Couple being held in Iran 'outrageous', MP says
Mr Bennett said the meeting had reassured the family they had support, but he would still continue to pressure government to "make sure that what can be done is being done immediately".Iran's government has been approached for comment.
'Bargaining chips'
Brendan O'Hara, APPG vice chair, told the BBC it was "absolutely outrageous" that Mr and Ms Foreman, who were just on holiday and have "no political connection", had been "taken hostage". The Scottish National Party MP called the couple from East Sussex "innocent victims of a geopolitical power struggle", likening them to "bargaining chips" between states. "The UK government has to act and it has to act decisively", O'Hara said, urging officials to do "everything they possibly can" to secure their freedom. He pointed to the case of Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, a British-Iranian national who was held hostage by the Iranian government for six years to pressure the UK to pay a long-standing, multi-million-pound debt.
Haydee Dijkstal, a barrister representing the family, told the BBC there were concerns the human rights of the couple were not being fully protected in Iran. She said they had been held in solitary confinement for more than 30 days and did not know what they were being charged with for several months. Mr Bennett said he had not spoken to his parents for more than six months.
The FCDO advises against all travel to Iran. "British and British-Iranian dual nationals are at significant risk of arrest, questioning or detention," it says in its Iran travel advice. "Having a British passport or connections to the UK can be reason enough for the Iranian authorities to detain you."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Michael Gove warns Angela Rayner made ‘a big mistake' warning of return of riots
Michael Gove has branded concerns made by Angela Rayner about a repeat of last year's summer of violence as 'a big mistake', claiming it could 'tacitly encourage' riots. The former Tory cabinet minister, who was Ms Rayner's predecessor as the secretary of state responsible for communities, added that history showed warning violence could break out made it inevitable. His comments follow a no holds barred briefing the deputy prime minister gave to cabinet colleagues on Tuesday, where she linked economic woes and immigration to community tensions and said the government needed to acknowledge the public's 'real concerns' about societal changes, as well as falling living standards. She was speaking following violent scenes in Epping, Essex where protesters have clashed near the Bell Hotel which is believed to contain asylum seekers . Noting that 17 of the 18 areas with riots last year sparked by the Southport murders were among the poorest in the UK, she told colleagues that 'while Britain was a successful multi-ethnic, multi-faith country, the government had to show it had a plan to address people's concerns and provide opportunities for everyone to flourish'. Mr Gove, who is now editor of The Spectator, comes with significant ministerial experience in dealing with community tensions and riots. As a former justice secretary he was also responsible for the law courts and in 2011 during the riots which broke out in London he was a key member of David Cameron's cabinet as education secretary. Speaking on ITV This Morning, he said: 'I think this is a mistake on Labour, to brief this out, I think it is a big mistake, it reminds me of what happened in the 1970s when [former US president] Jimmy Carter when America was going through difficult times said 'this country is in the grip of a malaise'. 'You do not, if you are the government, accentuate the negative in this way and you certainly don't suggest to people that violence might be about to break out in this way.' Asked about comments made by Reform leader Nigel Farage appearing to sympathise with protesters in Epping, he said: 'I think it is understandable why Nigel Farage says it but I don't believe that anyone should be doing anything to anticipate or to seek to in any way say this is inevitable. 'Because that either tacitly encourages or makes the government seem at the mercy of events. 'Of course you deal with migration, of course the government can and should do more to show that people are being deported and asylum seekers are being processed effectively. 'But the key rule in politics is show, don't tell. 'You give hope, you do not double down on despair.'
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK facing ‘very significant' volume of cyber attacks, security minister warns
The UK faces a 'very significant' volume of cyber attacks every year, the security minister has warned as new laws aim to deter hackers from 'extorting' businesses amid a spate of recent incidents. Dan Jarvis said new measures send a signal to cyber criminals that ransom demands will not be tolerated. Proposals from the Home Office would ban public sector bodies and operators of critical national infrastructure from paying hackers. It would also mean private sector companies not covered by the ban would be required to notify the Government if they intended to pay a ransom. 'The UK is not alone in this regard, along with our international allies, we are subjected to a very significant number of cyber attacks every year,' Mr Jarvis told the PA news agency. 'But from a UK Government perspective we are crystal clear that these attacks are completely unacceptable. 'There's more that we need to do to guard against them and that's why we're introducing these measures.' Mr Jarvis said the measures mean cyber criminals will be 'less incentivised' to target UK institutions because of the clarity the ban on ransom payments brings. 'We think these proposals will provide a powerful deterrent, and what we're wanting to do is break the business model of the cyber criminals who think that they can get away with extorting money from UK-based institutions,' he told PA. He stressed the Government would ensure 'cyber criminals, whether they're in Russia or wherever they might be, face the full weight of the UK law'. Ransomware refers to software used by cyber criminals to access the computer systems of its victims, which can then be encrypted or data stolen until a ransom is paid. It comes after four young people were arrested for their suspected involvement in damaging cyber attacks against Marks & Spencer, the Co-op and Harrods in recent months. Microsoft also said on Tuesday night that Chinese hackers had breached its SharePoint document software servers in a bid to target major corporations and government agencies. Furthermore, under the proposals, a mandatory reporting regime would mean companies and institutions that are targeted by ransomware attacks are required to report it. Mr Jarvis said the Government was going to 'look very carefully at the precise details' of the regime but that it would provide more clarity and intelligence to government agencies. M&S chairman Archie Norman told MPs earlier this month that UK businesses should be legally required to report major cyber attacks as he claimed two recent hacks involving 'large British companies' had gone unreported. Mr Norman said the retailer believed an Asia-based ransomware operation, DragonForce, had been involved in the attack – but refused to say whether or not a ransom was paid.
BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
TfL and BTP urged to bring back blue light status for engineers
The decision to stop vehicles being used by specialist engineers from having blue lights to get to emergency situations should be reversed, the London Assembly Transport Committee has use of Transport for London's (TfL) Emergency Response Unit (ERU) vehicles using flashing lights in an emergency situation was a key recommendation made to improve passenger safety following the 7/7 London year, TfL and British Transport Police (BTP) dropped the policy after a review cited collision of the Transport Committee, Elly Baker, said the ERU vehicles, which were driven by a BTP officer, needed the sirens for the "safety and resilience" of the transport network. The blue light status had been introduced in 2012 following the London Assembly Transport Committee's report into the 7/7 its report, it recognised that the ERU played a "crucial role in the emergency response" to the 7/7 bombings and were "experts in dealing with emergencies on and around trains".However a TfL document, seen by BBC London, said the decision to remove the policy was made to minimise "collision risk"."BTP assessment confirmed incidents where our Emergency Response Units were deployed did not meet national guidelines on grade I dispatch."In a statement, BTP's Assistant Chief Constable Sean O'Callaghan said: "In preparation for the London Olympics in 2012, BTP used converted specialist vehicles for the same purpose of getting TfL engineers to emergency incidents."As a result of a review in line with the NPCC (National Police Chiefs' Council), who consider the requirements for when blue lights can be used on police vehicles, the service was reconsidered by both partners." 'Left in the dark' Commenting on their bid to reverse the decision, Ms Baker, said: "TfL's ERU has an important role in London's emergency preparedness, and its vehicles need blue light status to support the safety and resilience of our transport network."Londoners have been left in the dark about why this decision was taken and what evidence there is to support it."The Committee wants this decision reversed, and urges those behind it to provide the evidence that led to them revoking a vital part of the ERU's emergency response capability."
