When are the benefits changes happening - and what happens next with the welfare bill?
Sir Keir Starmer was facing a substantial rebellion of Labour backbenchers, many of whom backed an amendment which would have halted the bill in its tracks.
The PM managed to survive the showdown on Tuesday, however, after making a number of major concessions, including one just 90 minutes before the vote.
Disabilities minister Stephen Timms told MPs that any changes to eligibility for personal independence payment (Pip) will only be made after a review he is carrying out into the system is completed. New Pip eligibility criteria will also now only apply to new claimants from November 2026 under the changes.
Concerns still remain, however, with some pointing out the changes mean the reforms will no longer save money, and others fearing the impact of cuts to the health top-up of Universal Credit for new claimants.
While the bill passed its second reading 335 votes to 260, it still has some way to go before it actually becomes law. Here, Yahoo News explains what happens next.
The bill is due to be debated by MPs again on Wednesday, 9 July, in what is known as the "committee stage".
This usually follows within a couple of weeks of a bill receiving its second reading and sees detailed examination of the legislation take place. A "Committee of the Whole House" will be used, meaning all MPs will get to debate and vote.
MPs will have a chance to put forward amendments to the bill. Every clause in the legislation is agreed to, changed or removed, although this sometimes happens without debate.
Once the committee stage is finished, the bill returns to the floor of the Commons for its report stage, where the amended bill can be debated and further amendments proposed.
It will then have a third reading immediately afterwards, which will give MPs a final chance to debate the bill's contents.
Debate during a third reading is usually short and limited to what is actually in the bill, and amendments can no longer be proposed at this stage.
MPs will vote on whether to give it a third reading. If they do, the bill will go to the House of Lords, where it will go through the same stages as peers scrutinise the legislation. No date has been set for the bill's first reading - a largely procedural step - in the Lords.
If, during Wednesday's debate, the speaker certifies the bill as a "money bill", the Lords will have no power to oblige the Commons to consider any amendments it puts forward, and the bill will become law after a month, the Benefits and Work charity writes.
While reforms to the Pip system have been halted until after the Timms review, changes to Universal Credit are expected to come in from April 2026.
From 6 April, the UC health element would be roughly halved for most new recipients under the bill, from £432.27 a month to £217.26, then frozen for four years, according to a Commons briefing.
Existing claimants were already protected from this cut, and in another concession made by the government on Tuesday, they will now also be shielded from the rate freeze.
However, the bill will also increase the standard allowance (the main element of UC) above inflation over four financial years from 2026/27.
Changes to Pip introduced in the bill include a new requirement for claimants to score at least four points in one activity, such as washing or preparing food, to receive the benefit.
However, it is not clear when this will come into effect, as the government halted any changes to Pip until after the Timms review.
The Timms Review - a comprehensive review of the PIP assessment led by Sir Stephen Timms - officially began with the publication of its terms of reference on 30 June 2025.
It is expected to be concluded by Autumn 2026.
Announcing the last-minute change to MPs on Tuesday, Timms said: "[MPs]have raised concerns that the changes to PIP are coming ahead of the conclusions of the review of the assessment that I will be leading.
"We have heard those concerns, and that is why I can announce that we are going to remove clause 5 from the bill in committee.
"We will move straight to the wider review… and only make changes to PIP eligibility activities and descriptors following that review."
The government says this review will "ensure the system is fair, supportive and reflects the realities of modern life".
"It will be co-produced with disabled people, the organisations that represent them, and MPs with the core objective of delivering better experiences and better outcomes for disabled people and people with health conditions," it adds.
"The review aims to respond to the changing picture of population health over the last decade, including the rising prevalence of long-term health conditions and disability in the working-age population.
It follows criticism by MPs that the government did not formally consult with disability groups on the provisions of the legislation, nor attempt to co-produce the bill with them.
However, there was a consultation on the Get Britain Working green paper, which set out "plans and proposals to reform health and disability benefits and employment support".
The consultation closed on 30 June, with the government stating that a White Paper with final proposals will be published later in 2025. No official date has been announced.
Read more
Welfare U-turn makes spending decisions harder, Bridget Phillipson admits (The Independent)
'I'm relieved the government isn't changing DWP rules on PIP - but I fear future cuts' (NottinghamshireLive)
'I want to buy a house - will being on PIP affect my mortgage application?' (BirminghamLive)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
28 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
UK Races to Get US to Cut Steel Tariffs Ahead of Key Deadline
The UK is racing to secure US agreement to make operational a deal to eliminate tariffs on British steel ahead of a Wednesday deadline when American officials could choose instead to raise the levy to 50%. Eliminating the tariffs is critical to an already struggling British steel industry, because the US is the second-biggest export destination for the alloy from the UK.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UEFA Sanctions Force Chelsea into Crucial Summer Sales
Chelsea's Champions League Gamble: Pressure Mounts as UEFA Tightens Grip Financial Firepower Collides with UEFA Reality Chelsea's windfall from the Club World Cup — nearing £60 million after victory over Palmeiras — may glisten on the balance sheet, but it is unlikely to ease their growing financial anxiety. UEFA's recent clampdown has seen the West London club hit with a record fine of £27 million, alongside a further £51.8 million suspended, for breaching the body's financial rules. But money alone is not the most punishing blow. As The Times reported, it's the accompanying sporting sanctions that will likely dictate Chelsea's direction this summer. Advertisement The spotlight now falls on UEFA's 'List A transfer balance' rule. Unless Chelsea's balance is positive, they will be barred from adding players to their Champions League squad for the upcoming season. It's a daunting requirement that prioritises sales over spending and puts pressure on the club's already congested roster. Photo IMAGO Sales Must Fund Signings The rule is clear: any new registration to UEFA's List A — the squad eligible for European competition — must be financially offset by outgoing transfers. Bonuses from the Club World Cup do not count. For Chelsea, who have already signed Liam Delap, João Pedro and Jamie Gittens, and who may need to register Estêvão Willian, Dario Essugo, Andrey Santos, Mamadou Sarr and Mike Penders if they are not loaned out, this spells trouble. Advertisement Delap's £30 million fee alone will be amortised over a five-year contract, meaning £6 million needs to be accounted for this season under UEFA's revised accounting rules. These rules, introduced in 2023, restrict amortisation to a five-year span. That, coupled with additional salaries and amortised fees for players such as Wesley Fofana and Romeo Lavia, who are yet to be registered with UEFA, makes the £60 million requirement a stark reality. As one source close to the club acknowledged, 'It is only if Chelsea's overall transfer balance is negative after the list is submitted that new players could be prevented from registering.' Time Ticking and Names Circulating The September 2 registration deadline looms, and while Chelsea remain confident they can work within the framework, the challenge is evident. Players who were left out of the Club World Cup squad — including João Félix, Raheem Sterling, Ben Chilwell, Renato Veiga and Axel Disasi — are all likely to be counted towards any positive transfer balance if sold in time. Advertisement It's not an ideal situation. Moving on high earners like Sterling and Félix, who come with substantial wage burdens and mixed recent form, will be far from straightforward. Chelsea's difficulty in offloading such players in previous windows suggests this summer may be no different. There is also the unsettling prospect of selling key contributors. Christopher Nkunku, despite fitness struggles last season, is attracting interest and could be sacrificed. Noni Madueke, who helped drive Chelsea to Champions League qualification, is drawing attention from Arsenal. 'Noni has been very important for us during this season,' admitted head coach Enzo Maresca. 'But my message to the players and to the club is that I want just players that are happy to be with us. The ones that are not happy, they are free to go.' Trevoh Chalobah is another name who may be reluctantly moved despite Maresca's praise. 'We made the Champions League and that's also because of Trevoh. He helped us a lot. We are happy with him. Unfortunately, when the window is open, anything can happen.' Advertisement Kudus in the Wings, but Conditions Apply The irony is Chelsea are still being linked with additions. West Ham's Mohamed Kudus remains a key target and a possible replacement should Madueke leave. But once again, UEFA's rule insists that any new arrival will only be possible if funded through sales. 'He is not our player, so I cannot say anything,' Maresca said of Kudus. 'The only thing is I have known about Kudus since he was in Ajax.' Such statements are revealing. Chelsea are not restrained in ambition, but they are restricted in execution. Their strategy must be more calculated, more surgical. They cannot simply accumulate talent. Every acquisition now demands a corresponding exit. Advertisement And despite the calm front projected by Stamford Bridge insiders, the reality is anything but relaxed. The summer window is not just a chance to reinforce, it is a fiscal puzzle that must be solved to avoid competitive setbacks. Long-Term Impact of UEFA's Settlement Chelsea are not alone. Aston Villa too have agreed to similar sanctions, underlining a new era of UEFA enforcement. But Chelsea's sheer squad size, the cost of recent investments and the scale of their operations make them arguably the most exposed. It's not just about meeting a fine, it's about navigating a future of conditional squad building. UEFA's decision to reject contracts longer than five years for amortisation was intended to prevent financial distortion, and Chelsea — who pioneered the long-contract trend — now face the brunt of that correction. Advertisement What is clear is that even the riches of a Club World Cup campaign are not enough to navigate UEFA's tighter framework. Chelsea must now sell smart, balance shrewdly and avoid sentimentality if they are to comply without damaging their European ambitions. Our View – EPL Index Analysis This report from The Times paints a troubling picture. As a Chelsea fan, it's hard not to feel uneasy. It's not the fine itself that worries me, it's what it symbolises — a club operating at the edge of what is sustainable, now forced into a corner. The idea that we might not be able to register our new signings unless we sell first is staggering. We're not talking fringe players either. Noni Madueke and Trevoh Chalobah were excellent last season, but now even they could be sacrificed just to stay compliant. The fact that Enzo Maresca said he hadn't paid attention to UEFA's squad registration rules is hardly reassuring. How can you plan pre-season properly when you don't even know who will be eligible come September? That's basic. Advertisement It all feels avoidable. The transfer strategy since the Clearlake takeover has felt more like fantasy football than a coherent plan. Now it's catching up to us. Selling players is fine — every club does it — but we're not in a position of strength. Everyone knows we have to sell, and that means we're not going to get top dollar. If this is the cost of chasing short-term glory, then maybe it's time we found a new balance — one that respects UEFA's rules and the traditions of smart football governance.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Council slammed for paying £2m of taxpayer cash on empty offices
Worcestershire County Council has been criticised for spending over £5,000 a day maintaining its empty headquarters, shut last year due to legionella contamination. The 49-year-old County Hall has cost taxpayers nearly £2 million since closure, including £390,000 for a study declaring it 'surplus to requirements.' Councillors slammed the waste, calling for the building's urgent sale or redevelopment to benefit public services. The council cabinet will discuss future plans for the site on July 17.