Opinion - Factory jobs aren't the future working Americans want
Why have our two oldest presidents fixated on 'bringing back' factory jobs? Both grew up in the '50s, when the United States bestrode a war-ravaged world like an industrial colossus. But the answer isn't just nostalgia for a lost 'golden age.'
There's also a pervasive feeling that our country owes a promissory note to working families hit hard by deindustrialization. The disappearance of manufacturing jobs with decent pay and benefits — traditionally their ticket from high school to the middle class — has undermined their living standards and social standing.
Since 1971, the share of Americans who live in lower-income households has increased, reports the Pew Research Center:
'Notably, the increase in the share who are upper income was greater than the increase in the share who are lower income. In that sense, these changes are also a sign of economic progress overall.'
The emergence of a highly educated upper middle class, however, is scant consolation to economically insecure working families. This divergence in the economic prospects of college and non-college workers is at the root of today's working-class revolt against political elites here and across Europe.
Populists insist that the cure for economic inequality is more factory jobs. But is this really what working Americans want?
Urged on by progressives, President Biden spent trillions to rebuild the economy 'from the middle out,' shelved trade in favor of tariffs and industrial policy, and tried to break up Big Tech companies that have supplanted yesterday's industrial giants. Yet Bidenomics delivered only marginal net gains in production jobs.
President Trump thinks he can do better by taxing imports so much that manufacturers will be forced to locate production here lest they lose access to America's huge consumer market. Both approaches gloss over the fact that the U.S. still has a healthy manufacturing sector — in 2023, it was the world's second largest after China in terms of output.
What's changed is that productivity gains and automation have combined to shrink factory employment. Since 1980, the share of U.S. workers in manufacturing has steadily declined to just over 8 percent. This trend away from labor-intensive production won't be reversed. The only way a high-wage country like ours can stay competitive in manufacturing is to make our factories more efficient.
Meanwhile, nearly 80 percent of Americans make their living in service-oriented jobs. The Economist notes that the manufacturing wage premium is falling, and there are lots of jobs with decent pay available to workers without degrees in skilled trades, repair and maintenance, health care and tech-related fields.
The digital economy, especially, has become a prodigious source of good jobs and careers for workers on either side of the diploma divide.
A new analysis by my Progressive Policy Institute colleague Michael Mandel finds that, since 2019, employment in the tech/info/ecommerce sector — which encompasses broadband, cloud computing, software and data centers as well as online retail — has risen by 18 percent, compared to a 4 percent gain in the rest of the private sector. The average weekly pay is 47 percent higher than in other private sector jobs.
Given these shifts in the locus of opportunity for working Americans, Trump's inflationary tariffs make no economic sense. They're best understood as reparations for past economic injuries suffered by his blue-collar base.
Yet non-college Americans don't seem eager to return to assembly-line work. Asked in a PPI poll where in today's economy they see the best career opportunities for their children, only 13 percent picked manufacturing, while 44 percent chose 'the communications/digital economy, such as writing code, managing data or e-commerce.'
Democrats should leave the smokestack reveries to Trump and the populist left and offer frustrated working families something different: A positive vision for how they can flourish in post-industrial America.
Their top economic priority is getting the cost of living down. Perversely, Trump's tariffs do just the opposite. Democrats should offer full-throated opposition to protectionism and work to dismantle tariffs on U.S. friends and allies.
They should also get out of their defensive crouch on trade. In a supreme irony, Trump's trade wars are making Americans free traders again. Not only are his tariffs unpopular, but voters now overwhelmingly say that trade improves their quality of life.
Putting working families first also means cutting regressive taxes on work, fighting exclusionary zoning that drives housing prices out of reach and breaking up concentrated markets like food processing, ticketing and hospitals and health care providers to expand consumer choice and drive prices down.
The centerpiece of a new Democratic offer to working families should be a new national commitment to guaranteeing 'high skills for all.' Non-college Americans, a majority of the electorate, need a more robust alternative to college: A post-secondary system of work-study opportunities that enable young people to get in-demand skills, credentials and work experience quickly and affordably.
Key features of this twin-track approach to upward mobility include dramatically ramping up apprenticeships, eliminating degree requirement for all but highly technical jobs, expanding 'workforce Pell Grants' for high-quality training programs, creating work-study opportunities for all high school students and supporting innovative 'apprenticeship degrees' that enable people to earn money while earning degrees.
President Trump isn't wrong that blue-collar workers have borne the brunt of deindustrialization. But his promise of a factory job boom is Fool's Gold.
Instead, Democrats should offer working families a new deal that equips them to compete for the jobs that define America's future, not its past.
Will Marshall is the founder and president of the Progressive Policy Institute.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
6 minutes ago
- Newsweek
China Is Winning the Trade Talks With Trump
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S.'s latest round of trade talks with China concluded in Stockholm on Monday without much headway in the trade war between the world's two largest economies. While U.S. negotiators continue to use tough rhetoric, including the threat of secondary sanctions to discourage China from fueling Russia's war against Ukraine, geopolitical analysts say President Donald Trump's administration is at a disadvantage in the negotiations. Newsweek has contacted the White House for comment via email. Why It Matters Trump dramatically escalated economic tensions in April. Citing unfair Chinese trade practices and promising to revitalize U.S. manufacturing, he announced heavy tariffs on Chinese goods. The move rattled global supply chains and prompted swift retaliation from Beijing, which introduced its own tariffs and a suite of other tit-for-tat measures. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who led the U.S.'s negotiating team in Stockholm, called the talks productive but said it was up to the president to extend the 90-day pause agreed to in May on the most severe tariffs. A trade truce between the countries is set to expire on August 12. What To Know Trump has already surrendered too much negotiating power in his pursuit of a sweeping deal with China, critics say. This includes the administration's recent decision to reverse restrictions on exports of Nvidia's H20 chips. The H20 is one of many chips to be restricted in a bid to slow China's progress in artificial intelligence—viewed by Washington as a national security threat given Beijing's policy of military-civil fusion. Additionally, the U.S. Commerce Department has been instructed to hold off on imposing new export controls on China, in what officials describe as an effort to keep trade talks on track, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing both former and current U.S. officials. Chinese President Xi Jinping, left, and U.S. President Donald Trump during a welcome ceremony at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on November 9, 2017. Chinese President Xi Jinping, left, and U.S. President Donald Trump during a welcome ceremony at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on November 9, 2017. Andy Wong/Associated Press Other alleged concessions center on Taiwan, the self-governed island that China claims as its territory and has vowed to unify with, by force if necessary. The Trump administration has blocked Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te from making a brief stopover in New York during a planned trip to visit Taiwan's diplomatic allies in Latin America, according to the Times, which cited multiple sources. Both Lai's predecessors and Lai himself in his previous role as vice president were permitted to make brief stopovers in the U.S., during which they met with supporters and officials. A separate report from the British paper said a planned meeting between the Taiwanese Defense Minister Wellington Koo and the U.S. Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby was canceled at the last minute last month. Newsweek was unable to independently confirm either of these reports. The move sparked criticism from prominent China watchers, who warned against using the self-ruled democracy and key trade partner as a bargaining chip. Liu Pengyu, a spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C., told Newsweek that he was not aware of the details of the reports. He emphasized Beijing's firm opposition to visits to the U.S. by Taiwanese leaders, invoking the "one China" policy—which holds that the government in Beijing is the sole legal government of China. China's concessions during the talks have been limited by comparison. They include designating two more chemicals as precursors to fentanyl, the powerful opioid behind the U.S. overdose crisis that has become a sticking point in bilateral ties—with Washington pressing Beijing to do more to stem the flow of the drug into the U.S. Following the first round of talks in May, China also announced it would ease some restrictions on rare earth magnets, which are vital for a range of both military and civilian technologies. However, the U.S. and other countries continue to complain of ongoing delays in the export of these resources. Beijing weaponized its dominance over rare earths in April by curbing exports in response to Trump's tariff salvos. What People Are Saying Li Chenggang, the Chinese vice minister of commerce and international trade representative, told state media: "Both sides had candid communication regarding each other's important economic and trade concerns. … The two sides will continue to push for the extension of the pause on 24 percent of reciprocal tariffs of the U.S. side, as well as counter measures of the Chinese side." David Sacks, a fellow for Asia studies at the Council of Foreign Relations, wrote in an article: "The cancellation of President Lai's transit, paired with the Trump administration's decision to allow Nvidia to sell its H20 inference chip to Chinese customers and to freeze planned export controls, suggests that the administration is pausing any actions that China may find offensive in favor of setting the table for a meeting between Trump and Xi." What Happens Next Trump administration officials have suggested that an in-person meeting between the president and his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, is likely by the end of the year. On Monday, Trump wrote on Truth Social that he would consider such a meeting only if Xi extended an invitation, adding, "otherwise, no interest!"
UPI
6 minutes ago
- UPI
Economists: Federal Reserve unlikely to drop interest rates
July 30 (UPI) -- The United States Federal Reserve will release its interest rates decision Wednesday, but it's unlikely to cut rates, economists say. The economy is mostly unchanged since last month, and the effects of President Donald Trump's tariffs are just beginning to take effect. So the Federal Open Market Committee is likely to stay the course until September. Trump has waged a verbal war against Fed Chair Jerome Powell, demanding that he lower interest rates or resign. Trump has even suggested he might fire Powell, whose term on the FOMC ends in May 2026. "They're not going to get anything if they ease, other than they'll look like they're knuckling under to the president," Bill English, the Fed's former head of monetary affairs and now a professor at the Yale School of Management, told CNBC. "So I think their best policy for sure is just to look at the data, make their best judgment, make their policy decision and explain it as well as they can." For the first time since 1993, two FOMC governors could dissent against keeping the rates where they are. Governors Christopher Wallen and Michelle Bowman have backed Trump's call for a rate cut. "It's a long way to September," Morgan Stanley said in a note to clients. "The Fed needs more time to determine how the economy is evolving versus its goals." Oxford Economics Chief U.S. Economist Ryan Sweet said he doesn't expect the "central bank to tip its hand, as it will want to remain flexible because of the lingering uncertainty of where tariffs will ultimately settle, the magnitude of the boost to core goods prices, and whether tariffs are bleeding into other prices." Last year, the Fed lowered its benchmark short-term rate by one percentage point after a pandemic-related inflation spike eased but has since been on hold. But the imposition of tariffs on imported goods makes economists expect an inflation boost and slowed growth. Tariffs have had little effect on inflation so far, but they were beginning to be felt by consumers in June because Chinese-made products got more expensive, according to the consumer price index. But that's because retailers and manufacturers loaded up on goods before the tariffs went into effect or took the costs on themselves. Forecasters say this isn't likely to continue.
The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
US economy rebounds a surprisingly strong 3% in the second quarter
WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. economy expanded at a surprising 3% annual pace from April through June, bouncing back at least temporarily from a first-quarter drop that reflected disruptions from President Donald Trump's trade wars. America gross domestic product — the nation's output of goods and services — rebounded after falling at a 0.5% clip from January through March, the Commerce Department reported Wednesday. The first-quarter drop was mainly caused by a surge in imports — which are subtracted from GDP — as businesses scrambled to bring in foreign goods ahead of Trump's tariffs. The bounceback was expected but the size of it wasn't: Economists had forecast 2% growth from April through June. From April through June, a drop in imports — the biggest since the COVID-19 outbreak — added more than 5 percentage points to growth. Consumer spending registered lackluster growth of 1.4%, though it was an improvement over the first quarter's 0.5%. Private investment fell at a 15.6% annual pace, biggest drop since COVID-19 slammed the economy. A drop in inventories — as businesses worked down goods they'd stockpiled in the first quarter — shaved 3.2 percentage points off second-quarter growth.
