Amazon to face UK probe over alleged payment delays to suppliers
The Groceries Code Adjudicator (GCA) said it has 'reasonable grounds' to suspect Amazon has breached the UK's Groceries Supply Code of Practice (GSCOP), which requires no delays in supplier payments.
The investigation will examine Amazon's practices from March 2022 to June 2025, based on evidence received from 'a range of sources', the GCA said.
The watchdog said it would look into Amazon's processes for receiving goods and making payments, handling supplier concerns about payment deductions and the use of deduction settlements in negotiations with suppliers.
"The alleged delays could expose Amazon suppliers to excessive risk and unexpected costs, potentially affecting their ability to invest and innovate," GCA adjudicator Mark White said in a statement.
An Amazon spokesperson told Just Food on Friday (20 June) the retail giant takes the GSCOP 'incredibly seriously' and will 'cooperate fully with the adjudicator'.
'We have already made significant improvements to our grocery supplier experience, including to payment practices, with supplier contacts on this reducing year-on-year," the spokesperson added.
Amazon has made changes including giving suppliers 30 days to challenge shortages and chargebacks before any money is deducted. The retailer also pointed to its introduction of "minimum notification periods" before any products are de-listed.
The GCA's investigation follows a directive from the watchdog nearly a year ago when it urged Amazon to take 'swift and comprehensive action' to comply with UK rules protecting suppliers.
According to the watchdog's 2024 annual survey, fewer than half of respondents directly supplying Amazon believed the retailer 'consistently' or 'mostly' adhered to the code.
"Amazon to face UK probe over alleged payment delays to suppliers" was originally created and published by Just Drinks, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
擷取數據時發生錯誤
登入存取你的投資組合
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Manchester's housing crisis is not the council's fault
Andy Burnham frequently says Greater Manchester's teenagers 'can see the skyscrapers from their bedroom window' but can't see 'a path' there. It's a comment he uses to argue for improved education so teenagers can secure a well-paying job in the city centre. But it could just as easily be applied to house prices. Since Mr Burnham took the mayoralty in 2017, thousands of luxury apartments have been constructed in town. Despite traditional economic logic dictating extra supply will lower prices, a council report last year found new 'homes are increasingly priced towards the top of the market however… this can result in the perverse impact of new supply ostensibly adding to the inflationary pressures in parts of the city where new development has been most intense'. READ MORE: Murder arrest at Manchester Airport after death of teen stabbed in car park READ MORE: The 'forgotten' Greater Manchester estate where people are demanding change The average house price in Manchester city centre in April was £270,036. That's more than eight times the average Manchester salary, calculated at £32,704 last November. In the same month, the average rent in the borough of Manchester was listed at £1,310 per month. That's means someone earning the average Manchester salary would have to spend more than half of their take-home pay on rent if they lived alone. Never miss a story with the MEN's daily Catch Up newsletter - get it in your inbox by signing up here But it's not like the council hasn't tried to stop house prices climbing in town. Since 2012, it's had a policy that says a fifth of all units need to be affordable, if a developer is set to make 20 per cent profit. How much money a developer will make is scrutinised by an independent expert, and if they tell the council the 'viability assessment' shows returns under 20 per cent, the developer is exempt from affordable housing. Often, the town hall will still ask developers to make a smaller 'section 106 contribution' to community infrastructure, like schools or parks, or the council's 'housing affordability fund' in lieu of the affordable homes. It also includes 'clawback clauses' when giving out planning permission, so if a developer that initially is exempt from affordable housing then makes more than 20 per cent profit, the council can get more cash out of them. While they rarely produce big returns to the public purse, it was recently revealed one had to pay £700,000 for a city centre project. How much developers chip into public projects and affordable housing made headline news this summer, following a court case between Mr Burnham's office, the Greater Manchester Combined Authority (GMCA) and Aubrey Weis, a major city centre landowner. Mr Weis claimed the GMCA's decision to loan major developer Renaker £140m 'distorted' the property market. The Competition Appeals Tribunal dismissed the claim. Contributions were raised again by opposition Lib Dem councillor Chris Northwood earlier this month, who told the town hall: 'Many, many large-scale developments in the city centre are approved through planning with zero affordable housing. 'That means we are not building those mixed, integrated communities for the future we want. It seems to me the existing system of independent assessments does not produce meaningful figures… and there's a huge lack of transparency over these.' Her motion referenced a 2017 Shelter report which found developers 'inflate their bids for land', pushing up the total bill for a building. That means profit margins take a hit in viability assessments so they don't hit the 20 per cent threshold and don't build affordable units, the report said. 'Developers know that they can use the loophole, and so factor it into their bids for new sites,' author Rose Grayston concluded. 'In fact, they must: if one developer does not plan to use the loophole, they risk being outbid for land by another one who does. This pushes the price of land up, making development more expensive.' Coun Northwood's motion was amended by governing Labour councillors, who point out most affordable housing is actually funded by a completely different scheme. Last year, 3,864 new homes were built in Manchester, with around 3,300 available on the open market, and 511 affordable (13 per cent of the total). More is coming — contractors are currently building roughly 12,000 homes in the city, 1,470 of which are affordable (12 per cent), and about 18,500 units are in the planning system now, with around 2,250 affordable (12 per cent). In fact, section 106 money only builds about one in 10 affordable homes in Manchester. The other 90 per cent is funded by grants given to housing associations and public bodies, largely from Homes England and the GMCA. That's why town hall chiefs have been genuinely encouraged by Rachel Reeves' decision to 'double the grant pot' to £39b over the next decade, because it's a model they understand. And it's a game they've become good at playing. Recently, One Manchester finished 24 new apartments and houses on Brigham Street in Openshaw, made possible by Homes England grants which created Manchester council's £3m 'Project 500' initiative, that helps housing associations cover the cost of building on brownfield land. All 24 homes are affordable, as are all Project 500 homes — 90 per cent will also be available at social rent. Grants also help the authority's own development company, called This City, which recently finished No. 1 Ancoats Green, a 129-apartment and townhouse development where 30 per cent are available at 'Manchester Living Rent', set at the level of the local housing allowance. Another city centre project from housing association Great Places will create 89 affordable flats on Laystall Street in the Northern Quarter in spring 2026 — again made possible by grant funding. The council has other levers to help get affordable homes to Mancs. A fifth of the massive, 850-home development planned for Mayfield will be affordable, partly due to the fact the town hall is a member of the 'partnership' overseeing the redevelopment of the area into a new neighbourhood. It's also been able to lean on developer Salboy to make nearly 30 per cent of the homes in its Viadux 2 project affordable, because it owns the land where two towers will shoot up. A new council initiative has also brought 276 empty homes back to the market, although only three have gone towards social housing. But while efforts are being made to solve Manchester's housing crisis, the current rate of building is clearly not enough. A recent town hall report found the number of people on the top three bands of the council's housing register surged to 11,500, an increase of 15 per cent, last year. It's grown by 49 per cent since April 2022. In part, the reason why affordable housing demand is growing when affordable housing supply is increasing is because newbuild figures are tempered by right-to-buy sales. Council tenants can purchase their home after three years. Last year, 137 did so, so the 'net gain' of affordable housing to Manchester wasn't 511 — it was 374. Over the last decade, the city built 3,998 affordable homes. It lost 2,139 to right-to-buy, so a net rise of only 1,859. The government is planning on making it harder for council tenants to buy their homes, extending the minimum occupancy window to 10 years and exempting any new stock from right-to-buy for 35 years — so the problem will subside, but not disappear. It's not just smaller gains that's an issue. Roughly half of all newly-constructed city centre homes, which would be perfect for first-time-buyers, are bought by investors to rent out — something council officer Nick Cole called 'a concern', because it cuts the amount of homes available to buy and increases the number of renters, blocking up the market. Nationally, big changes are in store for renters, as section 21 'no fault evictions' are expected to be abolished in early 2026 by the government. Ahead of the move, the council is seeing a spike in section 21 notices, sometimes following persistent increases in rent to a point where tenants can make ends meet — so they enter the council housing system. The question of how many affordable homes and who should pay for them looms as Manchester council is preparing its first local plan for 13 years — effectively its blueprint for development. It will be formally adopted by the end of the year. Campaigners are calling for all new developments to include 30 per cent affordable housing, but the final details of the plan have yet to be released. Whatever the final document says in the autumn, Manchester as a city will need to keep building affordable homes — and that requires grants to fund it, the council to steer it, and developers to play their part.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The most expensive transfers of the summer 💸
Liverpool in total domination. July has just ended, time to take a look at the most expensive transfers of the summer so far. Liverpool has the two most expensive transfers of this market. Florian Wirtz and Hugo Ekitike cost over €200M together. In the top 5, we find only one club outside the Premier League: Galatasaray with the official arrival of Victor Osimhen (€75M). A transfer tied with that of Bryan Mbeumo to Manchester United. The Red Devils are also closing the deal with the arrival of Matheus Cunha. Which of these recruits are you most looking forward to seeing play this season? Give us your opinion in the comments! This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇫🇷 here. 📸 Alex Grimm - 2025 Getty Images
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ripple: Banks Have Invested Over $100 Billion in Blockchain Infrastructure Since 2020
Traditional banks have invested more than $100 billion in blockchain since 2020, according to a recent Ripple-backed report claiming digital assets are going mainstream. That figure comes from 'Banking on Digital Assets,' a joint study by Ripple, CB Insights and the UK Centre for Blockchain Technologies (UK CBT), which analyzed more than 10,000 blockchain deals and surveyed over 1,800 global finance leaders. According to the findings, major banks are ramping up investments in custody, tokenization, and payment infrastructure — despite regulatory uncertainty and market volatility. The report estimates that more than $100 billion has been invested in blockchain and digital asset initiatives globally between 2020 and 2024. It also found that 90% of surveyed finance leaders believe these technologies will have a significant or massive impact on finance within the next three years. From 2020 through 2024, traditional financial institutions participated in 345 blockchain deals globally, the report says. Payment-related infrastructure drew the largest share, followed by crypto custody, tokenization and on-chain foreign exchange. Roughly 25% of investments focused on infrastructure providers powering blockchain settlement and asset issuance rails. More than 90% of finance executives surveyed by Ripple believe blockchain and digital assets will have either a 'significant' or 'massive' impact on finance by 2028. Among bank respondents, 65% said they are actively exploring digital asset custody, with more than half citing stablecoins and tokenized real-world assets as top priorities. Examples cited include HSBC's tokenized gold platform, Goldman Sachs' blockchain settlement tool GS DAP, and SBI's work on quantum-resistant digital currency. Still, most respondents say consumer-facing digital assets are not the immediate focus — less than 20% of banks reported offering crypto trading or retail wallets. The report frames the shift as more infrastructural than speculative. Institutions are largely investing in blockchain to modernize cross-border payments, streamline balance sheet management, and reduce reliance on legacy rails. Ripple, which provides enterprise-grade blockchain solutions for banks, positioned the findings as evidence that 'real-world asset tokenization is entering the implementation phase.' Even as regulatory clarity lags in many jurisdictions, more than two-thirds of surveyed banks say they expect to launch a digital asset initiative within the next three years. Those efforts may range from piloting tokenized bonds to building interoperable settlement layers for CBDCs and private stablecoins. Despite recent setbacks in crypto markets, Ripple's report argues that capital formation is accelerating, not retreating. It notes that blockchain investment from traditional finance hit a post-FTX high in Q1 2024, and that emerging markets — including the UAE, India and Singapore—are driving adoption faster than the U.S. and Europe. For blockchain firms and infrastructure providers, the message is clear: the next wave of institutional adoption won't hinge on hype cycles or retail mania, but on quietly transforming the pipes of global finance.
