logo
Life on the most hated motorway in Britain: Hours-long delays, dangerous lanes and run-down service stations - drivers reveal why the M1 has been voted the country's worst road

Life on the most hated motorway in Britain: Hours-long delays, dangerous lanes and run-down service stations - drivers reveal why the M1 has been voted the country's worst road

Daily Mail​18 hours ago
Furious drivers have revealed why the M1 has been been voted the country's worst motorway, citing lengthy delays, dangerous lanes and run-down service stations.
Motorists using the M1 motorway, which connects London to Leeds, have spoken about the grueling reality of travelling along the 193-mile road, criticising its never-ending traffic, roadworks and dangerous incidents.
While several complained about the 50mph speed limits, arguing that they were designed to catch individuals out, others condemned the decision to use the hard shoulder as an extra lane, arguing that it could cause accidents.
The controversial new road restrictions were introduced due to the construction of smart motorway emergency areas along the M1.
It comes as the M1 was officially revealed to be the country's most-hated motorway, with Transport Focus' new Strategic Roads User Survey finding that just 57 per cent of drivers were satisfied with their journey on the road.
Daniel Ward, from Manchester, is a frequent user of the M1 due to having business offices located in London.
Describing the major north-south route as 'horrendous' to drive along, he said: 'It's absolute chaos. There's always traffic.
'We're heading back to Manchester today and it should be about a three-and-a-half-hour journey, but we checked the route, and it says five hours.
'We're trying to work at the same time but the service is terrible along the road so we can't even take work calls in the car. We have to keep stopping.'
Speaking from London Gateway services, the 33-year-old also expressed concern about the 'incredibly dangerous' use of the hard shoulder as a fourth lane.
Adding that he 'doesn't like it at all', he said: 'What are people meant to do when they break down?
'Another issue is that the variable speed limits change all the time – and I've seen so many people getting flashed. It's almost like a trap.'
In the new Transport Focus survey it was revealed that most of the more than 9,000 road users surveyed 'recognise' the need for the emergency areas on the smart motorway but they had felt 'the impact of roadworks'.
John and Ruth Hudson, who had stopped at Newport Pagnell services, also often frequent the M1. While the married couple live in Newcastle, their sons attend colleges in Surrey and Buckinghamshire.
Mr Hudson, 47, expressed similar frustration towards the variable speed limits, adding that he has been 'caught before' by the smart technology and would prefer to use the A1 in order to avoid them.
Meanwhile, Ms Hudson agreed that her desired preference was the A1, explaining: 'The service stations are nicer.'
Alongside Mr Ward, the 39-year-old also raised concerns for the lack of a hard shoulder on parts of the M1, describing the restriction as 'dangerous' and something that 'worries her'.
In 2023, Anne Pember, a senior coroner for Northamptonshire, wrote to road bosses warning that the lack of a hard shoulder created 'a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken'.
Ms Pember's warning came after she presided over the inquest of David Levett. The 53-year-old, who had cerebral palsy, was a rear seat passenger when his carer's Seat Leon was smashed into from behind by a lorry on the M1 while stationary in February 2018.
The stretch had no hard shoulder as it had been converted into an 'all-lane running' (ALR) smart motorway.
This means drivers can become marooned in live traffic if they're unable to reach an emergency layby.
In 2023, Rishi Sunak, then Prime Minister, announced that all planned future smart motorway schemes were to be cancelled due to drivers losing confidence in 'death trap' roads.
However, he did not scrap any of the hundreds of miles of existing schemes, raising an abundance of safety concerns and criticism from campaigners.
HGV driver Jeff Alstead, 66, described the M1 as 'awful', with there 'always' traffic jams, often in predictable areas.
He said: 'There are always traffic jams on the M1. I can tell you exactly where they'll be each time, too. There's always one at Canterbury.
'The other day there was a jam for 20 miles. I was stuck for four hours.'
Mr Alstead, who was taking a break at Newport Pagnell services, also argued that the missing hard shoulder had actually made traffic worse, rather than helping to improve congestion as had been initially hoped.
Claiming that the decision to axe the hard shoulder in replacement of a fourth lane had been 'ridiculous'. He asked: 'What am I meant to do if I break down?'
In 2021, it was reported that a stretch of the M1's 'smart motorway' which had promised to boost the local economy by almost £1billion had actually increased congestion, slowing down journey times at an expected loss of more than £200million.
The damning figures, obtained via a freedom of information request by Highways Magazine, showed that there had been little benefit in introducing a 'dynamic hard shoulder' along junctions 10 to 13 on the M1 from December 2012 to December 2017.
One unfortunate road user driving along the M1 had reportedly already seen a crash by the time he stopped for a break at Toddington Services.
Nicky Frances, 31, who was driving from Margate to Manchester to see Oasis in concert, described some of the speed variables and incident warnings as 'pretty annoying' and resulting in a 'slow moving road'.
In February 2018, David Levett, 53, (pictured) who had cerebral palsy, was a rear seat passenger when his carer's Seat Leon was smashed into from behind by a lorry on the M1 while stationary
He added: 'I had one which said there was a cyclist in the road, but I didn't see anything, so sometimes it seems like everyone is just slowing down for no reason.'
Meanwhile, Shelley Bartosa, 58, who was visiting the UK from Michigan in the US, said that she had witnessed several incidents while driving along the M1.
Stating that she resonates with people's frustrations given her negative experiences on the M1, Ms Bartosa said: 'We've come here in the summer for the past couple years and a year ago we were on the M1 when a sausage truck overturned.
'We were there for hours The thing I've noticed is that you end up stuck with nowhere to go. In the US, there are more exit options.
'So I can see why people are frustrated.'
The new Transport Focus survey results revealed that the M1 had scored a satisfaction rating of just 57 per cent followed by a joint result of 60 per cent for both the M7 and the M25.
The A47 received the lowest A road rating overall with just 56 per cent of road users satisfied with their experience.
At the other end of the scale, the A30 from Exeter to Penzance is rated as England's best road.
'Recently upgraded to dual carriageway with new surfacing. Journey time improved,' said one happy road user.
Despite an overwhelming degree of negative feedback towards the M1, Capalin Cotoarba, 31, argued that the M25 was 'much worse' to travel on due to the high likelihood of traffic jams.
Catharine Crawshaw, 71, also voiced similar criticisms of the 117-mile-long motorway, stating: 'It's the M25 that's the worst bit. Last Friday we were stuck on there for two hours'.
Despite an overwhelming degree of negative feedback towards the M1, Capalin Cotoarba (pictured), 31, argued that the M25 was 'much worse' to travel on due to the high likelihood of traffic jams
ENGLAND'S WORST ROADS
Rank Road Satisfaction Rating
1 A47 56%
2 M1 57%
3 M27 60%
4 M25 60%
5 M4 62%
6 M42 62%
7 A27 62%
8 A12 63%
9 M60 65%
10 A3 66%
And, amid all of the objections, David Duro, 50, who was resting at Toddington services, even came out in defence of the M1.
While he agreed that it can be quite traffic heavy, the HGV driver claimed it has significantly improved over the past few years due to the new system.
He continued: 'It's a motorway – so sometimes it flows and sometimes it doesn't. But I just find there's no point getting stressed about it.
'It is what it is. At the end of the day it's just about getting there safely.'
In response to the survey results, Louise Collins, director at the independent watchdog Transport Focus, previously said: 'Long stretches of roadworks, sometimes one after another, and miles of cones have had a significant impact on road user satisfaction with England's motorways, with a disappointing downward trend over the past couple of years.
'While roadworks are necessary to help maintain roads and drive improvements in user experience, the decrease in road user satisfaction reinforces the importance of National Highways learning the lessons from the smart motorway emergency area retrofit programme.
'We'll be working with National Highways to help them use these survey findings as they plan future roadworks to make sure the impact on users is minimised.'
National Highways finished its installation of emergency areas in March with Transport Focus reporting there are 'early signs' that satisfaction is recovering after the completion of the works.
A National Highways spokesperson also said at the time: 'Installing more than 150 extra motorway emergency areas was a commitment made in 2022, with a stretching deadline of Spring 2025, to support drivers' confidence whilst travelling on smart motorways.
'We successfully completed this work in March, delivering around five years' worth of work in just over three.
'Drivers should now experience fewer delays and the M1 is now entirely free of major roadworks for the first time since 2008.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Call for quicker reviews of serious Lincolnshire road accidents
Call for quicker reviews of serious Lincolnshire road accidents

BBC News

time9 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Call for quicker reviews of serious Lincolnshire road accidents

Police and council highways officials should speed up how they report and review road collisions to prevent future deaths, a coroner's report has comes after David Walsh, 40, and his son Cameron, 16, died last year when the car Mr Walsh was test-driving went into Louth Canal close to Tetney Lock, near on Monday, the coroner's prevention of future death (PFD) report has been sent to Lincolnshire County Council and Lincolnshire found that crashes involving injuries and deaths that might have been due in part to road conditions were not immediately reported by police to the highways authority. The report by Marianne Johnson, assistant coroner for Greater Lincolnshire, also found that crashes involving injuries or deaths were reviewed by the highways team on only an annual basis. This includes deciding on potential safety improvements to reduce the risk of future incidents.A PFD report is issued when a coroner thinks action is needed to protect Johnson said that not reviewing road traffic collisions more regularly could mean there was a "possibility that other incidents can occur prior to the annual review that could have been prevented" if the report had been made at the time of the crash council and Lincolnshire Police have been given 56 days to respond to the report with a "timetable for action". Mr Walsh's Mercedes ended up upside down and fully submerged apart from its two rear wheels when it left Tetney Lock Road and went into the canal on 6 January last he and his son were pronounced dead at the Nick Prestwich told the hearing into their deaths there was a sign on that stretch of road warning drivers it was "undulated and uneven".Richard Fenwick, head of highways asset and local management services at the county council, confirmed the car would have driven past a warning sign about 650ft (about 200m) before the scene of the crash. He said the warning signs were "appropriate".The inquest found last month that Mr Walsh and Cameron died in a road traffic Police has been contacted by the BBC for comment on the PFD report.A council spokesperson said: "We are unable to comment until a response to the coroner has been completed by the deadline date set in the document." Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices

Karun Chandhok weighs up ‘potential' next F1 team for Christian Horner
Karun Chandhok weighs up ‘potential' next F1 team for Christian Horner

The Independent

time30 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Karun Chandhok weighs up ‘potential' next F1 team for Christian Horner

Karun Chandhok speculated that Christian Horner could join Alpine as team principal after his Red Bull exit. Horner was relieved of his duties as Red Bull F1 CEO last week in a surprise announcement, after 20 years and 14 world titles with the team. The 51-year-old has not missed a race since taking charge of Red Bull in 2005 but is set for some time away from the sport in light of his departure. However, Horner has been linked with Ferrari in recent months – and a potential link-up with Lewis Hamilton – but Sky Sports pundit Chandhok named another outfit who could target Horner. 'Could he go to Alpine and stay living in the UK?' Chandhok told Sky Sports News. 'Alpine are still based in that motorsport valley and are looking for a team principal. Christian's old friend Flavio Briatore is in charge. That could be a potential destination. 'Could he go to Ferrari? There were lots of rumours that they tried to hire him on various occasions. I don't think he'll go there.' Horner lives in rural Oxfordshire, close to Alpine's UK base in Enstone, and has a close relationship with Alpine adviser Briatore. Laurent Mekies, formerly team principal at sister team Racing Bulls, has taken over from Horner at Red Bull and will take charge from the next race, the Belgian Grand Prix (25-27 July). Red Bull are currently fourth in the constructors' championship while star driver Max Verstappen is 69 points behind leader Oscar Piastri in the drivers' standings at the halfway stage of the season.

Signs for EV chargers to be fitted on major UK roads
Signs for EV chargers to be fitted on major UK roads

Daily Mail​

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Signs for EV chargers to be fitted on major UK roads

Motorists have been told to expect new signs popping up at the side of roads in the not-too-distant future. The Department for Transport has confirmed the signage will shortly begin to appear on A-roads in England to support drivers of one particular type of vehicle. Unique EV charging signage has been confirmed by the Transport Secretary to point owners of battery cars to the nearest public charging hubs dotted across the nation's major road network. There are more than 300 of these charging hubs in England, each with six or more 'rapid' 50kW-plus charging device, many of which also have 'ultra-rapid' chargers that can bolster a compatible EV's battery from 10 to 80 per cent in around half an hour. They are typically located on or near motorways or major roads where short charging times are at a premium and typically have at least a coffee shop attached. Funding for signage is part of an increase in Government spending announced by ministers over the weekend, which will see £63million rolled out to bolster EV charging, including a £25million scheme for local authorities to install cables that run beneath pavements to allow drivers living in flats and terraced houses to charge at home safely. Tomorrow, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is expected to reveal the reintroduction of an EV purchase grant in an effort to accelerate waning demand. Officials hope the introduction of EV charging road signs along with the range of other measures will encourage more drivers to switch to electric motoring. Concerns over the ability to recharge EVs on long journeys have been blamed for some motorists being reluctant to move on from petrol or diesel cars. The DfT has yet to confirm what the new roadside furniture directing people to EV charging hubs will look like. Currently, there's little signage to show EV owners where hubs are located - or how much they'll be paying to charge at motorway service stations. In 2021, EG Group became the first chargepoint operator to introduce forecourt poles with per unit charging prices at its ultra-rapid chargers. By last year, 50 of its sites had pricing information displayed on filling station-style totem poles. Alexander said the Government's new measures will make it 'easier and cheaper' to own an EV. The £25million residential street charging scheme is a major factor in this, as the ability to safely run EV charging cables under the footpath - preventing a trip hazard for pedestrians - should attract more people to EV ownership because they will be able to access cheaper household electricity rates for recharging, rather than using more expensive public chargers. The latest AA Recharge Report for May shows that the typical EV owner who can charge at home using a domestic energy tariff pays just 6.1p per mile. In contrast, those forced to use even the slowest public devices are paying nearly double that (11.3p) while those using rapid devices can be paying as much as 19.6p per mile. The AA said that - based on average unleaded prices in May - a petrol car owner is forking out only 11.6 a mile. Based on the savings estimated by the DfT, drivers can save up to £1,500 annually by charging an EV at home, compared with running a petrol or diesel car. The Transport Secretary added: 'We know access to charging is a barrier for people thinking of making the switch, and we are tackling that head-on so that everyone – whether or not they have a driveway – can access the benefits of going electric.' AA president Edmund King welcomed the introduction of dedicated public EV charging signage, saying there are more chargers available than people realise but they are 'often hidden in plain sight'. He added: 'Increasing signs for the public network is vital to help the EV transition as it will create confidence for drivers both now and in the future.' Delvin Lane, chief executive of charging company InstaVolt, said the introduction of charging signage on major roads is a 'crucial step'. He added: 'For years, we have emphasised that the UK's public EV infrastructure, so critical to mass adoption, is already largely in place, and now this signage will finally showcase it to drivers in a visible, accessible way.' Tom Middleditch, head of electric mobility at Europcar Mobility Group UK, said that it's own research in 2024 found that 89 percent of EV drivers and 73 per cent of non-EV drivers wanted to see the roll out of EV charging signage on A roads and motorways. 'The DfT's announcement will help address the fact that more often than not the infrastructure is available – it's just that motorists don't see the signs for it,' he said. New EV grant on its way? A new EV grant - thought to be worth around £640million - could mean money off the price of some fully electric cars. It would see the return of purchase subsidies for the first time since 2022, when the former government prematurely terminated the Plug-in Car Grant - which had been available to EV buyers since 2011. Appearing on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg show, Heidi Alexander said: 'We know the high upfront purchase cost of EVs is something people are wary about. 'We've got to be honest and say there are a lot of people out there who think that EVs are just for the very wealthiest.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store