Notorious Iranian prison boss flees minutes before Israeli airstrikes after secret warning
EXCLUSIVE – The notorious director of Tehran's brutal Evin Prison, Hedayatollah Farzadi, escaped the compound ahead of Israeli strikes following threats to his life – and an alleged exchange between Jerusalem and his adult son.
Israeli authorities reportedly contacted Amir Husseini Farzadi, telling him that if he convinced his father to release political prisoners, his life would be spared in the impending attack.
According to a series of WhatsApp messages shared with Fox News Digital by an Israeli intel source, an agent instructed Amir to tell his father to open the prison's doors, warning that an attack would occur within "a few minutes." Amir asked whether something had already happened to his father, and the Israeli agent replied that it wouldn't – if he passed the message along.
Iran's Top Diplomat Contradicts Supreme Leader On 'Serious' Nuclear Site Damage
The source told Fox News Digitial that after receiving the message, Amir contacted his uncle, who then drove to the prison to get his father, Farzadi. The two were seen speeding away from the area moments before the airstrikes began. Farzadi has not been heard from since, according to the source.
Farzadi, who has been the director of Evin Prison since 2022, has been accused of committing egregious human rights violations, including the torture and murder of inmates, many of whom are political dissidents. Allegations against him include beatings, starvation, sexual violence against female prisoners and murder. He has been sanctioned by both the U.S. and the European Union.
Read On The Fox News App
The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has designated Farzadi under the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list, which prohibits U.S. entities and individuals from dealing with him.
Iran Intensifies Internal Security Crackdown After Us, Israel Strikes
"Numerous protesters have been sent to Evin Prison during the latest round of protests where they have been subjected to torture and other forms of physical abuse," the Treasury Department wrote in a statement.
Prior to his time at Evin Prison, Farzadi spent 10 years working at Dizel Abad Prison, where he "was known to organize public amputations of criminals convicted of petty crimes," the Treasury Department wrote. The department also noted that during his time as director of the Greater Tehran Penitentiary, also known as Fashafouyeh Prison, Farzadi "oversaw the torture and maltreatment" of inmates.
In its April 2025 announcement of sanctions against Ferzadi, as well as other entities and individuals, the EU condemned "the use of the judiciary as a tool for arbitrary detention" in Iran. The EU also noted that Iran saw a "dramatic increase in the number of executions" in 2024, which included women, minorities and European citizens. However, the EU did not specify how many of those executed were political dissidents.
"Freedom of opinion and expression, freedom of religion or belief, as well as freedom of assembly have been increasingly restricted, and threatening measures have been taken against human rights defenders, journalists and political dissidents," the EU wrote.Original article source: Notorious Iranian prison boss flees minutes before Israeli airstrikes after secret warning
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK considers envoy for Britons held abroad
Britain is preparing to emulate the United States by appointing an envoy tasked with freeing citizens arbitrarily detained abroad, as it faces calls to do more to bring them home. High-profile cases like jailed Egyptian-British activist Alaa Abdel Fattah and imprisoned Hong Kong media mogul Jimmy Lai have spotlighted the plight of Britons held in jails overseas. The UK foreign ministry insists it continues to press such cases with governments, but relatives of detainees and human rights organisations complain of a lack of urgency and transparency. "The government is committed to strengthening support for British nationals, including through the appointment of a new envoy," a Foreign Office spokesperson told AFP. Middle East Minister Hamish Falconer has said an "Envoy for Complex Consular Detentions" is expected to be appointed "before the summer". The government has not specified the terms of the role but it could be similar to America's Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs, a position created in 2015. Unlike the United States though, Britain does not take part in prisoner exchanges. Professor Carla Ferstman, an expert on arbitrary detentions at the Human Rights Centre at Essex Law School, said appointing someone would be the "clearest thing that the UK can do that it hasn't done yet". "When you have someone at the highest level they command a certain level of respect," she told AFP. Abdel Fattah was arrested in September 2019 and sentenced to five years in prison on charges of "spreading false news" after sharing a Facebook post about police brutality. He is still imprisoned despite a hunger strike by his mother and Britain's foreign ministry saying it is pushing for his release "at the highest levels of the Egyptian government". His sister Sanaa Seif said an envoy would mean "a proper continued focus on" freeing detainees. - 'Clear strategy' - "It's also important to have a focal point that can help coordinate between different government bodies so that they all work in synchronisation," she told AFP. Seif believes the government should consider revising travel advice to Egypt too, a call also made by lawmakers who have suggested the government should sanction Egyptian officials as well. "Is it not clear that words are no longer sufficient?" Conservative peer Guy Black asked in parliament's House of Lords recently. Ferstman said tightening travel guidance can be a powerful tool. "It's a big deal because all of a sudden tourists can't get insurance and it's harder for business travel to happen. There's all kinds of implications," she explained. Amnesty International recently called for the government to develop a "clear strategy" to support arbitrarily detained Britons, including by demanding that UK officials attend trials. The Labour government pledged in its general election-winning manifesto last year that it would introduce "a new right to consular assistance in cases of human rights violations". Amnesty also wants the government to call for a person's "immediate release", including publicly when it is requested by the family. It said London took three years to publicly call for Lai to be freed, something his son Sebastian said "sends the wrong message" to "autocratic states". "The quicker we have the government speak out post-arrest, that's the window of opportunity to have people released," Eilidh Macpherson, Amnesty's campaigns manager for individuals at risk told AFP. UK officials say the government can be wary of accusations it is interfering in another country's judicial system. "Sometimes it may need to be quiet about what it's doing, but this shouldn't come at the expense of transparency," said Ferstman. Jagtar Singh Johal, a Sikh blogger from Scotland, was arrested in India in November 2017 while there for his wedding on accusations of being part of a terror plot against right-wing Hindu leaders. He has not been convicted of a crime and in March was cleared in one of the nine charges against him. The foreign ministry spokesperson said Foreign Secretary David Lammy "continues to raise concerns" about the detention with India's government "at every appropriate opportunity". But his brother, Gurpreet Singh Johal complains of being kept in the dark. "We don't know what's actually being said," he told AFP. Gurpreet said an envoy would be a "good thing" but until the position is in place, "We won't know exactly what it means." pdh/jwp/ach
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Decline of Oil Power in Middle East Geopolitics
Despite expectations, the recent geopolitical turbulence in the Middle East—especially the events of October 7, 2023, and the escalation between Israel and Iran—did not deliver a severe blow to global energy markets. Compared to past regional crises or major global shocks like the Russia–Ukraine war, the impact was surprisingly muted. This apparent inability of oil-rich Middle Eastern nations to wield their petroleum power as a political weapon may mark the start of a deeper shift in global dynamics—one that emboldens Western-aligned states to more confidently pursue political and economic transformation in the region. For decades, oil served as the cornerstone of power for Middle Eastern rulers—a strategic lever to secure both domestic control and international backing. But as its political weight diminishes on the global stage, the fading support from major world powers may compel these leaders to reconsider their grip on authority. In response, they might shift focus inward, embracing reforms to strengthen their political and economic governance—not by oil wealth alone, but through more sustainable, accountable leadership. Since the 1970s, oil wealth has been the backbone of Middle Eastern states' power, shaping both their economies and political influence. Leveraging their pivotal role in OPEC and their ability to sway the global energy balance, these nations gained undeniable leverage in international affairs. Strategic partnerships with major oil corporations—spanning upstream operations to global trade—opened direct channels to the world's most powerful governments. Fueled by resource-driven wealth, many regional rulers modernized their states, entrenched authoritarian rule, and secured foreign backing—even as their regimes often stood in stark contrast to Western ideals like democracy and human most Middle Eastern oil-exporting nations, petroleum revenues account for over 70% of government income and roughly a third of GDP—with countries like Iraq and Kuwait even surpassing these levels. Despite political shifts in some states, such as Iraq's regime change, the region's governments continue to rely heavily on the oil sector as a cornerstone of economic stability and a tool for maintaining authority and influence across their territories. The political use of oil can be traced back to 1960, when Middle Eastern oil-rich states joined forces with Venezuela to establish the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). However, the first major deployment of oil as a political weapon occurred during the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, when Arab countries imposed an oil embargo that triggered a historic energy crisis and skyrocketed oil prices from around USD 3 to nearly USD 12 per barrel, quadrupling in just five months. The second major shock came in 1979 with the Iranian Revolution, which slashed Iranian oil exports and sent global prices soaring again, effectively doubling and shaking international markets. Just a year later, the Iraq–Iran War broke out in 1980, further escalating fears of regional supply disruptions and pushing prices up to approximately USD 40 per barrel by early that year. A decade later, in 1990, Iraq's invasion of Kuwait—another oil-rich Persian Gulf state—drove prices from USD 17 to USD 36 per barrel. The situation prompted Western nations to release strategic petroleum reserves to mitigate further spikes. The 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq caused immediate market volatility and long-term uncertainty. This geopolitical instability pushed oil prices from the USD 26–30 range in the early 2000s to over USD 31 in 2003, continuing a sharp upward trend that reached USD 66 by 2006. Unlike most global economic crises, such as the 2008–2009 financial meltdown—which depressed oil demand and caused prices to fall—Middle Eastern conflicts have historically triggered price surges. The next major spike occurred in 2011 during the Arab Spring. The unrest pushed prices from around USD 90 at the end of 2010 to USD 120 in early 2011. Libya's civil war disrupted oil flows to Europe, and fears over the security of the Suez Canal further heightened global supply anxieties. Another shockwave hit in 2019 when a drone strike targeted Saudi Aramco's Abqaiq and Khurais facilities, knocking out 5.7 million barrels per day—about 5% of global supply. This event caused oil prices to surge by 19.5% in a single day, jumping from USD 60 to USD 72—the largest single-day percentage increase since the 1991 Gulf War. A rare non-Middle Eastern event followed in 2022 when Russia invaded Ukraine. Oil prices surged to over USD 120 per barrel in March, marking a 15% increase from pre-war levels and underlining the global market's sensitivity to major geopolitical disruptions. However, the reaction to more recent Middle Eastern conflicts after 2023—mostly involving the so-called 'resistance axis'—has been substantially muted. On October 7, 2023, Hamas launched a surprise attack on Israel. Initially, prices rose from around USD 80 to USD 90 per barrel within a week, but the upward trend quickly reversed. By the third week, prices had dropped to USD 74 per barrel. Although the conflict zone wasn't central to global oil production or transport, concerns about potential escalations involving Iran, Lebanon, or Iraqi factions did raise alarms—but these were short-lived, and the market stabilized quickly. A similar trend was observed following Israel's strike on Iran: oil prices rose modestly—just 7% in the first week—before declining in the second. This subdued reaction came despite Iran's status as the world's fourth-largest holder of oil reserves, a leading oil producer, the second-largest holder of natural gas reserves, and one of the top five gas producers globally. Moreover, Iran's critical geopolitical position—adjacent to the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most vital oil transit chokepoint—adds weight to the surprising resilience of the global energy market. Even after the U.S. attacked Iranian nuclear sites and Iran retaliated, the market absorbed the shock swiftly, with prices returning to pre-conflict levels within hours. These recent responses suggest a shift in the global energy market's sensitivity to Middle Eastern tensions—possibly reflecting changes in global supply diversity, strategic reserves, and the political recalibration of major energy consumers and producers. While Middle Eastern conflicts have traditionally triggered sharp and prolonged oil price shocks, the market's response to recent regional crises reflects a notable shift—both in the scale of price increases and the duration of their impact. Even when a major historical oil exporter like Iran is directly involved, the market has shown a remarkable degree of resilience and short-term volatility rather than sustained disruption. Since 2001, the United States has significantly reduced its dependence on Middle Eastern oil, while Europe has actively diversified its energy sources—particularly in response to Russia's gas leverage and the fallout of the Russia–Ukraine war. As a result, geopolitical tensions in the Middle East today tend to provoke far milder reactions in the global oil market, especially when Western-aligned oil exporters remain unaffected. This shift was evident when comparing the market's sharp reaction to the 2019 attack on Saudi Aramco to its much more restrained response to the 2023 Hamas–Israel conflict and the Israeli strike on Iran. These patterns suggest that the global energy market is now more tightly managed and stabilized by major Western-aligned producers, chiefly Saudi Arabia. When Saudi Arabia—the de facto leader of OPEC and OPEC+—is not directly involved or its infrastructure is not at risk, the market remains confident in the continuity of supply. However, any threat to the Kingdom's facilities still triggers immediate and emotionally charged market responses. This not only highlights the success of Western strategies to diversify their energy dependencies but also signals the emergence of a new era in oil market governance—one dominated by OPEC+ leadership and strategic stability mechanisms. Consequently, future regional conflicts in the Middle East may increasingly be analyzed apart from oil price shocks. This decoupling could give the U.S. and EU greater flexibility in shaping their political responses and re-evaluating their relationships with Middle Eastern governments, without being constrained by energy security concerns. By Shahriar Sheikhlar for More Top Reads From this article on
News24
an hour ago
- News24
‘We are not going to stand for this': Trump demands Israel drops ‘witch hunt' case against Netanyahu
Donald Trump demanded that Israel drop its corruption case against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump hinted that the US would tie the case to US aid to Israel. Netanyahu and his wife Sara are accused of accepting more than $260 000 worth of luxury goods in exchange for political favours. US President Donald Trump on Saturday lashed out at prosecutors in Israel over the corruption trial that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has faced, saying Washington, having given billions of dollars worth of aid to Israel, was not going to 'stand for this'. Netanyahu was indicted in 2019 in Israel on charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust - all of which he denies. The trial began in 2020 and involves three criminal cases. 'It is INSANITY doing what the out-of-control prosecutors are doing to Bibi Netanyahu,' Trump said in a Truth Social post, adding that the judicial process was going to interfere with Netanyahu's ability to conduct talks with Palestinian militants Hamas, and Iran. Trump's second post over the course of a few days defending Netanyahu and calling for the cancellation of the trial went a step further to tie Israel's legal action to US aid. 'The United States of America spends Billions of Dollar a year, far more than on any other Nation, protecting and supporting Israel. We are not going to stand for this,' Trump said. READ | Trump demands Israel pardons 'great hero' Netanyahu, or abandons corruption case against him Netanyahu 'right now' was in the process of negotiating a deal with Hamas, Trump said, without giving further details. On Friday, the Republican president told reporters that he believed a ceasefire is close. Various sources/AFP Hamas has said it is willing to free remaining hostages in Gaza under any deal to end the war, while Israel says it can only end if Hamas is disarmed and dismantled. Hamas refuses to lay down its arms. Interest in resolving the Gaza conflict has heightened in the wake of the US and Israeli bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities. A ceasefire to the 12-day Israel-Iran conflict went into effect early this week. AFP reported that an Israeli court on Friday rejected Netanyahu's request to postpone giving testimony in his corruption trial, ruling that he had not provided adequate justification for his request. In one case, Netanyahu and his wife Sara are accused of accepting more than $260 000 worth of luxury goods such as cigars, jewellery and champagne from billionaires in exchange for political favours. In two other cases, Netanyahu is accused of attempting to negotiate more favourable coverage from two Israeli media outlets. AFP Netanyahu has denied any wrongdoing and has thanked Trump for his support in Israel's war with Iran, which saw a ceasefire agreement earlier this week. His lawyer had asked the court to excuse the leader from hearings over the next two weeks, saying he needs to concentrate on 'security issues'. Trump on Wednesday sprung to Netanyahu's defence, describing the case against him as a 'witch hunt'. On Saturday, he described Netanyahu as a 'War Hero' and said the case would distract the prime minister from negotiations with Iran and with Hamas, the Gaza-based Palestinian armed group that Israel is at war with. 'This travesty of 'Justice' will interfere with both Iran and Hamas negotiations,' said Trump, although it was unclear what negotiations he was referring to with regard to Iran. Yair Palti/Anadolu via Getty Images The US leader also likened Netanyahu's legal troubles to his own before he took office for his second term. 'It is a POLITICAL WITCH HUNT, very similar to the Witch Hunt that I was forced to endure,' said Trump. The Republican was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records in May 2024 in a case related to hush money payments to a porn star. Trump also faced two federal cases, one related to his alleged efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, which he lost to Democrat Joe Biden.
