Paddy McKillen's billion-pound legal battle over Claridge's hotel reaches ‘high noon'
On one side is
Paddy McKillen
, the wealthy Irish property developer who owns a whiskey distillery with U2 star Bono. On the other, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber al-Thani, the billionaire former prime minister of
Qatar
known as HBJ.
McKillen claims he is owed up to £1 billion (€1.2 billion) for his work at three of the world's most glamorous hotels – Claridge's, the Connaught and the Berkeley – all located in rarefied central London postcodes.
McKillen, 70, and HBJ, 66, were once close allies, spending time together on yachts and in swanky hotels. But this week's arbitration is unfolding amid a bitter legal battle, spanning at least a dozen claims and disputes in Europe and the US, between the former friends and their associates.
READ MORE
Three arbitrators – one chosen by each side, and a third chosen by the other two, according to those familiar with the terms – will now decide who emerges claiming victory.
[
Irish businessman Paddy McKillen claims he is victim of 'smear campaign' by Qatari royal family
Opens in new window
]
While sources said it may take as long as two months for a decision to be reached, a resolution to a dispute that began three years ago may now be in sight.
'It's high noon,' said one person close to the process.
Claridge's – the 169-year-old luxury Mayfair hotel that was a favourite of Queen Elizabeth II – is the crown jewel in a multibillion-pound portfolio of high end London properties owned by Qatar and wealthy members of its ruling family.
Belfast-born McKillen, who went into property in the 1980s after a stint working in his family's exhaust repair business, first invested in Claridge's in 2004.
His investment came under threat in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, when the Barclay brothers tried to seize control of Claridge's, the Connaught and the Berkeley, now known collectively as the
Maybourne Hotel Group
.
McKillen secured Qatari backing to help resolve his legal battle with the Barclays, former owners of the Telegraph newspaper. The 2015 rescue saw HBJ and the former Qatari emir, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani (HBK), take full control of Maybourne in a £1.3 billion deal that resolved McKillen's legal case, wiped out his debts and reduced his equity in the hotels to zero.
The Qataris subsequently agreed to an unconventional deal that McKillen hoped would allow him to share in the future upside of the hotels. Under the terms of the seven-year contract, McKillen's business,
Hume Street Management Consultants
(HSMC), would refurbish, manage and extend the hotels. The deal granted McKillen 36 per cent of any subsequent increase in valuation across the three hotels, minus the costs of the work.
But his involvement in the hotels – due to end in December 2022 – was cut short in April of that year, when McKillen was unexpectedly told by the Qataris he would no longer be working for them.
The size of McKillen's unpaid earnings from this arrangement sit at the heart of the dispute playing out this week in London.
McKillen argues that the extensive refurbishment work at Claridge's – which included adding an opulent underground spa and a £60,000-per-night penthouse suite, replete with 75 Damien Hirst artworks – has helped substantially boost Claridge's value.
The developer argues that those improvements, allied to a buoyant luxury hotel market post-Covid, means his payout should be in the hundreds of millions.
However, sources close to the Qataris claim the significant costs of work at the hotels means McKillen is owed substantially less than he claims. Even so, those close to the Qataris acknowledge McKillen is still owed something.
One person with knowledge of the dispute said that given the baseline value of £1.3 billion, and about £600 million-£700 million in costs, any valuation above £2 billion would mean McKillen is entitled to 36 per cent of the upside thereafter. Estimates being talked about by advisers have varied between less than £3 billion to over £5 billion, according to one person with knowledge of the situation, which would equate to a payout of more than £1 billion at the top end.
There have been attempts at mediation, according to one person with knowledge of the situation, with the most recent taking place in autumn 2023, after McKillen withdrew an attempt to extend the claim over a number of newer luxury hotels in the US and France, leaving the focus on the original three sites in London that had been the portfolio over the seven-year period.
In the meantime, the two sides appear to have been waging commercial lawfare. Claims and counterclaims have been filed across multiple countries, relating to developments owned by HBJ, or his associates and companies connected with them, on which McKillen claims refurbishment or development work.
People familiar with the Qataris' position claim McKillen thought he could 'embarrass' them into striking a deal by filing lawsuits that generated headlines and scrutiny of the complex ownership structures that often lie behind property acquisitions. They point to some of the victories secured so far in courts over McKillen.
McKillen's side argues the Qataris have been equally aggressive in their attempts to get him to back down from the Claridge's dispute.
Representatives for McKillen and the Qatari owners of Claridge's declined to comment on the confidential arbitration process.
In a statement, a spokesperson for McKillen said: 'It is right that he has taken, and will continue to take, all necessary steps to enforce his rights. As Mr McKillen has made clear over the four-year period since his departure from the Maybourne Hotel Group, he will not be deterred by any attempted campaign to cause damage to his business interests or smear his reputation.'
The Financial Times has identified a dozen legal clashes between the two sides – mainly in the UK, France or the US – often seeking money for work that McKillen and his companies say has been carried out for the Qataris and associated groups. Work for which McKillen claims he has not been paid.
Other cases have been started by the Qataris, which claim McKillen used Maybourne contractors, paid for by Maybourne, to undertake work at his hotel in France last July. McKillen denies the allegations.
The cases involve luxury properties, including hotels on the French Riviera and in Paris and Bel-Air, California, and homes in Manhattan and London. McKillen is claiming tens of millions of pounds of unpaid fees.
In March, a high court judge in the UK prevented McKillen's HSMC from serving a £3.7 million claim outside England, in a dispute over fees for work at Forbes House, a grade II listed mansion in Belgravia, bought by HBJ in 2016.
HSMC has appealed against the ruling and is seeking renewed permission to serve proceedings. McKillen has started new proceedings in his own name.
Separately, McKillen was convicted this year of verbally assaulting a female bailiff in his apartment on the Place Vendôme, a grand public square in Paris. The bailiff had entered his property with a locksmith in a dispute over mortgage repayments to a Qatar-owned private wealth manager.
McKillen is appealing against the decision. He denies any violence or wrongdoing, has filed an ethics complaint before the Paris disciplinary chamber of bailiffs, and his lawyers have in the past described the case as 'part of a more general smear campaign' against him.
Most recently, in April, McKillen filed a lawsuit in a California district court alleging that HBK and HBJ, as well as several of their business associates and related companies, sought to defraud him.
He alleges they did not pay for his firm's work at a number of properties which are already the focus of other cases, using the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. Qatar has denied the claims.
'Paddy McKillen and associated parties have orchestrated claims across multiple jurisdictions, all of which are either ongoing or have been struck out by the courts. We will continue to contest these claims and prove the assertions and allegations to be unsubstantiated and entirely false,' said a spokesperson for Maybourne.
The latest case under the RICO act adds to a long and costly list of lawsuits. However, the hundreds of millions of pounds at stake in the Claridge's arbitration is the real prize for both sides.
The sight of expensive tabs being quietly settled is a familiar one in the hotel's luxurious bars and restaurants. With the panel of arbitration in London totting up how much the Qataris owe McKillen, the owners of Claridge's will soon find out just how large their own bill will be. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the choices facing the EU: finding its place in a changing world
European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and European Council president Antonio Costa will be in Beijing on Thursday for an EU-China summit that is overshadowed by disputes over market access, export controls and Russia's war in Ukraine. Just over a week later, the United States is due to impose a 30 per cent tariff on goods imported from the EU, unless a deal is agreed before then. When Donald Trump announced his tariffs on about 60 countries and trading blocs four months ago, they looked set to push China and the EU closer together. But relations between Brussels and Beijing have deteriorated so sharply in recent weeks that China has scaled back this week's summit, which will now last for just one day instead of two as originally planned. The US, which at one stage imposed a 145 per cent tariff on Chinese goods, is now negotiating with China and Trump is expected to meet Xi Jinping later this year. Washington has lifted its ban on the export of some advanced semiconductors to China and Beijing has restored the supply of rare earth magnets to the US. For much of the 21st century, Europe could rely on Russia for energy, the US for security, and China as an export market. But Vladimir Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years ago severed the EU's economic relationship with Russia, Trump has brought the US security guarantee into question and China has lost much of its appetite for high-end European products. READ MORE Most EU member-states now see Russia, which has the world's largest nuclear arsenal, as a potentially existential security threat if it prevails in Ukraine and they are ramping up defence spending accordingly. However, Trump's support for Ukraine is contingent at best and could be deployed as a bargaining chip if the EU responds aggressively to tariffs by using its Anti-Coercion Instrument to target US services, intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment. The EU's fear of Russia, its grievances against China and its anxiety about the US's intentions are all based in reality and Europe needs to become more self-reliant in defence while protecting its industrial base from Chinese competition. But its response to a rapidly changing geopolitical environment has too often been piecemeal, defensive and lacking in vision. Mario Draghi's report on competitiveness and Enrico Letta's on the single market last year offered bold blueprints for action to combat Europe's economic weaknesses. The EU needs similarly fresh thinking on its place in the world, the security architecture of the continent, the future of the transatlantic relationship, the rise of China and the growing importance of middle powers such as Brazil and Saudi Arabia in an increasingly multipolar world.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Financial consultant who misappropriated funds to repay money, court told
A financial consultant has given a number of undertakings to the High Court to take steps to repay money he misappropriated from two companies he was engaged to wind up. Accountant David Kennedy and David Kennedy Financial Consulting of David Kennedy Financial Consulting Ltd, Orwell Shopping Centre, Templeogue, Dublin, consented to several orders, including judgment against him personally in the sum of €588,301 in favour of the two companies owned by third parties. On Wednesday, the court was told Mr Kennedy was taking steps to wind up his business, as he had a number of other liquidations which he had to deal with beforehand. Mr Justice Brian Cregan said it was a matter of significant concern that in circumstances where Mr Kennedy admitted misappropriation and breach of duties that he could 'possibly continue for a day longer as a liquidator'. READ MORE Micheál D O'Connell SC, for the defendants, said the orders made preclude him from misappropriating funds for other 50 companies he was dealing and it was necessary that they be wound down in an orderly fashion. It is anticipated allowing him to continue in his role for the time being will enable him to improve the situation not only in relation to the clients in this case but to others who are affected. Jarlath Ryan SC, for the plaintiff companies, said his side was satisfied that was addressed by obligations in the part of the orders restraining him from only to paying €1,000 per business transaction apart from normal wages, all monitored by the liquidators put in to replace him. He also must 'come clean' and disclose all other assets, he said. The judge said he wanted the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) to be notified and supplied with court papers so that it could tell the court whether it wished to be a notice party in the case. The other orders require that Mr Kennedy is only entitled to €15,000 in living expenses until the end of October and that he repay funds he had diverted from the plaintiff companies and restraining him from reducing assets in his consulting company below €588,301. He must also transfer €300,000 from a Bank of Ireland account he held to Micheál Leydon, the receiver who has now been appointed by the court to recover the funds. The court heard he had already transferred €200,000 from that account back to receivers who replaced in as liquidators of the plaintiff companies. He must deliver to those liquidators all books and records of those companies. The court heard gardaí were investigating him and had removed records and the Office of Corporate Enforcement had also been notified. The orders provide that proceedings against his wife, Danielle Colgan, who is also a defendant, can be adjourned generally on payment of €19,000 to the receiver. Mr O'Connell said she was the unknowing recipient of funds from her husband. Ms Colgan is the sole shareholder of David Kennedy Financial Consulting. Earlier this month, the court granted orders freezing assets of the defendants below €800,000, the sum which Mr Kennedy was engaged to capitalise on behalf of the two plaintiff companies. When the case returned, the court was told Mr Kennedy had 'put his hands up' in relation to the misappropriation and wished to be as much assistance as he can in recovering the money. Mr Justice Cregan adjourned the case to October but said in the meantime he would like to hear from the ACCA in relation to possibly making it a notice party.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘I am disappointed in myself for believing we were more than just a number': AIB staff angered by cut to hybrid working
A decision by AIB to cut hybrid working has been met by frustration and disappointment by some staff at the bank, internal company communications show. The bank informed more than 10,000 employees on Tuesday that staff eligible for hybrid working will be required to work from the office 'a minimum of three days each week' on a phased basis, the tightest rule among Irish retail banks. The company said it believes the new arrangements 'strike the right balance' between flexibility for staff and 'delivering invaluable opportunities and benefits of collaboration and deeper engagement' between colleagues. More than 250 staff members have expressed disappointment and frustration with the decision on an internal company forum seen by The Irish Times. [ AIB calls eligible staff into office three days a week Opens in new window ] 'I am disappointed in myself for believing we were more just a number,' one AIB employee said in response to a company question and answer post on the forum, in which AIB notes that 'deliberate non-compliance with the new policy will not be accepted'. Another staff member labelled the decision a 'really disappointing move'. It 'completely disregards the struggles working families already face with limited childcare and creche spaces available,' the person said. AIB 'A solution to a problem that didn't exist,' another person responded, saying the policy was 'forcing staff to be less productive, less motivated, and more stressed. Bravo.' Some responses criticised the company for the manner in which the decision was communicated. One staff member called it 'an example of very poor communication', calling for 'something this serious that affects staff lives' to have been delivered in-person or over a video call. [ Remote working is here to stay and has whole new language about 'hidden hybrid' and 'mouse jiggling' Opens in new window ] Another AIB employee said the company's Q&A posted to the forum, in addition to the staff email, 'reads like a lecturer to a student with a bamboo stick out... disgusting terminology.' 'There is ZERO thought for your employees here – we will be told where and when we are working and we will be 'MONITORED' for 'NON COMPLIANCE''. 'Who exactly do you think you are talking to after the loyalty shown and the HUGE hours far and beyond our working weeks with no overtime to keep the show on the road during Covid while the Bank raced to make bumper profits and coming back to private ownership?' AIB The new policy, according to the company Q&A post, will not allow in-person days be decided for individuals, with requirements being detailed on a team-by-team basis. A number of staff voiced concerns with this element of the policy. [ Office attendance is becoming a performance metric Opens in new window ] 'You state 'We'll be as flexible and understanding as we can',' an employee said, before pointing a number of restrictions on the flexibility of the policy, 'So what is this flexibility you speak of, can you give more detail please.' AIB Many employees questioned how the new limitations to hybrid working fit with the company's green ethos. 'As part of the Green Agenda, AIB wants to put more cars on the road commuting to their base location, locations already with limited on-site parking.' The employee said the bank had seen five 'hugely successful' years of hybrid working, which was used as a selling point to new staff, and that the reward for that performance was 'making staff come into the office an extra day for no logical reason other than they might bump into someone they know.' Some employees pointed to logistical and financial challenges that the new policy will pose for them. One employee, based in Cork, said the policy will require him to make a '520km round trip' to attend work and will make life harder for people to manage work and family responsibilities 'especially when remote work has already proven effective'. Links to sign up to the Financial Services Union (FSU) were posted in the channel a number of times. In a statement to The Irish Times, the FSU encouraged AIB to 'consider how they can promote sustainability while at the same time putting 10,000 staff back in cars.' The FSU said it will be holding 'a number of members meetings over the next few days' and expects to meet management following that consultation to 'strongly advocate for a reversal of this decision'. It said a survey of almost 3,000 AIB employees conducted in the past 48 hours showed 'real dissatisfaction' at the 'unilateral decision'. Responding to questions from The Irish Times, a spokesman for AIB said 'all employees benefit from in person time with their own team and broader colleagues' and that AIB 'recognise[s] the benefits of structured, hybrid working and are committed to enabling it.' The spokesman said AIB has a 'balanced and comprehensive hybrid working structure in place' and would continue to review the policy.
