More than 500 people crossed Channel on Friday
On Tuesday, the tally passed 20,000, the earliest point in the calendar year the figure has been reached since data was first collected in 2018, as ministers struggle with their pledge to 'smash the gangs' of people-smugglers who facilitate the journeys.
It comes after reports on Friday that French police officers had used knives to puncture a boat off the French coast.
The Government has repeatedly pushed for French authorities to do more to prevent boats leaving the shore, including changing existing rules to allow police officers to intervene when dinghies are in the water.
Those changes have not yet come into effect, but reports on Friday suggested tougher action was already being taken.
Meanwhile, the Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has announced a 'crackdown' on immigration enforcement targeting illegal working in the gig economy.
Officers will carry out checks in hotspots across the country where they suspect asylum seekers are working as delivery riders without permission.
It comes after Deliveroo, Uber Eats and Just Eat said they would ramp up facial verification and fraud checks over the coming months after conversations with ministers.
Ms Cooper said: 'Illegal working undermines honest business and undercuts local wages. The British public will not stand for it, and neither will this Government.
'Often those travelling to the UK illegally are sold a lie by the people-smuggling gangs that they will be able to live and work freely in this country, when in reality they end up facing squalid living conditions, minimal pay and inhumane working hours.
'We are surging enforcement action against this pull factor, on top of returning 30,000 people with no right to be here and tightening the law through our plan for change.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
20 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Family hubs to be rolled out across every council in England
The Department for Education is putting £500 million targeted at disadvantaged communities into the scheme, to put a Best Start family hub in every local authority by April 2026. The Education Secretary has said that the scheme will 'give a lifeline' to families. Family hubs were originally rolled out across 75 local authorities at the start of 2024 by the then-Conservative government. Officials say that the hubs will be rolled out in every local authority by April 2026, and there will be expanded so there are up to 1,000 of them by the end of 2028. Among the services available at the locations will be birth registration, debt advice, midwifery services and support for parents who are separating or have separated. Officials hope that the spaces will also provide families access to other services and social care. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson praised the scheme (Ben Whitley/PA) Bridget Phillipson said: 'It's the driving mission of this government to break the link between a child's background and what they go on to achieve – our new Best Start family hubs will put the first building blocks of better life chances in place for more children. 'I saw firsthand how initiatives like Sure Start helped level the playing field in my own community, transforming the lives of children by putting in place family support in the earliest years of life, and as part of our plan for change, we're building on its legacy for the next generation of children. 'Making sure hard-working parents are able to benefit from more early help is a promise made, and promise kept – delivering a lifeline of consistent support across the nation, ensuring health, social care and education work in unison to ensure all children get the very best start in life.' The Conservatives have said that the announcement 'brings little clarity on what's genuinely new and what simply rebrands existing services'. Shadow education secretary Laura Trott (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Shadow education secretary Laura Trott said: 'That lack of clarity is part of a wider pattern. 'This is a Government defined by broken promises and endless U-turns.' Charity Save The Children has said it is 'pleased' to see the Government 'making it easier for families to get the help they need'. Dan Paskins, executive director of Policy, Advocacy and Campaigns at Save The Children UK, said: 'Focusing on family services for the under-fives will be vital in securing better outcomes for children, and we welcome the Best Start In Life announcement. 'We know from our work in local communities that bringing together parenting, healthcare and education support services in one place is an approach which works, so we are pleased to see the UK Government making it easier for families to get the help they need. 'With ministers now demonstrating an increasingly ambitious plan for children in the UK, we hope this drive for change continues when the child poverty strategy is released in autumn. 'This must include scrapping the two-child limit to Universal Credit, which is the only meaningful way to reduce the UK's record child poverty rate.' The head of the NAHT union welcomed the move. General secretary Paul Whiteman said: 'This is a positive step forward towards ensuring all children get the best start – and we are pleased to see tangible investment following this week's announcement of new targets for school readiness.'
Rhyl Journal
22 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Conservatives will look to amend Government welfare Bill
Kemi Badenoch will pledge that the Tories are 'now the only party committed to serious welfare reform' after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer shelved plans to restrict eligibility for Pip in the face of a backbench revolt this week. Ministers have warned there will be costs to their backtracking on the plans, as Downing Street and the Treasury will be looking to cover the spending shortfall left by the decision. The Tories will look to lay amendments to the legislation – set to be renamed the Universal Credit Bill – and party leader Mrs Badenoch is due to deliver a speech on welfare on Thursday. Among the amendments the Conservatives will propose is a requirement for eligibility for Pip to be determined by a face-to-face meeting, rather than virtually. As part of the Government's reforms, the Department for Work and Pensions has proposed a new 'severe conditions criteria' for universal credit. Claimants in this category will be entitled to a higher rate of the benefit, and will not be routinely reassessed to receive money. Another of the Conservatives' amendments would prevent somebody from being classed as having a severe condition for the purpose of universal credit only by having anxiety, mild depression, or ADHD. The third amendment would block the increase in universal credit and restrict Pip for some people who are not British citizens. In her welfare speech, Mrs Badenoch is expected to say that the Conservatives are 'the only party that is prepared to take the tough decisions to get spending under control'. 'I have no doubt that, emboldened by their success in forcing Starmer to U-turn last week, Labour's backbench MPs will now be eyeing up more concessions,' she will say. The original welfare proposals had been part of a package that ministers expected would save up to £5 billion a year, and economists are now warning that tax rises are likely to plug the gap left by the concessions to rebels. On Friday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves admitted that the fallout over the Government's welfare Bill had been 'damaging' and did not rule out tax rises in the autumn budget. It came after images of the Chancellor crying during Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday spooked the financial markets and led to questions about her future, although a spokesman said she was upset by a personal matter. In an interview with The Guardian, Ms Reeves said it would be 'irresponsible' to rule out the idea of tax rises and warned 'there are costs to what happened' with the welfare Bill. The Sunday Times reported that the two-child benefit cap could be unlikely to be scrapped – as many Labour backbenchers want – as ministers look to balance the finances.
Daily Mail
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: So, Chancellor, why is it so wrong to stand by a solemn election pledge?
Are Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves actually secretly pleased to have been publicly humiliated by their own backbenchers? A cynic might conclude this was so. Once upon a time, a Premier and a Chancellor whose most vital economic plans were brutally, publicly destroyed by their own MPs would have at least considered resignation. It seems that nowadays it is more than their jobs are worth to resign. They propose to carry on in their well-paid posts, and to be driven about with their red boxes in Government cars, even though they no longer have the confidence of their party and cannot get their most crucial plans through Parliament. It was surely Sir Keir who ought to have been weeping on Wednesday. But no. A very odd thing has happened. Government ministers have been liberated from their own manifesto pledges by their own startling incompetence. By losing the battle to cut welfare payments, they have now been released from all their previous promises about tax. In fact, they are pretty much compelled to increase tax, something which they probably always wanted to do anyway, but had to promise not to do to get elected. Asked by the pro-Labour Guardian newspaper whether she was prepared to rule out tax rises in the autumn, Ms Reeves replied: 'I'm not going to because it would be irresponsible for a Chancellor to do that.' If this was not so bitter, and if the price to be paid was not so high, it would be funny. Suddenly it has become 'irresponsible' to stand by a solemn, undoubted promise, made in letters of fire in the Labour manifesto a year ago. There it was, on page 19: 'Labour will not increase taxes on working people, which is why we will not increase National Insurance, the basic, higher, or additional rates of Income Tax, or VAT.' Now, they will have to break at least part of this promise, or they will not be able to find the huge sums they will need to balance the national books. Having pretended to be hampered by a fictional black hole left by the Tories, Ms Reeves has now been presented with a real black hole, very wide and deep, by the Parliamentary Labour Party. This was bound to happen. Those who nowadays obtain nomination as Labour candidates are pretty unlikely to be moderates. But it has taken place surprisingly early in the life of the Starmer Government, because that Government is so badly run. The Labour leadership is simultaneously afraid of Nigel Farage and the voters he threatens to take away, and of Jeremy Corbyn and the voters – and activists – his new movement may seduce. What a terrible pity it is that the Opposition is currently so weak, and that so many voters were sweet-talked into complacency about the possibility of a Starmer administration a year ago. Even so, this is what has happened. The price must now be paid, probably in ways which will damage the economy as much as Ms Reeves's foolish increase in employers' National Insurance contributions. This new mess cannot be avoided. But we do not need any more of this. This week should be the turning point, when the voters decide that they made a mistake by choosing this Government and we start the long march towards replacing it with a competent, responsible administration.
