Bengal colleges fear erosion of autonomy as govt. demands bank account details for aid
'The Finance Department has introduced the Fund Information System (FIS) portal from the financial year 2025-26, and it is mandatory to provide bank account details and FD details to get any financial assistance from the State government,' said the Department of Higher Education in a circular issued earlier this week.
No official explanation has been given about the move, and principals of these aided colleges have refrained from commenting. However, some academicians are expressing their concern over the matter, and they feel that the government might 'dig into their resources'.
'The State government is reducing the funds for education in all sectors. Recruitment of teachers has been halted. Research funds are crunched. Universities are autonomous bodies that have raised resources for a long time through their research, advocacy and industry-institute partnership programmes,' said Ishita Mukhopadhyay, a professor of economics at the University of Calcutta.
Stating that several teachers' associations had expressed their anger against the government's move, she said, 'This move is just to siphon off these resources to the government for no reason. This is an attack on the financial and academic autonomy of state educational institutions. This will further deprive the students, who are already suffering from delayed admission and lack of funds.'
Meanwhile, an associate professor with a Kolkata college who did not want to be identified said, 'The State government is already taking half of the total tuition fees collected in a year. This notification makes us believe that the corpus fund of colleges in the form of FDs and bank balances can be taken away. The colleges need such funds for various development projects like construction of new buildings, renovation and repair, extensions of existing buildings, conduct of events, particularly when the UGC hardly extends any financial help as it did before till the 12th Plan.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
14 hours ago
- The Hindu
Calcutta University Vice-Chancellor receives praise for defying exam rescheduling request
Until Monday (August 4, 2025), University of Calcutta officiating Vice-Chancellor Santa Datta (De) was little known outside academic circles. But following a decision to uphold the university's autonomy against a request from the State's Higher Education Department, Prof. Datta (De) has received wide appreciation from both faculty and students. The Department had written to the university asking it to reschedule and LLB examinations slated for August 28, which coincides with the foundation day of the Trinamool Chhatra Parishad, the students' wing of the Trinamool Congress. Prof. Datta (De) convened a Syndicate meeting on Monday, where the majority opinion was in favour of continuing with the examinations as scheduled. Speaking to the media after the meeting, Prof. Datta (De) said that it was 'unprecedented' for the State government to write to the university over the foundation day of a student organisation. She added that by adhering to the schedule, the university had safeguarded its institutional autonomy. She also said that it was the government's responsibility to ensure normal traffic movement on that day, as it does when Opposition parties call for strikes. 'This is one of the most courageous decisions she took as V-C and such kind of courage and spine is the rarest of rare things among today's Bengalis. She herself is a message and she taught all of us what should be the responsibility of a good citizen of the country. Politicians and the ruling party have very short and narrow vision, they can do anything immoral to be in power, that makes the role of teachers very significant in such times,' Mrinmoy Pramanick, a professor at the university, said. Shreya Datta, a doctoral research scholar, said, 'In the current political climate of the State, when academics is marked by fear, intimidation, and corruption, the decision taken by the V-C along with the Syndicate members stands out as truly unprecedented. For scholars and students, such actions remind us that we must never compromise our core principles, even in the face of pressure from the ruling establishment. This kind of courage is essential across all spheres of the State if we are to reclaim its lost glory.' Ayan Ghosh, another doctoral researcher, said, 'We always felt the need to bell the cat and our V-C madam did just that, and very courageously. From a student's perspective, exams are always stressful, and it becomes frustrating when they are preponed or postponed. Postponing an exam due to a political party's programme not only creates chaos among students but also sets a dangerous precedent, encouraging such audacious demands from all political parties in the future.' SFI activist Malyaban Ganguly said that the university had since received another communication from the State government, seeking access to its financial records. 'It is worth noting that a large number of permanent teaching positions in the university remain vacant, and student union elections have not been held for over seven years,' he added. The Calcutta University Teachers' Association (CUTA) also issued a statement supporting the V-C, Registrar, and Syndicate members. 'We categorically oppose any intervention in the internal affairs and workings of the university. Autonomy is mandatory for its excellence and acceptability to the wider society,' CUTA president Sanatan Chattopadhyay said.
Hans India
a day ago
- Hans India
Use RTI to seek reasons for public employment and policy deviations
Recently, an RTI questioner from Coimbatore sought some very useful information. The query was built around RTI's utility in questioning the re-employment order by the Department of Higher Education, with a focus on the use of RTI queries as a tool for public accountability. In a compelling example of how the Right to Information (RTI) Act can be used to challenge administrative decisions, a former professor and RTI activist has raised critical questions about a recent order issued by the Department of Higher Education in Tamil Nadu, which allows re-employment of certain college-level administrative officers beyond the age of superannuation. On July 31, the department issued an order permitting the re-employment of those engaged in administrative functions, even after crossing the age of 60 years. This move, based on a request from the Commissioner of Collegiate Education, sparked concern over its legality and consistency with existing government norms. RTI activist seeks answers: N R Ravisankar, an RTI activist and former Head of the Mathematics Department at CBM College, Coimbatore, submitted a formal representation to the Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, raising a red flag on the order. He cited Government Order (G.O.) 192 dated November 12, 2024, which had categorically barred re-employment for such positions beyond the age of 60. Prof. Ravisankar argues that the new order contradicts this amendment to G.O. 92, which states: 'Every government servant in the superior as well as basic service shall retire from service on the afternoon of the last day of the month in which they attain the age of 60 years. They shall not be retained in service after that age.' Questions raised under RTI: The activist's move highlights how RTI can be effectively used to demand transparency and rationale behind policy reversals or deviations. Through RTI applications and petitions, the following key questions can be posed to the Department of Higher Education and relevant authorities: Did the Higher Education Department consult the Law Department before issuing this July 31 G.O.? If yes, provide copies of such legal opinions. Has any review committee or expert panel been constituted to examine the impact of re-employment on governance, recruitment opportunities for younger candidates, and institutional autonomy? How many officials have been re-employed under this new order? Please provide a district-wise list with names, designations, and dates of reappointment. Was the re-employment order placed before the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly or its relevant committee for oversight, especially in light of its policy implications? Is there any provision under existing UGC regulations or the Tamil Nadu Government Servants' Conduct Rules that permits administrative staff to continue beyond superannuation age, specifically in aided colleges? What was the rationale behind cancelling re-employment in an earlier instance—such as the case of a government-aided college in Coimbatore where a new principal was directed to be appointed upon the previous incumbent's retirement? Does the July 31, 2025 G.O. apply to government-aided institutions as well? If yes, how does this comply with the statutory and financial norms applicable to such institutions? Legal and ethical dilemma: Prof Ravisankar underscores that such re-employment orders not only defy the retirement age rule but also block opportunities for younger aspirants in the education sector. 'If the rule is clear that retirement is mandatory at 60, how can administrative exceptions be allowed selectively? It defeats the very purpose of uniformity and public interest in service rules,' he said in his representation. His RTI-based challenge exemplifies how citizens and professionals can act as watchdogs over executive discretion, especially in sectors like education, where transparency and accountability are vital for fair governance. An administrative question: Whether the Department of Higher Education will issue a clarification or revoke the July 31 order remains to be seen. To reinforce the utility of the Right to Information (RTI) in questioning government re-employment policies post-superannuation, we can refer to a landmark decision by this author (Prof. (Dr.) M. Sridhar Acharyulu, former Central Information Commissioner (CIC)). This answer underscored citizens' right to seek reasons and file queries regarding public employment and policy deviations, especially those affecting transparency and equal opportunity. In File No: CIC/SA/A/2016/001978, the CIC ruled that: 'Public authorities are bound to give reasons for selection, extension, or re-employment of public servants, especially when there is a departure from standard procedure or existing policy.' This judgment arose in the context of an RTI applicant seeking details about the re-employment of a retired officer in a central government department. The Central Information Commission directed the public authority to: Disclose the note sheets and file notings showing the rationale for re-employment. Provide copies of approval orders, correspondence, and minutes of meetings that led to the decision. Clarify whether any rules were relaxed or amended to allow such re-employment. In his detailed reasoning, he emphasised: 'When a government servant is re-employed post-retirement, especially when young and qualified aspirants are awaiting regular appointments, the authorities must place on record the compelling public interest that justified such a move.' This principle is directly relevant to the July 31, 2025 re-employment order issued by the Tamil Nadu Department of Higher Education. Based on that ruling, the following implications arise: Citizens can question: Activists like Prof Ravisankar can seek: 1. The file notings, justifications, and correspondence from the Higher Education Department and Collegiate Education Commissioner-On whether any rules under G.O. 92 or G.O. 192 were amended or bypassed. 2. Lack of transparency violates the RTI mandate-If the July 31 order does not disclose public interest justifications, it could be seen as arbitrary or opaque, inviting challenge under RTI as well as judicial review. 3. Re-employment must serve public interest, not individual continuity-As noted in the order: Public offices are not meant for the convenience of individuals but for the service of the public. 4. RTI is a tool to uphold equality and fair opportunity-Re-employment of individuals beyond 60, without open recruitment or advertisement, raises serious concerns about denial of opportunity to eligible younger candidates, which can be pursued through RTI. Activists or citizens can file RTIs asking for: Copy of the July 31 G.O. with background file notes and recommendations; Details of consultation with the Law Department, if any. This judgment of CIC affirms that RTI is a powerful legal mechanism to challenge arbitrary re-employment, demand transparency in administrative decisions, and protect the rights of deserving aspirants. In the current Tamil Nadu case, this precedent strengthens the position of public-spirited individuals like Prof Ravisankar in ensuring that public policy does not become a tool for preferential or non-transparent governance. (The writer is a former CIC and Advisor, School of Law, Mahindra University, Hyderabad)
The Hindu
2 days ago
- The Hindu
RTI activist questions latest order on re-employment of retirees issued by Department of Higher Education
The latest order by the Department of Higher Education permitting re-employment of Joint Director, Regional Joint Director, Principals in Grade I and II, College Librarians, and Directors of Physical Education who are engaged in administrative nature of job, after attainment of superannuation, has been questioned by an RTI activist in Coimbatore. In the Government Order 192 dated November 12, 2024, the re-employment for these posts were dispensed with, on the last day of the month of attaining the age of superannuation. The latest order issued on July 31 was based on the request of the Commissioner of Collegiate Education for permitting their re-employment. In a petition submitted to the Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, RTI activist and former Associate Professor and Head, Department of Mathematics, CBM College, Coimbatore, N.R. Ravisankar, said the re-employment order of the Higher Education Department ran counter to the amendment made to the Government Order 92. It states that every government servant in the superior as well as basic service shall retire from service on the afternoon of the last day of the month of attainment of 60 years. They shall not be retained in service after that age. 'The Amendment is clear that those attaining the age of 60 years on superannuation cannot continue further. How then is it possible for the Higher Education Department to issue the G.O. on reemployment which is applicable to the posts in the government-aided colleges as well. Citing an instance of the directive given to a government-aided college in Coimbatore to appoint a new Principal by cancelling the re-employment of the existing principal based on the retirement age of 60 years, Prof. Ravichandran said the latest G.O. of the Higher Education Department on re-employment has to be withdrawn.
