Domestic violence victim-survivors share early warning signs of abuse
They are just some of the early signs of intimate partner violence shared by victim-survivors in recent research from The University of Melbourne.
The study explored timelines of abuse in relationships, including early warning signs, which research fellow and co-author Elizabeth McLindon says usually involved psychological and emotional abuse by the perpetrator, such as isolating and controlling behaviours.
"Feeling as though there were subtle rules perhaps around who you could see and how much time you could spend with them," Dr McLindon, also from The Royal Women's Hospital, says for example.
She says the authors interviewed 815 women, 75 per cent of whom had a male partner, given they are "disproportionately the victim-survivors of intimate partner violence".
"It is a gendered crime as well as a gendered social issue," Dr McLindon says.
The report mapped different types of abuse over time and identified behavioural patterns, which can help women, along with health workers and others in their lives, recognise early red flags and intervene before violence escalates, she says.
"The psychological, emotional and physical health of women who are in relationships where there is abuse is worse than women who are not.
"And those health impacts last long after the relationship is over."
We spoke with victim-survivors independent of the research, including some from Advocates for Change with Engender Equality, based in Tasmania/Lutruwita, about the early warning signs they identified retrospectively since escaping violence.
Some names and details have been changed to protect the identity of contributors.
The experiences below may be distressing for readers.
Looking back there were signs from early in the relationship, like him being jealous, controlling how long I should wear my hair, or him driving off dangerously during an argument.
I used to think the first time he was physically abusive was the first time he was abusive. But I now realise that I had been scared of him and his reactions many times before that, and that was a huge red flag.
— Rachel, 40s, Tasmania
He was always wanting to be in control of where I was. He would be turning up at locations like where I was working, or if I was out with a girlfriend.
He was always wanting to be with me. At the start you think it's amazing this person is so into you and wanting to spend every moment of the day with you. Really, they were early signs of love bombing, isolation and control.
— Charlotte, 50s, Tasmania
Source: The University of Melbourne study
It's always easier in hindsight with these things, because it's so subtle. It can appear benign. Those early signs can come across as caring gestures, or concern, or even love.
There was constant messages and phone calls. I just thought it was over-excitement about the relationship.
I thought it would settle down with time. But it became obsessive and escalated to full-on stalking.
— Hannah, 50s, Melbourne/Naarm
I met him on a night out and the relationship escalated very quickly. It was quicker than I felt comfortable with, but he didn't respond well to me putting the brakes on in any way, and responded by sulking and withdrawing.
He told me many lies, which led me to believe that he was a really similar person to me. He mirrored things that I told him about me. It soon became clear that many of these things were gross exaggerations, at the very least.
He was extremely jealous of my male friends. If I spoke about them or ex-partners, he would be competitive, often making up things about himself to make himself sound better than them.
— Carrie, 40s, Tasmania
One time, I noticed that he was not happy that I was having a conversation with a man that was working for us. He fired him the next day.
He didn't like it if I was not at home when he came home from work. His demeanour would change dramatically, and it would take days for him to get over it.
In social settings, he would always talk over the top of me and shape the conversation around himself. I could feel myself disappearing into the background whenever he was around.
It was impossible to have a rational discussion with him about anything to do with our relationship. He was always the victim somehow. He could never bring himself to say sorry, no matter how big or small the issue.
He was threatened whenever I had some form of personal success and was totally incapable of acknowledging my efforts or being happy for me.
— Susie, 50s, Tasmania
He was so attentive. Rushing into saying "I love you". The grand gestures. Every Tuesday he would bring me a gift. He started rewarding me with treats and food. Looking back that was a thing for him to control my weight, to get me fat. My self-confidence plummeted.
There was extreme jealousy. He'd make it seem like because he loved me so much, he didn't want me to be around anybody else.
— Sarah, 40s, Tasmania
There was pressure soon into the relationship for exclusive commitment. Wanting me to move in with him soon after we became a couple.
He'd constantly check on me, turning up at my place without prior notice and daily interrogations: where I'd been, who I saw. Couching his behaviours under the guise of being so in love he wanted to spend most of his time with me.
His psychological abuse was a form of manipulation where he assigned responsibility on me to make him happy — to dress as he suggested and to converse on topics he was interested in only.
— Deborah, 60s, Tasmania
We'd like to thank all the victim-survivors who generously shared their experiences with us. Examples provided at the beginning of this article from The University of Melbourne research have been shared with permission from the study's authors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Almost certainly points to human intervention': Migrant mothers giving birth to more boys than girls
Immigrant mothers from China and India are giving birth to more sons than daughters, new research has found, sparking concern among experts about sex-selective abortion in Australia. The study, conducted by Edith Cowan University researchers and published in the Global Public Health journal, 'almost certainly points to' women from countries where higher value is placed upon having a boy, terminating a girl after discovering the gender through blood tests in early pregnancy. 'Indian and Chinese mothers had much higher induced abortion rates in early pregnancy than their Australian counterparts, which coincided with the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing,' the researchers wrote of their findings. 'This study provides the most compelling observational evidence to date of male-biased sex ratio at birth among overseas-born mothers, which appears to be attributed to prenatal sex determination followed by selective abortion of females.' The research was based on an analysis of 2.1 million births in NSW and Western Australia between 1994 and 2015. It found Australian-born mothers had children within the expected natural range of 105 boys for every 100 girls. For Chinese-born mothers, however, 133 boys were born for every 100 girls, and to Indian-born mothers, 132 boys for every 100 girls. There were 115 boys for every 100 girls born to British-born mothers. Chinese-born mothers were also nine per cent more likely than those from other migrant communities to stop having children once they'd had a son. 'It is crucial to examine how these practices may influence SRB (sex ratio at birth) trends, particularly in multicultural settings like Australia, where immigrants from countries with historically skewed SRB may maintain son preference and practice prenatal sex selection in their new countries of settlement,' the researchers said. 'Australia is a multicultural country with a sizeable immigrant population from Asia and other regions with a strong culture of son preference. It is plausible that such cultural preference combined with accessibility to NIPT (non-invasive prenatal testing) services may explain the unbalanced SRB.' Sex selection using IVF – apart from exemptions to avoid gender-specific diseases – is banned in Australia. As a result, the researchers said it was most likely migrant women who were aborting girls. Perinatal epidemiologist and lead researcher Amanuel Gebremedhin said that the 'markedly skewed sex ratio at birth among certain migrant communities almost certainly points to human intervention'. 'Oftentimes, parents are able to determine the gender of the baby as early as 10 weeks of gestation,' Dr Gebremedhin told The Australian. 'Given that abortion on request in many Australian jurisdictions is generally available up to 22-24 weeks of gestation, it allows parents time to consider whether they would maintain the pregnancy.' The Edith Cowan study is the latest to indicate an increase in male-biased SRB among Asian migrants in high-income Western countries like the US, Canada, the UK and Australia. In 2015, the SBS commissioned data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) that showed an average of 108.2 boys were born for every 100 girls to Indian-born parents, and 109.5 boys were born for every 100 girls to China-born parents. Demographer Dr Christophe Guilmoto – who co-authored a 2012 United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) report on sex selection in Asia – said the figures suggested that the practice was occurring here. 'I think there is no other explanation,' Dr Guilmoto told the SBS at the time. 'Once we have run statistical test on this data and they should that the gap between the sex ratio at birth among these two communities and the rest of the population is not random, then we know there is something. 'There are very few ways to influence the sex of your child so the most common is to resort to sex-selective abortion.' Dr Gebremedhin said the findings demonstrate a need for a discussion about the 'consequences of male-based sex-selective practices', noting it could reinforce gender inequality and put pressure on women only to have sons. Studies by the World Health Organisation (WHO) and United Nations (UN) has similarly found that in parts of the world where male-biased sex-selection is a problem, the drivers are deeply entrenched social, economic, cultural and political factors that see women discriminated against in all facets of their lives. 'While maintaining rights of bodily autonomy, sex-selective abortion should be discouraged, as it undermines broader commitments to gender equality and non-discrimination,' Dr Gebremedhin said. The WHO and UN previously warned against imposing restrictions on access to abortion for sex-selective reasons because it was more likely to have harmful impacts on women and 'may put their health and lives in jeopardy'. Despite any skewing of the sex of babies born to Chinese or Indian migrants, The Demographics Group co-founder and director Simon Kuestenmacher said Australia's genders would likely stay in balance. 'This will not lead to an overly male Australia because 70 per cent of population growth comes from direct migration, and we still take in more women than men through skilled immigration, international students and backpackers,' Mr Kuestenmacher said.
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Lung cancer screening gets underway
Isabella Higgins: Australia's new lung cancer screening program gets underway this month. Under the scheme, those with a strong history of smoking aged between 50 and 70 may be eligible for bulk build scans. Now a large trial is underway to see if more people would benefit from screening, including non-smokers. Emma Pollard has this report. Emma Pollard: Artist and teacher Nicole Ives was about to leave hospital after having appendicitis when medics made a chance discovery. Nicole Ives : They found a lump in my lung and there was a high probability that it was lung cancer. Emma Pollard: It was a shock. The 57-year-old had no symptoms and had never smoked. Nicole Ives : Because they did such a great job educating us about lung cancer and smoking, you know for someone like me who never smoked, you know I probably really wouldn't have thought myself vulnerable in any way. Emma Pollard: While smoking is the leading cause of lung cancer, other contributors include air pollution, occupational hazards and genetics. Brisbane-based thoracic physician and researcher Dr Kwun Fong says lung cancer is Australia's worst cancer killer. Dr Kwun Fong : The reason why it's got such a poor outcome is because when we detect it usually it's at a very late stage where cure is no longer possible. Emma Pollard: After years of planning, the National Lung Cancer Screening Program kicks off this month. It aims to save around 12,000 lives in its first decade by picking up lung cancers early using bulk-build low-dose CT scans. It's a targeted screening program open to people with a significant history of smoking, aged between 50 and 70 who have no symptoms of lung cancer. Dr Kwun Fong : We're very fortunate in one of the few countries where this national program will be rolled out. Emma Pollard: But like Nicole Ives, a significant number of those with the disease have never smoked. The figure is one in three for women and one in ten for men. So Dr Fong is leading a large national trial of 3,000 participants to see if other groups should also be eligible for screening, including non-smokers. Dr Kwun Fong : We're trying to advance the knowledge by finding out who else will benefit. Emma Pollard: It's hoped 1,000 Indigenous Australians will take part as they're twice as likely to develop lung cancer and die from the disease. Firefighters are another vulnerable group because of their exposure to toxins. General Manager of the Rural Fire Brigades Association Queensland, Justin Choveaux, would like to see them screened. Justin Choveaux : My hope would be that all firefighters, whether you be full-time, part-time or volunteer, would be able to access free screening. Emma Pollard: A spokesperson for the Federal Department of Health says the National Lung Cancer Screening Program is underpinned by strong clinical evidence. It'll undergo a comprehensive evaluation after two years, which could include changes to the eligibility criteria. Nicole Ives had surgery last year. She's now cancer-free and thankful her tumour was found early. I'd absolutely save my life. Isabella Higgins: Lung cancer survivor Nicole Ives ending that report by Emma Pollard.
ABC News
10 hours ago
- ABC News
AI productivity gains could mask social consequences lasting generations, says AI expert
The co-director of the Human Technology Institute and professor of responsible technology at UTS, Edward Santow, says AI offers plenty of opportunity but the risks of adoption are real and need to be talked about.
