Zabariah assumes duties as Court of Appeal president
In a letter dated yesterday, Chief Justice of Malaya Tan Sri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim, who is assuming the powers and duties of the Chief Justice, said Zabariah's appointment, effective yesterday, is made under Section 9 (3) (a) of the Court of Judicature Act 1964.
According to the letter, she is to exercise the powers and duties of the Court of Appeal president until the position is permanently filled.
A copy of the letter was also sent to the Chief Justice of Sabah and Sarawak, Tan Sri Abdul Rahman Sebli, Federal Court Chief Registrar Datuk Zamri Bakar and Court of Appeal Registrar Jumirah Marjuki.
Zabariah was appointed as a Judicial Commissioner and later served at the Kuala Lumpur High Court on January 5, 2009.
She was confirmed as a High Court judge on Aug 9, 2010, and on Jan 2, 2013, was assigned to the Seremban High Court. In 2016, she returned to serve as a High Court judge at the Kuala Lumpur High Court.
Zabariah was appointed as a Court of Appeal Judge on March 21, 2016, and as a Federal Court judge on Dec 5, 2019. She turned 66 last April 10, but was given a six-month extension.
In March, Zabariah was appointed as a member of the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC).
The President of the Court of Appeal of Malaysia is the second-highest position in the Malaysian judiciary after the Chief Justice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
7 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Teoh Beng Hock case may reopen if new evidence emerges, says Azalina
KUALA LUMPUR: The investigation into the death of Teoh Beng Hock may be revisited if new developments emerge in the future, despite the case being classified as No Further Action (NFA). Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said this is because criminal cases are not bound by any statute of limitations. "Unlike civil cases, criminal cases are not subject to any statute of limitations. "As such, if new developments arise in the future, further investigation and a review of the case may still be carried out," she said in a written parliamentary reply. Azalina (BN-Pengerang) said this in response to Lim Guan Eng (PH-Bagan), who had enquired about the reasons for the Attorney-General's Chambers' (A-GC) decision to classify the case as NFA. Meanwhile, she also said that while the police had established a special investigation team to reopen the probe into Teoh's death following the Court of Appeal's 2014 decision to set aside the coroner's open verdict, there was insufficient evidence to support any criminal charge against any individual. "As such, NFA directive has been issued by the A-GC in relation to this investigation paper, and this matter was also explained in the A-GC's media statement dated May," she said. In May, the Teoh Beng Hock Association for Democratic Advancement revealed that Teoh's death has classified as NFA. Following the revelation, the AG-C said that there was insufficien t evidence to prove any offence against any individual under the law. Teoh was found dead on July 16, 2009, at the Plaza Masalam building after giving a statement to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) office on the 14th floor of the same building. He was the political secretary to then Seri Kembangan assemblyman Ean Yong Hian Wah, who was the Selangor executive councillor for local government, legalisation of illegal factories, and new village development. On Jan 5, 2011, the Shah Alam Coroner's Court ruled that Teoh's death in 2009 was not due to suicide or murder, and found that there was no third party in his death case. On July 21, 2011, the Royal Commission of Inquiry formed to investigate Teoh's death ruled that his death was due to suicide. On Sept 5, 2014, the Court of Appeal overturned the ruling on Teoh's death, ruling that his death was the result of unlawful acts by one or more unknown persons.
New Straits Times
8 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Whistleblower identities to remain confidential under new committee, govt assures
KUALA LUMPUR: The government will not compromise on protecting whistleblowers' identities under the amended Whistleblower Protection Act, which includes a soon-to-be-formed Whistleblower Protection Committee. Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform), Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said any information submitted to the committee will not include confidential details, in line with Section 8 of the Act, which stipulates the prohibition on the disclosure of such information, including a whistleblower's identity, except under limited legal circumstances. She also said the safeguard is essential to prevent any risk of information leakage and to ensure that the identity of whistleblowers remains protected as stipulated under the law. "With the amendment, the committee will be responsible for ensuring more systematic coordination and monitoring of the overall implementation of this act. "The committee will also be tasked with gathering and coordinating statistics and data related to disclosures and complaints received by enforcement agencies, to ensure the effectiveness of the act can be continuously monitored. "Any statistics, data or information submitted to the committee must not include any confidential information protected under Section 8 of this act, to prevent any risk of information leakage. "This, in turn, provides assurance that the identity of whistleblowers remains protected as stipulated, thereby ensuring its effectiveness," she said during the tabling of the second reading of the Whistleblower Protection (Amendment) Bill 2025 in Dewan Rakyat, today. She also said the committee chairperson and members will be appointed by the minister. She added that with the establishment of the committee, there will also be a more focused entity to assess the effectiveness of the act through the data and statistics obtained. This will enable more detailed analysis of trends in disclosures of improper conduct, the level of protection provided, as well as any shortcomings in the implementation of the act that require improvement, she said. At the same time, through the amendment, Azalina said specific limits or restrictions on the disclosure of improper conduct will no longer be imposed. As such, she said, misconduct may now be reported to enforcement agencies even if certain restrictions under other written laws had previously limited such disclosures. She added that Malaysian law provides that if a disclosure is made honestly and in the public interest, it may be recognised and protected, even if it involves information that is typically restricted or bound by confidentiality agreements. She also said several countries have implemented more comprehensive whistleblower protection mechanisms to strengthen their effectiveness. "In terms of the disclosure of confidential matters, global approaches in countries such as the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand clearly show that public interest considerations serve as the main basis for allowing the release of confidential or otherwise restricted information. "This practice clearly reflects that whistleblower protection must take precedence over confidentiality restrictions when there is significant public interest involved, in line with global best practices aimed at encouraging more individuals to come forward without fear of legal repercussions," she said.
Focus Malaysia
9 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Balance of trade between nations need to reflect parity and equality
ONE of the reasons cited by US President Donald Trump in increasing trade tariffs with Malaysia is that the balance of trade has been in Malaysia's favour for many years, and that the Malaysian government has not seriously addressed the problem. Trump had expressed hopes that higher tariffs could redress the situation and expects Malaysia to purchase a more wider range of American goods and products. Many nations too have lopsided balance of trade with the US and this is one of the reasons for the much-feared Trump's tariffs worldwide which will begin to be implemented from Aug 1. Numerous countries have taken advantage of the large unrestricted open US market to increase exports exponentially but buy back less in imports leading to an unfavourable balance of trade. The US has lost out to many countries in the trade of agricultural and manufactured goods as well as services. This is the reason why the US is now the world's biggest debtor nation. Many American multi-national have also added to the problems by opening new manufacturing centres outside the US to take advantage of lower labour costs and other incentives and exporting their products to the US for higher profits. This has led to the famous 'rust belt', a vast number of US factories that had been shuttered down due to economic changes. This became a major socio-economic issue during the presidential elections. The range of products and services the US depends on worldwide especially from the European Union (EU) and Asean countries has increased manyfold over the last few decade and is straining the US economy with the huge range imports which are not matched with imports by these countries. This has been cited as one of the reasons for the much talked about decline of the US as a superpower. Trump is imposing punitive tariffs on nation he feels are restricting US imports through restrictions, regulations and import substitution. The entry of China as a big time trading nation has upset the balance of trade internationally. China's economy of scale has led to cheaper and competitive prices and many nations have lost their erstwhile monopoly. Previously, Malaysia trade with the US was more balanced as Malaysia used to buy a large range of manufactured products and other goods and services from the US. However, the situation has drastically changed when China began flooding its products in Malaysia. This led to Malaysia buying less from not only the US but also the EU, among others. Malaysia often lauds its favourable trade balance as an economic achievement and advantage but does not take into account the disadvantage it causes to others. For a healthy trading relationship there should not be a very wide gulf or deficit between trading partners. Another country with a perennially lopsided balance of trade with Malaysia is India. India has had an unfavourable balance of trade with Malaysia for decades. India is Malaysia's largest importer of palm oil and is one of the main countries Malaysia considers to sell off any glut arising in palm oil. This enables palm oil prices to be kept high and well above production costs. The palm oil sector has been one of the most profitable and Malaysia reaps billions of ringgit due to high prices fuelled by large scale imports by India. In fact whenever palm oil exporters get wind of prospective large scale purchase of palm oil from India due to domestic vegetable oil shortage or demand for festivals many of these exporters and speculators jack up the prices. The situation became so exploitative more than a decade ago when India decided to have a more stable palm oil pricing with a government to government arrangement with Indonesia. Needless to say Malaysia-India trade ties need to become more balanced and fair to both sides. Malaysia needs to import more from India considering the presently wide range of manufactured as well as tradition products from India. Indian investors and businesses need to reciprocate by increasing their economic activities in Malaysia and their involvement in the IT and related sectors is one way to improve the balance of trade. The Malaysian Indian community should look into good investment opportunities in Tamil Nadu as the government is providing various incentives for export-related manufacturing for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and larger firms. Alternatively, joint ventures between India and Malaysia need to be increased .This will also help redress the gap between imports and exports. Governments worldwide need to ensure that the balance of trade is fair and amicable for both sides and ensure that exploitative restrictions, over-regulation and domestic discrimination as well as unfair practices do not lead to countries reacting with higher tariffs and taxes. Trump's tariffs show how the US now unilaterally reacts to stop the disadvantages to the US economy. He has shown the way as to how to redress unfavourable trade balances with tariffs and other restrictions to save a country's economy. Tariffs will be a feature of the future with more nations feeling they are being exploited through unfair and discriminatory trade practices. Suffice to say, the days of unrestricted open markets are officially over. ‒ July 22, 2025 V. Thomas is a Focus Malaysia viewer. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: AFP/Andrew Hanik
