V.S. Achuthanandan, a leader of the masses with no parallels
Since then, I have had many opportunities to watch him from a distance and later in a more direct manner. Like his speech, the perfect fit white jubba was also his trademark.
My first interaction with VS was in 2000. As the State secretary of the Students Federation of India, I was in the midst of an indefinite hunger strike at the gates of SN College, Kollam. VS visited me, enquired about my health, and fondly advised me to take care. He was the convener of the ruling Left Democratic Front and we often had to discuss issues related to education with him. Some of his great qualities that I have observed are his patient listening and sharpness in quickly identifying issues and offering solutions.
In the 2001 Assembly elections, comrade VS' candidature was announced from Malampuzha, Palakkad. His opponent was the then Kerala Students Union president Satheesan Pacheni. VS summoned me to our party headquarters and instructed me to concentrate on Malampuzha. His rationale was that as the opponent was a student leader, I should be present in his constituency to mobilise the youth and students for electioneering. It proved to be a unique opportunity for me to work closely with him, who subsequently became the Leader of the Opposition. Later, on one of his visits to Palakkad, I was assigned by the party to accompany him. He had a habit of having an early dinner, which the organisers, the Indian Medical Association, had arranged in a restaurant. I had never used forks before, and was trapped in a dilemma about the related etiquette. When I saw VS push aside his cutlery and start eating with his hands, I was relieved and delighted to follow suit.
During his tenure as the Leader of the Opposition, his image of an 'apparatchik' created by the media was transformed to that of a popular communist leader with mass appeal. It is very uncommon for a leader to undergo a transformation like this in their late seventies, and it was a testament to his amazing ability to adapt to changing circumstances. Comrade VS was moulded as a leader in the second half of the 20th century, when television was not at all a factor. Despite this, he quickly adapted to the complexities of the televised era with an enviable ease. He had a great sense of humour. Once I introduced one of our SFI colleagues who was sent to Delhi to work at the national level, VS asked him if he knew Hindi, and when he answered that he did, VS replied in his characteristic demeanour 'so when someone speaks to you, you can understand the language is Hindi, right?' We all burst out laughing.
When I was a Member of Parliament, VS was Chief Minister and he used to take me to meet with Union Ministers. One such memorable meeting was with the then Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee. Senior leaders like Pranab Mukherjee had great respect and consideration towards comrade VS. By then, I had come to notice how he was a surprising personality for leaders and journalists in Delhi for his vigour, energy, dedication, and steadfastness. His strict adherence to his diet and exercise, even in his 90s, was a valuable life lesson for youngsters like us.
Comrade VS was a great communist and a leader of the masses who could strike an emotional bond with the common people. His unparalleled revolutionary life spanning over a century has come to an end. Red salute comrade VS.
(The writer is Excise Minister and State committee member of the CPI(M))
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
5 minutes ago
- Time of India
Congress slams govt for ‘institutional sabotage' over Justice Yashwant Varma impeachment
New Delhi: The Congress on Saturday accused the government of " institutional sabotage " for refusing to admit the Opposition-backed impeachment motion against Justice Yashwant Varma in the Rajya Sabha , while proceeding with a similar motion in the Lok Sabha signed by both ruling and Opposition MPs. Senior Congress leader and lawyer Abhishek Singhvi said the Centre had ignored former RS Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar's move to make the Opposition motion "property of the House" before his resignation. He warned that the government's conduct could give Justice Varma procedural grounds to challenge the impeachment. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Operations Management Product Management healthcare PGDM Finance Public Policy Leadership Healthcare others Data Science CXO Technology Degree Digital Marketing Management MBA Data Analytics Data Science MCA Project Management Cybersecurity Design Thinking Artificial Intelligence Others Skills you'll gain: Quality Management & Lean Six Sigma Analytical Tools Supply Chain Management & Strategies Service Operations Management Duration: 10 Months IIM Lucknow IIML Executive Programme in Strategic Operations Management & Supply Chain Analytics Starts on Jan 27, 2024 Get Details Rejecting Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju 's claim that the RS motion was never admitted, Singhvi asked: "Didn't Chairman Dhankhar, by his words, make the issue property of the House? If not, why did he consult the law minister on introducing similar motions in both Houses?" by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Want to know more? click here Undo Singhvi said instead of appreciating bipartisan cooperation on Justice Varma's impeachment, the ruling party was treating it as "a race to show who did it first," displaying "ego and invincibility notions." He also linked the episode to Dhankhar's abrupt resignation, questioning if he was forced out and if MPs were pressured to sign additional papers. Singhvi added that the Congress had first raised corruption allegations in the Varma case, while the BJP was silent. Live Events Singhvi further alleged double standards, pointing to the government's inaction on a pending impeachment notice against Justice Shekhar Yadav over hate speech. He said the AICC legal department would hold a conference on August 2 on challenges to the Constitution.


The Print
15 minutes ago
- The Print
CM Saini slams Mamata, says no place for Bangladeshi infiltrators in Haryana
Gurugram Police had earlier said that eight Bangladeshi nationals had been detained as part of an ongoing drive to identify illegal immigrants, who will be deported soon. 'There is no place for Bangladeshi infiltrators in Haryana; they are being taken out from the state (deported) as quickly as possible,' Saini said in a post on X in Hindi. Chandigarh, Jul 26 (PTI) Amid a drive in Gurugram district to identify illegal immigrants, Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini on Saturday asserted that there is no place for Bangladeshi infiltrators in the state, as he slammed West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee for her 'sympathy towards those who breach the country's security'. Mamata Banerjee on Thursday alleged that poor Bangla-speaking workers from West Bengal were being harassed, detained and even pushed into Bangladesh by authorities in certain BJP-ruled states, dubbing the incidents as acts of 'linguistic terror'. 'West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's sympathy toward those who breach the country's security is not only unfortunate but also against national interests. It is utterly deplorable that a chief minister, driven by appeasement and vote-bank politics, stoops so low as to compromise the country's security,' Saini said in his post. He adde, 'No compromise against India's unity, sovereignty and Constitution is acceptable in Haryana or anywhere in the country. For us, the nation's interest will always be paramount.' In a strongly-worded post on X on Thursday, Banerjee accused the governments in Haryana and Rajasthan of unleashing 'tortures and tortures (sic)' on Bengali-speaking citizens, and questioned what the BJP was trying to prove through such actions. 'Have been increasingly receiving reports of detentions and atrocities on our Bengali-speaking people from different districts of West Bengal in Gurgaon, Haryana. West Bengal police is receiving these reports from Haryana police in the name of requests for identity searches,' she said in her post. On Saturday, while referring to a report by New York-based Human Rights Watch (HRW), Banerjee strongly criticised the alleged deportation of Bangla-speaking Muslims from India without due process, calling it a 'shame' for the country. She claimed the HRW report stated that such deportations have been taking place systematically in the BJP-ruled states of Assam, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Odisha and Delhi, following a directive by the Ministry of Home Affairs, government of India. PTI CHS VSD ARI ARI This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.


The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Reports on officials, religion, protests land journalists in trouble; those in towns most impacted, finds study
Reporting on public officials, religious matters, and protests were the three most common reasons for which a journalist in India faced criminal charges, a study, co-authored by the National Law University (NLU), Delhi, has found. The study said that journalists from small cities and towns, or those who reported for local publications, in Hindi or other regional languages, were most impacted, and their cases often did not receive national or international media attention. The other two authors of the report are TrialWatch, an initiative of the Clooney Foundation for Justice, and Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School. The report, 'Pressing Charges: A Study of Criminal Cases Against Journalists Across States in India', was based on an analysis of 423 criminal cases registered against 427 journalists covering a total of 624 incidents of 'criminalisation of journalists' in relation to their work from 2012-2022. At least 40% of the journalists covered in the dataset were arrested, the study found. 'Our dataset revealed that reporting on public officials was the most common reason journalists faced charges, the basis for charges in 147 incidents. The second most common reason was for reporting on religious matters – 99 times, while the third most common was reporting on protests – 79 times. Significantly, in over 100 incidents, the charges related to the reporters' alleged conduct while reporting, instead of what they were reporting on,' the report said. The criminal charges most frequently invoked against journalists were offences related to public tranquility, criminal intimidation and insult, promoting enmity, defamation, offences against public servants, and offences relating to religion. G.S. Bajpai, vice-chancellor, NLU, told The Hindu that the growing trend of invoking criminal laws against journalists raises serious constitutional concerns. 'This report reveals that journalists, particularly from smaller towns, are increasingly being targeted through penal provisions. While it is true that journalists must uphold professional standards and exercise due responsibility in their reporting, the data emerging from this study points to a troubling pattern of criminalisation. Such developments do not bode well for the health of a constitutional democracy, where freedom of the press is a foundational pillar,' he said. The report said that a journalist's experience of the justice system differed based on location and status. 'While journalists in major metropolises were arrested in 24% of the total incidents recorded in such cities, this figure increased to 58% for journalists in small cities/towns. This, in turn, was linked to journalists' access to justice. In 65% of the incidents involving journalists from major metropolises, they secured interim protection from arrest, while the corresponding figure for small-town journalists was a mere 3%. This can potentially be explained by the fact that this relief was most often granted by the Supreme Court, which has a single seat in Delhi,' the report added. It was highlighted in the study that out of 244 cases for which data were available, more than 65% cases had not reached any conclusion as of October 30, 2023. 'In fact, the police had not even completed their investigation in 40% of the cases for which we had relevant data. And only 16 cases (6%) saw a concluded trial — ending in conviction or acquittal,' the report said. The registration of the case had harsh impacts on journalists and their loved ones which included the possibility of arrest, intimidation by the police or politicians, as well as social stigma. The report highlighted that cases against journalists in India do not, however, always take the same course. 'For instance, while defamation charges, which are prosecuted privately rather than by government authorities, were more common against journalists in larger cities and against investigative journalism, offences against public servants were more common in smaller towns and were invoked in relation to journalists' on-ground news-gathering activities,' it said. Journalists working in Hindi and other regional languages suffered from a similarly adverse ratio in relation to counterparts working in English, the study said. 'Our data suggests that while the process is the punishment, the pain it inflicts may be proportional to the accused's distance from the national capital,' it further said.