
US economy shrugs off trade war and soldiers on
President Trump is still issuing tariff threats, consumer spending is weakening, and the Mideast is in turmoil. So why did the S&P 500 hit a record high Friday?
Investors may not think the economy is taking off, but they are probably relieved that the worst-case scenarios feared in recent months haven't come to pass. Trump's tariffs, deportations, and cuts to the federal bureaucracy have bent the economy but haven't broken it.
The S&P 500 plummeted 19% from its previous high in February to its 2025 low on April 8. Behind the drop: fears that Trump's threatened tariffs of as high as 145% on China and 50% on other major trading partners would send inflation and interest rates up, sap business and consumer confidence, and spark a recession.
Instead, Trump has significantly dialed back the tariffs from what he first proposed. Although tariffs did come into effect starting in February on China, Canada and Mexico, as well as on autos, steel and aluminum, the effect on inflation to date has been milder than feared. Oil prices leapt when Israel attacked Iran and the U.S. joined in, but have since fallen back.
Even after President Trump's rollbacks, the average tariff in the U.S. is 18.8%, the highest since the 1930s.
Economists at JPMorgan Chase put the probability of recession starting in the next four quarters at about one-third, down from 60% in early April.
In recent months, business confidence fell amid tariff threats. Yet that sentiment never fully translated into behavior: businesses kept investing in equipment, factories and technology. They kept adding jobs, albeit at a slower pace than last year.
'The macro economy is doing decently," said Jason Furman, a Harvard economics professor who was an adviser to President Barack Obama. Especially when it comes to tariffs, the market is now more confident 'that Trump will back off if necessary," he added. 'In April I think the fear was he would just plow ahead no matter what. Now there is a sense that there are realities he won't try to blow past."
Consumer confidence has also recovered a bit. The University of Michigan's consumer sentiment index rose 16% in June from May, though it remains 18% lower than in December.
Wall Street analysts expect earnings at retailers and other S&P 500 consumer discretionary companies to fall in the second quarter from a year earlier.
Earlier this year, 'consumers were really on a downward trend, they really were worried that the high levels of tariffs threatened and policy volatility could lead to very dire consequences," said Joanne Hsu, director of consumer surveys for the University of Michigan. Now, 'consumers don't think we're out of the woods, but they're less worried about the worst-case scenario.'
Still, while consumer spending never collapsed, new data shows that it has weakened significantly. The labor market also appears to be softening. Annualized growth in gross domestic product is likely to average 0.8% over the first two quarters of 2025, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence, down sharply from 2.5% in 2024.
The stock market isn't the economy, but it does capture in real time how investors feel about growth, profits, interest rates, and risk. While companies were cautious about the outlook a few months ago, their recent profit guidance has tended to be better than analysts expected, according to FactSet.
The policy landscape has also become less unpredictable, easing investors' fears. Republicans' massive tax and spending bill remains up in the air, but that sort of risk is more familiar than the tariffs and steep cuts to the federal bureaucracy by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency that regularly emanated from the White House in previous months.
'If you look at the beginning of the year, the main action economically was tariffs and DOGE, and both of those were very dramatic, very fast and of debated lawfulness," Furman said. 'Now the main thing going on is this fiscal bill, which I think is problematic. But it's sort of normal…things have moved more into the legislative arena, which is weirdly more predictable."
In a recently released report, the White House Council of Economic Advisers predicted the Senate draft of Trump's 'one big beautiful bill" will significantly boost investment, wages and employment in the next four years relative to a scenario in which the 2017 tax cuts expire this year, as scheduled.
This past week, Fed chairman Jerome Powell acknowledged there has been little evidence of tariffs pushing up inflation broadly thus far, and some Fed officials have said a rate cut should be on the table as soon as next month. That has caused some bond yields to drop, which is also good for the stock market.
Still, tariffs' full effect could still lie ahead. A 90-day pause on Trump's steepest tariffs is to end July 9. Officials have said that deadline could slip as the U.S. and some partners close in on deals. But Friday, Trump said he had broken off talks with Canada and would issue new tariffs soon, and the administration is also carrying out probes that could yield new tariffs on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals.
Trump's tariff threats spurred car sales earlier this year.
Even after Trump's rollbacks, the average tariff in the U.S. is 18.8%, the highest since the 1930s, versus 2.4% in 2024, according to Preston Caldwell, chief U.S. economist at Morningstar. He thinks that will push inflation based on the index of personal-consumption expenditures to 3.2% in early 2026, versus 2.3% now.
The biggest risk to the outlook appears to be the consumer. This past week, the Commerce Department sharply revised down consumption growth. That softness has persisted in the second quarter, with inflation-adjusted consumption slipping 0.3% in May from April, leaving the level of spending below December's. Particularly notable was softness in discretionary categories including air travel and hotels, which are especially sensitive to moods about the economy.
Wall Street analysts now expect earnings at S&P 500 consumer discretionary companies, which includes retailers, restaurant chains and carmakers, to slip by 5.1% in the second quarter from a year earlier, according to FactSet, down from a 2.2% gain at the end of March.
Write to Jeanne Whalen at Jeanne.Whalen@wsj.com, Justin Lahart at Justin.Lahart@wsj.com and Te-Ping Chen at Te-ping.Chen@wsj.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
37 minutes ago
- Mint
Satellite images show Iran expanding Fardo nuclear facility after US bombed the site last week
New satellite images showed Iranian construction crews and heavy machinery at the Fordo nuclear facility five days after the US carried out massive strikes at Tehran's three nuclear sites. According to a report by The New York Post, images captured by Maxar Technologies on Friday showed crews operated excavators, bulldozers, and other construction vehicles near the craters and punctures in the ground above the nuclear facility caused by the GBU-57 bunker buster bombs dropped by American B-2s last weekend. The report also said that some satellite images showed apparent construction crews building access roads to the facility and rebuilding the damaged dirt road that led to the bunker laboratory that was targeted by the US as part of Israel's conflict with Iran. Similar construction activity was seen on the surface of the Fardo nuclear site in images from before the US attack. 'Those vehicles appeared to be moving unidentified contents out of the facility to a location roughly half-a-mile away,' the report added. The United Nation's nuclear watchdog, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has said that Fordo's centrifuges are currently 'no longer operational' and the facility has 'suffered enormous damage'. IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi said 'there is very, very, very considerable damage', the report added. The extent of the destruction — and the amount of time the Iranian regime's program has been set back — have yet to be officially determined. The Trump administration on Thursday insisted the operation had been a total success, berating journalists for having reported on an intelligence assessment that took a more conservative line. President Donald Trump "created the conditions to end the war, decimating – choose your word – obliterating, destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities", Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told journalists at the Pentagon. Earlier this week however, US media reported on a leaked preliminary US intelligence assessment that said the strikes had only set back Iran's nuclear programme by months – coverage sharply criticised by Hegseth and others. The Israeli military has said it had delivered a "significant hit" to Iran's nuclear programme. While it said its attacks had delayed the programme "by several years" it also said it was "still early to assess the results of the operation". Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday hailed a "historic victory" in the 12-day conflict and vowed to thwart "any attempt" by Iran to rebuild its nuclear programme, according to an AFP report. Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has hailed what he described as Iran's "victory" over Israel. "The American president exaggerated events in unusual ways," Khamenei said, insisting the strikes had done "nothing significant" to Iran's nuclear infrastructure, the report added. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi however called the damage "serious" and said a detailed assessment was under way. Doubts remain about whether Iran quietly removed more than 400 kilogrammes (880 pounds) of uranium enriched to 60 per cent from its most sensitive sites before the strikes – to hide it elsewhere in the country. The stockpile could in theory produce more than nine atomic bombs – if the enrichment level were raised to 90 per cent. A Khamenei adviser, Ali Shamkhani, has said that the country still had its stockpile. "Even if nuclear sites are destroyed, game isn't over, enriched materials, indigenous knowledge, political will remain," he said in a post on X. (With inputs from agencies)


Mint
37 minutes ago
- Mint
‘These people are SICK': Donald Trump calls report of paying Iran $30 billion for nuclear agreement ‘fake news'
US President Donald Trump on Friday slammed a news report of America willing to pay Iran $30 billion to build non-military nuclear facilities. Calling the report 'fake news', he said that it was a 'ridiculous idea'. The report, published by CNN earlier this week, had said quoting four sources that Donald Trump has proposed to pay $30 billion to build a civilian-energy-producing nuclear programme. 'Who in the Fake News Media is the SleazeBag saying that 'President Trump wants to give Iran $30 Billion to build non-military Nuclear facilities.' Never heard of this ridiculous idea. It's just another HOAX put out by the Fake News in order to demean. These people are SICK!!!,' he said in a post on Truth Social. Trump bashes news report Bashing CNN directly, Trump said that one of their reporters has 'no idea what she is talking about." 'Where does CNN get its 'talent?' Just watched someone named Abby Phillip lecture her audience on Tariffs and the economy (which is doing record business!). She has absolutely no idea what she is talking about, strictly 3rd rate. Fortunately, the audience has long ago left CNN, and it will only get WORSE. LOSERS ALL!!!,' he said. Trump's second post on the matter According to the report by CNN citing at least four sources, the Donald Trump administration discussed helping Iran get access to $30 billion to build the nuclear programme, ease sanctions and free up billions in restricted Iranian funds. The talks were reportedly held in a hush-hush manner as Iran and Israel continued to strike a flurry of drones and missiles at each other, CNN reported, quoting sources. The talks have continued even as the two countries agreed to a ceasefire. The Trump administration has floated several evolving proposals in return for one thing: zero Iranian enrichment of uranium, which Iran has consistently maintained it needs. This was done a day before America launched three strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. One Trump official told the outlet that the funding will not directly come from the US and its Arab partners may pay the bill. 'The US is willing to lead these talks' with Iran, the Trump administration official told CNN. 'And someone is going to need to pay for the nuclear program to be built, but we will not make that commitment.' Iran has repeatedly resisted the US's offers to strike a nuclear deal, insisting that nuclear enrichment is necessary for it.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump says Iran warned of missile strike at Al Udeid base: ‘They asked if 1 o'clock was OK — I said fine'
Donald Trump Says Iran Warned US Ahead of Missile Strike Discrepancy Emerges Between Donald Trump's Tone and Top Military Official Live Events Pentagon Praises Troops, Defends Trump and Pete Hegseth Donald Trump Suggests Base Was Evacuated Before Strike FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel As US president Donald prepared to leave a NATO summit on Wednesday, he said something surprising and unexpected, that Iran had warned the United States in advance of a missile strike on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar and that he personally told them to go ahead, as per a report. Iran's attack on a US military base was in retaliation for the United States' strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites amid the conflict between Israel and described Iranians as they "were very nice," and revealed that, "They gave us warning," as quoted in report. The US president said that Iranians asked Trump, "We're going to shoot 'em. Is one o'clock OK?," and Trump admitted that he replied, saying, "It's fine," as quoted in the READ: Who is Hariana Veras, the woman Trump flirted with? President says she is beautiful and wishes more were like her However, Trump's remark regarding Iran's strike on US forces at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, an attack that involved more than a dozen Iranian missiles, was in stark contrast to what Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine told reporters the next day, according to the said it was potentially the largest single use of the Patriot air defense system in US history, explaining that "there was a lot of metal flying around, and yet our U.S. air defenders had only seconds to make complex decisions with strategic impact," as quoted in the went on to praise the US military, as he said, "These awesome humans, along with their Qatari brothers and sisters in arms, stood between a salvo of Iranian missiles and the safety of Al Udeid," and he also called them the "unsung heroes of the 21st-century United States Army," as quoted in the READ: Could Disney stock surge? Analysts raise price targets after strong earnings While, Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson pointed out that, "The safety of our service members is of the utmost importance to Secretary Hegseth, and he couldn't be prouder of the troops who put their lives on the line every day to keep Americans safe," as quoted in the on, even chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said, 'Thanks to President Trump and Secretary Hegseth's leadership, our troops know that their commander-in-chief and secretary of defense have their back. Any insinuation to the contrary is absurd,' as quoted in the READ: Pornhub, XNXX in panic? US Supreme Court ruling lets states crack down on online adult content access However, there is speculation that Trump might have been aware of the danger that the Iranian attack posed because just after saying he gave Iran permission to strike, he also pointed out that "everyone was emptied off the base so they couldn't get hurt except for the gunners," quoted even Caine had revealed that only two Patriot surface-to-air missile batteries remained on base, leaving "roughly 44 American soldiers responsible for defending the entire base," which includes the forward headquarters for US Central Command, as reported by said, "The oldest soldier was a 28-year-old captain. The youngest was a 21-year-old private who'd been in the military for less than two years," as quoted in the according to his claims, Trump said Iran warned of the strike and asked if 1 o'clock was acceptable. He replied, 'It's fine.'It was in retaliation for US airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites during tensions involving Iran and Israel, as per the report.