Interpol warns of Africa cybercrime surge, SA also affected
Interpol confirmed the spiking rates of cyber-crime across Africa in its latest Africa Cyberthreat Assessment Report this week. Picture: iStock
A new Interpol report has revealed that cybercrime now accounts for more than 30% of all reported crime in West and East Africa, and is increasing sharply elsewhere on the continent, including South Africa.
Interpol confirmed the spiking rates of cybercrime across Africa in its latest Africa Cyberthreat Assessment Report this week.
South Africa
The report also revealed that online scams, particularly through phishing, were the most frequently reported cybercrimes in Africa, while ransomware, business email compromise (BEC) and digital sextortion also remain widespread.
According to the report, scam notifications spiked by up to a staggering 3 000% in some jurisdictions, and ransomware detections surged in heavily digitised countries, with South Africa receiving 17 849 attacks and Egypt hit by 12 281 over the past year.
Nigeria and Kenya also experienced 3 459 and 3 030 attacks, respectively.
ALSO READ: Cybercrime: A global risk surpassing load shedding in potential impact
Digital sextortion
According to the report, 60% of African member countries reported an increase in reports of digital sextortion, where threat actors use sexually explicit images to blackmail their targets.
The images can be authentic – shared voluntarily or obtained through coercion or deception – or they can be generated by artificial intelligence (AI).
Cybercrime
Interpol said cybercrime continues to outpace the legal systems designed to stop it.
African states are struggling on several fronts, with 75% of countries confirming their legal regimes and capacities require improvement and 95% reporting insufficient training on top of resource constraints.
'At the same time, countries also reported struggling to enforce the existing laws on cybercrime, with 95% of respondents reported inadequate training, resource constraints and a lack of access to specialised tools,' Interpol said.
'Despite rising caseloads, most African member countries surveyed still lack essential IT infrastructure to combat cybercrime. Just 30% of countries reported having an incident reporting system, 29% a digital evidence repository and 19% a cyberthreat intelligence database.'
ALSO READ: No one immune to cybercrime, not even Ramaphosa – Experts
Limitations
While cybercrime routinely crosses national borders, 86% of African member countries surveyed said their international cooperation capacity needs improvement due to slow, formal processes, a lack of operational networks, and limited access to platforms and foreign-hosted data.
Interpol said cybercrime investigations increasingly rely on cooperation from private sector partners, yet 89% of African countries said their cooperation with the private sector needed 'significant' or 'some' improvement due to unclear channels for engagement, low institutional readiness and other barriers
Ambassador Jalel Chelba, Acting Executive Director of Afripol, said cybersecurity is not merely a technical issue.
'It has become a fundamental pillar of stability, peace, and sustainable development in Africa. It directly concerns the digital sovereignty of states, the resilience of our institutions, citizen trust and the proper functioning of our economies.'
Positive note
On a positive note, Interpol claimed that several member countries have harmonised their cybersecurity laws with international standards and enhanced cybercrime response by investing in specialised units and digital forensics infrastructure.
Operation Red Card and Operation Serengeti are testaments to this good work which collectively led to more than 1 000 arrests and the dismantling of hundreds of thousands of malicious networks.
Operation Serengeti last year helped to disrupt cybercrime networks responsible for an estimated $193m in financial losses and 35 000 global victims.
Recommendations
To further improve Africa's cybercrime response capabilities, the Interpol report proposed six strategic recommendations, including improving regional and international cooperation, expanding prevention and public awareness, and leveraging emerging technologies.
Interpol's Africa Cyberthreat Assessment is part of the organisation's African Joint Operation against Cybercrime (AFJOC) initiative, which is aimed at strengthening the capability of African law enforcement to prevent, detect, investigate and disrupt cybercrime.
ALSO READ: Are you making password mistakes? Here's what you need to know
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
9 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Ramaphosa expected to engage with those directly implicated by Mkhwanazi
JOHANNESBURG - President Cyril Ramaphosa is expected to unpack and engage with those directly implicated in a series of explosive allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi on Sunday. Briefing the media in Durban, Mkhwanazi made several damning allegations against top police officials, including Minister of Police Senzo Mchunu and Deputy National Commissioner Shadrack Sibiya. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa commits to personally dealing with claims made by KZN top cop Mkhwanazi He claims they are complicit in a syndicate controlled by drug cartels and businesspeople who have infiltrated organised crime in the country. Speaking from the BRICS Summit in Brazil on Monday, Ramaphosa said he will personally deal with the matter upon his return to South Africa. 'I was not aware of it, that it was coming and obviously it is a matter that I will deal with when I get home. I will need to look at it more closely and have a thoroughgoing discussion with a number of people and thereafter, there will be a clear way forward.'
The Citizen
12 hours ago
- The Citizen
Swati man arrested for Umlazi mass murder
Police said the Umlazi murders were revenge-motivated, with the Xhosa-speaking victims having previously been involved in altercations with Eswatini nationals. The man arrested in connection with the mass shooting in Umlazi is expected to make his first court appearance in the Umlazi Magistrate's Court on Tuesday. Picture: iStock A 28-year-old foreign national has been arrested in connection with the brutal murder of six men who were gunned down at an informal settlement in Umlazi's V/6 Section on 17 August 2024. His arrest follows extensive investigations by KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Murder and Robbery Unit detectives. Melusi Dlamini, an Eswatini national, was arrested in Krugersdorp, Gauteng, on Friday, 4 July 2025. Dlamini faces six counts of murder along with charges of unlawful possession of a firearm and ammunition. Night of Umlazi mass murder The deadly incident unfolded when six men were socialising and consuming alcohol with three women at the informal settlement. According to police spokesperson Colonel Robert Netshiunda, the evening took a tragic turn when two unknown men approached the group claiming they wanted to purchase cigarettes. The attackers had initially been turned away when they were told that no one was selling cigarettes, but their return proved fatal for the six victims. 'The two men left, only to return moments later and instructed the three women to lie down as they fired shots [at] the male victims. 'Six men were shot and declared dead at the scene,' Netshiunda explained. ALSO READ: Man arrested for Gugulethu mass shooting, another wanted Umlazi mass murder revenge motive uncovered Investigations revealed that the mass shooting was motivated by revenge, stemming from earlier conflicts within the community. Netshiunda indicated that the killings were revenge-motivated, with the deceased victims having allegedly been involved in altercations with Eswatini nationals residing in the same area. The six men who lost their lives were all Xhosa-speaking, and their deaths appeared to be the culmination of tensions between different ethnic groups within the settlement. ALSO READ: Shootings plague Cape Town after another five people gunned down Court proceedings and ongoing investigation Dlamini made his first appearance at the Umlazi Magistrate's Court on Monday, 7 July 2025. During court proceedings, he chose to abandon his bail application. His case has been remanded to 14 August 2025 for further proceedings. 'Investigations are underway in search of the second suspect,' Netshiunda confirmed. READ NEXT: Outrage after seven people killed in mass shooting in Gugulethu
IOL News
12 hours ago
- IOL News
What if the Inquisition against JP Mbenenge Is Not What It Seems?
The Judicial Conduct Tribunal against Judge President Selby Mbenenge raises critical questions about power dynamics, cultural interpretations of flirtation, and the implications of colonial legacies in contemporary South Africa. Image: Office of the Chief Justice / S Lioners What if the public spectacle of the Judicial Conduct Tribunal against Judge President Selby Mbenenge is not just a hearing on alleged misconduct, but a broader political spectacle playing out a familiar choreography, one that disciplines deviant Black masculinity, regulates African erotic discourse, and shores up a liberal feminist orthodoxy whose selective outrage echoes imperial scripts? What if this is about more than flirtation, more than gendered accusations, and more than the legalistic framing of consent? What if this is also about the steady rollback of decolonial thinking in the judiciary, about an African judge who moved to rename colonial courtrooms after African ancestry, about a man who issued directives that dismantled the nomenclature of conquest and whose political work has now made him a target? What if this trial is doing something else altogether, reminding us of how postcolonial power operates when presented in the garments of liberal virtue? It demands we ask: why him, and why now? Judge President Selby Mbenenge is accused of coercing a younger subordinate, Andiswa Mengo, into a flirtatious, sexually suggestive exchange. His defence argues that the exchanges were mutual, desired, and situated in the realm of flirtation, known in isiXhosa culture as ukudlalisa ngamazwi (word play), a subtle and socially understood interplay of timing, gesture, tone, and consent. This is not a courtship that obeys the gender scripts of white feminism. It lives in layered codes, ancestral gestures, and unspoken rhythms. It is not easily reduced to the crude binaries of predator and victim. Why is this epistemic complexity so terrifying to the legal and media apparatus? What if, in this case, flirtation and desire, performed by an African man and an African woman, have been recoded through a punitive lens precisely because they elude the colonial scripts that still dominate our cultural and institutional life? In isiXhosa, when a woman lowers her gaze and shields her face while responding to attention, this is known as ukumutsa. It is not submission. It is a performative signal, an invitation to play. It does not exist in English legal terminology. When Judge Mbenenge referenced this in his testimony, he was not evading guilt. He was offering an epistemology. But the tribunal seemed to lack the literacy to read it. Instead, the exchange was hastily cast as evidence of harassment. The entire dynamic was squeezed into a familiar morality play. But who gets to decide what constitutes coercion when the cultural script itself is erased? And what if this erasure is deliberate? Judge Mbenenge is one of the few figures in the judiciary who has actively challenged colonial inheritances. After the successful renaming of Grahamstown to Makhanda and Port Elizabeth to Gqeberha, he issued a directive that instructed the courts in the Eastern Cape to adopt these indigenous names. This was not performative decoloniality. It was structural. It was language that honoured African lineage and replaced the geography of conquest. And this is when the backlash began. What if his bold insistence on naming, which is the first act of power in both colonial conquest and indigenous resistance, became intolerable to the establishment? What if this tribunal is not only about a woman's complaint, but about neutralising a man who exercised full African agency in his will to unseat the symbols of white power embedded in every legal form and every case citation? It is telling that the media reporting on the case has reproduced a narrow, wilfully decontextualised narrative. Karyn Maughan's coverage, for instance, opened with a headline stating that the judge admitted the complainant had 'led him on.' The framing was deliberately reductionist. It stripped out the cultural discourse, the flirtation, the ambiguity, the mutuality. It wrote Mengo out of her own erotic agency and turned her into a universal victim. But why is this erasure acceptable when it serves a specific ideological end? An army of liberal feminists, most of whom operate within donor-aligned NGOs and academic enclaves, have worked to shape this case into another totemic example of male guilt and female violation. But they have failed to ask deeper questions. What happens when African legal customs are put on trial by an imported ideology? What happens when our courts and media act in tandem to purge the system of anyone whose thinking does not toe the liberal orthodoxy? Why, too, has no one interrogated the conduct of Scheepers, the investigator in the matter, whose deliberate mishandling and inadequate investigation of evidence has led to key omissions? Why has the media refused to ask whether this failure might speak to something larger, a rush to a guilty verdict before all complexities are weighed? And perhaps most disturbingly, what happens to Andiswa Mengo, whose deliciously erotic banter, playful winks, and flirtatious agency have now been traded in for injury? She has been cast as a passive figure in a morality tale, rather than seen in the full dimensionality of her womanhood, someone who joked, flirted, asked for a hug, and engaged in suggestive repartee. Is this the feminism we are left with? One that erases African women's agency under the guise of protecting them? What if we allowed for a more complicated truth, one in which flirtation is mutual, desire is messy, and no one is entirely innocent or guilty? The case against Mbenenge invites us to revisit the spectacle of Amber Heard, whose courtroom theatrics revealed the distortions of liberal feminist ideology. Despite clear contradictions, withheld evidence, and demonstrable lies, she was upheld by liberal media and NGO networks as a global symbol of victimhood. A similar strategy appears to be in motion in Mengo's case. Her team omitted her own erotically charged messages from the evidence, while the evidence leader, Scheepers, also failed to pursue basic investigative protocols, including checking car tracking data, verifying time codes, and cross-referencing dates on which serious allegations were made. These omissions are not minor. They suggest a deliberate orchestration of a one-dimensional story. Mengo is now cast as a passive vessel of harm, her flirtation erased, her agency hollowed out, all to serve a script authored elsewhere. But what is lost when a woman's full erotic, intellectual, and cultural subjectivity is sacrificed on the altar of donor-aligned feminist orthodoxy? This is not a call to dismiss gendered injustice. It is a call to ask harder questions about how that injustice is constructed, interpreted, and amplified through media, law, and ideology. The stakes are high. When decolonial African figures are selectively purged from institutions under the banner of gender justice, we must look more closely. We must ask who benefits from the fall of this judge, who has radically reconfigured colonial legacies in our legal system, and whose cultural literacy offers an alternative to imported feminist frameworks. We are not being asked to hold two truths. We are being asked to choose between a script of victimhood that forecloses ambiguity and a deeper truth that resists translation. And in that resistance lies the real threat. * Gillian Schutte is a South African writer, filmmaker and social critic. She writes on decoloniality, media and political resistance across the Global South. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media.
