Dollar slips again on caution over US economy, Aussie falls after RBA
TOKYO (Reuters)The dollar slipped on Tuesday after declining for a week, weighed down by the Federal Reserve's caution over the economy and as US lawmakers came closer to passing a bill expected to widen the nation's fiscal deficit.The greenback sold off broadly on Monday following last week's downgrade of the US sovereign rating by Moody's on deficit concerns. Now attention turns to a critical vote in Washington over US President Donald Trump's sweeping tax cuts.Dollar selling continued on Tuesday, leaving the US currency down 0.35% against the yen at 144.305 hitting a fresh 12-day low. The euro rose 0.14% to $1.1259, and the Swiss franc strengthened, pushing the dollar down 0.2% to 0.83280 francs.Bucking the trend was the Australian dollar which edged lower after the Reserve Bank of Australia's cut benchmark interest rates by 25 basis points and left the door open to further easing in the months ahead. It was last down 0.59% to $0.64195, trimming a 0.8% gain on Monday.Trump is expected to join the congressional debate over his tax bill on Tuesday. The vote comes after Moody's stripped the US government of its top-tier credit rating, citing concerns over the nation's growing $36.2 trillion debt pile.Trump's bill would add $3 trillion to $5 trillion to the debt, according to nonpartisan analysts. Ballooning fiscal debt, trade frictions, and weakened confidence have weighed on US assets. The US dollar index has tumbled as much as 10.6% from its January highs, one of the sharpest retreats for a three-month period.The dollar got a breather after Trump paused many of the largest tariffs he announced last month. But comments from Japan's top trade envoy on Tuesday that Tokyo was firm in its anti-tariff stance pointed to no easy off-ramp in the negotiations in the weeks and months ahead.And in the wake of Trump's tariff turmoil, Britain on Monday agreed to the most significant reset of defence and trade ties with the European Union since Brexit.The pound was last up 0.16% at 1.33840 having risen 0.6% on Monday.
"Optimism surrounding key UK economic data and a major political breakthrough has fuelled sterling's gains alongside broad-based dollar weakness," wrote George Vessey, lead FX and macro strategist at Convera.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
5 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
UAE navigates global tariff storm with oil stability and fiscal strength
As global markets brace for a new wave of US tariffs and shifting Opec+ production strategies, the UAE appears firmly grounded, thanks to strategic oil exemptions, fiscal resilience, and a diversified economy, analysts say. With President Donald Trump reinstating a hardline trade agenda, a series of sweeping tariffs are scheduled to take effect on August 1. These include duties of up to 50 per cent on copper and significant increases on imports from Brazil, Japan, South Korea, and 14 other nations. Analysts fear escalating trade tensions could disrupt global supply chains and stoke inflationary pressure across import-heavy economies. Yet amid this volatility, the UAE stands out as an outlier. According to Razan Hilal, Market Analyst, CMT at 'While global headlines focus on tariff escalation, the exemption of crude oil from US tariffs protects a key revenue stream for the UAE.' This safeguard ensures that the UAE's vital energy sector remains insulated from a major external shock, allowing the country to maintain stable export flows at a time when volatility is the global norm. Concurrently, the latest developments within Opec+ may play in the UAE's favour. A subset of the alliance, including the UAE, has announced an unexpected increase of 548,000 barrels per day in August as part of a gradual unwind of voluntary production cuts. With Brent crude trading above $68 and WTI maintaining support above $67, Hilal sees a strong fiscal upside. 'Recovering global oil demand and rising production are set to support fiscal inflows and growth momentum,' she said. At the monetary level, currency dynamics are adding nuance to the UAE's economic outlook. Hilal highlights the precarious position of the US dollar: 'The US dollar hovers just above a 17-year trendline extending from the 2008 lows. A breakdown below this level could strain the dirham peg and amplify import-driven inflation.' That said, she notes, if the dollar index (DXY) stays above the 96-zone, the dirham may recover in H2 2025, particularly against the euro and pound. What underpins the UAE's relative calm amid these global tremors? Hilal points to a blend of strategic buffers: 'Supported by economic diversification, oil price stability, and a proactive fiscal stance, the UAE remains well-positioned to absorb external shocks and preserve currency stability.' In a global landscape dominated by tariff tension and fluctuating energy dynamics, the UAE's steady footing showcases the advantage of long-term planning and diversified resilience. As other economies scramble for clarity, the Emirates are focused on execution, Hilal noted.
The National
6 hours ago
- The National
Jerome Powell is 'torturing America' with interest rates, says US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick
The Trump Administration is showing no sign that it will lessen its criticism of Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell, with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick saying that the Fed chairman was torturing the US. On CBS Face the Nation, Mr Lutnick echoed US President Donald Trump's sharp tone when talking about the Federal Reserve chairman, saying that he was doing the 'worst job', among other things. 'I don't know why he's torturing America this way,' he said, referring to Mr Powell's decision to not cut interest rates. CBS anchor Margaret Brennan pointed out to Mr Lutnick that Mr Powell does not unilaterally set the interest rates, but rather, a committee consisting of federal governors and the heads of central bank offices throughout the US. Later in the show, Democratic Congressman Jim Himes condemned Mr Lutnick for his choice of words. 'He said, 'Jay Powell is torturing the American people',' lamented Mr Himes, saying that Mr Lutnick was putting Mr Powell's physical safety at risk. 'What you just saw was a masterclass by a huckster and a con man who uses words like torture that are very, very dangerous words,' he continued. Mr Lutnick's decision to use words like 'torture' when referring to the US Federal Reserve chairman are the latest in a series of condemnations of Mr Powell from the Trump White House. It also comes after Mr Trump's own comments on Tuesday, when he denied reports that he intends to fire Mr Powell, a move that is largely unprecedented and would likely rock the markets. 'I talked about the concept of firing him. I said, 'what do you think?' Almost every one of them said I should, but I'm more conservative,' he said before a meeting with Bahrain's Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa. When asked if he would rule out the idea, Mr Trump said: 'I don't rule out anything but I think it's highly unlikely unless he has to leave for fraud.' That same day, Mr Trump continued to insist the Fed's current target rate of 4.25 per cent to 4.50 per cent should be three points lower. During his appearance on Face The Nation, Mr Lutnick said he was angry that the US 'had the same interest rates as Gabon,' and echoed Mr Trump's call for lower rates. 'Whether [President Trump] decides to let Jerome Powell stay on the job or not, I'll leave that to Donald Trump,' Mr Lutnick explained, while addressing speculation that Mr Trump might fire Mr Powell. Under the Federal Reserve Act, a president can remove a Federal Reserve official only 'for cause'. This means the White House must show a Fed official or its chairperson had committed an act of malfeasance or neglect of duty. A recent Supreme Court ruling upheld the notion that legal reasoning the White House has been used to fire officials at other independent federal agencies does not apply to the Fed. But the White House in recent weeks has launched a new phase of attack on the Federal Reserve, accusing Mr Powell of mismanaging the central bank given the ballooning renovation costs of its headquarters. Asked if Mr Powell should be investigated, Mr Trump said: 'Well, I think he's already under investigation. He spent far more money than he was supposed to rebuilding.' Mr Powell's term as Fed chairman expires next May. Reports in recent days had suggested that Mr Powell had managed to convince Mr Trump to lessen his threats to remove the Fed chairman before his term expires. While addressing those reports on Sunday, Mr Lutnick instead boasted of what described as Mr Trump's transparency. 'When he thinks something he says it,' Mr Lutnick added.
The National
8 hours ago
- The National
Despite the Sweida clashes, Trump's backing of Al Shara will remain solid
US President Donald Trump has boundless self-confidence. He is undoubtedly intelligent and bold, and a master of risk-taking and deal-making. But he sometimes puts blinkers on when dealing with the rest of the world. The problem with blinkers is that they lead to tunnel vision, obstructing the development of a broad or deep perspective, and reducing perception to a single direction. Mr Trump surrounds himself with family and a handful of billionaire loyalists, and often dismisses complexity, history and the fundamental principles of strategic policymaking. This has been evident in his handling of several global files, including the future of Syria – a country trying to get back on its feet after the exit of Bashar Al Assad's government last December. Syria is currently grappling with violent clashes in the southern province of Sweida, involving forces loyal to President Ahmad Al Shara's government, the Druze and the Bedouins living in that part of the country. The US President's Syria file is now effectively managed by Tom Barrack, his ambassador to Turkey. A billionaire businessman, Mr Barrack is savvy and politically attuned, but views policy primarily through an investment lens just like Mr Trump and his other close advisers. There is less emphasis on historically grounded political frameworks. For them, financial power is the foundation of geostrategy. Mr Trump's fondness for Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan – a relationship that is key to Syria's future – didn't arise overnight. Over the years, Mr Trump has lavished Mr Erdogan with praise, backed him within Nato, and accommodated his concerns regarding the Kurdish movement both inside and outside Syria. The US President agrees to Turkey's influence in Syria. Ankara's role in ousting the Assad establishment, pushing Iran out of Syria, and undercutting Russia's foothold there have all unfolded in full co-ordination with Washington. Indeed, Turkey alone might not have orchestrated these dramatic reversals in Syria without tacit US support. Today, Mr Al Shara's hold over power is the product of US-Turkish investment with backing from key Arab powers. These stakeholders see Mr Al Shara as a stabilising force who can prevent Syria from slipping into total chaos. They believe his background as leader of the now-defunct Hayat Tahrir Al Sham means he can negotiate with the fundamentalist forces he emerged from, and that he understands the language of appeasement needed to co-opt and contain them. Mr Trump's representatives in Syria and Turkey often sing in Ankara's choir. They view Turkey as the senior supervisor and guarantor in Syria, sharing influence with Washington and some of its Arab partners. For the US President's circle, this soft American tutelage over Syria is enough, the task delegated to Turkish influence over critical Syrian institutions, provided that Turkey and Israel maintain an understanding, even if through superficial cordiality. Israel remains America's foremost ally after all, and its share in any regional arrangements must therefore be always assured. The Trump administration is aligned with Israel's ambitions to establish a buffer zone inside Syria and to designate southern Syria a demilitarised zone. It supports Israel's annexation of the Golan Heights and is working on a framework for Israeli-Syrian security arrangements to replace the current UN Disengagement Observer Force. This would be a stepping stone to a transitional agreement and, eventually, a form of normalisation between the two neighbours. The Israelis, however, don't share the US's assessment of Syria's extremist factions. They don't believe Mr Al Shara is willing or able to dismantle these factions, nor that he can completely break with his past associations with key extremist groups. In other words, Israel is far less enthusiastic than the Trump team is about positioning Mr Al Shara as Syria's future. While Israel is open to forging new security agreements and even exploring versions of the Abraham Accords with Syria, it isn't prepared to invest in Mr Al Shara the way Washington and Ankara are. It doubts the Syrian President can meet American-Israeli demands because his core base would never allow it. That may be a realistic reading. In truth, Mr Al Shara's powers are either exaggerated – given that he lacks a viable army to enforce presidential authority independently – or he tacitly agrees with his base's opposition to the American-Israeli agenda but seeks to avoid direct confrontation with Israel due to the latter's military superiority. What matters most to Trump is the investment in Al Shara, working in tandem with Ankara, and nudging Israel towards a scenario in which Damascus does little to obstruct Israel's agenda The Trump administration is turning a blind eye to the recent clashes in Syria. The US President has put on his blinkers once again, unwilling even to consider that his policies might facilitate the resurgence of ISIS and other extremist groups. He is thus unconcerned about warnings of Syria's possible fragmentation and partition if the violence gets out of hand. That's why his administration has dismissed recent turmoil in Sweida as mere tribal skirmishes between the Druze and the Bedouins. Indeed, what matters most to Mr Trump is the investment in Mr Al Shara, working in tandem with Ankara, and nudging Israel towards a scenario in which Damascus does little to obstruct Israel's agenda. In exchange, the Syrian President would receive US support, perhaps including help to rebuild the military alongside securing international legitimacy and the promise of reintegration and reconstruction. The Trump administration understands that Russia is now out of Syria, with no path for return. And it is determined not to allow Iran any opening to re-enter Syria either. Yet Mr Trump and his advisers appear to believe that financial power solves all problems. They hence believe that co-opting figures aligned with Mr Al Shara – regardless of ideology – could help pacify them, based on the principle of resource-sharing to prevent territorial fragmentation. As for the Druze, the Trump camp believes it could fare better under a model of limited self-governance yet without full secession. It envisages a scenario in which this key minority group benefits from the envisioned buffer zone to enjoy a degree of autonomy within Syria's governing framework. What matters most to the Trump team is the conviction that a stable Syria is the strongest bulwark against an ISIS resurgence, and that Mr Al Shara is the lock on that door.
