
Trump's DEI assault leaves Boston's Black cultural institutions in peril
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
But then the rug was pulled out. Amid the new Trump administration's frenzy of culture-altering cuts, a letter arrived this spring from the grant's provider, the US Institute of Museum and Library Services. The award was cancelled, the letter said, in part because it 'no longer serves the interest of the United States.' Now, Trent said, the museum's future is uncertain, including an outside chance it will have to close.
Advertisement
The Museum of African American History had a $500,000 federal grant canceled.
Brett Phelps for The Boston Globe
Similar cuts at cultural institutions across the country have wrought damage far and wide. But the Trump administration's drive to abolish diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, and,
seemingly, to quash all efforts to illuminate Black experience,
have hit Black cultural groups especially hard.
Advertisement
'It has been an attack since January on this field,' said Vedet Coleman-Robinson, head of the Association of African American Museums, adding that corporate bookings and overall visitor numbers have fallen since Trump mounted his sustained assault on DEI efforts.
'While we have stamina, and while we are tenacious, I think that everybody is just trying to get to the next day.'
For many, it is a moment of profound cultural whiplash. Black groups that saw a surge in interest in their work after the murder of George Floyd must now contend with the Trump administration's assertion
that their elevation of Black culture is racist. And while other organizations can now simply soft-peddle, or even table, DEI initiatives, Black cultural groups are often mission-driven to present Black narratives of nuance and complexity.
'There's a target on my back,' said Trent, whose museum has campuses in Boston and Nantucket. 'We're all trying to figure out how to survive.'
The effects are being felt well beyond the world of museums. Front Porch Arts Collective, a Black-led theater company in Boston, and Castle of our Skins, a Black musical arts group, were among a small cohort of up-and-coming New England cultural groups that recently lost sizable awards
from a National Endowment for the Arts pilot program meant to support groups that had shown a '
Led by co-producing artistic directors Maurice Emmanuel Parent and Dawn M. Simmons, Front Porch has thrived in recent years. The theater troupe, which regularly works with more established companies to co-produce shows about the African diaspora, has sextupled its operating budget and now has seven employees, three of them full-time.
Advertisement
Dawn M. Simmons and Maurice Emmanuel Parent, co-producing artistic directors at Front Porch Arts Collective, had funding terminated by the NEA.
Jonathan Wiggs/Globe Staff
The $130,000 NEA grant was going to help them create a permanent home in Roxbury, fund salaries, and offer free community and education programs.
Boston-based Castle of our Skins has made similar strides. The group, which collaborates with artists and organizations to present African diasporic music, garnered two NEA grants last year totaling $140,000. Then, in December, the group
secured its own performance and events space to be built in the Lower Roxbury/South End neighborhood.
Castle of our Skins co-founder and artistic director Ashleigh Gordon compared the last year to the 1980s-era video game 'Paperboy.'
'The whole point is that you're supposed to deliver the paper to someone's doorstep, and there's like a car, and a lawnmower, and a snake, and all these things sort of jumping out,' she said. 'We just want to build our organization, and then there's these things being thrown at us, which present their own Pandora's box of stresses.'
Simmons (center) and Parent (foreground) at a rehearsal last year for 'A Strange Loop."
Nile Scott Studios
Front Porch's Parent said he began to worry their NEA funds might be in jeopardy after president Trump won the November election.
'I just kind of saw the writing on the wall,' said Parent, who like other grant recipients in the NEA pilot program
received half the funds up front. He
noted that part of the company's mission is 'to advance racial equity through theater.' 'Look at the population of people that run the organizations receiving these grants and the populations being served.'
The Institute of Museum and Library Services grant cancellations
Advertisement
For Trent, whose Museum of African American History had already received a portion of the canceled grant, that includes whether schools will come for field trips at all.
'Is visiting us now a high risk activity?' she asked. 'Is there potential, given the circumstances, for a school to lose federal support?'
Black leaders said they've also been frustrated by the Trump administration's stated position that DEI efforts are discriminatory.
'We are a Black theater company, but we have never said we're only for Black people,' said Parent. 'Having knowledge of our community makes our entire Commonwealth better, just like having knowledge of all communities makes us all better.'
Simmons, who will become
'Somebody who's telling predominantly white stories wants us to come, wants us to see all of those stories,' she said. 'They think that there is a place for us there. Why would the reverse not be true?'
Meanwhile, Parent, like many nonprofit leaders, has been watching closely Harvard University's showdown with president Trump, who's floated the idea of stripping the school's nonprofit status.
'Take nonprofit status away from organizations, and we would all fold,' he said. 'People get tax breaks for giving to us. If that goes away, we don't have enough revenue to keep going.'
But Castle of our Skins executive director Ciyadh Wells said her organization will remain 'steadfast in our mission.'
'Our organization has been threatened, but we are going to continue,' said Wells, whose organization lost a total of $80,000 in canceled grants.
'If anything, it makes us double down.'
Advertisement
Castle of our Skins honors Fredrick Douglass with a performance at the Museum of African American History.
Heather Diehl for the Boston Glo
On a recent Sunday afternoon, Gordon and other Castle of our Skins
musicians performed for a small crowd at the African Meeting House on Beacon Hill. The program -- which included works by Black composers interspersed with excerpts from Frederick Douglass's speech 'What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?" -- was at once celebratory and defiant.
It was just the sort of program the museum's founder, Sue Bailey Thurman,
likely envisioned when she founded the
museum nearly 60 years ago.
'This whole idea starts from a woman who arrives in 1953 and thinks that Black history in Boston should be marked and preserved,' Trent had said while seated in the Meeting House a few days earlier. 'You don't want to be the leader who had to close it down.'
Ashleigh Gordan, viola player for Castle of our Skins, honored Fredrick Douglass with a performance at the Museum of African American History.
Heather Diehl for the Boston Glo
Malcolm Gay can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
4 minutes ago
- New York Post
Anti-Trump DA Alvin Bragg sure acts like he has something to hide — we're suing to find out
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg holds potentially hundreds of communications appearing to link his office to senior Biden administration officials and other political actors in connection with his unprecedented criminal prosecution of then-former President Donald Trump. We've asked for those records, and he's not turning them loose. So we're taking him to court. Last September, America First Policy Institute launched a formal investigation into the people and motivations behind Bragg's decision to prosecute Trump. Advertisement Our effort had a simple goal: figuring out whether Bragg's case was a routine legal probe — or lawfare, a politically engineered hit job orchestrated to influence the 2024 election. The charges brought against Trump were extraordinary. Never before has a question of federal campaign-finance law — which the FEC declined to pursue, no less — been morphed into a state-level misdemeanor, already time-barred under New York law, then Frankensteined into a felony by alleging it was committed to conceal some other crime never defined by the prosecution, nor unanimously agreed upon by jury. Advertisement Confusing? That's the point. Bragg's office thrives on obfuscation. Public records should be accessible. Criminal prosecutions should be transparent. This case was neither — and still isn't. We were drawn to investigate because we saw just too many coincidences to ignore. Michael Colangelo, a top DOJ official with a focus on white-collar crime, left his Biden administration post to join Bragg's office just months before Trump was indicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records. Advertisement Judge Juan Merchan, who presided over Bragg's prosecution, had a history of political donations to Biden and to political groups opposed to Trump, the defendant before him. He was officially 'cautioned' on that by the state ethics board. Merchan's daughter Loren worked on Kamala Harris' 2020 campaign and during Trump's trial served as president of Authentic Campaigns, a progressive political consulting firm hired by the Biden-Harris ticket. It all paints a curious picture: A DA who campaigned on a promise to take down Trump, aided by a Biden DOJ veteran, bringing legally contorted charges before a judge with clear partisan connections. Advertisement If this wasn't coordinated, it's one lucky political pile-up. The American people deserve answers. In pursuit of those answers, and in defense of the public's right to know, AFPI submitted a request to Bragg's office under New York's Freedom of Information Law in September 2024. We sought any records that could shed light on whether political influence or coordination played a role in Bragg's decision-making. Our request was specific, lawfully submitted and directly tied to one of the most consequential legal proceedings in modern American history. Ten months later, no records have been produced. None. Though they apparently exist. Instead of providing transparency, the DA's office has engaged in delay, double-talk and silence. We've asked for a list of responsive documents. They won't give one. Advertisement We've asked which of our specific requests the withheld documents pertain to. They won't say. We know, based on our investigation and his office's limited correspondence with us, that the DA possesses hundreds of records of communications with or about political agents who should have had no influence in a 'routine' prosecution, like Lauren Merchan's Authentic Campaigns. Bragg refuses to explain why the public isn't entitled to see them. There is no legal justification for this blackout. No privilege excuses total stonewalling. Advertisement There is only evasion. It's been nearly a year. The records exist, and the DA cannot explain why they remain secret. That alone should raise alarms. AFPI has now turned to the courts to compel compliance. The law does not permit selective transparency by the Manhattan DA. It does not allow politically sensitive cases to be shielded from scrutiny. Advertisement As the New York Legislature declared when it passed the state's open-records law in 1977, 'The people's right to know the process of governmental decision-making and to review the documents leading to determinations is basic to our society.' We agree. Advertisement That's why on July 17, AFPI filed its petition in New York County Superior Court requesting that Bragg's records, whatever they may reveal, be released to the public. The law demands openness, and we intend to see it enforced. Jessica Steinmann is executive general counsel and Jack Casali is an attorney at the Center for Litigation at the America First Policy Institute


Axios
4 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Dems think they can get ahold of Epstein's birthday book
House Democrats are trying to get their hands on the now-infamous book celebrating Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday after it was suggested the disgraced financier's estate is in possession of it, Axios has learned. Why it matters: As the minority party in Congress, Democrats have been largely toothless in their attempts to investigate President Trump. They believe this is a rare opportunity to obtain concrete information. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who is leading the effort, told Axios it would be "very difficult" to obtain the book if it was in the hands of the Department of Justice. "In this case, you literally have a private attorney," said the California Democrat. "A private attorney is much more likely to comply. It's a much easier challenge than going after the administration." Driving the news: Khanna and House Oversight Committee ranking member Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) wrote to attorneys for the Epstein estate's executors asking for a "complete, unredacted copy" of the book, according to a copy of their letter obtained by Axios. Citing Wall Street Journal reporting that Trump submitted a poem and drawing for the book, the lawmakers wrote that it may be "essential" for a probe of the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein matter. Trump has denied the Wall Street Journal's reporting and sued the outlet for libel. What they're saying: " We write with deep concern regarding potential public corruption, abuse of power, and failures in the federal law enforcement response to the Epstein case," Khanna and Garcia wrote. They argued that members of the Oversight Committee should be permitted to review the book before deposing Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who reportedly put it together. "Information gathered from this document may also inform the development of legislative reforms addressing sex trafficking networks, financial regulation, or other critical matters," they added. State of play: Brad Edwards, a lawyer for over 200 of Epstein's victims, said in an MSNBC appearance Thursday, "I know the executors of the estate are in possession of that book." "If somebody simply called" Epstein's executors "and said, 'Give us the book,' they would probably give you the book," Edwards said. "They have attorneys, their attorneys are good people. If they didn't just voluntarily turn over the book out of fear of reprisal, Congress could just issue a subpoena to their attorneys ... they would turn the book over immediately." The three attorneys for Epstein's executors did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Axios. What's next: Khanna and Garcia asked that Epstein's estate turn over the book by August 10. Khanna told Axios: "I will make sure, if we get it, that whatever we do in terms of releasing it is what the victims want, what the victims' attorney wants, and not just trying to score partisan points." "If the victims don't want certain things, I am going to guarantee that the victims are the topmost consideration," he said. "But I do believe that they will want some of it released and once we get it, we can."


Axios
4 minutes ago
- Axios
Salt Lake City named USDA hub in federal reshuffling
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is moving most of its employees from Washington, D.C., to five hubs, including Salt Lake City. Why it matters: Shifting operations to Utah's capital could give the state's farmers and ranchers more access to federal officials — and potentially shape policies that better serve the Mountain West. The big picture: The move, announced Thursday by Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, will close nearly all USDA offices in D.C. It is part of the Trump administration's effort to cut costs and consolidate the federal government. The other agriculture hubs include: Raleigh, North Carolina; Kansas City, Missouri; Indianapolis; and Fort Collins, Colorado. Despite the relocation, USDA has maintained that its critical functions "will continue uninterrupted," according to a news release. Reality check: While Utah's cost of living is lower than D.C.'s, it still has one of the nation's most expensive housing markets. Salt Lake City's federal salary locality rate is about 17%. Zoom in: Utah's farmland totaled about 10.5 million acres in 2023 — one-fifth of the state's total land area, according to the University of Utah's Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute. Utah ranks 25th among U.S. states for total farmland. What they're saying: Utah Republican leaders, including Gov. Spencer Cox and U.S. Sen. John Curtis, celebrated Rollins' Thursday announcement. "The USDA's decision to refocus on its core mission, supporting farmers, families, and rural communities, is long overdue," Curtis posted on X. "Utahns are the best at advocating for and advancing American agriculture." The other side: U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) called the decision a "half-baked proposal," warning it could affect the USDA's "ability to provide critical services for Americans" and farmers.