logo
Cousin of Air India victim wants recording released

Cousin of Air India victim wants recording released

Yahoo12-07-2025
The cousin of a man who died in the Air India plane crash has called for cockpit recordings from the flight to be released.
A total of 260 people were killed when the Boeing 787 flight bound for Gatwick crashed shortly after take-off in Ahmedabad, India, on 12 June.
A preliminary report on the incident found both fuel control switches were in the cut-off position - a step that turns off the engines - moments before the plane crashed.
Sameer Rafik, cousin of crash victim Faizan Rafik from Leicester, said: "I've just read the report and it doesn't make any sense to me."
Under International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) rules, investigating states are obliged to file a preliminary report within 30 days of a crash, detailing any initial findings.
One of the findings in the report by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau outlines how a pilot could be heard asking the other pilot, "why did you cut off?", in a voice recording of the cockpit in the moments before the crash.
It is not specified which voice is which.
At the time the aircraft took off, the co-pilot was flying the plane, while the captain was monitoring.
The report says the switches were moved back into their normal inflight position, something which would automatically start the process of relighting the engines.
One engine, according to the report, was in the process of regaining thrust at the time the aircraft crashed.
The other was relit but was not yet regaining thrust.
The report says both engine fuel cut-off switches were turned to "cut-off" with a time delay.
Mr Rafik said he would fly to India "straight away" if the recordings were released to family members.
"The Indian Government should release the cockpit audio for the families who lost loved ones," said Mr Rafik.
"After we listen to the cockpit recording, we will then know what happened.
"If they want to release the audio to family members only, I will be more than happy to fly to India and listen to it, I will go straight way.
"I lost my loved one. I know what my family are feeling and no one will understand my pain."
The investigation - led by Indian authorities with experts from Boeing, General Electric, Air India, Indian regulators, and participants from the US and UK - raises several questions.
Investigators say the lever-lock fuel switches are designed to prevent accidental activation - they must be pulled up to unlock before flipping, a safety feature dating back to the 1950s.
Built to exacting standards, they're highly reliable. Protective guard brackets further shield them from accidental bumps.
The report does not draw any conclusions, and points out that the investigation into the crash - which just one passenger, Vishwashkumar Ramesh, from Leicester, survived - is continuing.
In a statement following the release of the report, an Air India spokesperson said the airline "stands in solidarity with the families and those affected" and is cooperating fully with authorities investigating the crash.
It did not address specific findings in the report.
Follow BBC Leicester on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@bbc.co.uk or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210.
Fuel switches cut off before Air India crash, report says, as families ask if it was avoidable
Why cockpit audio deepens the mystery of Air India crash
'Was this avoidable?': Families of Air India crash victims seek answers
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A Bid to Undo a Colonial-Era Wrong Touches a People's Old Wounds
A Bid to Undo a Colonial-Era Wrong Touches a People's Old Wounds

New York Times

time2 hours ago

  • New York Times

A Bid to Undo a Colonial-Era Wrong Touches a People's Old Wounds

First it was the British. Then the Christian missionaries. Then the Indian state they had never asked to be a part of. For centuries, the Indigenous Naga people of the Indian subcontinent have struggled to preserve their culture against external forces. Now, Nagas are trying to reclaim a part of that lost history, but the process has been anything but straightforward. Their efforts to repatriate ancestral remains, which have been in a British museum for more than a century, have been 'a trigger for the Nagas,' said Dolly Kikon, a professor of anthropology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who is Naga herself. Naga society has changed immensely since those remains were taken. To contemplate their return means reckoning with those changes, and with how many of them are the result of external forces and violence. ARUNACHAL PRADESH NEPAL Longleng ASSAM NAGALAND Dimapur INDIA MANIPUR MYANMAR CHINA New Delhi INDIA Mumbai Bay of Bengal 200 mileS By The New York Times Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Army Pilots Might Have Struggled to See Passenger Jet Before D.C. Crash
Army Pilots Might Have Struggled to See Passenger Jet Before D.C. Crash

New York Times

time6 hours ago

  • New York Times

Army Pilots Might Have Struggled to See Passenger Jet Before D.C. Crash

Before an Army Black Hawk crashed into a passenger jet on the night of Jan. 29, the helicopter pilots told the air traffic controller guiding them near Ronald Reagan National Airport that they saw a nearby jet and would steer clear of it. But experienced Army aviators told the National Transportation Safety Board during hearings on Friday that American Airlines Flight 5342 might have been difficult for the helicopter pilots to keep in their sights. Federal investigators will release their findings early next year about the cause of the midair collision, which killed 67 people — the worst airplane crash in the United States in nearly a quarter-century. But one question is whether the Army pilots ever actually saw the airplane that the air traffic controller flagged in his communications with them that night. In their testimony Friday, Army experts explained why that might have been difficult for the pilots, Capt. Rebecca M. Lobach, who was undergoing her annual flight evaluation, and her instructor, Chief Warrant Officer 2 Andrew Loyd Eaves. At night, light pollution from Washington, the Pentagon and the airport itself is a common problem for pilots. It can be worse when flying with night-vision goggles, as the Army pilots were using on the night of the crash, the aviators said. Further complicating matters were exterior lights on the commercial jet that were dimmer than those on more modern planes. Even the configuration of the Black Hawks can cause sightline problems. All those factors could have complicated the Black Hawk pilots' ability to keep their eyes on the correct airplane, even after telling the air traffic controller they could see it. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Key takeaways from 3-day hearing on deadly D.C. midair collision
Key takeaways from 3-day hearing on deadly D.C. midair collision

CBS News

time6 hours ago

  • CBS News

Key takeaways from 3-day hearing on deadly D.C. midair collision

Over the course of three days of investigative hearings, the National Transportation and Safety Board sought to gather more information about the factors that lead to the deadly midair collision over Washington, D.C., in January between an Army helicopter and a passenger plane. The NTSB heard testimony from air traffic controllers, the Federal Aviation Administration and the Army, and the families of several of the victims attended. At one point on the first day of the hearings, NTSB Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy said of the circumstances leading up to the crash, "Every sign was there that there was a safety risk." Addressing the families, she said the hearings would be "a critical part of our ongoing investigation." On Jan. 29, a Black Hawk helicopter struck an American Airlines flight from Wichita, Kansas, as it was coming in for a landing at Ronald Reagan National Airport, killing all 67 people aboard both aircraft. The NTSB will continue its fact finding and will compile a final report with determinations about the probable cause, likely within the next year. Here are the top takeaways from the hearings: The barometric altimeter the Black Hawk crew members were relying on may have given them incorrect information, according to NTSB investigators, because the crew was calling out altitudes that were lower than the actual height at which the helicopter was flying. The helicopter and commercial airliner collided approximately 300 feet above the Potomac River, and the maximum altitude for helicopters at that part of the route near D.C.'s Reagan Airport is 200 feet. The NTSB, as part of its investigation, tested three helicopters that are in the same battalion as the one that crashed and found that the barometric altimeter for all three was off by 80 to 130 feet. Army representatives on Wednesday told investigators that discrepancy is within the accepted variability because pilots are trained to maintain their altitude at plus or minus 100 feet. NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy told CBS News' senior transportation correspondent Kris Van Cleave the NTSB calculated the margin of error on Route Four in that area of the Potomac to be 75 feet. The Army said it is conducting additional reviews to determine how to proceed, frustrating investigators who asked why it would not make changes to the equipment, based on the findings of the NTSB tests. In 2022, an FAA working group considered moving helicopter traffic away from the airport, but ultimately did not. Transcripts from the airplane's cockpit voice recorder show the pilots received an automated verbal warning about traffic in the vicinity approximately 20 seconds before the collision. Less than two seconds before impact, the pilots shouted in alarm. Flight data indicates the plane's pilots attempted to climb to avoid the helicopter just before impact. The transcripts also reveal the pilots of the American Airlines flight questioned the move to Runway 33. The plane was originally supposed to land on Runway 1 but was redirected by air traffic controllers to Runway 33. As it was trying to land on that runway, the helicopter and plane collided. The pilots of the Black Hawk missed a key word when communicating with the air traffic control tower, according to a transcript released during the hearings of the conversation between the helicopter crew and the control tower. Fifteen seconds before the collision, DCA Tower asked the helicopter if it had the regional jet in sight. Four seconds later, the DCA Tower instructed the helicopter to pass behind the plane. The Black Hawk's cockpit voice recorder indicated that the phrase "pass behind" was rendered inaudible because a helicopter crew member pressed the microphone key. Although it was already known — based on control tower audio from that night — that the controller did not warn the American Airlines plane that the Black Hawk might cross its path, the FAA only openly acknowledged this for the first time during this week's hearings. In a key moment from the second day, Homendy asked FAA Air Traffic Oversight Service executive director Nick Fuller if any traffic advisories or alerts were issued to the plane. He responded, "No safety alerts." Homendy then asked, "Should the local controller have let the [plane] crew know that there was a helicopter there?" "Yes," Fuller responded. Rick Dressler, of Metro Aviation – which operates medical helicopters — was asked if there are units flying in the National Airport airspace that make him uncomfortable. "I don't like saying that first heli of [U.S. Air Force] from Andrews (Air Base) and I don't like saying that 12th Aviation Battalion gives us all pause in the community…," Dressler said, but "we are all very uncomfortable when those two units are operating." During the hearing, the Army admitted helicopters regularly flew below flights that land at Reagan National Airport.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store