Trump denies coverup in Jeffrey Epstein case
Some of Trump's allies, including journalist Tucker Carlson and former adviser Steve Bannon, have criticized a report by the Department of Justice and the FBI, which found no evidence of a list of powerful individuals to whom Epstein trafficked underage girls. The report also found no signs of foul play in Epstein's 2019 death at a Manhattan correctional facility, which was ruled a suicide.
In a Truth Social post on Saturday, Trump claimed that the so-called Epstein Files were created by prominent Democrats, including former President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. 'They created the Epstein Files, just like they created the FAKE Hillary Clinton/Christopher Steele Dossier that they used on me, and now my so-called 'friends' are playing right into their hands,' he wrote.
'Why didn't these Radical Left Lunatics release the Epstein Files? If there was ANYTHING in there that could have hurt the MAGA Movement, why didn't they use it?' he added.
Trump defended his Attorney General Pam Bondi and argued that federal agencies should instead focus on investigating Democrat-linked scandals and corruption, as well as the 2020 presidential election, which he continues to claim was rigged in favor of Joe Biden. 'LET PAM BONDI DO HER JOB – SHE'S GREAT!' Trump wrote. He previously said that the Epstein case has been used to distract from more pressing issues, including the deadly floods in Texas.
FBI Director Kash Patel also dismissed the allegations. 'The conspiracy theories just aren't true, never have been,' he wrote on X.
Critics have pointed to a minute-long gap in the surveillance footage outside Epstein's cell on the night of his death, claiming the tape had been doctored. Bondi, however, denied that there was anything suspicious about the video.
The debate surrounding the case has reportedly caused a rift within the government, with several news outlets claiming that FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino is considering resignation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Trump believes Russia will win
US President Donald Trump believes that Russian victory in the Ukraine conflict is inevitable, Politico reported, citing a senior White House official. On Monday, Trump threatened to impose secondary US tariffs of up to 100% on Russia's trading partners unless progress toward a peace agreement is made within 50 days. He also authorized new weapons deliveries to Ukraine, which are to be paid for by European NATO members. Moscow has warned that Trump's declaration could be seen by Kiev as a signal to continue the war. According to Politico, Trump decided to up the pressure on Moscow out of frustration with continued Russian strikes on Ukraine. The source noted that the US president believes that Moscow can secure military victory against Kiev thanks to its 'bigger economy' and 'bigger military.' 'The president's view is Russia is going to win; it's a matter of how long it takes,' the White House official told the outlet, noting Moscow's progress on the battlefield. In recent months, Russian forces have continued to gain ground, fully liberating the Lugansk People's Republic, as well as the Kursk Region, which was invaded by Ukrainian forces last year. Russia has rejected Trump's latest ultimatum, while condemning attempts to pressure it. Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov asserted that this approach is 'unacceptable' and demanded that Washington and NATO respect Russia's interests and concerns. Moscow has repeatedly stressed that it is open to conducting negotiations based on mutual respect with the aim of settling the Ukraine conflict diplomatically. However, Russian officials have also said they see no genuine effort on the part of Kiev or the West to pursue peace and repeatedly slammed calls by Western officials to inflict 'strategic defeat' on Russia. Russia has emphasized that it remains determined to achieve the goals of its military operation in Ukraine and, while it would prefer to do so through diplomacy, it is prepared to use military means if necessary.
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
EU welcomes Trump's ultimatum to Russia
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has welcomed US President Donald Trump's threat to impose tariffs on Russia's trading partners unless a deal with Ukraine is reached within 50 days, calling it a 'positive' step. Moscow, however, has warned that Trump's declaration could be seen by Kiev as a signal to continue the war. Trump said on Monday that he was 'very, very unhappy' with the protracted negotiation process, warning Moscow of 'severe' secondary tariffs of up to 100% unless the sides move towards a settlement. 'It is very positive that President Trump is taking a strong stance on Russia,' Kallas, known for her hawkish stance on Moscow, said at a press briefing. She suggested, however, that Trump's deadline may not be enough to 'pressure' Russia. '50 days is a very long time... It is clear that we all need to put more pressure on Russia so that they would also want peace,' she stated, calling for Washington to continue supporting Kiev militarily. Russia has repeatedly denounced Western arms supplies to Ukraine, saying they prolong the conflict without changing its course. Moscow has also condemned sanctions as illegal under international law. Russia and Ukraine have held two rounds of direct talks in Istanbul over the past two months. Both sides agreed to major prisoner swaps and exchanged proposals on potential ways towards a settlement. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Tuesday that Moscow remains open to negotiations but has not received a response on the timing of the next round from Kiev. Peskov described Trump's ultimatum as 'quite serious,' but noted that Russia needs time to analyze it. He also warned that the shift in Washington's tone could be seen in Kiev 'not as a signal toward peace, but as a signal to continue the war.'
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump could authorize long-range Ukrainian strikes on Russia
US President Donald Trump is considering allowing Ukraine to launch long-range strikes into Russia using US-made ATACMS missiles, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday, citing sources. According to the outlet, Trump could permit Ukraine to use the 18 ATACMS launchers that have already been delivered to fire at their full range of 300km. A source involved in the discussions told the Post that the decision would also likely include providing Kiev with additional ATACMS munitions. While ATACMS would not reach Moscow or St. Petersburg, they would allow Ukraine to strike military bases, airfields, and supply depots deep inside Russia that are currently out of range, the Post said. The report also noted that Pentagon officials have for months pushed for deeper strikes into Russia to undermine its military. The report follows Trump's 50-day ultimatum to Moscow in which he threatened to impose 'severe' secondary tariffs of up to 100% on Russia's trade partners if no progress towards peace is was first allowed to use US-supplied long-range missiles against targets deep inside Russia by the Biden administration in the autumn of 2024, although reportedly under geographic restrictions. By January, however, Ukrainian forces had largely exhausted the stocks of ATACMS provided by Washington during heavy fighting with Russian forces, according to an AP report at the time. In some cases Ukraine has used ATACMS to strike civilian targets inside Russian territory. In the most widely covered incident last June, missile fragments fell on a beach in Crimea, killing four civilians and injuring more than 150. The Post also reported that Trump had a phone call with Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky last week, during which the US president wondered why Ukraine had not targeted Moscow. However, the White House insisted in a statement to the outlet that the comments should not be taken out of context. Commenting on the report, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that 'as a rule, all of this usually turns out to be fake,' adding that 'sometimes there are indeed serious leaks, even in publications we once considered quite respectable.'
