Los Angeles joining federal lawsuit against immigration raids
The city will join the American Civil Liberties Union in suing the federal government, alleging officials are using 'unlawful tactics to achieve its intended arrest numbers.'
'The federal government has concentrated thousands of armed immigration agents, many of whom lack visible identification, and military troops in our communities, conducting unconstitutional raids, roundups and anonymous detentions, sowing fear and chaos among our residents,' Hydee Feldstein Soto, city attorney of Los Angeles, said in a Tuesday release.
'Today's motion to intervene shows we will not stand by and allow these raids to continue or to become the standard operating procedure in our communities.'
Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) denied the allegations.
'DHS enforcement operations are highly targeted, and officers do their due diligence,' McLaughlin told The Hill, denying that arrests are not made based off of the color of someone's skin.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) have both railed against the president's decision to send National Guard soldiers to Los Angeles last month in an effort to quell protests against immigration policies.
'I have said that I think this is an experiment. I think LA is a petri dish, and they are essentially pressing the envelope to see how far the American public will tolerate the federal seizure of power from a governor and in this random thing is just a way of creating a sense of … terror and fate and fear in our community,' Bass said during a Tuesday press conference.
'It is having profound economic impact. It is obviously impacting and traumatizing families, and it is to serve a political agenda, none of which has anything positive to do with our city,' she added.
Groups gathered for multiple days to share outrage over recent immigration raids that resulted in the arrests of dozens, but Bass said they were inaccurately characterized.
''Riots' that were reported never happened. We did have a couple of incidences of vandalism and looting, but the way it was portrayed nationally was like the whole city was up in flames,' Bass told reporters.
She criticized comparisons to the 1992 LA riots following the acquittal of police officers in the beating of Rodney King, saying they were 'completely and 100 percent inappropriate.'
Mayors from the surrounding area joined Bass on Tuesday to call out the Trump administration for an alleged violation of residents' constitutional rights.
'The lawsuit seeks to hold federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, accountable for policies and practices that violate the Fourth and Tenth amendments of the United States Constitution and the Administrative Procedure Act,' Montbello Mayor Salvador Menendez said at the press conference.
'And let me be clear, we cannot allow families to be torn apart without due process, and we cannot stand silent while the constitutional rights of our residents are trampled,' he added.
Updated at 5:30 p.m. EDT
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
19 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Patriot System Will Be Sent to Ukraine, Trump Says
President Trump said Sunday the U.S. will send Patriot air-defense systems to Ukraine that will be paid for by the European Union, and he again criticized Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'It'll be business for us, and we will send them Patriots, which they desperately need, because Putin really surprised a lot of people,' Trump said. 'He talks nice, and then he bombs everybody in the evening,' he added on his way back to the White House from New Jersey. 'There's a little bit of a problem there, and I don't like it.'
The Hill
29 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump says US will send Patriot missiles to Ukraine
President Trump on Sunday said that the United States will be sending Patriot air defense munitions to Ukraine, reiterating his disappointment with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The president wouldn't say how many Patriot systems or missiles will go to Ukraine but noted the U.S. isn't going to be paying for the supply. 'I haven't agreed on the number yet, but they're going to have some because they do need protection, but the European Union is paying for it. We're not paying anything for it, but we will send it,' Trump told reporters at Joint Base Andrews on his return to Washington. He added, 'we will send them Patriots, which they desperately need because Putin has really surprised a lot of people. He talks nice and then he bombs everybody in the evening. A little bit of a problem there. I don't like it.' He also said he will have a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte at the White House on Monday. Trump on Thursday said a deal has been struck with NATO to send weapons to Ukraine, with the military alliance bearing the brunt of the cost. Trump has grown increasingly frustrated with Putin, saying earlier this month after a call with him that the Russian leader has made 'no progress' in ending the three-year war in Eastern Europe. The Defense Department last week halted the delivery of some air defense missiles and munitions to Ukraine, citing concerns about U.S. military stockpiles being depleted. The White House at the time confirmed the decision, saying it was made after a review of the U.S. military's backing of other nations around the world. Trump reversed course days later, with the Pentagon saying Tuesday it would send 'additional defensive weapons to Ukraine to ensure the Ukrainians can defend themselves while we work to secure a lasting peace and ensure the killing stops,' citing Trump's direction for the move. Trump later told reporters that he didn't know who approved the weapons shipment halt.
Axios
31 minutes ago
- Axios
Fed explains its mega-renovation project as Trump pressures Powell
The Federal Reserve has offered key details of its expensive headquarters renovation project, which the Trump administration has invoked as potential grounds to try to fire Fed chair Jerome Powell. Why it matters: The White House appears to be using cost overruns in the $2.5 billion project on the National Mall to build a case for dismissing Powell for cause, amid the president's unheeded demands for the Fed to cut interest rates. Zoom out: The Fed asserts, in a new posting on its website Sunday evening, that many of the costs of the project are necessary to bring two nearly century-old buildings up to modern standards, and do not reflect exorbitant public expenditures. It further asserts that the Fed is not subject to direction from a Washington planning organization that the Trump administration appears to be seeking to use to pressure the central bank. It all is occurring against a backdrop of the president's open rage that Powell and the Fed are leaving interest rates steady rather than cutting them. Driving the news: Top Trump economist Kevin Hassett suggested earlier on Sunday that the president might consider firing Powell over the building issue. Trump added fuel to the fire later. "Jerome Powell has been very bad for our country. We should have the lowest interest rates on Earth and we don't," he told reporters on Sunday, before adding: "And yet he is spending $2.5 billion rebuilding the Federal Reserve building." "He should quit," Trump said. Catch up quick: The expanded FAQs — an earlier version of which were posted late Friday — address a key issue raised by Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, in a letter sent to the Fed last week. Vought, who requested a response by the end of this week, is trying to gauge whether the Fed's renovations are out of step with plans approved by the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) in 2021 — and thus a violation of a law governing National Mall construction. Vought appears to be trying to catch Powell in a legal vise, suggesting that either he lied to Congress by stating last month that several high-end aspects of the projects' plans had been canceled, or that the Fed violated the National Capital Planning Act by changing those features without NCPC approval. What they're saying: "[T]he Board generally is not subject to direction from the NCPC on its building projects," the Fed says in the update posted on Sunday. It adds that even if the Fed did answer to the NCPC, only substantial changes to design or project plans are required to be reviewed by the commission. The Fed said it did not believe the changes it made to its project would require "further review" from plans approved in 2021. The intrigue: Powell told Congress last month that some controversial, high-end renovations — a private elevator leading to a private dining room and a rooftop gardens with beehives — included in the Republican attacks were taken out of context or were not part of the Fed's current plan. "Beginning in 2023, the Board made a small number of design changes to remove certain elements and added no new elements," the Fed said in its posted response. The Fed said that "rooftop spaces and new water features on the building grounds, were scaled back or eliminated as the project moved forward." It added that the Fed canceled a separate planned renovation of another building "in light of higher-than-expected construction costs." The bottom line: In its FAQ, the Fed states that the project "will reduce costs over time by allowing the Board to consolidate most of its operations.
