&w=3840&q=100)
Jaishankar holds talks with Austrian FM Meinl-Reisinger, reaffirms stance against terrorism, nuclear blackmail
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Wednesday held a telephonic conversation with Austrian Foreign Minister Beate Meinl-Reisinger and the two leaders reaffirmed a joint commitment to zero tolerance towards terrorism and expressed firm opposition to nuclear blackmail.
Jaishankar also congratulated Meinl-Reisinger on her new role.
Appreciated the conversation today with Austrian FM @BMeinl. Congratulated on her appointment.
Agreed on zero tolerance of terrorism and firm opposition to nuclear blackmail.
Discussed our excellent bilateral ties and the Ukraine conflict.
🇮🇳 🇦🇹 — Dr. S. Jaishankar (@DrSJaishankar) May 14, 2025
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Taking to X, the EAM wrote, 'Appreciated the conversation today with Austrian FM @BMeinl. Congratulated on her appointment. Agreed on zero tolerance of terrorism and firm opposition to nuclear blackmail."
The discussion also included an exchange of views on the ongoing Ukraine conflict and a review of the 'excellent' bilateral ties between India and Austria.
India's 'Operation Sindoor', which was launched to avenge Pahalgam terror attack, has garnered strong international support for its counter-terrorism stance.
Countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates have publicly backed India's position.
The European Union, along with all 27 member states, issued a unified and forceful statement in support.
US President Donald Trump expressed solidarity with India, affirming its sovereign right to act against terrorism, while also calling for restraint and a focus on diplomatic solutions.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Trump Cannot Dictate': Putin & His Top Ally Unite Against U.S. Over Ukraine Ultimatum
Praniti Shinde Refuses to Apologise for 'Tamasha' Remark on Op Sindoor After PM Modi Takes Dig Congress MP Praniti Shinde's 'Tamasha' comment on Operation Sindoor sparked outrage across party lines, but she's not backing down. Even as PM Modi condemned her remarks as an insult to the 26 lives lost in the Pahalgam terror attack, Shinde doubled down: 'We'll apologise 1000 times to the victims' families, but never to the BJP's andh-bhakts and trolls.' Shinde further questioned the lack of transparency in Operation Sindoor, asking how many terrorists were neutralised, whether jets were lost, and what India truly gained. The BJP called her stand disrespectful to the armed forces. #operationsindoor #pranitishinde #tamasharemark #congressvspm #pmmodi #pahalgamattack #loksabhadebate #modivscongress #modivspranitishinde #andhbhakts #bjpcongressclash #indianpolitics #breakingnews #trending #mediaoptics #nationalsecurity #operationmahadev #modispeech #bjpvscongress #parliamentdrama #expungedremark #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews 9.8K views | 2 days ago
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Swiss Luxury Faces Skyrocketing Prices As Trump's 39% Tariffs Kick In
Prices for the eponymous Swiss watches, Swiss chocolate and Swiss cheese could skyrocket in a week as a result of US President Donald Trump's trade war. Switzerland, home to some of the world's most recognizable luxury brands, now faces an upcoming 39% tariff from the US. Industry groups on Friday warned that both Swiss companies and American consumers could pay the price. Trump signed an executive order Thursday placing tariffs on many US trade partners - the next step in his trade agenda that will test the global economy and alliances - that's set to take effect next Thursday. The order applies to 66 countries, the European Union, Taiwan and the Falkland Islands. In Switzerland, officials failed to reach a final agreement with the US after Trump initially threatened a 31% tariff in April. Swiss companies will now have one of the steepest export duties - only Laos, Myanmar and Syria had higher figures, at 40-41%. The 27-member EU bloc and Britain, meanwhile, negotiated 15% and 10% tariffs, respectively. The Swiss government spent Friday, the country's National Day, reeling from the news. Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter said that the 39% figure was a surprise, because negotiators had hashed out a deal last month with the Trump administration that apparently wasn't approved by the American leader himself. "We will now analyze the situation and try to find a solution," Keller-Sutter told reporters. "I can't say what the outcome will be, but it will certainly damage the economy." The US goods trade deficit with Switzerland was $38.5 billion last year, a 56.9% increase over 2023, according to the Office of the United States Trade Representative. Keller-Sutter said that she believes Trump ultimately chose the 39% tariff because the figure rounded up from the $38.5 billion goods trade deficit. "It was clear that the president was focused on the trade deficit and only this issue," she said. For Swiss watch companies, whose products already come with price tags in the tens of thousands - if not the hundreds of thousands - of euros, a timepiece for an arm could cost a leg, too, come next week. The 39% figure was especially galling to the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry, because Switzerland in 2024 got rid of import tariffs on all industrial goods. "As Switzerland has eliminated all custom duties on imported industrial products, there is no problem with reciprocity between Switzerland and the US," the federation said in a statement. "The tariffs constitute a severe problem for our bilateral relations." Swiss watch exports were already facing a prolonged slowdown, with significant declines in the United States, Japan and Hong Kong, according to the federation's June figures, the most recent available. Swatch and Rolex declined to comment Friday. Representatives for Patek Philippe, IWC and Breitling didn't respond to requests for comment. Nestle and Lindt & Sprungli said they have production lines in the US for American customers. But small- and medium-sized Swiss companies are predicted to suffer under the tariffs. Roger Wehrli, chief executive of the Association of Swiss Chocolate Manufacturers, also known as Chocosuisse, said Switzerland exports 7% of its chocolate production to the US It's not just the 39% tariff that's the issue. Once the manufacturers factor in the exchange rate between US dollars and Swiss francs ($1 to 1.23 francs on Friday), Wehrli said, it's close to a 50% increase in costs for the Swiss companies. And that's a big number to pass on to American consumers, if the already-slim margins aren't further reduced. "I expect that our industry will lose customers in the United States, and that sales volumes will decrease heavily," he told The Associated Press. Wehrli said that he wants Swiss chocolatiers to sell to other markets around the globe to make up the difference. Still, he hopes American customers remember that Swiss quality beats cheaper quantity. "I think even if prices for Swiss chocolate increase due to the very high tariffs, I think it's worth it to buy Swiss chocolate," he said. "It's worth it to really eat it consciously and to really enjoy it instead of eating a lot." Swiss pharmaceuticals powerhouse Roche says that it's working to ensure its patients and customers worldwide have access to their medications and diagnostics amid the Trump tariff war. "While we believe pharmaceuticals and diagnostics should be exempt from tariffs to protect patient access, supply chains and ultimately future innovation, we are prepared for potential tariffs being implemented and confident in managing any impacts," the statement said. The company in April announced that it plans to invest $50 billion in the United States over the next five years, creating 12,000 jobs. The company already employs more than 25,000 people in the US Meanwhile, Novartis, another major Swiss pharmaceutical firm, said in a statement that it was reviewing Trump's executive order. "We remain committed to finding ways to improve access and affordability for patients," it said.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
House of wars: on Parliament, Operation Sindoor discussion
The government and the Opposition crossed swords in Parliament during a discussion on Operation Sindoor this week. There was unanimity in praising India's armed forces, but there was little common ground beyond that. Operation Sindoor was India's military response to the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, on April 22, 2025, which claimed 26 lives. The elimination of three terrorists behind the attack, just before the parliamentary debate, helped the government's case. It told Parliament that these terrorists were Lashkar-e-Taiba members from Pakistan. The Narendra Modi government's strident approach seeks to change the behaviour of Pakistan and reassure its domestic audience. The success of this approach is debatable and the Opposition sought to put the government on the spot on both counts. A demonstrated willingness to use force against Pakistan in the event of a terrorism incident is a definitive turn in India's strategy, and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) takes pride in that. But there is no evidence yet that it is working though there has been chest thumping around it by the ruling party. The discussion in Parliament barely addressed the implications of this approach, which is being touted as the new normal. The Opposition and the government agreed on the need to punish Pakistan, and also disagreed on who would do it better. The government claimed success in meeting its objectives of launching a military operation and denied that it had acted under pressure in ending the war. Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi demanded a pointed response to repeated claims by U.S. President Donald Trump that he mediated the ceasefire but the Prime Minister evaded a direct response on it. The government contradicts itself when it says that the operation was a success, and that it is continuing. It is also exasperating to hear a party that is now in its eleventh year of uninterrupted power, blame people who passed away decades ago for any challenge that India faces now. There was little self-reflection regarding the lapses that led to the terrorism incident, and whether and how the government plans to address them. The government had sent joint teams including several MPs from the Opposition abroad to garner support for India in the aftermath of the operation, but that sign of statesmanship was a short-lived aberration, as it turns out. The world is changing rapidly and India's capacity to navigate those changes will be largely determined by its own character. Questioning the patriotism of political opponents is an easy route to take to evade tough questions, but the BJP must realise that such an approach has diminishing returns.
