Supreme Court throws out appellate rulings in favor of transgender people in 4 states
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday threw out appellate rulings in favor of transgender people in four states following the justices' recent decision upholding a Tennessee ban on certain medical treatment for transgender youths.
But the justices took no action in cases from Arizona, Idaho and West Virginia involving the participation of transgender students on school sports teams. The court could say as soon as Thursday whether it will take up the issue in its next term.
The high court ordered appellate judges to reexamine cases from Idaho, North Carolina, Oklahoma and West Virginia involving access to medical care and birth certificates.
The action was unsurprising because the court had set the cases aside until after it decided the Tennessee case, as typically happens when the same legal issue is being considered.
The rulings all included findings that the restrictions on transgender people imposed by the states violate the Constitution's equal protection clause.
In the Tennessee case, the Supreme Court ruled that there was no constitutional violation in a state law prohibiting puberty blockers and hormone therapy to treat gender dysphoria in people younger than 18.
The justices ordered the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, to review its decision that West Virginia's and North Carolina's refusal to cover certain health care for transgender people with government-sponsored insurance is discriminatory.
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will get back a case from Idaho stemming from the state's ban on certain surgical procedures for Medicaid recipients.
The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver will review its ruling blocking an Oklahoma ban on people changing their gender on birth certificates.
In one other case, from Kentucky, the justices rejected the appeal of transgender minors and their families challenging that state's ban on gender-affirming care.
___
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
30 minutes ago
- New York Post
SCOTUS' slap at lower courts: Letters to the Editor — July 1, 2025
The Issue: The US Supreme Court ruling that lower-court judges are 'likely exceeding' their authority. The US Supreme Court has rightfully ruled that lower-court judges do not have the constitutional authority to block executive actions from taking effect nationwide ('Supreme rebuke of judges,' June 28). While they did not rule on the merits of this executive order, I'm sure all that litigation will come in due time. For the minority of the court to assume judges can overstep the powers granted to them by the Constitution is in direct conflict with their opinion that the Executive Branch is doing the same. Also: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's opinion that she could trump President Trump does not align with her argument that the law applies equally to all. Her rare but stinging admonition by fellow Justice Amy Coney Barrett was well deserved. Bo Madden Jupiter, Fla. On June 27, six Supreme Court justices removed another obstacle to Trump's complete capture of governmental power. They have removed the 'federal' from federal judges, emasculating rulings by all lower courts that would limit a president's power. The lower-court judges had been the last bastion of resistance to an imperial presidency, a k a a dictatorship. Nicholas Molinari Brick, NJ Wow: Just after five months in office, the Supreme Court untied the hands of Trump's administration, putting district court judges back where they belong. This is as exciting to watch as 'Yellowstone.' I can't wait for the next episode. Mike Santavicca Yonkers The Supreme Court ruling in favor of Trump basically states that if he tries to engage in unconstitutional acts, like his effort to end birthright citizenship, any effort on the part of lower courts to rein him in would amount to judicial overreach. Yet the federal judiciary exists for the purpose of ensuring that neither the Congress nor the Executive Branch exceeds the powers granted to them under the Constitution. To those who believe that the Republican majority on the Supreme Court would have still ruled in favor of a Democratic president exceeding his or her constitutional authority, there is a bridge in Brooklyn I would be happy to sell you. Dennis Middlebrooks Brooklyn The familiar huddle of Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Jackson against all things Trump and in preference of their own social standards above the text of the parchment is tedious and wrong. Leonard Toboroff Ramatuelle, France The Issue: Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa's run to become New York City's next mayor. It is time for a dose of Curtis Sliwa as New York City's mayor ('Sliwa stands tall,' June 27). Like President Trump, he's a proud American, a friend to law-and-order and an assassination-attempt survivor; so, maybe he's lucky too and has got nine lives. Robin Bredin Ontario, Canada Sliwa has been a New Yorker through and through. He is for everyone; just look at his Guardian Angels and knowledge of New York City and the great people who run it. Give him and the city he loves a chance. Bruce Altman Miami Beach, Fla. The lack of media coverage for Sliwa, who, for all practical purposes, is invisible and who the pundits have written off from having any chance of winning the election, hasn't gone unnoticed. Unfortunately, Sliwa is not being given the chance to get the GOP message out. The Post owes its readers some overdue publicity for Curtis; he's been very unlucky so far. J.J. Crovatto Ramsey, NJ Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
Miami Herald
36 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Sex, corruption and tapes: Scandal shakes Spain's Socialist government
In 1989, filmmaker Steven Soderbergh shook up cinema with 'Sex, Lies, and Videotape' which explored the darker sides of sexuality, the lies embedded in human relationships and the objectification of women. I bring this up in light of the political crisis shaking Spain, where the Socialist government (PSOE) of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez is on the edge of a cliff. This time, it's not just lies and sex — it's an alleged corruption scheme involving kickbacks received by top Sánchez advisors in exchange for political favors, mostly related to public works contracts. The scandal has reached deep into the PSOE leadership and continues to unfold. At the center of this scandal are three men: former Transport Minister José Luis Ábalos; former PSOE organization secretary Santos Cerdán; and Koldo García, their trusted aide who allegedly handled the dirty money — the commissions that were skimmed off the top and pocketed. These men were instrumental in Sánchez's rise to power and helped consolidate his leadership. But now, their proximity to power makes this all the more damning. And the scandal just deepened Monday: Santos Cerdán was ordered into provisional prison without bail by Spain's Supreme Court. He stands accused of belonging to a criminal organization, accepting bribes, and influence peddling. The judge cited the risk of destruction of evidence and coordinated criminal activity across public institutions. Cerdán now joins Koldo and Ábalos in a fall from grace so severe, even their closest allies have cut ties. The Spanish Civil Guard, in a nearly 500-page report, calls this an organized crime network, and it's inching dangerously close to the prime minister himself. Once welcome at Moncloa Palace, these men are now political poison. Former colleagues who once 'would've put their hand in the fire' for Ábalos and Cerdán now deny ever knowing them. As for Koldo García, he is seen as the operative who got his hands dirty—enriching his superiors, himself, and even his family. In true underworld fashion, García tried to shield himself from the fallout. Knowing the day might come when the whole house of cards collapsed, he secretly recorded conversations with his bosses . These tapes — now in the hands of authorities and partially leaked—are damning. They capture discussions of massive commissions tied to government contracts, awarded to companies willing to pay bribes. The men even quarrel like vultures over how to split the spoils. But it's not just corruption that makes these tapes horrifying. It's also the blatant misogyny. Koldo and Ábalos are caught speaking crudely about the women they allegedly hired for private parties — classifying them by sexual skill, discussing how to divide them and referencing their nationalities (Colombian, Romanian, etc.). The most 'favored' were reportedly assigned apartments. What emerges isn't just kickbacks — but the outlines of a prostitution ring allegedly funded with illicit money. This is especially shocking from a government that touts feminism as a core value. The Sánchez administration has positioned itself as a champion of gender equality, with many female leaders fronting that battle. Listening to these degrading tapes, it's impossible to believe these men reserved their vile language for private chats — it seems embedded in their mindset. And Sánchez, who styles himself a modern, progressive man, surely knew how coarse and sexist these men were. Yet they remained his confidants. Now we wait to see what Sánchez knew — and when. For the moment, he's clinging to victimhood, blaming the opposition for trying to 'bring down a legitimate government.' But legitimacy isn't destroyed from the outside. It's rotted from within. And as for the prime minister's inaction on the misogyny of his closest aides? Let's remember: it's not enough for Caesar's wife to be above suspicion — Caesar himself must be, too. Sadly, many in politics fail that test.
Miami Herald
37 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
DeSantis budget vetoes hit some critical GOP lawmakers
Gov. Ron DeSantis vetoed about $567 million in projects from the state budget Monday, including millions of dollars in initiatives sponsored by Republican lawmakers who challenged his administration. In the final hours before the state's spending plan took effect, DeSantis made cuts across the state: $14 million for a Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office aircraft hangar, $1.2 million to investigate homeowners association fraud in Miami-Dade and more than $4.5 million for affordable housing initiatives in various counties. He cut another $5.7 million in funding for public radio and television stations, along with $3.1 million in pay raises for public defenders. On top of the local projects, he axed $200 million to purchase land for Florida's wildlife corridor, and another $1 million that would have gone to studying property tax relief. 'I think what you see in the budget is an example of a very fiscally responsible state,' DeSantis said during a Monday news conference in the Villages. 'We're meeting the needs of the state of Florida that I think most people want us to be focusing on.' The budget still preserves pay raises for state employees, teachers and police, and $28 million for a farmer food share program. The state's affordable housing trust funds also remained untouched, at about $235 million. It also includes $830 million to pay down state debt ahead of schedule, a DeSantis priority. 'We're not, you know, frittering it away on something,' DeSantis said of the spending. House Republicans were hit After the most contentious legislative session in DeSantis' history, state lawmakers were bracing for the governor to use more ink than usual with the veto pen. That ire appears to have been trained on just a few lawmakers. Fourteen projects in Republican Rep. Alex Andrade's Pensacola district were cut after he spent much of the legislative session investigating one of DeSantis' top priorities, Hope Florida. Much of that investigation revolved around how the Hope Florida Foundation, a state-created charity, accepted $10 million from a state settlement with a Medicaid contractor and quickly gave it away to two outside organizations, which then gave at least $8.5 million to a political committee controlled by DeSantis' then-chief of staff, James Uthmeier. Andrade has accused Uthmeier of committing federal crimes, and the State Attorney's Office in Leon County has an open probe into it. 'From what I can tell, yes, Governor DeSantis is obviously trying to punish me for investigating the theft of $10,000,000 in Medicaid funds by his then chief of staff,' Andrade said in a text message. 'I knew that heavy vetos would be his reaction as I began investigating what happened. DeSantis can't help himself.' Rep. Vicki Lopez, a Miami Republican who was outspoken against some of DeSantis' executive agency heads, saw more than half of her proposed projects vetoed, including $100,000 for a local boater safety program and $445,000 for a food access program. Other representatives who found themselves in a spat with the governor saw their projects cut. Miami GOP Rep. Juan Carlos Porras, an outspoken Trump supporter who often criticizes DeSantis, had more than half of his projects cut. Rep. Michelle Salzman, R-Pensacola, who ran a bill that would have kept DeSantis out of the college presidential search process, also saw about half of her proposed projects cut. Comparatively, DeSantis' allies faced seemingly less heat. Sen. Jay Collins, the Tampa Republican who is eyed as a possible front-runner to be DeSantis' lieutenant governor, got four of his nearly 50 proposed projects vetoed. Those four included $3 million for new generators for Hillsborough wastewater systems and $375,000 for the Tampa Museum of Art. Overall, South Florida projects seemed to take a hit in the veto list. Because House Speaker Daniel Perez of Miami does not file any appropriations requests himself, other members would file requests for South Florida funding projects for him. Perez and DeSantis repeatedly clashed during this session, with Perez at one point likening the governor to a seventh-grader and DeSantis attacking House leadership as a failure. A spokesperson for Perez did not respond to a request for comment. Senate President Ben Albritton declined to comment. The final total for next year's state budget, which begins Tuesday, is not clear. That's partly because the budget wasn't released, and because DeSantis — who has seen the state budget balloon by 26% on his watch — used some creative accounting to calculate the total. The Legislature's final budget, passed earlier this month, was $115.1 billion, about $500 million less than what DeSantis requested in February. But in his news release Monday, DeSantis used a different metric to calculate the total, bundling in money that his administration did not spend during the previous fiscal year. The result: In February, DeSantis said his proposed budget was $115.6 billion. On Monday, he said the final budget was just $10 million off from what he originally proposed: $117.9 billion. No study on property taxes DeSantis also vetoed $1 million for state economists to study the effects of eliminating or significantly reducing property taxes, something he has been advocating for for months. He said Monday that he's been 'nonplussed' by the economists' work. Their office, which reports to the Legislature, is known for issuing nonpartisan reports and staying out of the political fray. 'We don't need to give a bureaucracy money to study this,' DeSantis said. 'We know what needs to be done, so let's just do it.' What 'it' means is not clear, and DeSantis' spokespeople did not respond when asked for clarification. Although DeSantis has floated the idea of eliminating property taxes, he has offered no concrete proposals. Any statewide changes to property tax rates would have to be approved by 60% of voters through a ballot initiative, likely next year. Republican lawmakers said they want to propose something for next year's ballot, and Perez convened a special committee to come up with ideas. But lawmakers in both parties have balked at the idea of eliminating property taxes, warning that it could devastate local governments, especially in rural counties. Police and firefighters are the biggest expenses, on average, for city and county governments, and property taxes also heavily fund public schools. 'You're talking about a complete defunding of the government in those counties,' Rep. Shane Abbott, R-DeFuniak Springs, said during a committee meeting in May. Former Republican Sen. Jeff Brandes said pretending property taxes weren't a serious issue was 'political malpractice.' He wrote on X that his think tank, the Florida Policy Project, would study it if economists didn't. 'We need research and a plan, not the Governor's 'let's wing it and hope for the best' strategy,' Brandes wrote. 'Florida deserves better.' DeSantis also vetoed the Legislature's plan to put at least $750 million away in the state's rainy day fund, which was last accessed in 2008 during the Great Recession. Along with the line in the budget this year, lawmakers earlier this month proposed a constitutional amendment to make that annual funding permanent and to make it harder to access for non-emergency spending. 'We're in this problem because we spend all the money in our checking account,' House Budget Chairperson Rep. Lawrence McClure said earlier this month. DeSantis said he vetoed the move because he thought the amendment would not pass.
