Crews deployed to battle invasive 'vampire fish' in Great Lakes
Work began back in April in Lake Erie in Ontario and is expected to continue into October.
That's good news, because when left to multiply, sea lampreys can cause big problems and threaten the Great Lake's $5.1 billion fishing industry.
Yikes! (Canva)
There are four native lamprey species in the Great Lakes - the American brook lamprey, the chestnut lamprey, the silver lamprey, and the northern brook lamprey.
The sea lamprey is invasive, and it can devastate local ecosystems. That has a lot to do with its size. Sea lampreys are big compared to naive species -- up to four times bigger. And in the Great Lakes, they have almost unlimited food availability, practically unlimited spawning grounds, and no natural predators.
Sea lampreys posing for the camera. (Fernando Losada Rodríguez/Wikipedia) CC BY-SA 4.0
COVID-19 restrictions caused a spike in sea lamprey population
COVID-19 safety restrictions paused the ongoing work needed to control sea lamprey populations in the Great Lakes.
A March 2025 study found this caused sea lamprey numbers to "skyrocket," highlighting the need for ongoing control measures.
Experts say the invasive lampreys can kill more fish than humans in the Great Lakes.
Vampire fish
Sea lampreys can inflict gruesome damage on their prey, earning these eel-like parasites the nickname "vampire fish."
Only about one in seven fish attacked by a sea lamprey will survive. They will suction themselves to a fish, creating a seal that's nearly impossible to break off.
They have about 100 teeth, which they use to suction to the side of a fish, and a sharp tongue that drills through its scales.
They secret an enzyme that prevents blood from clotting. Once attached, the sea lamprey will spend the next several months feeding off the blood and fluids of the host animal.
Lake trout with lampreys attached. (Great Lakes Fishery Commission/Wikipedia)
Just in case you're wondering, sea lampreys can accidentally latch on to humans, usually when people are swimming. A bite won't be fatal, but it can be painful, and untreated wounds could lead to infection. Sea lampreys don't pose a threat to people though - they aren't interested in us and human bites appear to be rare.
In their native environment, the Atlantic Ocean, sea lampreys don't often kill their host. In the Great Lakes, where sea lampreys have not co-evolved alongside native species, they are a significant threat.
Shipping canals transport more than just ships
Sea lampreys entered the Great Lakes from the Atlantic Ocean through man-made shipping canals, popping up in Lake Ontario in the 1830s. When the Welland Canal deepened in 1919, sea lampreys gained access to all the Great Lakes -- and they remain there to this day, although their numbers are falling.
In the 1950s, the U.S. and Canada teamed up to implement population control measures), and they have worked.
Several strategies, including traps to capture adult lampreys, lampricides to target sea lamprey larvae, and installing barriers and traps are a few tactics in use.
So far, it's working. Today, sea lamprey populations are down by around 90 per cent in the Great Lakes.
Header image: Cheryl Santa Maria for The Weather Network, using elements from Canva Pro and the public domain.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
3 hours ago
- CNN
Can You Lower Your Risk for Dementia? - Chasing Life with Dr. Sanjay Gupta - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
Dr. Sanjay Gupta 00:00:03 Welcome to Paging Dr. Gupta. Thank you so much for joining us. We are really trying to be your source for answers to whatever health questions you've been mulling over. Feel free to send those in to us. This is the show where we take those questions, really dig into the science and hopefully the stories behind them. Kyra's back with us. Who do we have first? Kyra Dahring 00:00:24 Hey Sanjay. So first up today, we've got a question from Alan in Ottawa, Canada, who wrote in asking if having type 2 diabetes accelerates cognitive decline if you're over the age of 70. Dr. Sanjay Gupta 00:00:40 Alan, I am really glad you asked about this, because so many people in both Canada and the United States have type 2 diabetes. In fact, around 11% of the general population lives with diabetes, and the numbers for those over the age of 65 jump up close to 30%. Keep that in mind when we give you the answer right after the break. Dr. Sanjay Gupta 00:01:06 'Alright, so does having type 2 diabetes affect cognitive decline in older adults? Well, the short answer, unfortunately, is yes. Studies find that diabetes can increase the odds of developing cognitive decline up to two times. A 2021 JAMA study following about 10,000 men and women found that those who had diabetes at age 70 had a higher likelihood of developing cognitive decline. So, you know, older adults with diabetes do have higher instances of dementia overall, Alzheimer's disease, and also something known as vascular dementia. And it has also been shown that the risk of cognitive decline in dementia is higher for those who develop diabetes at a younger age. So the earlier the age when you develop diabetes, the more likely you are to have cognitive decline again after age 70. Now, we don't know exactly why this is, but the connection appears to be pretty strong. So much so that some people have started calling Alzheimer's type 3 diabetes. Now that might be a bit hyperbolic, but I think there's no question that we know diabetes raises the risk of heart disease and stroke, which hurt heart and blood vessels, damaged blood vessels in the brain, could contribute to cognitive decline. We also know that the brain is dependent on many different chemicals, which can become imbalanced when insulin is not working as it should. Some of those changes could trigger cognitive decline, high blood sugar all by itself is pro-inflammatory that could damage brain cells and cause dementia to develop. But all this to say that there's clearly a connection between lifestyle and dementia. In fact, if you look at some of the latest studies, probably around 40% of dementia cases are preventable through lifestyle changes -- healthy balanced diet, physical activity, exercising your brain, social activity, and yes, keeping your blood sugar in check. There was another recent study called the Poynter Study, around 2,000 participants from across the United States, people who were between the ages of 60 and 79 and were cognitively healthy, okay, so they did not have problems, but they were leading sedentary lifestyles and had a higher risk of dementia due to health issues like pre-diabetes or borderline high blood pressure. And what they did in these two groups is one was given sort of a structured lifestyle intervention program, and the other was given guidance, but they were told to sort of do it on their own. All of it was geared towards healthy behaviors. Things like 30 minutes of cardio a day plus several days of weight training, a Mediterranean DASH diet, which is basically the Mediterranean diet with even more salt restrictions, certain brain training exercises, social activities, and health monitoring. Both groups that focused on these lifestyle changes did see an improvement in cognitive function. So that was really encouraging. There was other studies that have shown people who had even been given the diagnosis of cognitive impairment or early Alzheimer's disease also saw an improvement. Not only were they able to slow or stall the progression of the disease, in some cases they were able to reverse it with lifestyle changes alone. So there's this connection between high blood sugar, diabetes and cognitive impairment. But I think the evidence is becoming increasingly clear that there's a lot that you can do about it. Hope that helps, Alan. I'll be back to answer another one of your questions right after the break. Dr. Sanjay Gupta 00:04:50 All right, all sorts of pagers going off. Kyra, who's next? Kyra Dahring 00:04:55 Okay, next up we've got Cal. Now, he's wondering, can learning a new language or even picking up a new instrument, can that actually help slow down cognitive decline? Or what kind of impact does that have? Dr. Sanjay Gupta 00:05:11 'So just as keeping your body active is important, and we know it's really important, not just for your physical health, but your brain health as well, we also know that learning a new language or learning to play an instrument can have a really significant beneficial impact on cognitive decline. I love this question. I love the topic. It is true that just moderate brisk activity, physical activity, is probably the most evidence-based way to improve your overall brain health. But when it comes to doing other things, learning new skills, taking on new hobbies, the key word here is new. A lot of people focus on things like crossword puzzles, which can be really helpful for overall brain-health, but mostly what crossword-puzzles do is make you really good at crossword puzzles. What you want to do is something new! Learning a new language is kind of like a form of developing cognitive reserve, like a demanding career of some sort that's going to strengthen and organize your brain circuits, helping to fight off the initial symptoms of dementia until later in life. I really loved this one study when it came to instruments. There was a study of twins where one twin had developed dementia, the other didn't. And what they found after controlling for education and physical activity, that playing a musical instrument was significantly associated with lower likelihood of dementia and cognitive impairment. So, you know, genetically identical individuals, the only big difference was that one played an instrument. Taking that a step further, there was a study that found professional musicians who began training before age seven actually had reliably thicker areas of certain parts of the brain, such as the anterior corpus callosum, which is the very front of the brain that sort of connects the two hemispheres. Even learning an instrument later in life, was associated with improved attention, improved thinking skills, and overall better mental health. Dr. Sanjay Gupta 00:07:18 'So, Shukriya, merci, gracias for your question. Thank you very much. That's all the time we have for today. Thanks to everyone who sent in questions. I'm inspired by your curiosity. I love reading these questions, I love hearing your stories and I love your voices. That is what makes this show so special. So keep the questions coming. If there's something health related you've been wondering about send it to us, we might try and answer it next week! Record a voice memo email it to AskSanjay@ or give us a call, 470-396-0832, and leave a message. Thanks so much for listening. I'll be back next Tuesday.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Study IDs possible cause of sea star wasting disease that wreaked havoc on Oregon Coast
A leading suspect has been identified as a likely cause of sea star wasting disease, which has had a major impact on the ecology of the Oregon Coast over the past decade, according to a study published Aug. 4 in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution. The bacterium Vibrio pectenicida was identified as being the causative agent in a disease that has killed billions of sunflower sea stars on the West Coast. The finding is critical, the study says, because the discovery "will enable recovery efforts for sea stars and the ecosystems affected by their decline." The loss of sea stars has led to a highly impactful "trophic cascade" in the ecosystem off the coast. Left unchecked by predatory sea stars, the sea urchin population has exploded, which has led to a major decline in nearshore kelp forests that serve as habitat for a wide range of fish and shellfish species. In 2021, the Center for Biological Diversity submitted a petition to list the sunflower sea star under the Endangered Species Act. The National Marine Fisheries Service proposed to protect the species as threatened in 2023 but the listing has not yet been finalized. 'Hats off to the dedicated researchers who've identified what killed billions of these extraordinary sea stars in the Pacific,' said Catherine Kilduff, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity. 'With this new information, I'm hopeful we'll be able to stop the sunflower sea star's decline and get their populations back up so they're thriving again." Kilduff said the discovery can help entire ecosystems and highlights why research funding and species protection are important. "The federal government needs to stop dragging its feet and provide the safeguards these sea stars desperately need to survive," Kilduff said. Sea star wasting disease first emerged in 2013 along the Pacific Coast and quickly became one of the largest documented marine epidemics ever recorded. Sunflower sea stars, which can grow to 3 feet across and have up to 20 arms, once ranged in high densities from Mexico to Alaska. But they were extremely susceptible to the disease, and after multiple waves of die-offs, have become functionally extinct in their southern range and have lost nearly 91% of its population overall. The identification of the bacterium causing SSWD, conducted between 2021 and 2024, is critical because it could mean treating sea stars in captivity with antibiotics or testing them in the field, Scenice News reported. "You can treat them with antibiotics [that] would target that specific bacteria,' Ian Hewson, a marine ecologist at Cornell University, told the media outlet. Any rebound in their population would be critical. The kelp forests off the Oregon Coast have been disappearing at an alarming rate as the number of sea urchins rises. The forests absorb carbon dioxide and support fish, otters, sea lions and other animals. Zach Urness has been an outdoors reporter in Oregon for 18 years and is host of the Explore Oregon Podcast. He can be reached at zurness@ or (503) 399-6801. Find him on X at @ZachsORoutdoors and BlueSky at This article originally appeared on Salem Statesman Journal: Study IDs possible cause of sea star wasting disease on Pacific coast Solve the daily Crossword
Medscape
5 hours ago
- Medscape
Cognitive Impact From Dementia Risk Factors Greater in Women
TORONTO — A number of modifiable risk factors are more common in women than in men and have a greater impact on cognition, an early look at new research showed. Six modifiable dementia risk factors were more prevalent in women, whereas only three were more common in men. Investigators also found that the impact on cognition from some of these factors was greater in women than in men, especially hearing loss and diabetes. However, the impact of these and other risk factors varied by age. Megan Fitzhugh, PhD The results suggest personalized health and lifestyle interventions should consider both sex and age, study author Megan Fitzhugh, PhD, assistant professor, Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, told Medscape Medical News. 'Clinicians should familiarize themselves with the 14 identified modifiable risk factors, and if their patients have these risk factors, consider their sex and age, and try to target the behavior changes accordingly to minimize the impact on cognition and dementia risk,' Fitzhugh said. The findings were presented on July 28 at the Alzheimer's Association International Conference (AAIC) 2025. At Greater Risk It's well-known that women are at greater risk for dementia. The lifetime risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is 1 in 5 for women compared with 1 in 10 for men. Sex-specific factors such as pregnancy and menopause may contribute to this imbalance. But while many researchers tackle this issue from a biological perspective, Fitzhugh focuses on the effects of modifiable risk factors. She used the 2008 wave of the Health and Retirement study, an ongoing population-based study of a representative sample of American retirees and their spouses who complete questionnaire every 2 years (in 'waves'). After excluding anyone younger than 40 years and those without self-reported risk factor information, the study sample included 17,182 individuals. Fitzhugh concentrated on items included in the Lancet Report on Dementia Prevention. As reported by Medscape Medical News , 45% of dementia risk factors are potentially modifiable. Risk factors identified in the Lancet report include less education in early life (contributing 5% to risk); hearing loss (7%), elevated low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (7%), depression (3%), traumatic brain injury (3%), physical inactivity (2%), diabetes (2%), smoking (2%), hypertension (2%), obesity (1%), and excessive alcohol (1%) in midlife; and social isolation (5%), air pollution (3%), and vision loss (2%) in late life. Looking at prevalence, investigators found that six of the 14 risk factors were more common in women, including physical inactivity, depression, smoking, poor sleep, less education and poor vision (for example, glaucoma or cataracts). Only three risk factors were more common in men, including hearing loss, diabetes, and alcohol use. There was no difference in prevalence between men and women in high BMI, hypertension, and social isolation. Plotting Cognition The Health and Retirement Study also gathers data on global cognition (immediate recall, delayed recall, numeracy, etc.) using a 27-item scale. Fitzhugh separated mean cognitive scores for men and women and for three age groups (middle age: 40-59 years; middle to older age: 60-79 years; and oldest age: 80 years and over), then plotted risk factors in each group. The graphs she created illustrate the differences in cognitive performance between having and not having a risk factor for each sex. For example, the diabetes plot shows this risk factor has a much bigger impact on cognition in women. 'The line for men is relatively flat, so their cognition is really the same if they have diabetes or not, but for women, if they have diabetes, cognition is much lower compared to women who don't have diabetes', explained Fitzhugh. In addition to diabetes, other risk factors that have a greater cognitive impact on women included poor sleep, BMI, hypertension, poor vision, less education, and hearing loss. Along with high LDL, hearing loss is the largest modifiable risk factor, accounting for 7% of dementia risk, according to the Lancet Commission report. But even though more men have hearing loss across all ages, it appears to be more impactful on women in terms of cognition, said Fitzhugh. 'Maybe we should be targeting women with hearing loss in middle to older age, making sure they get hearing aids,' she said. Elsewhere in her research, Fitzhugh found women with hearing loss have a greater risk for dementia than men with hearing loss. 'There's something about hearing loss in women that is particularly detrimental.' The cognitive impact of risk factors also varies by age, investigators found. Among women, the impact of hearing loss was greatest in middle to older age. Poor sleep only had a significant impact in middle age, which coincides with the menopause transition. And in the oldest age, less education was the only risk factor to have a significant impact on cognition. In men, only smoking had a greater cognitive impact, but interestingly, only in the older age group. 'The way I think about age in this study is it's telling us when, potentially, we should be targeting these risk factors,' said Fitzhugh. She recognizes this is 'just a snapshot' in time and said she'd like to 'map out' how risk factors impact cognition over time. Commenting on the research, Liisa Galea, PhD, Treliving Family Chair in Women's Mental Health, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, and professor of psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, said that more modifiable factors are associated with cognition in females than males is 'most surprising.' 'Clearly these factors are important for everyone, but we need more targeted messaging to women across the lifespan about the importance of these variables for their brain health,' Galea said.
