Judge rules that Rhode Island's gun permit system does not violate Second Amendment
In a ruling handed down Friday, U.S. District Judge William Smith granted Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha's motion for summary judgment that dismisses a lawsuit filed by a coalition of gun owners in 2023.
The lawsuit stems from a Rhode Island law dictating how the state issues firearms permits.
According to the statute, local officials are required to issue concealed-carry permits to anyone who meets the specific criteria outlined in the statute. However, it also allows the attorney general's office to issue open-carry permits 'upon a proper showing of need.' Unlike municipalities, the attorney general is not required to issue such permits.
The plaintiffs, largely led by Michael O'Neil, a lobbyist for the Rhode Island 2nd Amendment Coalition and a firearm instructor, said in their initial complaint that the attorney general's office denied all seven of their applications in 2021 for an 'unrestricted' firearm permit, allowing both open and concealed carry. Court documents show that the attorney general's office denied their permits because all of them had been granted 'restricted' permits, which only allowed concealed carry.
Smith said in his ruling that unrestricted permits 'are a privilege and there is no constitutionally protected liberty interest in obtaining one.'
The plaintiffs had hoped for a similar ruling handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022, where the justices struck down a New York state law that had restricted who could obtain a permit to carry a gun in public.
Similar to Rhode Island, New York's law had required residents to show an actual need to carry a concealed handgun in public for self-defense.
Yet, notably, Smith said in his ruling that the high court's 2022 ruling did not declare that the Second Amendment 'requires open carry,' but even if it did, Rhode Island's law 'is within the Nation's historical tradition of regulation.'
Frank Saccoccio, the attorney representing the gun owners, said in an email Monday that they did not believe Smith's decision was in line with the 2022 SCOTUS decision and would be appealing.
An email seeking comment from the attorney general was sent on Monday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump Media CEO Devin Nunes loses defamation suit over Rachel Maddow claims
Devin Nunes, the former GOP lawmaker who now serves as chief executive for Donald Trump's media company, has lost his defamation lawsuit against NBCUniversal over comments MSNBC star Rachel Maddow made about his interaction with a pro-Russian operative. In dismissing the lawsuit, which centered on remarks Maddow made during a March 2021 broadcast, U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel concluded that 'no reasonable jury could find' that Maddow engaged in 'constitutionally-defined actual malice' against Nunes in the segment, which focused on a package he received from Ukrainian businessman Andrii Derkach. When Nunes was still in Congress and served as the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee in 2019, Derkach – who intelligence agencies described as a Russian agent – addressed a package to Nunes. According to Nunes, the package was promptly handed over the the Federal Bureau of Investigation. In July 2020, however, Politico published a piece with the headline 'Democrats: Packets sent to Trump allies are part of foreign plot to damage Biden.' The outlet reported that Nunes 'declined repeated requests for comment' but that 'one person familiar with the matter said the information was not turned over to the FBI.' Eight months later, Maddow and her show's executive producer Cory Gnazzo relied upon that Politico article for a segment that covered an ODNI report and Nunes' conduct with the Derkach package. Furthermore, in a separate appearance on MSNBC the day before the Maddow segment, then-Rep. Sean Maloney (D-NY) remarked about Nunes: 'And the fact is that [the Russians] were so comfortable using people like Devin Nunes that Andrii Derkach, a known Russian asset, sent information to Devin Nunes at the Intelligence Committee. We literally had the package receipt.' Meanwhile, in the Maddow segment, the MSNBC host claimed that Nunes 'has refused to hand it over to the FBI, which is what you should do if you get something from somebody who is sanctioned by the U.S. as a Russian agent.' In the lawsuit, Nunes said that both Maddow and Gnazzo knew that he had handed the package over to the FBI right away, but they both asserted that they were unaware of other reporting that contradicted their segment. Maddow and Gnazzo were not named defendants in the case, as the complaint was instead directed at NBCUniversal, a division of Comcast. MSNBC will soon be spun off from NBCU into a separate company called Versant. Nunes, who left Congress in 2022 and is now the CEO of Trump Media & Technology Group, contended in his complaint that Maddow and the network harbored 'an institutional hostility, hatred, extreme bias, spite and ill-will' towards him. However, Castel said that there was no clear evidence that the 'defendant's admitted political bias caused defendant to act with a reckless disregard of the truth' or that Maddow was aware of 'probable falsity' as it related to a separate Politico article that reported the FBI received the package from Nunes. The Independent has reached out to Nunes and Trump Media. MSNBC declined to comment. Unlike his boss, Nunes hasn't been quite so lucky when it comes to his many defamation lawsuits against media organizations and personalities. Between 2019 and 2021, judges tossed out three other complaints that Nunes filed against CNN, the Washington Post, and two parody social media accounts that mocked him online. Derkach, meanwhile, was sanctioned by the Treasury Department in September 2020 for attempting to interfere on Trump's behalf in that year's presidential election. He was later indicted for sanctions violations by federal prosecutors in 2022.
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Republicans slap AOC with a fresh ethics violation — over whether or not fiance Riley Roberts is her ‘spouse'
Republicans on the House Ethics Committee have reprimanded New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez after she reportedly said in government filings that her fiancé, Riley Roberts, both is and isn't her 'spouse.' In its July 2025 report, the ethics committee criticized Ocasio-Cortez for listing Roberts as her 'spouse' on federal documents that she filed before attending the 2021 Met Gala. Roberts and Ocasio-Cortez are not yet legally married. 'The Committee also found evidence that Representative Ocasio-Cortez listed Mr. Roberts as her 'spouse' on paperwork filed with the House relating to privately sponsored travel, although the two were not legally married at the time of the gifted travel,' the report states. Similarly, the ethics panel stated that Roberts was listed as a spouse on the documents to attend the gala, but that he wasn't listed as a spouse in Ocasio-Cortez's financial filings, The Daily Mail noted. If he had been listed as a spouse, he would have been forced to disclose stock and other financial holdings. 'The Committee further notes that at the same time Representative Ocasio-Cortez was seeking to take advantage of exceptions to the Gift Rule only applicable to spouses and/or certain relatives, she was not disclosing Mr. Roberts's financial interests as is required of Members who are legally married,' the report adds. Last month, Ocasio-Cortez was ordered to pay back thousands of dollars after the ethics panel determined that she had not been paying market rates in connection with her appearance at the Met Gala in 2021. The panel found that the 35-year-old had underpaid for her dress, which said 'tax the rich' across the back, as well as for jewelry and accessories. In the July 2025 report, the committee states the investigation will be closed after Ocasio-Cortez has paid another $2,700 to vendors for clothing and accessories. The panel said the congresswoman has been cooperating with the investigation. The committee also criticized that Met Gala organizer and Vogue editor Anna Wintour personally invited Ocasio-Cortez and Roberts to the event. Ocasio-Cortez and Roberts met while they were both studying at Boston University and have been engaged since April 2022, The Mail noted. A lawyer for Ocasio-Cortez, David Mitrani, argued in the filings that Roberts is not subject to the financial disclosure rules as he's 'not considered a spouse.' The committee states that Roberts still enjoyed some of the benefits of being a spouse, such as receiving a spouse's congressional pin, which allowed him to access certain restricted parts of the congressional complex. 'Mr. Roberts and the Congresswoman have been together since 2014, and have lived together since 2016,' the committee states. 'Mr. Roberts has had a spouse pin since the Congresswoman entered Congress in 2019.' 'It is clear that the term 'spouse' – as utilized in this former rule and as seemingly accepted by the Committee by expanding 'spouse or dependent' to any guest – was intended to allow a Member of Congress to bring the individual that they've decided to share their lives with to a charity event, regardless of whether they had taken steps to bring the law or religion into their relationship,' it adds.
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
British man smuggled out of US migrant detention centre by Left-wing activists
A British man accused of being in the US illegally broke out of a migrant detention centre with the help of Left-wing activists. Ahmed Mohamed escaped from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody on Tuesday while being transferred to an immigrant detention centre in California. Mohamed, who has been charged with narcotics and weapons offences, was shackled and being frogmarched to an ICE facility in downtown Los Angeles when a masked man, understood to be a pro-immigration protester, helped him to escape while guards were distracted, Homeland Security sources told The New York Post. The suspect was then loaded into a waiting van and made his getaway with the help of other protesters, according to ICE. After a three-day manhunt, Mohamed was tracked down and 'swiftly arrested' on Friday by ICE agents in San Diego, who shared a social media post of the suspect. 'You can run from the law but you cannot hide,' the post read. 'After escaping ICE custody with the help of pro-illegal alien activists, Ahmed Mohamed of the UK was swiftly apprehended and placed back into ICE custody. 'On top of his charges and convictions for narcotics and weapons possession, he will now be charged with escaping from confinement.' Mohamed 'reunited with handcuffs' The agency signed off by thanking San Diego ICE staff for 'reuniting Ahmed with his handcuffs'. The detention centre was targeted by anti-ICE protesters in June, when rioters threw rocks at police and blocked off major roads in an attempt to push back against Donald Trump's deportation programme. Mr Trump responded by deploying 2,000 members of the National Guard and 700 marines to quell the protests, with Karen Bass, the LA mayor, accusing the president of acting like a bully. The administration's show of force sparked fury from Gavin Newsom, the state's Democratic governor, who warned that 'Democracy is under assault before our eyes'. Mohamed is the latest British citizen to be detained by ICE agents, after Orlando Duncan Da Silva Bain, 19, was arrested in New York in May. On entering the US, Da Silva Bain allegedly failed to declare his UK criminal record, which included child sex offences, according to ICE.
