Microsoft says goodbye to the Windows blue screen of death
It's a bittersweet day for Windows users.
Microsoft is scrapping its iconic "blue screen of death," known for appearing during unexpected restarts on Windows computers. The company revealed a new black iteration in a blog post on Thursday, saying that it is "streamlining the unexpected restart experience."
The new black unexpected restart screen is slated to launch this summer on Windows 11 24H2 devices, the company said. Microsoft touted the updates as an "easier" and "faster" way to recover from restarts.
The software giant's blue screen of death dates back to the early 1990s, according to longtime Microsoft developer Raymond Chen.
Microsoft also said it plans to update the user interface to match the Windows 11 design and cut downtime during restarts to two seconds for the majority of users.
"This change is part of a larger continued effort to reduce disruption in the event of an unexpected restart," Microsoft wrote.
The iconic blue screen was seemingly everywhere in July of 2024 after a faulty update from Crowdstrike crashed computer systems around the world.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
27 minutes ago
- Forbes
From Expense To Asset: How Today's AI Investments Can Save You Money
Michael Ringman is CIO at TELUS Digital (formerly TELUS International), providing digital-first, AI-fueled customer experiences. Whatever sector you're in, you've no doubt been thinking about the mounting pressures facing your business. Now more than ever, it's critical to strategically prioritize any and all investments. If you're looking for a sign to invest in generative AI (GenAI) solutions, here it is: According to a 2024 IDC–Microsoft survey of 4,000 business leaders tasked with bringing AI into their operations, for every dollar invested, you can expect to get about 3.7 times back. And that ROI is projected to climb as both GenAI and its adoption continue to grow. However, realizing this ROI takes time. According to KPMG, as reported in The CFO, "nearly 70% of leaders plan to spend between $50 million and $250 million on related [GenAI] Yet as we look to the future of GenAI, it's clear that the efficiency gains, cost savings and competitive advantages are too significant to ignore. With more successful use cases emerging and GenAI tools maturing rapidly, the question is no longer if businesses should invest in this technology, but how to do it right. Spending Money To Save Money It may feel counterintuitive to invest in new technologies when markets are facing uncertainty, but GenAI is already making tangible differences. Microsoft recently published a list of 261 success stories about how its GenAI solutions were used to save money, amplify efficiencies, drive productivity and extend the capabilities of organizations globally. Regardless of economic conditions, customers' expectations of digital experiences will never decline. If anything, those expectations will continuously rise as competitors and new market entrants set higher bars for service. Those bars are greatly influenced by companies' embrace of new and emerging technologies. Nvidia's "State of AI in Financial Services" survey notes that one of the top GenAI ROI use cases is customer experience (CX) and engagement. Notably, the report states that the use of GenAI for CX "has more than doubled, rising from 25% to 60%. This surge is driven by the increasing availability, cost efficiency and scalability of generative AI technologies for powering more sophisticated and accurate digital assistants that can enhance customer interactions." The report also says roughly two-thirds of respondents saw AI drive a 5% increase in revenue and a 5% reduction in annual costs. It also tracked an uptick in the number of companies using GenAI, and in the variety of ways the technology is used. GenAI can be deployed both as agent-facing tools to empower employees and as customer-facing solutions, including autonomous AI agents, to handle interactions independently. But these applications aren't the only ways AI drives value. Meaningfully supporting your company's ability to serve and engage customers takes a more profound and big-picture implementation across the employee experience, business operations, hiring processes and supply chain management. Only when your company is working in harmony across all departments can you fully realize the ROI potential of your AI investments. Bringing GenAI Assistants Into The Fold GenAI has changed the way companies handle communications, information, performance data and innovation. Employees are increasingly turning to GenAI tools to enhance their productivity, streamline workflows and tackle complex problems more efficiently. This is happening whether or not your company has adopted and implemented GenAI. Recently, my firm, TELUS Digital, revealed that a majority of employees depend on GenAI assistants in their day-to-day work and will use publicly available large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT if none are available internally. What's more, 57% of respondents admitted to entering sensitive information, including customer names and contact details, into publicly available GenAI assistants, making the need for a secure, enterprise-safe GenAI platform even more evident. Unsurprisingly, employees reported that GenAI assistants helped them work faster, improved their performance and reduced strain caused by repetitive tasks, but the availability of GenAI assistants also has impacts on talent acquisition and recruitment. In fact, our survey found that 44% of employees would be more likely to quit if their company didn't allow AI assistants, and 59% said they'd prioritize applying for jobs at companies that allow AI assistant usage. GenAI is becoming an increasingly crucial part of employees' day-to-day lives, and businesses can no longer simply ban the use of AI at work. Given the workforce demand for GenAI assistants, it's incumbent upon companies to embrace GenAI and work to fill skill gaps now. The Cost Of Inaction Regardless of data to the contrary, many business leaders believe GenAI may still be too risky to invest in. Choosing to delay adoption is not the safe bet some may think it is. Late adopters may experience escalating implementation costs, widening skill gaps and dissatisfaction among customers who are benefiting from AI-enabled services elsewhere. The reality is, the capabilities of safe and responsible GenAI are expanding by leaps and bounds every day. McKinsey recently noted that transparency and explainability of some of the leading LLMs doubled or tripled between 2023 and 2024, based on Stanford University's Transparency Index. GenAI is continually becoming better at accuracy, reasoning and even independent decision-making. For those considering GenAI investments, best practices dictate a few clear steppingstones: • Conduct an AI readiness assessment. • Start small with pilot projects with a fast time to value. • Develop a phased implementation strategy. • Establish clear benchmarks and KPIs for tracking ROI and other metrics. • Develop comprehensive training programs and risk and governance frameworks that include human oversight. • Work with an experienced partner to benefit from their expertise, technology and economies of scale. Taking The Leap To drive efficiencies and reduce costs on a sustainable basis means investing strategically in AI today. As our executive vice chair of the board, Jeff Puritt, previously shared, "Whether your organization is poised to thrive, highly constrained, or in a fight to survive, investments in your people, technology, and communities are measurably beneficial to the bottom line. ... Doing the right thing is the right way to inoculate your business against exogenous events, while positioning your brand for sustainable growth in even the most trying of times." Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
WIRED
30 minutes ago
- WIRED
Microsoft Says Its New AI System Diagnosed Patients 4 Times More Accurately Than Human Doctors
Jun 30, 2025 9:00 AM The tech giant poached several top Google researchers to help build a powerful AI tool that can diagnose patients and potentially cut health care costs. Microsoft built an AI system called the MAI Diagnostic Orchestrator that the company says can diagnose ailments. Photograph:Microsoft has taken 'a genuine step towards medical superintelligence,' says Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of the company's artificial intelligence arm. The tech giant says its powerful new AI tool can diagnose disease four times more accurately and at significantly less cost than a panel of human physicians. The experiment tested whether the tool could correctly diagnose a patient with an ailment, mimicking work typically done by a human doctor. The Microsoft team used 304 case studies sourced from the New England Journal of Medicine to devise a test called the Sequential Diagnosis Benchmark (SDBench). A language model broke down each case into a step-by-step process that a doctor would perform in order to reach a diagnosis. Microsoft's researchers then built a system called the MAI Diagnostic Orchestrator (MAI-DxO) that queries several leading AI models—including OpenAI's GPT, Google's Gemini, Anthropic's Claude, Meta's Llama, and xAI's Grok—in a way that loosely mimics several human experts working together. In their experiment, MAI-DxO outperformed human doctors, achieving an accuracy of 80 percent compared to the doctors' 20 percent. It also reduced costs by 20 percent by selecting less expensive tests and procedures. "This orchestration mechanism—multiple agents that work together in this chain-of-debate style—that's what's going to drive us closer to medical superintelligence,' Suleyman says. The company poached several Google AI researchers to help with the effort—yet another sign of an intensifying war for top AI expertise in the tech industry. Suleyman was previously an executive at Google working on AI. AI is already widely used in some parts of the US health care industry, including helping radiologists interpret scans. The latest multimodal AI models have the potential to act as more general diagnostic tools, though the use of AI in health care raises its own issues, particularly related to bias from training data that's skewed toward particular demographics. Microsoft has not yet decided if it will try to commercialize the technology, but the same executive, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the company could integrate it into Bing to help users diagnose ailments. The company could also develop tools to help medical experts improve or even automate patient care. 'What you'll see over the next couple of years is us doing more and more work proving these systems out in the real world,' Suleyman says. The project is the latest in a growing body of research showing how AI models can diagnose disease. In the last few years, both Microsoft and Google have published papers showing that large language models can accurately diagnose an ailment when given access to medical records. The new Microsoft research differs from previous work in that it more accurately replicates the way human physicians diagnose disease—by analyzing symptoms, ordering tests, and performing further analysis until a diagnosis is reached. Microsoft describes the way that it combined several frontier AI models as 'a path to medical superintelligence,' in a blog post about the project today. The project also suggests that AI could help lower health care costs, a critical issue, particularly in the US. "Our model performs incredibly well, both getting to the diagnosis and getting to that diagnosis very cost effectively," says Dominic King, a vice president at Microsoft who is involved with the project. 'It is quite exciting,' says David Sontag, a scientist at MIT and cofounder of Layer Health, a startup that builds medical AI tools. Sontag says the work is important not only because it more closely mirrors the way physicians operate but also because it is rigorous about addressing potential issues with the underlying methodology. 'That's what makes this paper strong,' he says. But Sontag says that Microsoft's findings should be treated with some caution because doctors in the study were asked not to use any additional tools to help with their diagnosis, which may not be a reflection of how they operate in real life. He adds that it remains to be seen whether the AI system would significantly reduce costs in practice. The doctors involved in the study may have taken into account factors that the AI could not, such as a patient's tolerance for a procedure or the availability of a particular medical instrument. 'This is an impressive report because it tackles highly complex cases for diagnosis,' says Eric Topol, a scientist at the Scripps Research Institute. Showing that AI could, in theory, reduce the cost of medical care is novel, he adds. Both Topol and Sontag of MIT say that the next step in validating the potential of Microsoft's system ahead of general deployment would be demonstrating the tool's effectiveness in a clinical trial comparing its results with those of real doctors treating real patients. 'Then you can get a very rigorous evaluation of cost,' Sontag says.
WIRED
32 minutes ago
- WIRED
The Lenovo Chromebook Plus 14 Is the Best Chromebook Ever Made
Amazingly, the base configuration has 12 GB of RAM. That's not quite as much as the 16 GB you get in some Snapdragon X-powered Windows laptops like the forthcoming HP Omnibook 5 16—but for ChromeOS, it's more than enough. Meanwhile, the base configuration comes with 128 GB of storage, and the upgraded model has a 256-GB solid state drive. Performance is solid. Speedometer is a benchmark that tests performance in the browser, which is important for ChromeOS since it's all built around the Chrome browser. The Lenovo Chromebook Plus 14 was around three times faster than the Celeron N4500, as tested in the Asus Chromebook CX15, and around half the speed of the Apple M4 in a MacBook Air. I also tested a couple of heavier Android games like Diablo: Immortal and PUBG Mobile , which played well with settings maxed out. That's not surprising, but it shows that this chip can handle almost anything you throw at it. Like most ARM-powered laptops, the Chromebook Plus 14 is just as fast on battery as it is while plugged in. Google and Lenovo are also touting the AI capabilities of this device, as the MediaTek chip is capable of 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), a standard met by nearly all of its Windows and Mac competitors. Because of that, the Chromebook Plus 14 has a few exclusive on-device AI features you won't find in other Chromebooks. One of the most useful is Smart Grouping, which can identify the various apps and tabs you have open and group them intelligently into separate desktops. It's pretty handy. Less interesting to me is Quick Insert, which gives you unnecessarily easy access to AI-generated images. Beyond that, it also has the selection of AI features that come with all Chromebook Plus laptops, such as the helpful Continue Where I Left Off. The efficiency of the Kompanio Ultra 910 shines bright in battery life tests, too. It has a 60-watt-hour battery, resulting in some impressive runtime. Lenovo and Google claim it's the longest-lasting Chromebook ever, and it's the best I've tested, lasting 16 hours in a video playback test. It might not last as long as the MacBook Air M4 or laptops like the Asus Zenbook S 16, powered by Intel's latest Core Ultra Series 2 chips, but it's in the ballpark. That's important because before the recent surge in ARM-powered laptops (like the modern MacBooks), Chromebooks were known for battery life. That was largely due to how lightweight ChromeOS was to run. It's nice to see Chromebooks are back in the running. Value Where It Counts Photograph: Luke Larsen The Chromebook Plus 14 has one other trick up its sleeve. Unlike the janky speakers featured in nearly every Chromebook, this Lenovo has a quad-speaker setup and is the first to use Dolby Atmos. These are surprisingly good speakers— almost as good as the 13-inch MacBook Air's audio, providing a well-rounded sound that even features hints of bass. They're the best speakers on a laptop of this price. Many of my points have been couched in the context of the price, and there's a reason for that. At $650 for the base configuration or $100 more to up the RAM and storage (and add the touchscreen), the Lenovo Chromebook Plus 14 is hitting a price that Windows laptops have struggled to address. There are contenders, but the Chromebook Plus 14 makes a case for Chromebooks at this price, offering several features and overall build quality that you won't find in competitors. If you're willing to embrace ChromeOS, this is simply the best the ecosystem has to offer.
