
‘'The Fantastic Four: First Steps' review: A breath of fresh air for superhero fans
That's why this summer has been so refreshing for viewers like me, first with James Gunn's 'Superman' and now with Matt Shakman's 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps,' both of which enthusiastically embrace the colorful silliness of the comic books that inspired them.
While 'Superman' marks a fresh start for DC's movie universe, 'First Steps' is yet another installment in the never-ending Marvel Cinematic Universe, but it's consciously set apart from other MCU movies, and that leaves it much better off.
Set on a retro-futuristic alternate Earth, 'First Steps' allows the story of the Fantastic Four to play out unencumbered by ongoing storylines or characters from other movies and TV shows, making it the most accessible and straightforward MCU movie in years.
Like 'Superman,' it begins not with the team's familiar origin story, but with Reed Richards (Pedro Pascal), Sue Storm (Vanessa Kirby), Johnny Storm (Joseph Quinn) and Ben Grimm (Ebon Moss-Bachrach) as established, well-known heroes in their world. Every bit of background information that viewers need to know is delivered in bite-sized bits of exposition via TV broadcasts and news headlines.
Although it's taken a long time for them to enter the MCU, the Fantastic Four marked the beginning of Marvel's comic-book Silver Age in 1961, and 'First Steps' emulates that era, resembling a 1960s sci-fi movie. The technology is more advanced than what existed in 1961, but with a throwback design sense that looks nothing like actual modern technology.
The team even gets its own kitschy robot named H.E.R.B.I.E., a variation on a character first introduced in the 1970s Fantastic Four animated TV series. It's the kind of stylized aesthetic that's common in comic books but less likely to be presented in a modern blockbuster movie, and it instantly sets 'First Steps' apart from the rest of the MCU.
What also sets 'First Steps' apart is that the Fantastic Four are the only superheroes in their world, and they seem universally beloved. Following the outer-space accident that gave them their superpowers, they've taken on numerous threats, which the movie lays out quickly and clearly in an initial montage.
There's enough material there for several movies, but Shakman allows it to exist as backstory, to establish how experienced and accomplished the Fantastic Four have become in the four years they've been active.
'First Steps' becomes slightly less distinctive as its main threat comes into play, and the characters travel back into space to confront the giant, planet-devouring entity known as Galactus (Ralph Ineson). Those CGI-heavy scenes resemble similar set pieces in other Marvel movies, although the team's spaceship retains its vintage look. As is often the case in the MCU, the villain proves to be the weak link, both visually and narratively.
Galactus is still a meaningful enough threat for the stakes to be apparent, and what's more important is how the characters react. Married couple Reed and Sue are expecting their first child, and their protectiveness as prospective parents drives their decision-making.
In the largely forgettable pre-MCU Fantastic Four movies, the team's family dynamic was often missing, but here the main characters feel like a genuine family unit, living together in their vast but cozy New York City headquarters and sitting down to Sunday dinner each week. Pascal and Kirby embody the movie's core relationship, and Kirby, in particular, brings range and complexity to Sue, who is a devoted mother but also an eager scientific explorer.
That makes it easy for the audience to invest in the climactic showdown between Galactus and the Fantastic Four, with the fate of the world — but also Reed and Sue's baby — at stake. Shakman makes significant improvements on the dodgy special effects of past Fantastic Four movies, and Johnny (as the flame-based Human Torch) and Ben (as the rock-covered Thing) look much more convincing and substantial.
It helps that so much of the space-age sets and costumes have the same weight and presence, although it renders Galactus' CGI clunkiness that much more obvious. The actors make up for the shortcomings, whether they're interacting directly with each other or reacting to phenomena that were obviously added in later.
As Galactus' herald, the Silver Surfer, Julia Garner adds her own emotional depth to a character who is primarily regal and aloof.
The performances and the visuals add up to a fun, fast-paced sci-fi adventure that never slows down, but also never feels rushed. The humor arises from authentic connections between the characters, rather than from strained quips, which makes 'First Steps' more earnest than most recent MCU movies.
It's old-fashioned in an appealing, honest way, delivering a simple, engaging superhero story without franchise baggage.
The requisite post-credits tease indicates a larger future for the characters (who are already set to appear in next year's 'Avengers: Doomsday'), but 'First Steps' stands on its own, with the kind of grand yet intimate adventure that superheroes embark on all the time in comic books, but all too rarely on the big screen.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
4 minutes ago
- CNBC
Marvel's 'Fantastic Four: First Steps' opens to $118 million domestically
What superhero fatigue? Twice in one month, a comic book film has rocketed to the top of the box office, debuting with more than $100 million in ticket sales. Two weeks ago, it was "Superman," the first theatrical release from James Gunn and Peter Safran as co-heads of DC Studios at Warner Bros. Discovery. This weekend, Disney and Marvel's "Fantastic Four: First Steps" fueled an estimated $118 million in ticket sales during its first three days in theaters. "The lesson is that if you build great movies, audiences will head to the multiplex," said Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst at Comscore. Internationally, "Fantastic Four: First Steps" snared an estimated $100 million, bringing its global weekend haul to $218 million. "Marvel bet big releasing their long-awaited introduction of the Fantastic Four as the last MCU film to hit theaters for at least another year, and it's paying off," said Shawn Robbins, director of analytics at Fandango and founder of Box Office Theory. "The franchise has had its share of hiccups in recent years, but Marvel's First Family is winning over fans and spurring the kind of enthusiasm that could bring back casual viewers who sat out some post-'Endgame' chapters." Marvel has struggled in the wake of the record-breaking "Avengers: Endgame," the culmination of more than a decade of interconnected storytelling. While films like "Deadpool & Wolverine" and "Guardians of the Galaxy: Vol. 3" enticed moviegoers to theaters, others like "Captain America: Brave New World," "The Marvels" and "Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania" failed to drum up the same enthusiasm. Box office hauls haven't been the only hit-or-miss for the studio. Marvel films have experienced significant fluctuations since the release of 2019's "Endgame." Previously, no MCU film had a Rotten Tomatoes score below 67%, meaning each had earned the title of "Fresh," indicating that critics had a generally positive view of the film. Since then, five films from the franchise have been below that metric and three of those were considered "Rotten," earning less than 50% positive reviews. This year, "Captain America: Brave New World" tallied $413 million globally and earned a 48% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. But "Thunderbolts*" generated just $382 million globally — one of only five titles under the Marvel Cinematic Universe banner to tally less than $400 million worldwide — it secured an 88% "Fresh" rating. Its newest theatrical entry, "Fantastic Four: First Steps," also has an 88% "Fresh" rating from the site. "For Disney, this has truly been a magical summer and for Marvel a reaffirmation that their strategy to revamp the brand is certainly working," Dergarabedian said. "With 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps' following in the footsteps of 'Thunderbolts*' Marvel is showing that a focus on quality rather than quantity is a recipe for success."


Los Angeles Times
33 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Marvel returns to form as ‘Fantastic Four' soars to $118 million at the box office
It was clobberin' time this weekend, as Marvel's 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps' nabbed the top spot at the box office with a performance that returned the Walt Disney Co.-owned superhero franchise to form. The movie hauled in $118 million in the U.S. and Canada and grossed $218 globally in its opening weekend. The film, which stars Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Ebon Moss-Bachrach and Joseph Quinn, is just the latest remake of the comic book property, though the first under Walt Disney Co.'s ownership. Formerly owned by 21st Century Fox, 'The Fantastic Four' is one of several key intellectual properties now under the umbrella of the House of Mouse after its $71.3 billion acquisition of that studio's entertainment assets in 2019. Disney has already capitalized on its ownership of the 'Deadpool' and 'X-Men' properties — its 2024 film, 'Deadpool & Wolverine,' garnered more than $1 billion in global box office revenue. Fox produced and released three 'Fantastic Four' movies, none of which were well-received by audiences or critics. A 2015 reboot was particularly reviled. Quality was not an issue this time. The movie notched a 88% approval rating on aggregator Rotten Tomatoes and an 'A-' grade from audience polling firm CinemaScore. The movie exceeded pre-release estimates. 'First Steps' was expected to gross $100 million to $110 million in its debut weekend, on a reported budget of about $200 million. The theatrical reception for 'The Fantastic Four' is a relief for Disney and Marvel, which has struggled in recent years to reap the box office earnings it once did with its superhero films. The Anthony Mackie-led 'Captain America: Brave New World' received middling reviews from critics and brought in about $415 million in global box office revenue. Ensemble movie 'Thunderbolts*' received strong reviews, but made only $382 million worldwide. Disney Chief Executive Bob Iger said earlier this year that the company 'lost a little focus' in its zeal to produce more shows and movies for the Disney+ streaming platform, acknowledging that 'quantity does not necessarily beget quality.' 'By consolidating a bit and having Marvel focus much more on their films, we believe it will result in better quality,' he said during an earnings call with analysts in May. Anticipation was high for 'The Fantastic Four,' and Disney went all out with the marketing. The company hired a skywriter to craft encircled 4's in the sky near downtown Los Angeles on the day of the premiere and featured a drone show outside the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion after the showing. 'While Marvel films have settled into a fairly predictable core audience after multiple under-cooked films and streaming series in the post-'Avengers: Endgame' era, the brand remains sturdy when the right film comes along,' Shawn Robbins, director of movie analytics at Fandango and founder of site Box Office Theory, wrote in a weekend theatrical forecast published Wednesday. Warner Bros.' DC Studios' 'Superman' came in second at the box office this weekend with a domestic total of $24.9 million for a worldwide gross so far of $503 million.


Geek Tyrant
33 minutes ago
- Geek Tyrant
How Dark Gritty Reboots Paved the Way for Today's Lighter Escapism in Cinema — GeekTyrant
For years, Hollywood loved its dark, grounded reboots. But times have changed, and so have audience tastes. A recent video essay by Pyramid Peak takes a deep dive into why the bleak tone of early 2000s blockbusters has shifted toward something lighter, more hopeful, and even escapist, like Superman . After September 11, 2001, American audiences gravitated toward stories that reflected their fears and uncertainties. Movies embraced gritty realism, and no franchise exemplified that better than Christopher Nolan's Dark Knight trilogy. 'You can imagine just how incredible it was to see this in 2005 for the first time audiences saw a Batman who looked like he belonged in our world and faced dangers that felt almost too real. 'Needless to say Batman Begins was a massive success to critics and general audiences the movie's dark and gritty tone felt like a breath of fresh air.' Following that, other franchises leaned hard into the 'realistic' approach, turning comic book worlds and action sagas into moody character studies. But that was 20 years ago, and as Pyramid Peak explains, that tone no longer resonates the same way: '20 years later the reboot doesn't pack the same punch. So what happened to the dark and gritty era? Right now we're living in a world of constant noise a million channels of conflicting information are all shouting at once. 'That overwhelm might inspire stories where the hero is someone who cuts through the chaos sees the bigger picture and finds a clean focused solution a narrative where all the threats are secretly connected and one brave person untangles them giving us the simple clarity we crave.' This shift is more than just stylistic. It's a reflection of our cultural mood. Back then, villains were symbolic. Today, the issues feel personal and systemic. As Peak notes, future stories might even tackle wealth inequality head-on. 'If another global recession makes wealth inequality the popular issue of the day, the real enemies might be the rich, the powerful the out of touch elite. We could see a resurgence of stories about the common person rising up against unchecked greed and corruption and a generation dealing with the housing crisis and endless inflation would connect with the hero who's dealt a crappy hand but make something of it.' The era of gritty antiheroes might be behind us, replaced by characters who bring clarity in chaos or challenge corruption head-on. In other words, escapism is evolving, and Hollywood will follow wherever our cultural compass points next.