Germany's Max Planck society emerges as magnet for US researchers amid Trump-era turmoil
The spring 2025 recruitment round saw 81 applications from early-career women scientists in the US, compared to just 25 in the previous year as reported by Reuters.
'Applications from other parts of the world have remained constant. The surge is distinctly American,' confirmed Max Planck president Patrick Cramer.
Top US institutions at the center of the exodus
Almost half of the new US applicants are affiliated with just five institutions—Harvard University, Stanford University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the University of California.
The Max Planck Society, a German state-funded research network with 84 institutes, a €2 billion annual budget, and 39 Nobel laureates, is now considering hiring 20 candidates, up from the originally planned 12, if the quality threshold is met.
Research crackdown and the Harvard controversy
The migration of talent follows the Trump administration's revocation of Harvard University's certification to host international students, a move currently blocked by a federal court.
The policy mandates that foreign students either transfer to compliant institutions or lose their legal status in the US. The White House has indicated intentions to broaden the restrictions to additional universities.
These developments have sent shockwaves through the global academic community, especially as prominent scholars, such as Yale historian Timothy Snyder, have already resigned in protest and relocated to institutions abroad.
Europe seeks to absorb displaced talent
Cramer, recently returned from discussions in the US, revealed to Reuters that international research leaders are increasingly focused on safeguarding academic talent. 'Our main concern is that a whole generation of scientists may be lost to global science,' he said. 'Europe must become a safe haven and help bridge the years ahead.'
The German government is preparing a national initiative, tentatively titled the '1,000 Brains' programme, to expand research infrastructure in anticipation of an influx of international academics fleeing US policy disruptions.
Germany's call to action: A wounded scientific benchmark
Petra Olschowski, the research minister of Baden-Württemberg—home to four of Germany's 11 top-tier universities—warned that the global research ecosystem could suffer if American institutions continue to lose credibility. He said in an interaction with Reuters,
'Harvard and other major US universities are our benchmarks,' she said. 'That very standard is now under threat.'
Global science at a crossroads
Despite European enthusiasm to accommodate affected scholars, budgetary constraints remain a concern. Still, research organisations across the continent are aligning their efforts to counterbalance the instability in the US.
As Trump's education policies grow increasingly nationalistic, Europe is positioning itself not just as an academic alternative, but as a sanctuary for scientific inquiry in peril.
Ready to empower your child for the AI era? Join our program now! Hurry, only a few seats left.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump UNAFFECTED With Gaza 'Famine'; Tells Netanyahu To 'Decide' After Hamas Talks Derailed
US President Donald Trump said that Israel will have to make a decision on the future of the Gaza War. This comes after us and Israel announced an exit from the Doha peace talks, blaming Hamas for a lack of desire to reach an agreement. Watch this video to know more.#trump #netanyahu #hamas #gaza #gazawar #gazastarvation #us #lackofdesfire #dohatalks #israel Read More
Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
US-EU trade deal: Winners, losers, and what's missing? Who benefits and what new deal mean?
US President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen have unveiled a broad trade agreement that sets 15% tariffs on most European imports. This averts Trump's earlier warning of a 30% rate if a deal isn't struck by 1 August. These tariffs, import taxes applied to European goods bought by Americans, could raise prices for US consumers and reduce profits for European businesses and their US partners. Here are some things to know about the trade deal between the United States and the European Union: Trump and von der Leyen's announcement, made during Trump's visit to one of his golf courses in Scotland, leaves many details to be filled in. The headline figure is a 15% tariff rate on 'the vast majority' of European goods brought into the US, including cars, computer chips and pharmaceuticals. it's lower than the 20% Trump initially proposed, and lower than his threats of 50% and then 30%. Von der Leyen said the two sides agreed on zero tariffs on both sides for a range of 'strategic' goods-Aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products, and some natural resources and critical raw materials. Specifics were lacking. She said the two sides 'would keep working' to add more products to the list. Additionally, the EU side would purchase what Trump said was USD 750 billion worth of natural gas, oil and nuclear fuel to replace Russian energy supplies, and Europeans would invest an additional USD 600 billion in the US. Trump said the 50% US tariff on imported steel would remain; von der Leyen said the two sides agreed to further negotiations to fight a global steel glut, reduce tariffs and establish import quotas, that is, set amounts that can be imported, often at a lower rate. Trump said pharmaceuticals were not included in the deal. Von der Leyen said the pharmaceuticals issue was 'on a separate sheet of paper' from Sunday's deal. Where the USD 600 billion for additional investment would come from was not specified. And von der Leyen said that when it came to farm products, the EU side made clear that 'there were tariffs that could not be lowered,' without specifying which products. The 15% rate removes Trump's threat of a 30% tariff. It's still much higher than the average tariff before Trump came into office, of around 1%, and higher than Trump's minimum 10% baseline tariff. Higher tariffs, or import taxes, on European goods mean sellers in the U.S. would have to either increase prices for consumers, risking loss of market share or swallow the added cost in terms of lower profits. The higher tariffs are expected to hurt export earnings for European firms and slow the economy. The 10% baseline applied while the deal was negotiated was already sufficiently high to make the European Union's executive commission cut its growth forecast for this year from 1.3% to 0.9%. Von der Leyen said the 15% rate was 'the best we could do' and credited the deal with maintaining access to the US market and providing 'stability and predictability for companies on both sides.' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal, which avoided 'an unnecessary escalation in transatlantic trade relations" and said that 'we were able to preserve our core interests,' while adding that 'I would have very much wished for further relief in transatlantic trade.' The Federation of German Industries was blunter. "Even a 15% tariff rate will have immense negative effects on export-oriented German industry," said Wolfgang Niedermark, a member of the federation's leadership. While the rate is lower than threatened, "the big caveat to today's deal is that there is nothing on paper, yet," said Carsten Brzeski, global chief of macro at ING bank. 'With this disclaimer in mind and at face value, today's agreement would clearly bring an end to the uncertainty of recent months. An escalation of the US-EU trade tensions would have been a severe risk for the global economy," Brzeski said. 'This risk seems to have been avoided.' When asked whether European carmakers could still compete under the new 15% tariff, von der Leyen noted that the rate is significantly lower than the previous 27.5% which included Trump's 25% tariff on foreign cars, along with the existing 2.5% U.S. car import duty. The effect on some companies is expected to be considerable. Automaker Volkswagen, for instance, reported a $1.5 billion loss in profit during the first half of the year due to the higher tariffs. Mercedes-Benz dealers in the US have said they are holding the line on 2025 model year prices 'until further notice.' The German automaker has a partial tariff shield because it makes 35% of the Mercedes-Benz vehicles sold in the U.S. in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, but the company said it expects prices to undergo 'significant increases' in the coming years. Before Trump returned to office, the US and the EU maintained relatively low tariff rates within the world's largest bilateral trading relationship, totalling around $2 trillion annually. Combined, the U.S. and EU account for 44% of the global economy. According to the Brussels-based Bruegel think tank, the average U.S. tariff on European goods was 1.47%, while the EU's average tariff on American products stood at 1.35%. Trump has complained about the EU's 198 billion-euro trade surplus in goods, which shows Americans buy more from European businesses than the other way around, and has said the European market is not open enough for US-made cars. Von der Leyen said the 15% rate was 'the best we could do' and credited the deal with maintaining access to the US market. Even a 15% tariff rate will have immense negative effects on export-oriented German industry. However, American companies fill some of the trade gap by outselling the EU when it comes to services such as cloud computing, travel bookings, and legal and financial services. And some 30% of European imports are from American-owned companies, according to the European Central Bank.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 minutes ago
- First Post
'Very close to China deal': Trump hopeful as trade negotiators meet in Stockholm
US President Donald Trump said his administration is very close to a trade deal with China as senior negotiators from both nations meet in Stockholm read more US President Donald Trump said that Washington, DC, is 'very close' to a trade deal with China, as senior negotiators from both nations meet in Stockholm on Monday. The talks aim to resolve longstanding economic disputes that are at the heart of the trade war between the world's two largest economies. The negotiations are being conducted at a time when China is facing an Aug 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with the Trump administration. It is pertinent to note that both nations reached a preliminary deal in June to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Before meeting European Union Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen, Trump expressed optimism over the deal. 'We're very close to a deal with China. We really sort of made a deal with China, but we'll see how that goes,' the president told reporters, providing no further details over the matter. What lies ahead The Stockholm talks are led by US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice-Premier He Lifeng and are coming right on the heels of Trump's biggest trade deal yet, with the EU accepting a 15 per cent tariff on its goods exports to the US and agreeing to make significant EU purchases of US energy and military equipment. Without an agreement between China and the US, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil of high duties that can go beyond the 100 per cent mark. Analysts believe that while the trade deal between Beijing and Washington, DC might not be as grand as the one Trump struck with the EU, another 90-day extension of a tariff and export control truce is more likely to be the outcome, Business Times reported. Interestingly, an extension of the deadline would prevent further escalation of the trade war between the two nations and would also create a space for a possible meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. There have been speculations that the two leaders can hold talks in late October. Trump-Xi meeting on the cards? In the past, Trump has said that he will decide soon whether to visit China in a landmark trip to address trade and security tensions. 'The Stockholm meeting is an opportunity to start laying the groundwork for a Trump visit to China,' Wendy Cutler, vice-president at the Asia Society Policy Institute, told Business Times. Meanwhile, Bessent has already maintained that he wants to work out an extension of the Aug 12 deadline to prevent tariffs snapping back to 145 per cent on the US side and 125 per cent on the Chinese side. Beijing, on the other hand, is likely to request a reduction of multi-layered US tariffs totalling 55 per cent on most goods and further easing of US high-tech export controls, experts said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD China argued that these purchases would help reduce the US trade deficit with China, which reached US$295.5 billion in 2024. China is currently facing a 20 per cent tariff related to the US fentanyl crisis, a 10 per cent reciprocal tariff, and 25 per cent duties on most industrial goods imposed during Trump's first term.
