UK's sale of F-35 fighter jet parts to Israel is lawful, high court rules
Al-Haq, a human rights group based in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, took legal action against Britain's Department for Business and Trade over its decision to exempt F-35 parts when it suspended some arms export licences last year.
The UK had assessed that Israel was not committed to complying with international humanitarian law, in relation to humanitarian access and the treatment of detainees, as the basis for its decision.
But Britain decided to 'carve out' F-35 licences, with the government saying suspending those licences would disrupt a global programme that supplies parts for the aircraft, with a knock-on impact on international security.
Any such disruption would 'undermine US confidence in the UK and Nato', the Ministry of Defence said.
Al-Haq argued at a hearing last month that the decision was unlawful as it was in breach of Britain's obligations under international law, including the Geneva conventions.
But the high court dismissed the group's challenge in a written ruling.
More details soon …
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Iran made preparations to mine the Strait of Hormuz, US sources say
WASHINGTON, July 1 (Reuters) - The Iranian military loaded naval mines onto vessels in the Persian Gulf last month, a move that intensified concerns in Washington that Tehran was gearing up to blockade the Strait of Hormuz following Israel's strikes on sites across Iran, according to two U.S. officials. The previously unreported preparations, which were detected by U.S. intelligence, occurred some time after Israel launched its initial missile attack against Iran on June 13, said the officials, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence matters. The loading of the mines - which have not been deployed in the strait - suggests that Tehran may have been serious about closing one of the world's busiest shipping lanes, a move that would have escalated an already-spiraling conflict and severely hobbled global commerce. About one-fifth of global oil and gas shipments pass through the Strait of Hormuz and a blockage would likely have spiked world energy prices. Global benchmark oil prices have instead fallen more than 10% since the U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, driven in part by relief that the conflict did not trigger significant disruptions in the oil trade. On June 22, shortly after the U.S. bombed three of Iran's key nuclear sites in a bid to cripple Tehran's nuclear program, Iran's parliament reportedly backed a measure to block the strait. That decision was not binding, and it was up to Iran's Supreme National Security Council to make a final decision on the closure, Iran's Press TV said at the time. Iran has over the years threatened to close the strait but has never followed through on that threat. Reuters was not able to determine precisely when during the Israel-Iran air war Tehran loaded the mines, which - if deployed - would have effectively stopped ships from moving through the key thoroughfare. It is also unclear if the mines have since been unloaded. The sources did not disclose how the United States determined that the mines had been put on the Iranian vessels, but such intelligence is typically gathered through satellite imagery, clandestine human sources or a combination of both methods. Asked for comment about Iran's preparations, a White House official said: "Thanks to the President's brilliant execution of Operation Midnight Hammer, successful campaign against the Houthis, and maximum pressure campaign, the Strait of Hormuz remains open, freedom of navigation has been restored, and Iran has been significantly weakened." The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Iranian mission at the United Nations also did not respond to requests for comment. The two officials said the U.S. government has not ruled out the possibility that loading the mines was a ruse. The Iranians could have prepared the mines to convince Washington that Tehran was serious about closing the strait, but without intending to do so, the officials said. Iran's military could have also simply been making necessary preparations in the event that Iran's leaders gave the order. The Strait of Hormuz lies between Oman and Iran and links the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman to the south and the Arabian Sea beyond. It is 21 miles (34 km) wide at its narrowest point, with the shipping lane just 2 miles wide in either direction. OPEC members Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Iraq export most of their crude via the strait, mainly to Asia. Qatar, among the world's biggest liquefied natural gas exporters, sends almost all of its LNG through the strait. Iran also exports most of its crude through the passage, which in theory limits Tehran's appetite to shut the strait. But Tehran has nonetheless dedicated significant resources to making sure it can do so if it deems necessary. As of 2019, Iran maintained more than 5,000 naval mines, which could be rapidly deployed with the help of small, high-speed boats, the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency estimated at the time. The U.S. Fifth Fleet, which is based in Bahrain, is charged with protecting commerce in the region. The U.S. Navy has typically kept four mine countermeasure vessels, or MCM vessels, in Bahrain, though those ships are being replaced by another type of vessel called a littoral combat ship, or LCS, which also has anti-mine capabilities. All anti-mine ships had been temporarily removed from Bahrain in the days leading up to the U.S. strikes on Iran in anticipation of a potential retaliatory attack on Fifth Fleet headquarters. Ultimately, Iran's immediate retaliation was limited to a missile attack on a U.S. military base in nearby Qatar. U.S. officials, however, have not ruled out further retaliatory measures by Iran.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Angela Rayner's new deputy PM office inspired by John Prescott
Angela Rayner will model her new office of the deputy prime minister on that of John Prescott. Rayner is expected to set up her power base a year after Labour entered government, including 30 staff, a new logo and an email address. The Times understands it will take inspiration from Prescott, the last Labour deputy prime minister, and will also draw lessons from Nick Clegg's time in the role. Sources close to Rayner, who has her own mandate through being elected as deputy Labour leader by party members, pointed to Prescott's aim of 'creating sustainable communities' through his office, suggesting it was a key priority that she would emulate. They suggested she would be taking direction from a 2005 document that read: 'The aim of the office of the deputy prime minister is 'creating sustainable communities'.' Whether Rayner would be granted a separate office from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, for which she is secretary of state, has been unclear since Labour took power. In the run-up to the election, there was a plan to give Rayner, who previously described herself as 'John Prescott in a skirt', a fully fledged office for deputy prime minister in the Cabinet Office, with a dedicated team and a cross-Whitehall brief. When that failed to materialise, Sue Gray, the prime minister's then chief of staff, was blamed for blocking the long-standing plans that, it was thought, would co-ordinate Rayner's work across Whitehall. The claim was denied by No 10. The Times reported in January that while plans for a formal office had been shelved, discussions had resumed about a move to No 9 Downing Street. The political blog Guido Fawkes reported on Tuesday that the new office would be announced next week, including room in the Cabinet Office for about 30 staff, a new logo and staff emails using the domain @ A source close to Rayner pointed out that Prescott's official office for the deputy prime minister was not formed until 2002, a year after the 2001 Labour victory. • Angela Rayner: 'Whatever I achieve, people still say I'm thick' They highlighted a description of Prescott's office that put focus on 'sustainable communities', described as being 'about things that matter to people: decent homes at prices people can afford; good public transport, schools, hospitals and shops; people able to have a say on the way their neighbourhood is run; and a clean, safe environment'. It said: 'The role of the office of the deputy prime minister is to help create sustainable communities, working with other government departments, local councils, businesses, the voluntary sector and communities themselves.' The office will be seen by some as Rayner consolidating her power as Sir Keir Starmer's authority has been thrown into question by a series of U-turns. Rayner is seen as a frontrunner to replace Starmer despite having ruled out a leadership challenge.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
F1 talks up Silverstone's 'forever' future before Starmer meeting
LONDON, July 1 (Reuters) - Silverstone circuit could stay on the Formula One calendar forever with no real rival to host the British Grand Prix, the sport's chief executive Stefano Domenicali said on Tuesday ahead of this weekend's race. The Italian told reporters he could not imagine a championship without Britain, home to seven of the 10 teams, but there was also no chance of the country having more than one race. "I do believe that... Silverstone has the right characteristics to stay forever in the calendar," said Domenicali, who will visit Downing Street on Wednesday with some drivers and team bosses to meet Prime Minister Keir Starmer. "There's no other places where you can develop such a huge event in the UK. I don't see any other places, to be honest." Silverstone hosted the first world championship race in 1950 and has a contract until 2034. Last year it hosted the biggest crowd of any event on the calendar with 480,000 spectators. Miami and Austria's Red Bull Ring have the longest deals, both running to 2041, and Domenicali saw no reason why Silverstone could not join them although the circuit management had yet to seek an extension. The meeting at Downing Street is billed as an informal celebration of the 75th anniversary of the first F1 championship race at Silverstone, but it is also a chance to raise issues the sport wants addressed. Domenicali said he would highlight how much the "F1 ecosystem" contributes to Britain as the beating heart of a global sport, and the risk of losing that primacy due to restrictions on staff and movement. Formula One figures calculate the sport brings 12 billion pounds ($16.48 billion) annually to the UK economy with 6,000 people directly employed and a further 41,000 working in a supply chain of 4,500 companies. The Italian said visa issues post-Brexit had affected the deployment of staff from race to race around Europe, while costly and time-consuming paperwork had complicated logistics and made it harder to draw up the race calendar. "It is impossible to think in the short term that the teams will move out from the UK because of this limitation but the teams will organise themselves maybe in a different way," he warned. "What we are asking is not to change the decision that your country has taken, because it's not our mandate and our role, but to facilitate things that are having a burden on the economical side. "And also in terms of possibility to be, as a country, more attractive for keeping the central part of F1 in this country." ($1 = 0.7281 pounds)
