Pak had to plead before the might of Indian Army: Modi
Addressing a public meeting after inaugurating and laying the foundation stone of various development projects here, the PM reiterated that India now treats terrorists and the government that supports them alike. He said that Uttar Pradesh is moving at a fast pace towards becoming an Uttam Pradesh today.
While referring to Operation Sindoor, he said it has only been postponed and it is not over yet. "The enemy who was pleading during Operation Sindoor should not be under any illusion. This operation is not over yet," he said
Modi said, "Our army showed such valour that the Pakistani army was forced to beg and demand to stop the war."
The PM said that he salutes this valour of the Indian armed forces again and again from Kanpur, the land of the freedom struggle.
He said India has clearly laid down three principles in its fight against terror. "India will give a befitting reply to every terrorist attack, its time, method and conditions will be decided by our forces themselves. India will no longer be afraid of the threat of the nuclear bomb nor will it take any decision based on that. India will look at the master of terror and the government that patronises terrorism with the same eye."
He said, "Pakistan's game of state (government) and non-state (outside the government) actors is not going to work anymore. If I say straight in Kanpuriya that the enemy will be killed wherever he is."
The PM said, "Our Indian weapons and Brahmos missile have wreaked havoc by entering the enemy's house. We have got this strength from the resolve of self-reliant India. There was a time when India was dependent on other countries for military needs, for its defence. We have started changing those conditions." UNI XC AB SSP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
8 minutes ago
- First Post
Yunus's Bangladesh has become a Pakistani client state
Bangladesh and Pakistan have agreed to implement visa-free travel for each other's diplomats and official passport holders—an unprecedented policy shift that marks the most explicit sign yet of Dhaka's growing closeness to Islamabad read more In a move that has raised alarm across Bharat, Bangladesh and Pakistan have agreed to implement visa-free travel for each other's diplomats and official passport holders. This policy shift marks the most explicit sign yet of Dhaka's growing closeness to Islamabad, following the sudden and opaque ouster of Sheikh Hasina in August 2024. Framed officially as a gesture of 'Muslim brotherhood' and 'regional solidarity', this development has far deeper—and darker—implications, especially for Bharat. To those familiar with Bangladesh's liberation struggle, the deal reeks of strategic capitulation and ideological drift. After all, this is the same Pakistan whose military committed unspeakable atrocities in 1971, the very trauma that gave birth to Bangladesh. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The symbolism is unmistakable: Post-Hasina Bangladesh is behaving like a Pakistani client state, seduced back into the orbit of the regime it broke free from five decades ago. And this isn't without precedent. Mujib's Dangerous Playbook What we are witnessing today echoes a disheartening chapter in Bangladesh's formative years. Just two years after leading a bloody struggle for independence, 'Bangabandhu' Sheikh Mujibur Rahman began realigning with Islamabad—a move that stunned Dhaka and Delhi alike. In 1974, Mujib gave a state welcome to Pakistani Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, offering him more honours than were extended to Bharat's President, VV Giri, who had visited Dhaka only days earlier. President Giri's reception was deliberately subdued—overshadowed by preparations for Bhutto's visit—leaving even Bangladeshis puzzled. This contrast wasn't merely accidental. It was a shift in the ideological direction of the state. Mujib's fiery Bengali nationalism began to give way to pan-Islamic overtones. Post-independence, his speeches, once invoking unity among Bengalis, started leaning heavily on Bangladesh's Muslim identity. The man who had once declared, 'I am a human being first, then a Bengali, and then a Muslim,' had reversed that order—signalling a fundamental redefinition of the country's soul. The Aeroplane That Said It All Nothing illustrated Mujib's post-liberation hypocrisy better than the aircraft controversy surrounding his return from Pakistani captivity. Bharat had fought a brutal war and negotiated his release. It had even arranged its own aircraft to fly him home. Yet Mujib chose a British Royal Air Force (RAF) Comet instead. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The British celebrated it as a diplomatic coup, with Rae Britten, the British deputy high commissioner in Dhaka, terming it a 'considerable prestige'. New Delhi was deeply slighted. The row exposed Mujib's desire to downplay Bharat's foundational role in Bangladesh's freedom—and to elevate the West and Islamic powers as future allies. The disregard didn't stop there. At a strategically important railway bridge inauguration shortly afterward—an infrastructure project executed in record time by Bharat's engineers with liberal assistance from New Delhi—Mujib thanked the British for financial support but made no mention of its neighbouring country. He then left by helicopter, inviting only British High Commissioner Sir Arthur Gold aboard. Subimal Dutt, Bharat's distinguished former foreign secretary and ambassador, was left to travel back in a crowded, non-VIP carriage, without food or official courtesy. Author Manash Ghosh, who was then reporting from Dhaka for The Statesman, writes about Subimal Dutt's plight in Mujib's Blunders, one of the best books to come out in recent times. 'No food or water was served to him during the four-hour return journey. He (Dutt) was seen frequently dozing off and his head falling and resting on the shoulders of his co-passengers, who repeatedly woke him up, and he with folded hands sought their forgiveness. 'I go to bed early, hence the problem,' he had gone on to explain embarrassingly,' Ghosh adds. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Mujib's actions were seen as a calculated distancing from Bharat. After all, Subimal Dutt had played a great role in the reconstruction of Bangladesh post-liberation. Today's visa-free agreement with Pakistan carries the same symbolic weight—a statement of ideological realignment. The Return of US-Pakistan Influence Since Sheikh Hasina's ouster, Bangladesh's new administration has moved swiftly to rehabilitate pro-Pakistani forces, many of them linked historically to Jamaat-e-Islami and other Islamist outfits banned by the previous dispensation. While this is being spun as 'democratic pluralism', it is, in reality, a deliberate erasure of the 1971 war consensus that built Bangladesh as a secular, pluralistic republic. The rollback has been quietly orchestrated by Washington, which had long viewed Hasina as an obstacle to its Indo-Pacific strategy. Her refusal to lease St Martin's Island for a US naval base in the Bay of Bengal infuriated American policymakers. Enter Donald Lu, a US State Department official with a dubious reputation for regime change, and Ambassador Peter Haas, whose fingerprints are all over Dhaka's recent political recalibration. Just as the CIA played a silent role in the events leading to Mujib's assassination in 1975, today's developments bear the mark of Washington-Islamabad collusion. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Lessons from Mujib's Fall History offers a chilling warning. Mujib's appeasement of Pakistan and alienation of Bharat didn't save him—they isolated him. And now Mohammed Yunus, the economist-turned-administrator propped up by Western and Pakistani interests, is repeating the same fatal mistakes. Yunus weaponised anti-Bharat rhetoric, aided by the Pakistani ISI and the American deep state, to unseat Hasina. But nearly a year later, his administration is floundering amid economic chaos and rising insecurity. Minorities are being terrorised. And the middle class is losing hope amid a declining economy and rising joblessness. Having nothing to show, Yunus is now resorting to Islamist appeasement: invoking jihadist nostalgia, deepening ties with Islamabad, and empowering religious extremists. But as Mujib's downfall proves, this path leads to disaster. Sooner or later, he too will be consumed by the very fire he has ignited. Conclusion Bangladesh stands at a perilous juncture. It can choose ideological amnesia—forgetting war crimes, surrendering to foreign meddling, and embracing Islamist reactionism. Or, it can choose memory, justice, and sovereignty, rooted in the blood sacrifice of 1971 and anchored by Bharat's principled friendship. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The choice now lies with the people of Bangladesh. They must confront the Islamist virus that re-emerges with intermittent regularity. This ideology returned for the first time just a couple of years after independence. And now, half a century later, it once again threatens to devour the republic from within. One hopes this is only a passing cloud. If not, Bangladesh risks walking the path to perdition—abandoning its secular foundations, its democratic promise, and the very spirit of its liberation war. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Government must answer, be held accountable': Kiren Rijiju urges opposition not to stall Parliament; ‘disruptions hurt you more'
NEW DELHI: Parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju warned the opposition that frequent House disruptions undermine their "own role in democracy" by robbing them of the opportunity to question the government. His remarks came after the first week of the ongoing Monsoon Session, which was largely derailed by repeated protests from opposition MPs, who have been raising alarm over the Election Commission's ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise. Noting that "tough questions" don't get raised when the proceedings are disrupted, Rijiju said, "Let me tell you, officers are relieved when Parliament doesn't function because they escape the grilling. The government can be held accountable in Parliament. When the House runs, ministers face tough questions. When it adjourns within minutes, those questions don't even get raised. Opposition loses more than the government when Parliament is disrupted. " "Those who stall the House think they are damaging the government, but in truth, they are weakening their own role in a democracy. In any democracy, the government must answer to the people through Parliament. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pirates Climb Aboard Cargo Ship - Watch What The Captain Did Next Tips and Tricks Undo That is why allowing the House to run is essential for a functioning democracy." Rijiju added. He further contrasted the current state of frequent disruptions with the past, when leaders like Atal Bihari Vajpayee and LK Advani commanded such respect that MPs would "think twice" before speaking. "Back then, we would think twice before speaking because stalwarts were listening. Now disruptions begin on day one. Maybe social media has changed the game," PTI quoted him at the Sansad Ratna Awards. The opening week of Parliament's Monsoon Session was marked by high drama, political clashes with the surprise resignation of Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar over "health reasons". Moreover, 16-hour special discussion on Operation Sindoor has been scheduled for July 28 in the Lok Sabha and July 29 in the Rajya Sabha. Rijiju has also confirmed that the impeachment proceedings against Justice Yashwant Varma would begin soon, indicating a potentially explosive Week 2.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Balancing strengths-sensitivities': India secures safeguards for key sectors in UK FTA; import access to be phased
Representative image (TOI) Only around one fourth of the UK's exports by value will receive immediate duty-free access to the Indian market, with most sensitive sectors remaining safeguarded, the government said on Friday, according to ET. Commerce secretary Sunil Barthwal, addressing the media, explained that product-specific rules of origin have been established. These include value-addition requirements designed to prevent transshipment and block third-country goods from benefiting under the deal. India has protected several sensitive sectors under the trade deal, including dairy, cereals, millets, pulses, vegetables, and high-value products such as gold, jewellery, lab-grown diamonds, and certain essential oils. Key exclusions also cover critical energy fuels, marine vessels, used clothing, important polymers and their monofilaments, smartphones, and optical fibres, reported ET. For strategically important goods, especially those where domestic manufacturing is being strengthened under the 'Make in India' and production-linked incentive (PLI) schemes, tariff concessions will be phased in gradually over five, seven, or ten years. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Historic Figures Who Were Actually Photographed Gloriousa Undo India and the UK signed the comprehensive economic and trade agreement (CETA) on July 24, following years of discussions and negotiations. Barthwal noted that this agreement stands apart from India's previous free trade deals, as it reflects the country's evolution into a more mature economy. He added that India is now engaging in areas previously untouched in past trade agreements, marking its shift toward developed nation status. Working between strengths and sensitivities The agreement strikes a balance between "sensitivities and strengths," the official said, reported ET. 'We wanted to shed the label of 'tariff king,' and FTAs are a way to achieve that,' said commerce secretary Barthwal. 'FTAs bring a lot of certainty and predictability to businesses which this UK FTA will ensure. FTAs are give and take and when we build a narrative, we are sensitive that it's not one-sided.' Barthwal also mentioned past comments by US President Donald Trump, who had called India a "tariff king," and referenced ongoing negotiations with both the US and the European Union, as quoted by ET. 'Detailed talks are happening in the EU FTA. Talks with the US are going on, it will fructify,' he said. Barthwal said the India-UK partnership is rooted in fair play, equity, and mutual benefit. 'We protected our sensitivities and they protected theirs. This FTA has been a balance of sensitivities and strengths,' he stated. Calling it a complex and comprehensive agreement, Barthwal added, 'our defensive interests have been taken care of.' He noted that while the UK may take under a year to ratify the CETA, India will use that time to build the capacity of its exporters and educate them on how to leverage the deal. The government is also working with state governments and export promotion councils to assess how they will be affected. 'We are doing granular studies,' he said. India and the UK have agreed to negotiate mutual recognition agreements (MRAs) to facilitate the movement of professionals such as nurses, accountants and architects to Britain. 'Non-tariff barriers will be eased, and regulatory systems and MRAs would be improved,' Barthwal said, reported ET. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
