Letters: There will be consequences for S.F. Mayor Lurie if free parking in Golden Gate Park ends
Mayor Daniel Lurie should focus on cutting irresponsible city spending, not on increasing taxes. Yes, like tariffs, charging for parking is actually a tax, except that it won't fund any new park projects or services, and it's highly regressive.
If the mayor insists on going ahead with this ill-conceived idea, I can pretty much guarantee that he'll lose the support of many voters, including me.
Stan Barnett, San Francisco
Consider for a moment what San Francisco has done to its streets.
The city has restricted driving on numerous (do we know the number?) of roads, designating them as 'Slow Streets.'
In addition, the Upper Great Highway is now closed to cars, ditto for many of the streets in Golden Gate Park.
Other streets around the city have been reconfigured to include bike lanes, reducing the number of traffic lanes for cars.
Do the math: If streets and lanes that cars can drive on are reduced, there are fewer places for vehicles. This forces the remaining open streets to carry more automobile traffic. This will lead to more congestion.
I don't believe this is an unintended consequence; it is the desired outcome of the city's Transit First policy, which seems to be intended to make driving in the city so unattractive that people will be forced to take the bus to go grocery shopping for a family of four.
Please, let's not pretend that no one knew this is what would happen.
Military going backward
Regarding 'Trump reportedly to strip Harvey Milk name off naval vessel' (Politics, SFChronicle.com, June 3): Defense Secretary Peter Hegseth seems hellbent on restoring America's warrior values by eliminating diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives and other alleged woke policies that were aimed at making people of color and women feel that they were part of the team, not just tolerated.
Hegseth has brought back the names for Fort Bragg and Fort Benning and their Confederate connotations. He has banned transgender people from serving. Now, he plans to strip Harvey Milk's name from a Navy ship.
These reactionary policies are likely causing our military to lose thousands of qualified potential recruits who feel they wouldn't be welcome. Seasoned military members are undoubtedly not re-enlisting in this atmosphere of hate.
With the United States facing threats from our enemies in Asia, Africa and the Middle East, now is not the time to divide our military with anti-DEI ideology, but to unite it in defending our country.
Paul L. Newman, Merion Station, Pa.
Newsom can't win
Regarding 'What Newsom understands about power that other California Democrats don't' (Open Forum, SFChronicle.com, June 3): Gov. Gavin Newsom's strategy of pandering to conservatives demonstrates how he is out of touch.
Newsom is unelectable outside of California because when he was the mayor of San Francisco, he helped to legalize gay marriage. Many of us find this an admirable legacy, but all those misogynists who would rather vote for a felon than a woman won't vote for Newsom, either— even if he bashes trans athletes.
Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, has said that the Democrats are going to pick a 'safe' white man to win in 2028. Sadly, I agree, someone straight, married and ideally with some military background.
I don't know who, but not Newsom. The governor would be a great senator, but he is unelectable nationally.
Democrats doing the same thing over and expecting different results is one of the definitions of insanity. There's no point in nominating another woman.
Kathy Johnson, Mountain View
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
18 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Great Budget Baseline Con
The Senate on Monday began its 'vote-a-rama' on amendments to the tax bill, and it was scheduled to go deep in the night. But before we see the final product, it's worth rehearsing one more time one of the greatest distortions of this budget debate—to wit, that the Senate bill is a fiscal blowout because it will increase the federal deficit by $3.3 trillion over 10 years. That's the official Congressional Budget Office 'score' of the bill, but it's only true if you assume that Congress was going to tolerate a $4.5 trillion tax increase. That would be the result if the 2017 tax reform expired at the end of this year, as most of the individual tax provisions are scheduled to do. Congress was never going to allow that. Even Democrats support extending most of the 2017 individual cuts except the lower 37% top marginal rate. Senate Republicans correctly argue that the bill's cost should be measured against a more realistic baseline, which assumes that existing tax rates and policy continue. In any rational world, changes in the law would be scored against current policy. But in Washington they are scored against CBO's current-law 'baseline,' which assumes that the 2017 tax cuts will expire. Voila, $3.3 trillion in new deficits over 10 years.
Bloomberg
19 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Populism Is Shifting America's Economic Goalposts
This is Bloomberg Opinion Today, the perspiring masses of Bloomberg Opinion's opinions. Sign up here. I never thought of politics as having a scent — aside from stale pizza and blue slips — but now it does: President's Donald Trump's 'Victory' perfume smells like a 'rallying cry in a bottle.' If that's the scent of the Republican Party, then what do Democrats smell like? Then again, maybe this isn't a red vs. blue thing at all.
New York Post
19 minutes ago
- New York Post
Zohran's race-based tax plan: Letters to the Editor — July 2, 2025
The Issue: Zohran Mamdani's plan to raise property taxes in 'richer, whiter neighborhoods.' Zohran Mamdani's statement that he would raise taxes in 'richer, whiter neighborhoods' is an outlandishly racist proposition ('Zohran's 'cauc' talk,' June 28). He has a deceitful smile that epitomizes his persona of being a sheep in wolf's clothing. His left-wing agenda would place him in the stratosphere of radically extreme mayors nationwide. He would make mayors like Brandon Johnson of Chicago and Karen Bass of Los Angeles look like Ronald Reagan disciples. New York City is currently in fiscal limbo. If elected mayor, Mamdani's left-wing policies would destroy it. Consequently, the Big Apple would become rotten to its core. Denis David East Rockaway The people of New York City have lost their collective minds by voting for a socialist, racist, extremist and antisemite who, if elected, will destroy this once-great city. Mamdani represents all that is wrong with the liberal way of thinking. He will increase taxes on the rich, and now says that he will increase property taxes on 'white neighborhoods.' Besides being racist, it is no doubt against the law and the civil rights of those homeowners in these so-called 'white neighborhoods.' If elected, Mamdani will bring about an exodus from New York City like never before and will destroy what was once the financial capital of the United States. Alan Brooks Brooklyn There are no words to explain the shock of who Democrats are selecting as candidates. How could they ignore the struggles of cities like Los Angeles and Chicago that have far-left mayors? There is a thing called 'economic racism,' so how could someone blatantly express racist views and run for office? Socialism hasn't worked anywhere, so why do voters in New York think it will be different? Greg Raleigh Washington, DC As the worm burrows deeper into the Big Apple, we learn that immutable characteristics like skin color are to be taxed differently. Here's a haiku for Zo: Big bad Mamdani. Tax the white, they will take flight. Then who will you tax? Paul Bloustein Cincinnati, Ohio Admittedly, I am a successful white person who lives in a fairly affluent community with successful families of many races and creeds — a truly wonderful place to live. It is disgusting for a potential mayor to categorize people and communities by race. Beyond that, it seems to me that raising property taxes in white communities would benefit the successful families who already live there and harm the very people Mamdani claims to be helping. It would create an even more difficult financial barrier to success for those who are trying to climb that already difficult ladder. It will uphold the status quo in the already affluent communities. Frank Coppotelli Staten Island I take Mamdani's comments personally and every white person in our city should feel the same: He says he wants to raise taxes, but only in white neighborhoods. The nerve of this man to say something like that. We have enough problems in our city. Mamdani is only going to cause more if, God forbid, he gets elected. When we go to the voting booth in November, every single white person should not vote for Mamdani. If you do, then shame on you. He is not good for New York City. Rob Johann Queens Mamdani is now targeting white people to pay higher property taxes. If that's not racist, I'm not sure what defines racism. Now that he has momentum, it appears that the mass exodus of people fleeing to other American cities will continue to be a reality. Please leave the liberal hypocrisy behind, for it did nothing but destroy our democracy. Kevin Judge Naples. Fla. Mamdani's plan to redistribute others' money brings the Yiddish noun 'pisher' to mind. This inexperienced man will drag the Democratic Party to an even lower depth than it is now. It scares me to think people actually take him seriously. Phil Serpico Queens Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
