Number of nicotine poisonings in kids skyrockets with pouches becoming more common
Zyns, a nicotine pouch placed between a person's gum and lip, have quickly risen to popularity as a way to get a nicotine hit without smoking. But nicotine pouches such as these can be a danger to kids if the container is left unsupervised.
A study published Monday in the American Academy of Pediatrics found there were more than 134,000 nicotine ingestions among children younger than the age of six reported to poison centers from 2010 to 2023.
Most of the poisoned children were younger than two years old, and almost all of the poisonings happened at home.
While the rate of nicotine poisonings decreased from 2015 to 2023, it was mostly thanks to a decrease in poisonings from liquid nicotine used in vapes.
The rate of nicotine pouch poisonings has increased by about 763 percent from 2020 to 2023. Nicotine pouches were also more likely 'to be associated with a serious medical outcome or medical admission than other product formulations combined,' researchers wrote in the study.
Most of the poisonings had no effect or a minor effect on the children, but there were 39 ingestions with major effects and two deaths. The two deaths were in children under the age of two who ingested liquid nicotine, NBC News reported.
Dr. Molly O'Shea, a Michigan pediatrician and spokesperson for the American Academy of Pediatrics, told NBC News, 'It was just a matter of time before they fell into the hands of younger kids.'
Those nearly 40 children who had major effects experienced trouble breathing and seizures, Dr. Natalie Rine, an author of the study and director of the Central Ohio Poison Center at Nationwide Children's Hospital, told NBC News.
Rine said the 'two deaths is a lot, especially for something considered a preventable death.'
O'Shea suggested parents keep their nicotine products 'locked away' instead of in a purse, pocket or on a counter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
US ice cream brands to stop using artificial dyes in products as part of RFK Jr's MAHA push
America's ice cream giants have pledged to remove artificial dyes from their products within the next three years, federal health officials said on Monday. The move is the latest voluntary effort by food manufacturers to heed calls from the Trump administration to remove synthetic dyes over concerns about potential health effects. Companies including Nestle, Kraft Heinz and General Mills - almost 90 percent of the industry - said they would pull artificial colors from their foods, too. 'This is a renaissance moment for health in America,' US Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary said at a news conference. About 40 makers of ice cream and frozen dairy desserts said they would remove seven petroleum-based dyes from their products by 2028, according to Michael Dykes, president of the International Dairy Foods Association. The colors are Red 3, Red 40, Green 3, Blue 1, Blue 2, Yellow 5 and Yellow 6. The trade group wouldn't identify the firms, although Turkey Hill Dairy chief executive Andy Jacobs was present at the event where the announcement was made. The national focus on artificial food dyes is 'a good step to take,' but officials should not ignore larger known contributors to chronic disease, including the added sugars and saturated fat commonly found in ice cream, said Deanna Hoelscher, a University of Texas nutrition expert. 'Just taking out or changing the food dye source is not necessarily going to make it a healthy option,' she said. 'It still is a food that should be consumed in moderation.' However, Makary also hinted that new federal dietary guidelines, expected later this year, would challenge established links between saturated fat and heart disease, ending what he called 'a 70-year demonization of natural saturated fat.' The average American eats about 4 gallons of ice cream a year, the IDFA said. The frozen treat contributes an estimated $12 billion to the economy and supports more than 27,000 dairy industry jobs. Health advocates have long called for the removal of artificial dyes from foods, citing mixed studies showing that they may cause some neurobehavioral problems, such as hyperactivity and attention problems, in some children. The Food and Drug Administration has maintained that approved dyes are safe and that 'most children have no adverse effects' when consuming foods made with them. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has criticized the dyes and pressured manufacturers to remove them from foods. In their place, manufacturers should use dyes made from fruit juices, plant extracts and other sources, federal officials said. The FDA has approved new natural color additives in recent months, including a new blue color made from the fruit of the gardenia announced Monday. Gardenia (genipin) blue is approved for use in sports drinks, candies and certain other products, the agency said. Makary also sent a letter to food manufacturers on Monday that 'encourages' them to speed up removal of the dye known as Red 3, which was banned in January. Food makers have until 2027 to remove the dye, which was found to cause cancer in laboratory rats, but not humans. 'I'm particularly happy to be here today because this is relevant to my favorite food, which is ice cream,' Kennedy said at a press event, lauding the dairy industry for its actions. 'This is a great day for dairy and it's a great day for Make America Healthy Again,' added the IDFA's President and CEO Michael Dykes, referencing Kennedy's MAHA slogan that is a play on President Donald Trump's 'Make America Great Again' or MAGA. Andy Jacobs, CEO of Turkey Hill, said many commercial ice cream manufacturers had already phased out artificial colors or were in the process of doing so. 'By taking this step now, ice cream manufacturers are ensuring that ice cream remains a special part of our lives as consumer preferences change and the nation's regulatory priorities evolve,' he said. Some food companies have said they will stop using artificial dyes, but relying on voluntary action rather than regulatory requirements won't guarantee compliance, said Thomas Galligan, a scientist with the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a consumer advocacy group. 'Talk is cheap,' Galligan said. 'It's easy for companies to make promises to look like they're being compliant and generate goodwill among consumers and the Trump administration, but it remains to be seen if they will actually follow through.' There are also concerns that the bright colors could encourage people to eat more sweet treats, leading to weight gain which is linked to a whole host of chronic diseases. It follows moves from the states, with both California and West Virginia passing laws to ban some artificial food colorings. There are at least 30 others, mostly Democrat, considering similar legislation. Major food manufacturers including Nestle, Kraft Heinz, General Mills, and PepsiCo have already signed on to ditch artificial dyes. Kennedy on Monday said between '35 and 40 percent' of the food industry has now pledged to make the shift, but it was notable the ice cream makers' pledge pushes past the health secretary's original target of end-2026, giving companies an extra year to adjust their supply chains. But key holdouts remain - for example Mars, the maker of M&M's and Skittles, and its subsidiary Kellogg's, whose Froot Loops still use Red 40, Yellow 5, Blue 1, and Yellow 6 in the US, even though the same cereal is artificial dye-free in places like Canada. The FDA recently ordered that Red 3 must be removed from foods sold in the US by 2027 and medications by 2028, over concerns it can cause cancer. This dye is responsible for the bright red colors found in candies and lollipops, although there are now natural alternatives. Many states are also seeking a ban on Red 40, or Allura red - found in several popular snacks including Doritos, Skittle and Pepsi. Yellow 5 is also on the chopping block, which has been linked to potentially triggering hyperactivity in children and damage to DNA. It is also used in Doritos, juices and cookies. Similarly, Yellow 6 - found in sugary breakfast cereals like Lucky Charms - and Blue 1 - found in sweets like gummy bears - have both also been linked to hyperactivity. Studies in animals have also suggested that Blue 2 - found in sports drinks - and Green 3 - often found in salad dressings - raised the risk of tumors developing, particularly in the bladder and testes.
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The three popular beverages teaming with toxins... and the easy swaps to avoid them
A doctor has issued an urgent health warning for caffeine and sport drink lovers over secret toxins that may cause cancer and neurological problems. Dr Alessia Roehnelt, a board-certified endocrinologist in New Jersey, revealed the three most common drinks that can cause significant damage to your body. She noted that coffee, especially when made with disposable pods, could cause a buildup of hormone-disrupting microplastics in the body. Meanwhile, sports drinks are also filled with tumors-causing food dyes that can pave the way for cancer. Apart from this, the physician also said that drinking decaffeinated coffee or tea also pose a risk to your health due to the chemical solvents used to remove its stimulant effects. The warnings comes as two in three American adults drink some form of coffee every day, according to the National Coffee Association. ALong with this, over 159 million Americans regularly drink tea while one in four adults consumes sports and energy at least one time per week in the US. Below, reveals the three popular beverages that can cause long-term damage to your body, as noted by Dr Roehnelt: 1. K-Cups K-Cups, made wth a Keurig machine, are coffee beans or tea leaves sealed in a disposable pod, usually made of plastic. The cup has a plastic ring covered with a foil top, and the inside of the capsule is lined with a filter material to keep the coffee contained while brewing. While more convenient than the traditional coffee-making process, Dr Roehnelt claims that this process can lead to a builup of microplastics inside the liquid and increase the risk of chemical exposure with 'each sip.' Micro and nanoplastics (MNPs) are small plastic pieces less than five millimeters long that can damage DNA and accumulate inside vital organs. Scientists believe that an increasing consumption of microplastics through foods and beverages can cause inflammation and lead to colon cancer. Additionally, a March 2025 study also found that microplastics and their related toxins build up in human brain and cause inflammation and brain damade, which can lead to dementia. It revealed that about a tablespoon worth of microplastics and nanoplastics were discovered in the brain and levels were three to five times higher in people diagnosed with dementia. MNPs have also been linked to cell death, changes in the gut microbiome, blood clots and increased risk of heart attacks. Instead of K-cups, Dr Roehnelt recommends using a French press or stovetop espresso machine, as neither require the use of any plastic cups to filter coffee beans into liquid. 2. Decaf coffee or tea In recent years, decaf beverages have gained popularity due to health concerns and lifestyle preferences. About 26 million Americans drink decaffeinated beverages every day as people's desire for the taste of coffee without the stimulant effects of caffeine continues to rise. However, Dr Roehnelt believes decaf may not be healthy, as many are processed using chemical solvents. Chemical solvents are usually used in the processing of various items including soybeans, ice cream, instant noodles and palm oil to purify and enchance their flavor. Typically, the decaffeination process for coffee beans involves using chemical solvents, primarily methylene chloride and ethyl acetate, to remove the beverage's stimulant effects on the body. But previous research has found that exposure to methylene chloride can increase the risk of liver cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, brain cancer, leukemia as well as neurotoxicity, liver harm and even death in some cases in humans. In 2024, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) banned most industrial uses of methylene chloride after noting that at least 88 people have died from acute exposure to the solvent since 1980. But despite its well-known dangers, it continues to be used to decaffinate coffee beans. While ethyl acetate is not fatal to humans in small amounts, high levels of ingestions can cause gastrointestinal irritation and, potentially, central nervous system depression. Central nervous system depression refers to a condition where brain and spinal cord activity slows down, impacting various bodily functions such as heart rate and breathing - eventally damaging vital organs. Dr Roehnelt recommends instead opting for herbal teas such as mint or chamomile that naturally do not have any caffeine and therefore do not require any decaffeination processes. 3. Store-bought electrolyte drinks Lastly, Dr Roehnelt warned against drinking electrolyte-filled energy drinks as they are 'filled with artificial sweeteners, food dyes and other chemicals' such as Blue 2. Blue 2 is a modified version of the natural indigo dye and is used to give a blue color to a wide range of products including sports drinks, baked goods, cereals, snack foods, candies, maraschino cherries, sausages, ice cream and sherbet. Previous studies have found that consuming excessive amounts of Blue 2 can raise the risk of tumors developing, particularly in the bladder and testes. Additionally, animal studies have also shown links between Blue 2 and an increased risk of brain tumors. It has also been associated with allergic reactions and hyperactivity in young children. Since his appointment, Human and Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr has been making several efforts to ban the use of Red 3, Red 40, Green 3, Blue 1, Blue 2, Yellow 5 and Yellow 6 food dyes from all foods and beverages across the U S. The secretary also announced earlier this month that America's ice cream giants - including Nestle, Kraft Heinz and General Mills - have pledged to remove artificial dyes from their products within the next three years. As an alternative to energy drinks made of synthetic dyes, Dr Roehnelt suggested drinking a glass of water with a sprinke of Celtic salt and a squirt of lemon juice.
The Guardian
35 minutes ago
- The Guardian
I traded booze for THC drinks. But are there hidden risks?
Mark Zuckerberg, a billionaire, has said he avoids substances like caffeine because he likes 'rawdogging' reality. I, on the other hand, do not. I mean, have you seen reality lately? For most of my adult life, alcohol has been my preferred way to take the edge off. But, like a lot of other people, I got older and realized regular drinking was not doing me any favours. Last year, I experimented with 'intermittent sobriety', taking months off here and there. It helped, but it was also easy to slip back into bad habits. This year, I've jumped on the California-sober bandwagon, trading booze for the hemp-derived THC drinks that are rapidly growing in popularity. (THC stands for tetrahydrocannabinol, which is the psychoactive component of cannabis.) I've never had any interest in smokable or edible THC in the past – as a green card holder, I reckon I should make that very clear to any immigration officers reading. But these new drinks have been a game-changer. The dosage is clearly marked and the effects are felt almost as quickly as alcohol thanks to a technology called nanoemulsification, which turns the THC into tiny water-soluble droplets that are more rapidly absorbed by the body than traditional edibles. Having a 5mg THC seltzer or infused cocktail in the evening scratches the 'I need to unwind' itch for me with seemingly no short-term negative effects, like a hangover. While I find THC doesn't deliver quite the dopamine rush alcohol does, low doses give me a relaxing warm fuzz, and have been great for my anxiety. Most importantly, it's helped me kick the alcohol habit; I've never felt healthier. Apart from the hefty price tag (one can costs $5-$7), these drinks feel a little too good to be true. So are they? The short answer is: sort of. First, their legality is a little … hazy. Marijuana is still a controlled substance under federal law in the US, although some states have legalized it for recreational and/or medicinal purposes. But under the 2018 Farm Bill, any cannabis plant with less than 0.3% delta-9 THC by dry weight is considered hemp and is no longer a controlled substance. This loophole has birthed a booming market: THC beverages are expected to be a $4bn industry by 2028, according to Euromonitor International. (Even comedian Seth Rogen has jumped in with his own line of drinks, called Houseplant.) Depending on the state, you might find these drinks in grocery or liquor stores. Some brands sell online, but while hemp-derived THC is federally legal, this is a grey area, and some states have imposed restrictions on products containing it. Whether birthing a THC product industry was an intention of the Farm Bill is unclear. 'Some independent attorneys argue it was,' says Hilary Bricken, a lawyer who specializes in cannabis. 'Others say absolutely not: the bill was meant to promote things like textiles, not consumer-facing drugs. But ultimately, it's enforcement, or the lack of it, that's allowed this market to develop the way it has.' 'There's no federal regulation unless a particular state steps in,' says Bricken. 'Some states, like Minnesota, regulate these products. Others, like California, have banned them entirely.' (In California, these unregulated hemp-derived THC products are banned, but THC products that comply with the state's cannabis regulations can legally be sold at cannabis dispensaries.) But there are other risks to be aware of. 'Practices vary wildly between operators,' says Bricken. 'For the consumer, it's hard to tell what's actually in the drink. There's no federal standard, so it's essentially dealer's choice on the operator side. While the original hemp might have tested under the 0.3% THC threshold, post-harvest it can be transformed in ways that technically still comply with federal law. But many believe that most of what's being sold is synthetically derived, and potentially contains toxic compounds.' Even in a best-case scenario where you're buying from a responsible operator, THC isn't as harmless as many believe. A recent study led by researchers at the University of California at San Francisco found people who regularly used marijuana in either smokable or edible form had reduced blood vessel function comparable to tobacco smokers. This is associated with a greater risk of heart attack and other cardiovascular issues. 'We saw a 42% reduction in vascular function in marijuana smokers and 56% in THC edible users,' said lead study author Leila Mohammadi. 'The effect was dose-dependent: the more someone used per week, the worse their vascular function.' Worryingly, even relatively small doses of 2.5mg multiple times a week seemed to have a harmful effect. The study didn't look at drinkable THC; a single can typically contains 2.5-10mg, though some products have considerably more. But Mohammadi notes there's no reason to think drinkable products would be significantly different. THC can also affect cognitive function, especially in adolescents, whose endocannabinoid systems – which interact with cannabinoids like THC and regulate critical bodily functions – are still developing. The long-term effects are complex, and research is ongoing, but one clearly documented risk of THC use in adolescence is in how the body handles fat, says Daniele Piomelli, a neuroscientist and leading cannabis researcher at the University of California at Irvine. 'In adolescents who use cannabis heavily, the fat in their bodies becomes dysfunctional. Normally, during times of stress or intense cognitive effort, the brain uses glucose for energy but can also tap into energy derived from fat. But frequent cannabis users often lose that ability,' notes Piomelli. That means they might find concentrating more difficult. 'There's a large body of evidence suggesting a link – not necessarily causation, but a strong association – between cannabis use in adolescence and increased risk of psychosis,' says Piomelli. And while these drinks are only supposed to be consumed by people over 21, adolescence for men is longer than women and 'really continues until 25 or 26'. Even if you're an old crone like me, there are risks. A low-dosage THC drink now and again probably won't do much harm, but it's easy to accidentally go overboard. 'The real problem is that, like many things in the US, we don't do moderation well,' says Piomelli. 'Some of these seltzers now contain up to 100mg of THC. That's enough to send even an experienced user to the hospital if they're not expecting it. Not because THC is deadly – you can't overdose fatally on THC, even if you tried. But the experience can be incredibly unpleasant and disorienting, and recovery might take a couple of days.' It doesn't help that the category is bringing in lots of inexperienced THC users, and dosage guidelines and risks often aren't made particularly clear. In states like New Jersey, you can find THC-infused beverages containing 25mg of THC (not a negligible amount!) in the grocery store, stocked next to seltzers and energy drinks. You can very easily imagine a scenario where someone downs one of these without knowing exactly what they're getting themselves into. If you are intrigued by these beverages, experts say education and a slow start are critical. Start with 2.5mg or less and work your way up incrementally. While it's hard to generalize about effects, Piomelli notes that 'for a person in their 20s to 40s, weighing anywhere from 50-80kg (110-175lbs), 10-20mg of THC per serving would be enough to produce a noticeable buzz – definitely not enough to cause a full-blown high for someone who isn't a regular user.' Sign up to Well Actually Practical advice, expert insights and answers to your questions about how to live a good life after newsletter promotion 'I always say: know before you go,' says Harvard neuroscientist Staci Gruber, who directs the longest-running study of medical cannabis use in the United States. 'What's your goal? Are you looking for mild relaxation or trying to manage chronic pain? Your intention should guide your choice of product.' Many of these THC drinks also include CBD, which is one of the main non-intoxicating components of cannabis, and alters the experience. 'Some research suggests CBD can mitigate some of THC's negative effects, like anxiety or paranoia,' Gruber explains. No matter the ratio, the dose of THC is what's really important. 'THC at low doses is often anxiolytic: it can reduce anxiety and make people feel more relaxed,' says Gruber. 'But at higher doses, it becomes anxiogenic – it can actually cause anxiety. The problem is, what counts as a 'low dose' varies widely from person to person.' THC may have its risks but, just asking for a friend: is going California-sober still healthier than drinking alcohol? After all, alcohol heightens the risks of at least seven types of cancer and the World Health Organization has said no level of consumption is safe. Unfortunately, scientists don't give black-and-white statements that affirm your life choices; they qualify things. And the answer to whether going California-sober is a harm-reduction strategy is: it depends. 'It really depends on the person,' says Ziva Cooper, director of the University of California at Los Angeles Center for Cannabis and Cannabinoids. Factors like someone's age, individual vulnerability and what they're doing while intoxicated can influence the effects, as can frequency and dose of ingestion. 'Some people may have a family history of psychosis or mood disorders,' says Cooper. 'Others may be using very high doses regularly.' But there are risks either way: 'Some are associated with frequent use, and others with being a novice user. One unexpected risk we're now seeing is cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome – basically, heavy users presenting to the ER with severe nausea and vomiting. That was completely off the radar a few years ago.' Cooper notes that scientific research is still lagging behind the market. 'We need better data, more funding and more research, especially because half the adult population is using cannabis products in some form now,' she says. Many THC startups, and their new users, are on a high, but they might be headed for a comedown. 'A lot of these hemp companies are acting like they're too big to fail, like they can't be touched,' says Bricken. 'Maybe that'll end up being true. But right now, nobody really knows how it will play out.' Hemp-derived THC is receiving a lot more scrutiny, and increased regulation – even possible prohibition – is on the horizon. Last month, a key US House committee approved a spending bill, championed by the representative Andy Harris, a long-term prohibitionist, that walks back the legal definition of hemp. The bill still has to pass the House and Senate. But if it does get signed into law, the loophole these hemp-derived THC drink companies rely on will close, and they will have to stop operating in their current form. Separately, Congress generally renews the Farm Bill, a mammoth piece of legislation that funds major agriculture and food programs in the US, every five years. The current bill, which contains the hemp loophole, expired in October 2023 and Congress has since passed two one-year extensions. While they could potentially extend for another year, there's a strong possibility that a new version will be debated later this year. When this happens, Bricken thinks, we'll see the hemp-derived THC loophole either get closed or distilled into some kind of regulatory framework. 'Hemp companies are scrambling to gain ground before anything changes,' notes Bricken. 'They're surprisingly well-organized from a lobbying perspective, and some factions in the alcohol industry support them. But prohibitionist groups are also lobbying hard.' Xander Shepherd, co-founder of THC aperitif brand Artet (his 86-year-old grandmother's art adorns the bottles), says that flux in this sector is nothing new: 'I've almost become numb to the constant changes, whether it's the Farm Bill or state-level regulations. I try to remind myself it's kind of like two steps forward, one step back. But overall, I really believe the industry is moving in the right direction.' While all of this is playing out, I'm going to continue sipping legal THC drinks – albeit with a little more caution than before. Going California-sober is clearly not the healthiest choice in the world but, speaking from a purely personal level, the highs currently outweigh the lows.
