What's really behind Harvard's clash with the US government over federal funds?
Harvard University is currently embroiled in a legal battle with the US government over the freezing of nearly $3 billion in federal funding. The dispute centers on allegations made by the Trump administration and the University's response through a federal lawsuit.
The courtroom hearing, taking place in Boston's Seaport District, represents a key moment in the case. The proceedings involve oral arguments over whether Harvard can recover federal research funds that were withheld following the administration's imposition of specific conditions tied to hiring, admissions, and oversight.
Background of the lawsuit and key issues at stake
The legal conflict began in April when the Trump administration sent a letter to Harvard President Alan M.
Garber outlining conditions for continued federal support. These included structural reforms to increase 'viewpoint diversity' and audits of various academic units, as reported by The Harvard Crimson. In response, Harvard filed a lawsuit arguing that the administration's demands violated the First Amendment and bypassed formal legal procedures for terminating federal funding.
Following the University's legal challenge, the administration halted more than $2 billion in federal grants.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
What Happens When You Massage Baking Soda Into Your Scalp
Lintmit.com
Read More
Undo
According to The Harvard Crimson, the government escalated further by adding hundreds of millions in additional cuts and warning that Harvard would no longer receive future grants.
Federal agencies involved and legal grounds cited
Eleven federal agencies are named as defendants, including the Department of Health and Human Services, the National Science Foundation, and the Department of Defense. Harvard argues that the Trump administration's funding freeze violated the First Amendment by attaching viewpoint-based conditions to funding.
The University also cited the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, stating that the government failed to follow the necessary steps before terminating grants.
Title VI typically requires a hearing, two formal notices, a 30-day pause, and a failed attempt at voluntary compliance. Harvard contends that none of these steps were followed before the April funding freeze.
Key Information
Details
Amount frozen
Over $2.2 billion
Total funds at stake
Nearly $3 billion
Agencies involved
11 (including NSF, DOD, HHS)
Legal claims
First Amendment, APA, Title VI
Judge
Allison D. Burroughs
Court location
Boston, Massachusetts
Allegations of antisemitism and racial bias
According to the Trump administration, the cuts were prompted by Harvard's alleged failure to adequately address antisemitism and racial discrimination against white students.
As reported by The Harvard Crimson, several federal agencies referenced findings from a task force on antisemitism, which described incidents of social isolation and discrimination faced by Jewish and Israeli students.
Harvard, however, maintains that it has implemented significant measures, including the formalization of protest policies and expanded academic programs on Jewish and Israeli history. In a court filing cited by The Harvard Crimson, the University said the 2,000-page administrative record submitted by the government failed to show a proper investigation into antisemitism on campus.
Ongoing impact and future implications
The funding cuts have already disrupted research at Harvard, halting projects in cancer and rare disease treatment and prompting layoffs and hiring freezes. According to The Harvard Crimson, the University requested a summary judgment in early June to resolve the case before the federal government's September 3 deadline for fulfilling financial obligations related to canceled grants.
The Trump administration has argued that the case belongs in the Court of Federal Claims, which could delay a final ruling. Meanwhile, discussions between Harvard and the White House have not resulted in a settlement.
Judge Allison D. Burroughs is presiding over the case. Though a final ruling is not expected immediately, the court's decision will have significant implications for the University and federal oversight of higher education.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here
.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Governor C V Ananda Bose returns Bengal rape bill after Centre flags concerns
West Bengal governor C V Ananda Bose (Pic credit: ANI) KOLKATA: West Bengal governor C V Ananda Bose has returned the Aparajita bill to the Assembly for reconsideration, citing serious objections raised by the Centre regarding proposed changes to Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), according to a high-ranking Raj Bhavan source. The Centre found that the Aparajita Women and Child (West Bengal Criminal Laws Amendment) Bill, passed in Sept 2024, contains changes in penal provisions for rape under multiple BNS sections, proposing "excessively harsh and disproportionate" punishments, sources said. A major point of contention is an amendment to BNS section 64. The state bill increases the punishment for rape from the current minimum of 10 years to either imprisonment for the remainder of the convict's natural life or capital punishment. The ministry of home affairs (MHA) reportedly deemed this as unduly harsh and inconsistent with principles of proportionality. Another change that MHA has objected to involves the removal of BNS section 65, which prescribes stricter penalties for sexual assault of minors. According to sources, Union govt believe scrapping this clause weakens protections for the vulnerable groups and risks diluting the intent behind age-based classifications in rape laws. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Brain tumor has left my son feeling miserable; please help! Donate For Health Donate Now Undo However, the clause that the Centre found most problematic is the one under section 66, making the death penalty mandatory in rape cases where the victim either dies or is left in a vegetative state. The MHA raised constitutional concerns, arguing that removing judicial discretion in sentencing violated established legal norms and Supreme Court rulings, sources said. State govt, however, said it had received no official communication either from the Centre nor the governor's office about these observations. Earlier, bills similar to Aparajita, like Andhra Pradesh Disha Bill, 2019, and Maharashtra Shakti Bill, 2020 - which had mandatory death penalty for all rape and gang-rape cases - were passed unanimously by state legislatures, but did not get President's assent. Trinamool Congress indicated the party would make it a political issue. TMC spokesperson Kunal Ghosh said: "The returning of the Aparajita bill is unfortunate, deplorable and condemnable... This has proved that BJP is unwilling to impose maximum punishment in these cases, as their members are implicated in molestations and rapes."
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pitched battle on cards as CAL goes to polls today
Lucknow: Cricket enthusiasts, players and administrators will keep a close eye on the much-awaited election of the Cricket Association Lucknow (CAL) scheduled to be held on Saturday. A total of 155 voters, including 34 executive members and 121 club representatives, will cast vote. Before elections, these voters would decide on the mechanism of voting – through ballot or raising of hands – by majority vote. "CAL is prepared for both the mechanisms, as ballot papers have also been printed," a member told TOI. At least 49 candidates filed nominations for different posts of whom eight withdrew their nominations on the last date for withdrawal and scrutiny of nomination papers. Total 16 candidates have filed nominations for the post of the members of executive committee. Elections were to be held on a total 23 posts including that of one president, one senior vice-president, three vice-presidents, one secretary, four joint secretaries, one treasurer, one PRO and 11 executive members. Of these, three vice-presidents and one PRO were elected unopposed on the last day of withdrawal of nomination papers. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Nvidia's AI Strategy Is Clear - But Is Wall Street Paying Attention? Seeking Alpha Read More Undo Now the elections will be held for 19 posts. Since the elections are being held after a long time, those who have been watching the CAL closely believe that it could go to wires on some posts. Among the prominent candidates are retired IAS officer Navneet Sehgal (incumbent), Haider Raza, younger brother of former minister in Yogi govt Mohsin Raza, former president of Lucknow University Students' Union Neeraj Jain and Congress functionary from Bakshi Ka Talab Lallan Kumar. For the post of secretary, incumbent Khaleeq Mukhtar Khan is pitted against Arshi Raza, youngest brother of former minister Mohsin Raza, and Gopal Singh, who looks after LDA, Aliganj, sports complex. Meanwhile, candidate for the post of president Haider Raza said, "We have demanded election by ballot paper and boycott the election if it is held by raising of hands."
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trichy police tighten security ahead of PM's visit
Trichy: Ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's two-day visit to Tuticorin and Ariyalur districts for participating in various govt events, Trichy city police have beefed up the security arrangements as the PM is scheduled to stay in the city on Saturday night. On Friday, police personnel and sniffer dogs were deployed near a private hotel in Cantonment and the govt circuit house complex at TVS Tollgate. They inspected the premises of both establishments and curtailed public movement in the areas. Around 1,300 police personnel were engaged for security in multiple areas including the Trichy international airport where Modi will land on Saturday night after attending govt events including the opening of the expanded passenger terminal at Tuticorin airport. From there, he will reach either the private hotel or the govt guest house by road. On Sunday morning, the PM would reach Trichy airport to take a chopper to the Gangaikonda Cholapuram temple in Ariyalur district. Once there, he would preside over the Aadi Thiruvathirai (birth anniversary) festival of Chola emperor Rajendra Chola I and commemoration of 1,000 years of the king's maritime expedition to southeast Asia. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Write Better, Work Smarter With This Desktop App Grammarly Install Now Undo A temporary helipad for the PM's visit was constructed near the Chola-era temple, an Unesco world heritage site, and a trial landing of a chopper was conducted on Friday. After completing the temple event on Sunday afternoon, PM would return to Trichy and head back to New Delhi.
