Florida state rep: Trump building ‘modern-day concentration camps'
'This isn't about safety. This is actually about Donald Trump building modern-day concentration camps in an effort to disappear people from our communities,' Nixon said Tuesday during an appearance on CNN's 'Out Front.'
'Donald Trump's blueprint for America has now become barbed wire and broken families,' she told host Erin Burnett.
Her comments come days after large groups gathered for mass demonstrations popped up across the country to protest the Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigration — including mass deportations, controversy over migrant flights, an uptick in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids to foreign student visa revocations.
'You don't make America great again by doing these types of things,' Nixon said. 'All he's simply doing is returning our country to the worst chapters of our history.'
The migrant facility, built near a remote airport, includes soft-sided holding units for hundreds of detainees through a partnership funded by the federal government and maintained by the Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM). Additional holding units are expected to be added through next month.
The Trump administration has argued the site will help hold migrants awaiting deportation.
'There is only one road leading in, and the only way out is a one-way flight. It is isolated and surrounded by dangerous wildlife and unforgiving terrain,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said earlier this week. 'The facility will have up to 5,000 beds to house, process and deport criminal illegal aliens.'
'This is an efficient and low-cost way to help carry out the largest mass deportation campaign in American history,' she added.
Trump visited the 'Alligator Alcatraz' site Tuesday alongside Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. He lauded the natural barriers blockading the building.
'It's known as 'Alligator Alcatraz,' which is very appropriate, because I looked outside and it's not a place I want to go hiking anytime soon,' he told reporters on Tuesday. 'We're surrounded by miles of treacherous swampland and the only way out is, really, deportation.'
The president, ahead of his trip, joked about how migrants could evade alligators: 'Don't run in a straight line.'
Democrats have pushed back against Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) described the site as an 'internment camp' while House Democrats are lobbying for the site's closure.
'They target migrants, rip families apart, and subject people to conditions that amount to physical and psychological torture in facilities that can only be described as hell on Earth,' Frost said in a statement last week. 'Now, they want to erect tents in the blazing Everglades sun and call it immigration enforcement. They don't care if people live or die; they only care about cruelty and spectacle.'
'I've toured these facilities myself — real ones, not the makeshift tents they plan to put up — and even those detention centers contain conditions that are nothing short of human rights abuses,' he continued at the time. 'Places where people are forced to eat, sleep, shower, and defecate all in the same room. Places where medical attention is virtually non-existent.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
13 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Elon Musk Is Selling His Political Party Like a Tesla
Less than 24 hours after launching his political party, Elon Musk is already playing hype man for the movement he claims will disrupt America's broken political system. The richest man in the world took to X (formerly Twitter), the platform he owns, early Saturday morning to promote and to articulate the need for The American Party, his newly announced third party aimed at breaking what he calls the 'uniparty' stranglehold of Democrats and Republicans. The move has drawn sharp criticism from supporters of President Donald Trump and the core of the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement. As of now, Trump has not responded. 'The people want change,' Musk wrote in response to a user who referenced Ross Perot's 1992 presidential run, which despite ending early, still earned nearly 19% of the vote. 'If you keep voting out of fear, we will keep seeing the result of that. Our government won't change if we don't change our thinking,' the user said. The people want change — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 6, 2025That's the sentiment Musk is banking on. He's now channeling that energy into his own populist rebellion, but with a billionaire's budget and a full social media machine behind it. Musk's posts made clear he's still fuming over what he sees as fiscal irresponsibility from both parties, but especially from President Donald Trump and the Republicans. That betrayal, he says, is what finally pushed him to walk away. 'The Republican Party has a clean sweep of the executive, legislative and judicial branches and STILL had the nerve to massively increase the size of government,' Musk posted, referencing Trump's recently signed 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' a sprawling budget and tax plan projected to balloon the national deficit. 'Expanding the national debt by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS,' Musk added. The Republican Party has a clean sweep of the executive, legislative and judicial branches and STILL had the nerve to massively increase the size of government, expanding the national debt by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS … — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 6, 2025When asked directly what triggered his break from Trump, Musk didn't mince words: 'Increasing the deficit from an already insane $2T under Biden to $2.5T. This will bankrupt the country.' Increasing the deficit from an already insane $2T under Biden to $2.5T. This will bankrupt the country. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 5, 2025This marks a stunning reversal for Musk, who donated close to $290 million to support Trump's re-election campaign and served as head of the controversial Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Once a star player in the MAGA orbit, Musk now positions himself as its biggest defector. Though most of the backlash to The American Party has come from MAGA loyalists, Musk says his movement isn't just for disaffected Republicans. Responding to a user who suggested that the party could 'soak up a lot of the existing Dem base that feels politically homeless / hate extremism,' Musk replied with a simple: '💯'. 💯 — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 6, 2025He's pitching the party as a safe haven for political moderates who've grown frustrated with both the far-right and the far-left. And he's doing it with all the energy of a product launch. In true Musk fashion, he didn't stop at political philosophy. He started planning the party's first big event. 'When and where should we hold the inaugural American Party congress?' he asked his 222 million followers. 'This will be super fun!' When & where should we hold the inaugural American Party congress? This will be super fun! — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 6, 2025His chatbot Grok, developed by his AI company xAI, suggested Austin, Texas—Musk's adopted hometown—as the ideal location. Musk responded, 'Good suggestion,' all but confirming that Austin may host the kickoff rally. Good suggestion — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 6, 2025Several pro-Musk accounts spread news that The American Party will run candidates in the 2026 midterms. While Musk hasn't confirmed names or races, he has hinted that the focus will be surgical: just a handful of high-impact congressional and Senate contests, enough to sway legislation and send a message. It's unclear who will carry The American Party's banner, or whether it will make any real impact on a deeply entrenched political system. But what is clear is this: Elon Musk has the platform, the followers, and the money—$361 billion, according to the latest Bloomberg Billionaires Index—to make noise. Whether it's political theater or the beginning of a real movement, Musk is once again putting himself at the center of America's biggest cultural flashpoints.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
President Trump Signs 'Big Beautiful Bill' Into Law
President Donald Trump speaks during the Military Family Picnic on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, DC, on July 4, 2025. Credit - BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP—Getty Images At the White House on the Fourth of July, President Donald Trump held a 'Big Beautiful Bill' signing, complete with B-2 bombers. The most sweeping policy achievement of his second term so far includes tax cuts, eliminates taxes on tip and overtime, slashes Medicaid funding, food benefits, and clean energy incentives, and is expected to add $3 trillion to the national debt. Trump hailed it as "the greatest victory yet" in his remarks before the signing on Friday. "It's the most popular bill ever signed in the history of our country," he stated. Earlier in the day, Americans nationwide took to the streets to protest the signing at 'Free America' demonstrations. About 300 events are listed on the Women's March website. Participants are speaking out against what they see as an authoritarian president who works for the wealthiest citizens. The House passed the bill Thursday by a narrow margin, 218-214. All Democrats voted against it, and every Republican voted for it, except Kentucky Congressman Thomas Massie and Pennsylvania Congressman Brian Fitzpatrick. New York Congressman Hakeem Jeffries tried to delay the vote by talking for eight hours and 45-minutes, breaking the House record for longest floor speech. The bill passed the Senate earlier in the week after Vice President JD Vance cast a tie-breaking vote. Even though public opinion of the "Big Beautiful Bill" is looking ugly so far, some experts say Trump comes out seeming stronger than ever. In an article published after the House vote, TIME summed up the significance of the bill's passage as 'a moment when President Donald Trump's hold on the Republican Party was tested — and he won.' Longtime Republican pollster Whit Ayres told TIME that Trump's control over the GOP 'is as close to total as any President has ever had over his own political party.' Whether the American public comes to see the 'Big Beautiful Bill' as 'beautiful' remains to be seen. A June 26 Quinnipiac poll found 29% of voters support the bill, 55% opposed it, and 16% did not have an opinion. What's clear is that Democrats will hold the bill against Trump during the 2026 midterm election campaign season. Write to Olivia B. Waxman at
Fox News
30 minutes ago
- Fox News
Netanyahu and Trump to meet in DC as Gaza's fate without Hamas is debated
President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are set to meet at the White House on Monday. One of the most difficult questions on the table is what Gaza might look like without Hamas. Experts tell Fox News Digital that while the need for an alternative is clear, almost every proposed solution comes with serious structural, political and security limitations. John Hannah, a senior fellow at the Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA) and veteran of both Republican and Democratic administrations, said building an alternative to Hamas must happen in parallel with dismantling it. "Part of how you win is by showing there's a viable alternative," Hannah said. "People need to see there's a future beyond Hamas" That future, experts believe, lies in a non-Hamas technocratic government – comprised of Palestinians unaffiliated with either Hamas or the PLO – backed by a coalition of key Arab states, including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan and the UAE. "While a new administration in Gaza should be independent, some symbolic link to the Palestinian Authority could enhance its legitimacy with the Arabs. Perhaps Ramallah could serve as a pass-through for paying salaries. But the PA won't call the shots," Hannah said. "The default right now, if Israel ends up leaving Gaza, is Hamas," said Ghaith al-Omari, senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. "There is no one on the ground who can challenge them. And there is no Arab involvement without the defeat of Hamas. Not just a ceasefire – actual disarmament." At best, said al-Omari who served as the former executive director of the American Task Force on Palestine, the PA might offer a "kosher stamp" to satisfy Arab states, which have made clear they will only intervene in Gaza under a Palestinian national umbrella. "Without that symbolic PA invitation, Egypt and others won't come in," said al-Omari. "But they still need a political framework – some commitment to a two-state solution. Without that, they have absolutely no incentive to play a role in Gaza." Securing Israeli approval for any new Gaza administration is another major hurdle. An Israeli security official told Fox News Digital that any deal would need to include guarantees that Israel retains counterterrorism access to prevent Hamas from reemerging. "Something like what exists in the West Bank – buffer zones, perimeter security, and the right of the IDF or Shin Bet to act on intelligence when needed," Hannah said. That framework, he noted, would require intensive American-led diplomacy with sustained presence and coordination. "I can't see anyone else but the United States doing it – there are too many inner-Arab rivalries," Hannah said, "No other actor has the relationships, resources or trust required to bridge the deep divides between Israel, Arab states and international players. Everyone's going to want the U.S. at the center of this. And there's no doubt President Trump wants to solve it." "Qatar is the elephant in the room," said Hannah, "They bring a lot of much-needed money, but they've had a deeply problematic relationship with Hamas. If they want a seat at the table, it has to be with strict conditions – money flowing through trusted, externally controlled channels. But they can't be a key player in this effort." The United Nations, meanwhile, is largely out. "UNRWA's days are over," said Hannah. "They can't run education or the economy in Gaza anymore. At most, the U.N. might endorse a U.S.-Arab-Israeli plan with a Security Council resolution – but they won't play an operational role." One proposal gaining quiet traction in Israeli and American circles is the idea of empowering local clans to establish self-governing enclaves. Joseph Braude, president of the Center for Peace Communications, has spoken extensively with activists on the ground and believes this model could mark the beginning of an alternative. "It may not be realistic to talk about one civil administration managing all of Gaza right now," Braude said, "But in discrete geographical enclaves within the strip, you can pilot non-Hamas self-rule. Local Gazans patrol internally while the IDF or another force secures the perimeter. " "There's a fiber of educated, civically minded individuals in Gaza – from engineers to teachers – who are not Islamists," he added, "If vetted properly, they can manage administration, education and basic services. But you have to start by identifying who they are and what they actually believe." Braude pointed to one such case: Yasser Abu Shabab, a local militia leader. "This is the first anti-Hamas militia to emerge in Gaza in a generation. He's a local fighter from a Bedouin clan with family ties to Egyptian forces battling ISIS in Sinai. He says he wants to invite civil servants to begin staffing an administration." But not everyone agrees this is feasible. "These groups are fragmented, displaced and lack the legitimacy or cohesion to govern," said al-Omari. "You might use these militias to secure aid deliveries in a specific area, but they can't form the basis of governance." Dr. Michael Milstein, head of the Forum for Palestinian Studies at Tel Aviv University, told Fox News Digital, "Since the war began, several attempts to promote clans as an alternative to Hamas have also failed, like the Doghmush clan, whose leaders were executed by Hamas in early 2024." "Even now, figures like Abu Shabab in Rafah or the Barbakh family in Khan Younis are fringe cases," Milstein added. "Hamas still controls most of the public space. Clans may offer localized solutions, but they are no cohesive or legitimate alternative. Many are openly loyal to Hamas." "Many say, until Palestinians teach their children to love themselves more than they hate Israel, there will never be peace," Braude said, "That's true. But who is actually working to foster a Palestinian leadership [that] does so? That's the challenge – and the opportunity – right now."
