Elizabeth Hurley Dons Jaw-Dropping Minidress With Plunging Neckline
looked stunning in her latest ensemble, with the actress going for a daring yet glamorous minidress featuring a deep-V neckline.
The 60-year-old shared videos and photos from a recent event she attended with her boyfriend, Billy Ray Cyrus, and her son, , for the London premiere of ' movie, Something Beautiful.
🎬
Hurley wrote on Instagram in one of a few updates from the event, "What a treat- a perfect way to celebrate the Summer Solstice with @mileycyrus Reborn from Something Beautiful ♥️♥️♥️."
She wore a sultry sparkling dress with a plunging neckline and a pattern all over in pink, blue and silver, adding tall silver strappy heels and a matching clutch. Hurley also shared photos posing with her son and her beau.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Elizabeth Hurley (@elizabethhurley1)
Fans were wowed by the Austin Powers star's look, with compliments in the comments like, "You look perfect ❤❤❤❤," and "Gorgeous as ever 😍."
A third questioned, "Does she just get hotter with age?"
Hurley shared other photos from the premiere as well, including one of Damian and Miley standing side by side at the screening, with the caption reading, "The babies are all grown up 🥹❤️ @damianhurley1 & @mileycyrus at the premiere of Something Beautiful in London last night ❤️❤️❤️ #proudparents."
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Elizabeth Hurley (@elizabethhurley1)
Miley's new movie made its world premiere at the Tribeca Festival on June 6. It is a companion film to her latest album, also called Something Beautiful, which came out on May 30.Elizabeth Hurley Dons Jaw-Dropping Minidress With Plunging Neckline first appeared on Parade on Jun 22, 2025
This story was originally reported by Parade on Jun 22, 2025, where it first appeared.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Laurence Fox ‘paedophile' posts would not have been taken seriously, appeal told
Social media posts by Laurence Fox referring to two people as paedophiles likely would not have been taken 'seriously' by many people, the Court of Appeal has heard. The actor-turned-activist was successfully sued by now-Stonewall CEO Simon Blake and drag artist Crystal over a row on Twitter, now known as X. Mr Fox called Mr Blake and the former RuPaul's Drag Race contestant, whose real name is Colin Seymour, 'paedophiles' in an exchange about a decision by Sainsbury's to mark Black History Month in October 2020. Mr Fox called for a boycott of the supermarket and was called 'a racist' by the pair, as well as broadcaster Nicola Thorp, before he responded with the 'paedophile' tweets which led to the libel claims. In two judgments in 2024, Mrs Justice Collins Rice ruled in favour of Mr Blake and Mr Seymour and said Mr Fox should pay the pair £90,000 each in damages. The judge dismissed Mr Fox's counter claims against the pair and Ms Thorp over tweets accusing him of racism. The 47-year-old is now challenging the rulings at the Court of Appeal in London, attending the first day of the hearing on Monday. Patrick Green KC, for Mr Fox, said in written submissions that the judgment which found Mr Fox had libelled the pair should be quashed due to 'errors of approach' by the judge, including over whether Mr Blake and Mr Seymour were caused serious harm. Mr Green said: 'Her conclusions were in any event, plainly wrong, on any fair consideration of the evidence.' The barrister added that Mrs Justice Collins Rice had wrongly decided damages for the two men, who, along with Ms Thorp, are opposing the appeal. Mr Green said that the decision on damages did not consider the actual words Mr Fox used 'and the likelihood that many or the vast majority of readers would have not have taken them seriously, particularly in their context'. The barrister said that in one of her rulings, the judge 'ignores the actual words used, or their all important context'. He also said the judge 'failed to account adequately or at all' for an apology Mr Fox made, or alleged misconduct by Mr Blake and Mr Seymour in 'exaggerating' the harm and distress caused. Mr Fox told the original trial in November 2023 that his use of the term was 'rhetorical', and 'there was no inference at any point that I thought they were a paedophile'. 'I was diminishing the ridiculousness of calling me a racist,' he said. And on Monday, Mr Green said it was clear Mr Fox was being rhetorical. The barrister told appeal judges: 'He's not saying 'I am a racist and they are paedophiles' and everyone understood it in that way.' Adrienne Page KC, for Mr Blake, Mr Seymour and Ms Thorp, said in written submissions that Mr Fox's appeal was 'lacking in merit'. She continued: 'The 'paedophile' tweets did not embody the appellant's opinions about Mr Blake and Mr Seymour. 'They conveyed factual imputations of the most serious defamatory character.' The barrister added there was 'no meaningful retraction or apology' by Mr Fox. She later said: 'Whichever way one looks at it, the judge was fully entitled to reach the factual conclusions that she did on the serious, real-world, reputational impact of the appellant's tweets, for the reasons which she gave. 'There was nothing wrong with her analysis in fact or law.' Ms Page added that Mr Fox's case at trial had been 'largely devoted to hypothesising, as already noted, a series of different scenarios as to the various ways or settings in which his tweets may have appeared to different readers'. 'After very careful and conscientious evaluation, the judge was, unsurprisingly, not persuaded of this on the facts,' she continued. Ms Page continued that the sums of £90,000 in damages awarded to the pair were 'unexceptionable'. The hearing before Lord Justice Dingemans, Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing and Lord Justice Warby is expected to conclude on Tuesday.
Forbes
37 minutes ago
- Forbes
Hulu's Best New Show Lands A 100% Rotten Tomatoes Critic Score
Dope Girls If you are currently working your way through your streaming services, trying to find something to watch, it turns out Hulu has a new series that's starting out reviewing especially strong. That would be Dope Girls, the series that originally aired on the BBC, but has now made its way to Hulu, and it currently has a 100% Rotten Tomatoes score from a limited number of critics. While this may sound like some sort of modern day drug-dealing drama, it's the opposite. Rather, it chronicles a much different type of tale. Here's the synopsis: If you think you recognize the actress who plays Kate, you are almost certainly right. That is Julianne Nicholson, and while you may not know her name, if you have watched Hulu's other big show this year, the now Emmy-nominated Paradise, you'll know her as the (mostly) villainous Sinatra, the force of power behind the entire city. And she also got an Emmy nomination for that role. Nicholson is recognizable from a slew of projects. She's been in 13 movies and shows since 2020 alone, including The Outsider, Mare of Easttown, Blonde, The Amateur and Hacks, in addition to Paradise and Dope Girls. Dope Girls, however, is a rare chance where she's been given the opportunity to lead a production, and clearly that has gone well. Dope Girls Dope Girls, the six-episode series, appears to be a one-and-done, based on a 1991 book, Dope Girls: The Birth of the British Drug Underground, written by Marek Kohn. Here's what some critics are saying about the series: These are mostly UK outlets, so now that the show has made its way to Hulu, more reviews may start to come in, as might an audience score, as it doesn't have one of those yet. As for Nicholson's main project, Paradise, that has been renewed for season 2 and is supposed to be out sometime in 2026. It was nominated for four Emmys: Best Drama, Best Lead Actor (Sterling K Brown), Best Supporting Actor (James Marsden) and Best Supporting Actress (Nicholson). I would be a little surprised if it won any of those, given how steep the competition is in the drama categories, but hey, this is a pretty big achievement for both a Hulu show and something in the post-apocalyptic genre. What were we talking about? Oh right, watch Dope Girls. Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram. Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Prince Harry's peace summit with King Charles could take place within weeks – but duke has no plans to see William
Prince Harry is ready to speak to his estranged father, King Charles, after approving a so-called peace summit between their aides, according to insiders. The Duke of Sussex's press team was seen meeting up with the monarch's communications secretary for a top-secret meeting in London last week. And according to insiders, the 'Spare' author was the one who gave his press reps, Meredith Maines and Liam Maguire, the go-ahead to meet with the cancer-stricken king's secretary, Tobyn Andreae. The meeting, which took place at the Royal Over-Seas League — a private members' club just minutes from Clarence House — reportedly saw the trio discuss best steps to mending bridges between both camps, The Sun reports. However, sources told the outlet that a proposal for the Invictus Games founder, 40, to return to the royal fold was not on the agenda. Still, it seems as though a royal reconciliation may well be on the cards as Harry is plotting a return to the UK in September for the annual WellChild Awards. His impending arrival on British soil has opened up the prospect of a potential meeting between the pair, which would mark their first in 18 months. The Post has reached out to Prince Harry's reps for comment. Last week's meeting also underscored another element to the rift as the Prince and Princess of Wales's communications team was not in attendance. It was revealed earlier this week that not only Prince William and Princess Catherine's camp were absent, they weren't even told that the meeting was taking place at all. The Post understands that Maines' London dash was officially part of her routine duties. Maines, who is the Sussexes' chief of staff and communications director, met with the UK-based communications team, media, stakeholders and senior figures connected to Harry's patronages. The trans-Atlantic trip was part of ongoing planning and engagement. However, sources told The Telegraph that Harry and the 'Suits' alum, 43, were 'frustrated' that the meeting was leaked to the press. The meeting came just weeks after Harry told the BBC that he would 'love a reconciliation' with his estranged father, though he claimed the king 'won't speak' to him. 'There have been so many disagreements between myself and some of my family,' he told the outlet. 'I would love reconciliation with my family. There's no point continuing to fight anymore, life is precious,' the Invictus Games founder said, adding that he has since 'forgiven' them for their many 'disagreements.' While a September meet-up between the father-son duo hasn't been confirmed just yet, it may put the King in a tricky position as he's set to welcome President Donald Trump at Windsor Castle for his upcoming state visit, slated for September 17. Solve the daily Crossword
