Germany: Police probe death of author Alexandra Fröhlich
'The investigation has revealed that blunt force trauma was the cause of the 58-year-old's death,' German daily the Hamburger Morgenpost quoted police as saying (in German). Earlier, some German media reported that Fröhlich had been shot.
Hamburg police told DW on Tuesday that the investigation was still ongoing.
What do we know about the incident?
Hamburg police said on Thursday, without naming Fröhlich, that a 58-year-old woman was found dead on her houseboat in Hamburg's Moorfleet district on Tuesday morning, April 22.
In a press release, police said that relatives found the woman lifeless on her houseboat and alerted the rescue service of the fire department, which could only determine that the woman had died.
As the cause of death was unclear and outside influence could not be ruled out, officers from the homicide squad (LKA 41) took over the investigation at the scene in close coordination with the public prosecutor's office. A 3D scanner and divers from the state police were also used to secure evidence.
A police spokesman later said that after examining traces and evidence, investigators believe the woman died as a result of violence.
Who was Alexandra Frölich?
Fröhlich was one of the most successful German novelists of recent years.
Her humorous yet profound novel My Russian Mother-in-Law and Other Catastrophes (2012) landed her on the Spiegel bestseller list for months. The writer said the book was based on her own experience of marrying a Russian.
Her second book, Death is Certain , was released in 2016, followed by Skeletons in the Closet in 2019, both published by Penguin. She has also written for several women's magazines.
Fröhlich began her journalism career in Ukraine, where she founded a women's magazine in Kyiv and later became a freelance journalist. She had three sons.
DW
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
3 hours ago
- Observer
Italy receives back ancient mosaic stolen during WWII
A two-millennia-old mosaic, which was stolen by a member of the Nazi armed forces, has been returned to Italy more than 80 years after the end of World War II. The piece will now be displayed on the site of the ancient city of Pompeii near Naples, which was buried in the year 79 AD during an eruption of Mount Vesuvius, the director of the museum site, Gabriel Zuchtriegel, said. 'Every returned stolen artefact is like a wound that heals,' Zuchtriegel, a German national, said. The intricately crafted piece depicts a man and a woman. According to the museum, the mosaic most likely originates from the region around the volcano and may have once adorned the floor of a bedroom. It is believed to have been created in the first century BC or AD. According to the Carabinieri Police Force for the Protection of Cultural Heritage, the mosaic probably came into the 'wrongful possession' of the Wehrmacht member during the German occupation. The soldier gifted it to a German. His heirs approached the Italian state to return the mosaic. They said that the Wehrmacht member was an officer, the Carabinieri spokesman said. Documents regarding the theft, the gifting, names, or similar have not yet been found, he said. The mosaic was brought back to Italy in September 2023 through the Italian Consulate General in the south-western German city of Stuttgart. After the armistice between Italy and the Allies in September 1943, the German Wehrmacht occupied large parts of the country. The approximately 20-month occupation period was marked by violence. At the same time, numerous art and cultural objects disappeared from public collections or archaeological sites. — dpa
Muscat Daily
7 hours ago
- Muscat Daily
Trump accuses Obama of 'treason', without providing evidence
Washington, D.C., US – US President Donald Trump accused former President Barack Obama of 'treason' on Tuesday without providing evidence. Trump cited his intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard, who on Friday declassified documents that allegedly showed how the Obama administration laid the groundwork for an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. What did Trump say about Obama? 'It's there, he's guilty. This was treason,' Trump said in the Oval Office on Tuesday. 'They tried to steal the election, they tried to obfuscate the election. They did things that nobody's ever imagined, even in other countries,' Trump claimed, without offering any proof. Trump's remarks came as he deflected questions from journalists about the Justice Department's decision to interview Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted of helping the financier sexually abuse underage girls and is now serving a lengthy prison sentence. Obama's office slams allegations The office of the former president later hit back with a statement saying Trump's 'bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction'. 'Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response,' said Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush. 'But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one.' Did Russia interfere with election? A 2017 assessment by the US intelligence community concluded that Russia used social media disinformation, hacking and bot farms to damage Democrat Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and bolster Trump. But the same assessment determined that the impact was likely limited and there was no evidence that Russia's efforts altered the election outcome. In 2020, a bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence Committee – spearheaded by then acting chairman Marco Rubio, now Trump's secretary of state – found that the Trump campaign sought to 'maximise the impact' of leaks of Democratic documents stolen by Russian military intelligence. DW
Muscat Daily
a day ago
- Muscat Daily
US ex-officer sentenced to prison over Breonna Taylor raid
Kentucky, US – A former Kentucky police officer was sentenced to 33 months in prison on Monday for violating Breonna Taylor's rights during the raid in which she was shot and killed five years ago. Kentucky police officers shot and killed Taylor, a Black woman, in March 2020 after they used a controversial no-knock warrant at her home. Taylor's death, along with the murder of George Floyd in Minnesota in May 2020 by a white police officer, sparked racial justice protests across the US and internationally. Civil rights attorneys for Taylor's family welcomed prison time but had hoped for a tougher sentence. 'While today's sentence is not what we had hoped for – nor does it fully reflect the severity of the harm caused – it is more than what the Department of Justice sought,' they said. 'That, in itself, is a statement.' Police officer fired 10 shots The court heard that Taylor and her boyfriend were sleeping when they heard a noise at the door around midnight. Her boyfriend, believing it to be an intruder, fired his legally-owned gun, wounding a police officer. Police officers then opened fire, killing Taylor. 'A piece of me was taken from me that day,' Taylor's mother Tanika Palmer told the court. Brett Hankison is the only officer to be convicted in connection with the incident. He fired 10 shots during the raid but didn't hit anyone. US District Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings said she was 'startled' there weren't more people injured during the raid from Hankison's blind shots. In addition to almost three years in prison, Hankison was also sentenced to three years of supervised release afterwards. The charges against him carried a maximum sentence of life in prison. Trump admin calls for lighter sentence The Trump administration's Justice Department had recommended that Hankison be given no additional prison time beyond the one day he spent in jail at the time of his arrest. 'Hankison did not shoot Ms Taylor and is not otherwise responsible for her death,' Harmeet Dhillon, the head of the Justice Department's civil rights division, wrote in a rare memo to the judge. 'Hankison did not wound her or anyone else at the scene that day, although he did discharge his duty weapon ten times blindly into Ms Taylor's home.' However, Jennings said this recommendation treated the shooting as 'an inconsequential crime' and would minimise the jury's verdict from November, which found Hankison guilty of using excessive force. DW
