Dutch intelligence services say Russia has stepped up use of banned chemical weapons in Ukraine
The Netherlands' military intelligence and the security service, together with the German intelligence service, found that the use of prohibited chemical weapons by the Russian military had become 'standardized and commonplace' in Ukraine.
According to the findings, the Russian military uses chloropicrin and riot control agent CS against sheltering Ukrainian soldiers, who are then forced out into the open and shot.
Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans called for more sanctions against Moscow, and continued military support for Kyiv.
Brekelmans, who stayed on in a caretaker role after the Dutch government collapsed last month, said that he doesn't want to see the use of chemical weapons become normalized.
Lowering the threshold for use 'is not only dangerous for Ukraine, but also for the rest of Europe and the world,' he said in a statement.
Russia has signed up to the Chemical Weapons Convention, which bans the use of chloropicrin and CS as weapons. The convention's watchdog, The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, or OPCW, has found several incidents in Ukraine involving CS, but the group hasn't conducted a full investigation, which must be requested by the member states.
The executive committee for the OPCW is holding a regular meeting next week, where it's expected to discuss the conflict in Ukraine.
Russian authorities didn't immediately comment on the findings, but they have denied using chemical weapons in the past, instead alleging that Ukraine has used the banned substances.
According to Ukraine, Russia has carried out 9,000 chemical weapons attacks in the country since the start of the full-scale invasion in 2022.
In 2024, the U.S. State Department said that it had recorded the use of chloropicrin against Ukrainian troops.
___
Follow the AP's coverage of the war at https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Former Labour Leader Comes Up With Brutal Farage Nickname For New Corbyn-Led Party
Ex-Labour leader Neil Kinnock just came up with a brutal new nickname for the alternative party Jeremy Corbyn is trying to set up: the Farage Assistance Group. Suspended Labour MP Zarah Sultana quit the party this week and announced she was starting up a new group with former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, who was expelled from the party in 2024. Corbyn released his own statement on Friday suggesting discussions around the new party 'are ongoing' – while promising 'change is coming'. On Sky News' Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips, the presenter asked Kinnock, now a Labour peer, 'how serious a threat' this new Corbyn-led group might be. Kinnock noted they were already struggling to think up a name and so suggested one himself: 'Farage Assistance Group.' Reform UK is currently leading in the polls as dissatisfaction with the Labour government rises. He explained: 'The reality is, and everybody knows it, a division in the anti-conservative – capital C or small c – anti-right wing vote can only assist the parties of the right, the Conservatives especially now, and that is bad enough, and Farage's Reform party. 'The splintering, fragmentation offered by a new party of the left they say – I've got my doubts about that – of the left can only be of assistance to the enemies of Labour of the working class, people who have no means to sustain themselves, other than the sale of labour, by hand and by brain. 'It can be of benefit to the egos of those running the central party – and they haven't decide who should do that yet either!' Kinnock, who led the opposition from 1983 to 1992, also said he does not think Starmer 'should worry himself too much' about Corbyn or Nigel Farage. 'He's the prime minister, he would be punching down,' he continued. 'But there are other people throughout the party who should be taking Corbyn and Reform very seriously.' He warned there could be voter 'seepage' away from Labour unless these groups are addressed. Kinnock went on to describe because Reform as the 'natural enemies of progressives'. 'You've just got to look at them and listen to them to know that they're following the classic pattern,' he said. According to the Labour peer, the right-wingers have managed to first find and harvest division, then found someone to blame, and followed up with simplistic responses to complex problems. #TrevorPhillips: How serious a threat do you think a Corbyn party is going to be? Lord Kinnock: I understand they're having a little difficulty over the name... I suggest they call themselves the Farage assistance group... # — Haggis_UK 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 (@Haggis_UK) July 6, 2025 Labour MP Accuses Government Of Behaving Like Flat-Earthers Over Waspi Women 'I Strongly Disagree': Yvette Cooper Hits Back After Ex-Labour MP Attacks Government Jeremy Corbyn 'To Set Up New Left-Wing Party' With Former Labour MP
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Plan to scrap two-child benefit cap ‘dead in the water' after welfare U-turn
Sir Keir Starmer will not scrap the two-child benefit cap after his U-turn on welfare cuts left a £5bn hole in Labour's spending plans. Senior Labour figures have reportedly warned that tax hikes are on the horizon after the benefits climbdown, with a change in the controversial cap, introduced when George Osborne was chancellor, now thought to be off the table. 'My assessment is that is now dead in the water,' a No 10 source told The Sunday Times. A source close to the chancellor added: 'MPs will need to acknowledge that there is a financial cost to not approving the welfare changes, whether that's tax rises or not scrapping the two-child benefit cap. They need to understand the trade-offs.' The prospect of Labour keeping the two-child benefit cap in place will provoke fresh unrest among Labour backbenchers, who have a taste for rebellion after forcing Sir Keir's hand on cuts to the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability benefit. Sir Keir is believed to have told his cabinet he wants to scrap the two-child cap - first imposed by Osborne in 2015. Critics of the policy, which restricts parents from claiming certain benefits for more than two of their children, say it pushes children into poverty. Charities frequently cite the £3.4bn move as one of the most cost effective ways of alleviating child poverty. Asked on Thursday whether he still wanted to scrap the two-child cap, Sir Keir said: 'The last Labour government drove down child poverty and it's one of the proudest things that we did. 'Sadly, the last government allowed child poverty to go back up again. 'I'm determined that this government will drive it down, just as the last Labour government did. 'We've got a strategy and a task force working on this and will lay out the details of that. I personally don't think there's a silver bullet that if you do this one thing, it will deal with child poverty.' Labour's Child Poverty Taskforce, headed by work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall and education secretary Bridget Phillipson, was due to report in the spring but was delayed until the autumn. Pressure on the PM over the two-child benefit cap will likely increase in the run up to this autumn's Budget, in which Rachel Reeves has been warned she must raise taxes or put Labour's agenda at risk. Jim O'Neill, a former Goldman Sachs chief turned Treasury minister who quit the Conservatives and later advised Ms Reeves, said she faces no choice but to abandon key parts of her economic policy – including her commitment not to raise income tax, national insurance contributions for employees or VAT. 'Without changing some of the big taxes, welfare and pensions, they [Labour] can't commit to things like Northern Powerhouse Rail, small modular nuclear reactors, and various other things that will make an investment and growth difference,' he told The Independent.

Washington Post
3 hours ago
- Washington Post
Russia's ‘anti-woke' visa lures those fearing a moral decline in the West
In a brightly lit conference room of a Moscow police department, a smiling officer flanked by Russian flags and gilded double-headed eagles handed over small blue booklets to an American family of five — asylum certificates granting them the right to live and work in Russia after fleeing Texas because they felt their way of life was under threat.