Retirees pull billions from pension pots to escape Reeves's tax raid
Official figures showed 672,000 retirees, representing roughly 5pc of all pensioners, pulled £5bn from their pots in the first three months of this year.
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) said the amount taken from retirement funds was 25pc higher than the same quarter a year ago, with 13pc more people withdrawing money.
It means withdrawals during the period were the highest since George Osborne introduced pension freedoms a decade ago.
It comes after the Chancellor announced in her maiden Budget last October that pension pots would no longer be exempt from inheritance tax from April 2027, making them subject to a levy of up to 40pc.
Baroness Altmann, a former Tory pensions minister, urged the Chancellor to reverse the policy, warning that many more people would choose to withdraw money from their retirement pot as soon as possible, creating a 'pensioner poverty time bomb'.
Sweeping changes mean retirees can now withdraw unlimited amounts from their pot as soon as they hit 55.
The figures also revealed a 50pc increase in the number of octogenarians taking money out of their pensions over the course of last year with the amount withdrawn by those aged 81 and over up by 80pc to £360m.
'It's a disaster'
The Chancellor hopes to raise £1.5bn from her decision to bring pensions within the scope of inheritance tax.
Pension withdrawals from defined contribution pots above the 25pc tax-free lump sum incur an income tax charge of 20pc for basic rate taxpayers and a 40pc levy at the higher rate.
The changes mean heirs will be subject to both inheritance and income tax at the marginal rate from 2027.
'It's a disaster,' Lady Altmann said, adding that she expected withdrawals to accelerate as more people became aware of the looming inheritance tax charge.
She added that the 'draconian' way the policy was introduced was storing up a crisis for the future, and said she was pushing for changes in the Lords that would see beneficiaries charged a maximum 20pc 'pension recovery tax' instead on inherited pots.
Lady Altmann said: 'This policy could end up being as damaging to workplace pensions as Gordon Brown's tax rate was for DB [defined benefit] pensions.
'I honestly think this is an existential threat to the long-term survival of our DC [defined contribution] pensions, because there's a clear incentive to take the money out as soon as you possibly can.'
She added that this would leave many middle-class families in danger of not leaving themselves enough to fund their retirement.
Lady Altmann said: 'This IHT [inheritance tax] imposition will ensure that more and more people – especially those who don't have massive amounts of money – will just say, 'Why on earth would I want to lose two thirds of my pension to the taxman? I'll just take it out as soon as I can.'
'Those who build up, say, between £200,000 and £300,000 over their working life are now in danger of having a real financial incentive not to keep money in their pensions for their later life and then end up in poverty.'
'Taking a big hit'
Guy Opperman, another former pensions minister, said: 'Pensions are taking a big hit from the Government's actions.
'The consequences of this policy are clear: people will save less for their pension and will withdraw more. This will also affect the ability to pass money on. There is time for the Government to think again and they should. It is very short-term.'
Jamie Jenkins, director of policy at pensions giant Royal London, which manages more than £170bn of client cash, said there was already clear evidence that people were changing their retirement planning ahead of the changes.
He said: 'There is increased interest from advisers and their clients in how they can mitigate the potential inheritance tax bill.'
Claire Trott, at wealth managers St James's Place, added: 'Every individual's circumstances are different, but IHT changes to pensions have certainly triggered more conversations about gifting strategies and whether it makes sense to start drawing from pensions earlier.'
An HM Treasury spokesman said: 'We continue to incentivise pensions savings for their intended purpose – of funding retirement instead of them being openly used as a vehicle to transfer wealth – and more than 90pc of estates each year will continue to pay no inheritance tax after these and other changes.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Express
13 minutes ago
- Auto Express
Car Deal of the Day: MGS5 EV for under £200 a month is a true bargain
Easy to drive; good quality interior Near 300-mile range Just £194.74 a month The MG ZS EV is dead, so meet its replacement. The MGS5 EV takes MG's small electric SUV offering to new heights, while also sticking to what we loved about the ZS EV – and that's excellent value for money. Advertisement - Article continues below This deal underlines that and then some. Through the Auto Express Find a Car service, Lease Car UK is offering the British-badged small electric SUV for just £197.47 a month – that's a real bargain in our book. An initial payment of £2,717.64 isn't even too unreasonable, while mileage is capped at 5,000 a year. Nudging this up to 8,000 per annum won't break the bank, coming in at just under £18 extra month. It's especially good value when you realise that this deal is for the Long Range model. Here, a 64kWh battery pack yields a claimed range of just under 300 miles, while a peak DC charging rate of 135kW means a 10-to-80-per-cent top-up will take just 26 minutes. Along with the larger 64kWh battery, you get the entry-level SE trim, but there's no issue on that front. MG likes to give its cars a high standard of specification, so the SE gets 17-inch alloys, full LED headlights, rear parking sensors with camera, a 12.8-inch infotainment screen, along with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. There's even a nifty smartphone app so you can control various functions of the car. One area where the MGS5 EV is a big improvement on the old ZS EV is interior quality. There's a higher standard of fit and finish and attention to detail than before, with a range of plush materials used. Meanwhile, it's a roomy car considering its compact dimensions, with a spacious 458-litre boot. On the road, the car feels easy and very natural to drive, with good acceleration and a ride that strikes the right balance between comfort and taut body control. The Car Deal of the Day selections we make are taken from our own Auto Express Find A Car deals service, which includes the best current offers from car dealers and leasing companies around the UK. Terms and conditions apply, while prices and offers are subject to change and limited availability. If this deal expires, you can find more top MGS5 EV leasing offers from leading providers on our MGS5 EV page. Check out the MGS5 EV deal or take a look at our previous Car Deal of the Day selection here… Find a car with the experts Electric cars driven until they die: the truth about EV range Electric cars driven until they die: the truth about EV range Five EVs under £24k have joined Dacia's Spring on the UK market. How far can you go on a budget? We find out Volkswagen, Skoda and Cupra slash electric car prices Volkswagen, Skoda and Cupra slash electric car prices Volkswagen, Skoda and Cupra aren't waiting around for the government grant by cutting £1,500 from their EV prices New MINI Cooper and MINI Aceman get the monochrome treatment New MINI Cooper and MINI Aceman get the monochrome treatment It's as simple as black and white for new MINI Cooper and MINI Aceman Monochrome
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
An establishment stitch-up at the expense of consumers
The market reaction to the Supreme Court's intervention in the car finance mis-selling scandal tells you everything you need to know about this grubby saga. Shares in Lloyds Bank, the UK's biggest car finance provider through its Black Horse brand, jumped as much as 7.5pc when trading commenced on Monday morning, leaving it at the top of the FTSE 100 leaderboard. The share price of Close Brothers, a specialist lender that is disproportionately exposed to the car finance market, surged as much as 25pc having sunk to 30-year lows as the industry braced for PPI-sized payouts. Shares in Bank of Ireland and Barclays, both of which have car finance arms, rose 4.2pc and nearly 2pc respectively. Make no mistake about it, the Supreme Court's ruling is a serious let-off for the banks and other lenders that have a big presence in the car loans space. True, revised payout estimations of between £9bn and £18bn to customers who were mis-selling victims is not to be sniffed at. However, even the top end of the range is less than half the £44bn bill the sector was collectively thought to be facing before the Supreme Court decision. The lower end would be just a quarter. It is a massive result for an industry that fought this case tooth and nail. Anthony Coombs, a former Tory MP and now chairman of lender S&U, whose shares had tanked 33pc at one stage, described it as 'a victory for common sense'. I'm not so sure about that. I certainly share the concerns of many about the shameless ambulance-chasing law firms and claims management firms that have helped fuel Britain's compensation culture. Clearly, it means there is a high risk of people jumping on the bandwagon and lodging bogus claims that the banks then feel the need to recover through higher borrowing costs for all of us. But that's hardly a new phenomenon – there will always be a relatively small number of chancers looking to game the system wherever they can. I'm less inclined to celebrate what has the unmistakable feel of an establishment stitch-up at the expense of consumers. I have a natural aversion to the armies of highly-paid lobbyists who go into bat for big business, skewing what is already a massive power imbalance even further. Consumers already face a David-versus-Goliath battle to be treated fairly. In this case, the scare tactics employed were particularly shameless as industry campaigners sought to ensure the Supreme Court's ruling was as favourable as possible to the banking community. Even now, despite a significant legal climbdown, these same activists felt the need to take to the airwaves to issue fresh apocalyptic warnings. Stephen Haddrill, the director general of the Finance & Leasing Association, claimed the scheme could push up borrowing rates for car-buyers as if somehow large corporations have no choice but to always pass on any additional costs to their customers. The same arguments were rolled out after Covid when companies claimed they were lifting prices to offset their own cost increases and they were no more convincing back then – with research suggesting pandemic profiteering was rife among the biggest companies. As if that wasn't sufficiently disingenuous, John Phillipou, chairman of the Finance & Leasing Association, weighed in too, complaining that there was a risk of harm to Britain's 'investability'. Still, lobbying is what lobbyists do and at least they make no attempt to hide their true intentions. Moreover, Phillipou is only echoing our alarmist Chancellor, and it is surely far more outrageous that she sought to meddle in the outcome. Rachel Reeves has absolutely no business at all involving herself in such matters, while there is zero evidence to back up her suggestion that large-scale payouts represented a threat to growth. Yet, as with the wrong-headed ousting of the chairman of the competition watchdog, the Treasury will stop at nothing in its attempts to deflect blame for Britain's floundering economy from the Chancellor's job-wrecking tax raid. The reasons for the UK's lack of competitiveness are innumerable and too often they can be laid at the door of 11 Downing Street. Reeves's willingness to side with bank bosses instead of standing up for the little man is also disquieting. The job of the Supreme Court judges is to ignore the noise and correctly apply the law but ministers seem to have allowed themselves to be captured by the lobbying fraternity. Voters may see it as another betrayal from a party that has waged war on hard-working families with its tax blitz. As Liberal Democrat MP Bobby Dean rightly said, Government interventions like this set a bad precedent if the reason for intervening is that it might damage industry, 'because then almost every consumer redress case would fall'. Dean, who is a member of the powerful Treasury select committee that polices the City, regulators and the Treasury, points out that compensation schemes give consumers confidence to borrow and invest, 'if they know they will be protected when companies take advantage of them'. It is now down to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to restore the balance after it confirmed it will consult on a redress scheme for those still entitled to compensation. But that hardly inspires confidence. After all, this is the same FCA that was described in a damning report by MPs and Lords just last year, as 'incompetent at best, dishonest at worst'; its actions as 'slow and inadequate.' The chances of the watchdog suddenly showing some teeth seem slim.
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘China's Google' to launch self-driving cars in UK
A tech giant dubbed 'China's Google' is planning to test self-driving taxis in the UK, as the US prepares to ban Chinese driverless car technology. Baidu, the Chinese internet search giant, confirmed on Monday that it would be seeking to road test its Apollo Go autonomous cars in the UK and Germany starting in 2026 under a deal with Lyft, a rival to Uber. The tech giant is expanding its self-driving car business across Europe, as Chinese carmakers flood Europe with cheap electric vehicles that have challenged domestic car businesses. Baidu already operates ride-hailing operations in China in cities including Beijing and Wuhan. It said it hoped to have thousands of autonomous cars in Europe in the coming years. It has also tested and developed its self-driving cars on US roads under an agreement with California's department of motor vehicles. However, the US has moved to ban Chinese connected car and autonomous driving software from 2027 onwards. The Biden administration introduced the ban in January on national security grounds. It said this was to ensure America's 'automotive supply chains are resilient and secure from foreign adversary cyber threats'. The decision has remained in effect under Donald Trump. The US department of commerce warned in January that the plethora of microchips and internet-connected systems in self-driving cars created 'opportunities for data exfiltration and unauthorised vehicle manipulation due to the direct'. It added that the 'China's role in the US connected vehicle supply chain presents undue and unacceptable risks'. Fears of cyber espionage UK intelligence officials have repeatedly accused China of cyber espionage and hacking campaigns targeted at government officials and MPs. In 2023, Sir Iain Duncan Smith, the former Conservative leader, claimed he had been 'reliably told' that a ministerial car used by then prime minister Rishi Sunak had been bugged with a tracking device hidden in a microchip. Officials previously blocked Huawei, the Chinese telecoms business, from Britain's 5G networks over fears it could pose a security risk. Luke de Pulford, the executive director of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, said: 'It wasn't long ago we were seeing credible reports of ministerial cars hacked by China. 'The Government should act to protect Britain from exposure to Beijing's data harvesting and espionage, not expose them to more of it.' US ride-hailing company Lyft has launched a major expansion into Europe in an attempt to challenge Uber. It acquired Freenow, a ride-hailing business owned by BMW and Mercedes-Benz, in a $200m (£150m) deal earlier this year. The deal with Baidu could bring self-driving cars designed by the Chinese company and connected to Lyft's app to Europe by early next year. Robin Li, the chairman of Baidu, said its launch was part of a 'commitment to making autonomous mobility accessible worldwide'. David Risher, Lyft's chief executive, said Baidu's 'extensive track record operating the world's largest autonomous ride-hailing service means we can bring all the benefits of AVs [autonomous vehicles] – safety, reliability, and privacy – to millions of Europeans'. Uber has said it will test driverless taxis in the UK in a deal with Wayve, a British technology start-up. Tesla, meanwhile, has started trials of its driverless car technology in London after government officials sought to speed up rules that would allow autonomous vehicles on UK roads.
