and what I could sense is that you are clearly having a ball playing Armaan Mistry. So what was your prep like? First of all, thank you for the compliment. Yes, I tried to have as much fun as possible with all the work that I do. It's important for me. Even all actors in the beginning, when they're trying to make a name for themselves at that time, sometimes work is not fun because you have to take on everything that you get, because it's such a difficult profession that you don't know when your next job is going to come. So you have to keep taking work to get money and everything. And when you finally reach a level like me where you want to work by choice, you want to do only the a particular kind of work with the kind of people you want to work with. Then you're very lucky, like me, then it's very important that jo bhi karo, you must have fun. Because if you are lucky enough to reach that level in your profession and still you're not having fun, then what are you doing. So it's very nice for me when people like you, you're a journalist, you're a professional, you know what you're saying, but people like you comment on stuff like this, that you are having a blast, I love that because that is what I want people to realise. So thank you for pointing that out. Now coming to your question, how did I prepare? I have a detailed process of which I prepare for a role. It depends. See, I went to study acting abroad, as you know. So I do an internalised approach where I run the point is, I try and get inside myself, inside my head and instead of focussing on things like the OCD, of focussing on the disease, instead of focussing on the sickness, I try to focus on what happened because of which he has reached where he has reached. So what I mean is, his wife died in front of his eyes and that's why the trauma affected his mind. So I try to focus on that. I tried and felt that. So if you feel his trauma and you feel his pain, then whatever happens after that, I let it happen. Everyone has their own process and there's no right and there's no wrong. That's what works for me. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD You had OCD in Humshakals as well. Now, these two are completely different characters, but was the prep for that one used in this one? No, no, no, that was all Sajid Khan. I did Humshakals only relying on Sajid Khan. You know, I said, 'I don't know what this role is, but you tell me what it is and I'll do it.' There was no prep. Sajid is very old friend of mine. I've known him for 30 years. So I just did what he said. This was very different. This is a role where trauma is concerned and a lot of OCD. I met with people with OCDs, doctors who deal with patients. I had sessions with them. I watched a lots of videos of OCD patients, each case is unique, and I saw what they do, when they do all of that. Once I did my research, once I understood everything, when it was trying to start building the character. At that time, I did not focus on the OCD, I only focussed on the trauma. I focussed on the pain, not the sickness. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Monk was a show that lasted for eight years and seven seasons. Now, I am absolutely game if Mistry goes as far, but do you feel the audience has the patience if they can watch a series for as many as seven seasons? Because it has never happened in India before.. Maybe on OTT this has never happened, but on television it has very much happened. When I started TV soon, Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu thi and Kahaani Ghar Ghar Ki lasted for eight years. So, I think it's not about audiences having patients. It's about if you're giving them something that they really like, if you're giving them a character they really like, and then they want it all the time. In fact, I'm so lucky. I left left television 13 years back. Bade Achche Lagte Hain was there. Still today, people say they want to see that show. I had a chance to still do that show, there were people who still wanted it. So I'm saying that if you give them something that they really like, and if it's good, I don't think patience is an issue, then they want it as much as they can get it. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But whether this will go that many seasons now, that is something that Hotstar will decide because today is a very different market. It's very competitive. There's a lot of choices. There's so many channels, so much software, so many programs. And then there are budgeting issues. It's a different world right now. So how many seasons have happened and all that is something that Hotstar will decide? And I guess time will tell. I'm not the kind of actor who likes to focus too much in the future. I like to concentrate on the present. I don't live too much in the past or the future. Right now, I so happy that it has been received so well. The fact that it has been liked so much is in for me because this is what we live for.. Now I'm enjoying this moment. I'm really enjoying because with all the controversy that happened has happened. So after all of that, in spite of all of that, the fact that it's been liked so much is very special, very special for me. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD And I want to enjoy every single moment of this. I'm getting I'm getting lot of comments and messages and calls from actors, from people of the industry, from fans, and especially from press people. A lot of press people are calling me. Press people, I have a lot of respect for, especially the people who I have known for 25 years. They are calling me and praising me for Mistry. This is what an actor lives for. You know, when people who you respect call you and say, boss, you are awesome, You have dabbled with television, films, OTT, you have been working for more than 25 years now and today we are talking about work-life balance. Do you feel you now have the position to put your foot down and say that you can only work for eight hours a day because you need time with your family, you need to rejuvenate yourself. What would you like to say on that? STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Once you have achieved success in showbiz, whether as a star, as an actor, and people want to work with you, then, yes, you are in a position to choose how many hours you want to work. I have been in that position for many years, even when I was doing TV, I used to decide how many hours I want to work. So I've been lucky. Anybody who reaches a level where he doesn't have to find work is in that position to choose how many hours he or she wants to work. However, most of us actors, myself, of course, and I know a lot of my colleagues, we know that when we sign on a project, we have to do that project to the best that we can, because that's what it's all about. When I was doing television, I said I would only work eight hours a day because television was nonstop, there were no seasons. It was every single day of every single month for three years, four years, five years. But now, when I'm doing a film, I'm doing an OTT show, like for Mistry, there were times I was working 14 hours a day 16 hours a day. But it was only for four months. I'm very lucky that I'm getting to do whatever I want to do, then I don't want to restrict myself. I have no reason to complain. This industry is very challenging. The hours are definitely too long. What they are saying, they are right in their own thinking, I'm only saying that I feel very lucky, very blessed, that I have achieved so much in this line, which is very difficult. And that is why I don't choose to complain about anything. I just want to stay in a state of happiness where I know how lucky I am. So you don't get into that negative frame of mind of complaining. You know what I'm saying? Yeah. But that's just for me. It doesn't mean that I'm right and they are wrong/ STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Anant and Radhika Ambani's wedding ceremony: One year since a celebration that transcended borders and honoured Indian culture
Anant Ambani and Radhika Merchant's wedding was a grand display of Indian culture. The wedding highlighted traditions and spiritual values. It featured Vedic chants and a Banaras recreation. Global leaders and spiritual figures attended. The family emphasized service, including a mass wedding for underprivileged couples. The event showcased India's heritage to a global audience. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads It has been a year since Anant Ambani and Radhika Merchant's wedding, an event that not only dominated headlines but also defined a moment in India's cultural history. In July 2024, the Ambani wedding became a powerful showcase of India's traditions, spiritual depth, and unrivalled sacred Vedic chants resonating across Jamnagar to the immersive recreation of Banaras at Mumbai's Jio World Centre, every detail carried intent. This was opulence and a deliberate affirmation of India's Sanskriti (culture), Samrataa (harmony), and Sambandh (connection).At a time when weddings are often reduced to photo ops and viral reels, the Ambani wedding chose a different path. From Grah Shanti and Shiv Shakti Puja to soulful Bhajans and the celebratory Sangeet, each ritual was performed with a sense of reverence rarely seen at such high-profile was lived-in, authentic, and a heartfelt nod to customs that have endured for approach resonated far beyond Indian shores. With live broadcasts, social media coverage, and guests documenting every nuance, the wedding became a moment of soft power for India, projecting its art, attire, and ethos to a global audience of has a wedding brought together such a diverse group of global leaders, spiritual figures, and cultural icons. Heads of state, captains of industry, and celebrities from across continents participated in ceremonies that were as spiritually profound as they were visually leaders from across the Vedic tradition offered blessings. And, global dignitaries immersed themselves in a world where Bharat's ancient soul met contemporary before the festivities began, the Ambani family anchored the wedding in acts of service. At a Samuhik Vivah, 50 underprivileged couples were married with dignity and joy. Community kitchens served meals to over 1,000 people daily for three weeks. Even household staff from Ambani residences across cities were invited to a special reception, which was an acknowledgement of the unseen hands that make grand events a culture where celebration is inseparable from sharing, this emphasis on seva felt both traditional and the wedding day, the venue transformed into 'An Ode to Banaras', a living, breathing homage to one of India's most sacred cities. Guests wandered through recreated alleys of Kashi, past artisans at work and the aroma of age-old cuisines, experiencing the city's timeless rhythms within Mumbai's ultramodern dress code was strictly Indian. Guests adorned themselves in shimmering sarees, handwoven textiles, and tailored bandhgalas, each ensemble reinforcing the narrative: this was India at its most the Ambani-Merchant wedding stands as more than a memory of excess or elegance. It has set a benchmark for how India celebrates, rooted in faith, informed by history, and unafraid to embrace grandeur as a vehicle for redefined what a modern Indian wedding could be. Not just a family affair, but a cultural statement. A moment when ancient wisdom and contemporary ambition found common ground, and when celebration began, as it should, with service.
