Teenage boy who was maimed in Gaza becomes the first to be treated for war injuries in the UK
Majd Alshaghnobi suffered severe facial injuries and a shattered leg while searching for food with two friends last year.
He was brought to the UK by Project Pure Hope, a charity set up by senior healthcare workers who have also treated children from Ukraine and Israel.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, along with the US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, made a rare trip into Gaza to visit an aid station and devise a plan to get aid into the strip.
Mr Witkoff tweeted: 'We spent over five hours inside Gaza. The purpose of the visit was to give the President a clear understanding of the humanitarian situation and help craft a plan to deliver food and medical aid to the people of Gaza.'
On Thursday, Mr Trump said he did not believe Israel's denials of famine in Gaza, saying there was 'real starvation' happening.
'We want to get people fed,' he said. 'It is something that should have happened a long time ago.'
The UN says that more than 1,300 people queuing for aid at centres run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which is backed by Israel, have been killed since late May. Rights group have condemned the centres as a 'death trap'.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, along with the US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee (both pictured), made a rare trip into Gaza to visit an aid station and devise a plan to get aid into the strip
Yesterday, wounded Madj was applauded by well-wishers when he arrived at Heathrow airport in London.
He said Israeli soldiers had opened fire on him and his friends, killing one and seriously injuring the other two, as they waited for aid.
His medical team, all working for free, will include craniofacial, plastic and orthodontic surgeons. Hospital bills will be covered by private donations.
Lead surgeon Professor Noor ul Owase Jeelani, of London's Great Ormond Street Hospital, said Majd's arrival comes after months of wrangling over a temporary visa.
'If we are able to give him a face and a jaw, it won't be completely normal, but hopefully he will be able to feed himself and speak, and his facial expressions will be better,' he said.
'Hopefully that will make a big impact on how he lives and on his future.
'Our hope is that we will be able to help many more children like him in the coming months. It's our collective moral responsibility. I don't quite understand why it's taken us over 20 months to get to this stage.'
Majd's arrival comes a week after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said he was planning to evacuate badly injured children from Gaza. Dozens of MPs have called on him to establish a Ukraine-style visa to allow Gazans to enter Britain for medical treatment
Majd's arrival comes a week after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said he was planning to evacuate badly injured children from Gaza.
Dozens of MPs have called on him to establish a Ukraine-style visa to allow Gazans to enter Britain for medical treatment.
Omar Din, an NHS healthcare executive and co-founder of Project Pure Hope, said: 'Every day of delay risks the lives and futures of children who deserve a chance to live, to recover and to rebuild a life.'
Two Gazan girls aged five and 12 with long-term medical problems were brought to London for treatment in April.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
How Trump's 'secondary tariffs' on Russia could hit global economy
Despite being the world's most sanctioned country, Russia has continued to use its vast energy wealth to bankroll its war in President Donald Trump is hoping to change that. He has announced that sweeping new secondary tariffs will impact any country still trading with Russia if a ceasefire with Ukraine is not agreed by Friday 8 August. Secondary tariffs would see goods from any country that trades with Russia face a 100% tax when they are imported into the and gas are Russia's biggest exports, and Moscow's biggest customers include China, India and Turkey. "I used trade for a lot of things, but it's great for settling wars", said Trump last would not be the first time the Trump administration has imposed secondary tariffs, which are also in place to punish buyers of Venezuelan using them against Russia would have far bigger implications for the global remains the world's third biggest oil producer, behind only Saudi Arabia and the US itself. But its shipments have been falling this year, according to a Bloomberg analysis of ship-tracking data. Increased energy prices "The key channel by which secondary tariffs on buyers of Russian energy could impact the global economy would be through the level of energy prices," says Kieran Tompkins from the consultancy Capital the tariffs work, they will cut the flow of Russian oil and gas to global with less supply, prices could go up, just as they did when Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. That led to a spike in inflation around the world. President Trump says he isn't worried because of record US oil Tompkins points out that, this time, there are also other reasons to suggest the impact on prices would not be as marked. He explains that "the current backdrop is one where OPEC+ [the group of major oil producing countries and its allies] have significant spare capacity to draw upon."Russia has devised a whole system for avoiding existing sanctions, which could be useful for helping its trading partners avoid the secondary tariffs threatened by example, its so-called "shadow fleet" - consisting of hundreds of tankers with obscure ownership - could be used to conceal the origin of exported Russian oil and gas."Sanctions maintenance is as big a task as the imposition of sanctions in the first place," US sanctions expert Richard Nephew of Columbia University says. "That's because the party that is being sanctioned takes steps to evade them." Pricier iPhones from India Since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 India has been the second biggest buyer of Russian oil, according to the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air. "They're fuelling the war machine. And if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be happy," President Trump told US outlet CNBC on Tuesday. If secondary sanctions take effect, US companies buying goods from India will have to pay a 100% import tax - or tariff - when those products reach US idea is that it makes these goods so expensive that US businesses will choose to buy them cheaper from elsewhere, resulting in lost revenue for India. That, in turn, is supposed to deter India from buying Russian oil. And if Russia is left unable to sell its oil elsewhere because other countries face the same predicament, it will have less cash to finance the war in way in which Americans could experience higher prices as a result of new secondary tariffs is in their purchase of mobile phones from calls Trump's tariff threat over Russian oil 'unjustified'US firm Apple is moving much of its iPhone production to India - in particular the manufacturing of handsets that it wants to sell in the US. If these products are subject to the new tariffs, prices could double for US consumers. That is because tariffs are paid by the companies that import goods - and those companies tend to pass most, if not all, of their cost increases on to their to the US from India are already facing a 25% tariff as part of President Trump's broader trade shake-up, and he told CNBC that number could be raised "very substantially". India's government has accused the US of double standards, pointing to Washington's own continued trade with vast majority of that trade is made up of US imports from India which amounted to just over $3bn (£2.2bn) last year - although that's just 10% of 2021 levels. That trade is dominated by US purchases of raw materials for nuclear energy and fertilizers. Russia is a major global supplier of both. Derailing trade talks with China China is buying the most Russian oil, and a decision by President Trump to impose secondary tariffs on Chinese goods would be much more challenging to because US imports from China are worth five times as much as those from India, and a lot more of those imports are consumer goods such as toys, clothes and tariffs aimed at Beijing would also risk upsetting a much broader renegotiation of trade between the world's two biggest economies that Trump has been pursuing since his first term in office."This type of over-escalation is unlikely to impress the Chinese," says trade expert Professor Simon Evenett of IMD Business explains that it would be "very difficult" to peel the Chinese away from the Russians without a good reason, given how closely Presidents Xi and Putin have worked together in recent top of that, the last time Trump tried using triple-figure tariffs against China, he found it did not work - as it almost cut off all trade between the two move like that could add to inflationary pressures in the US, which Trump has long pledged to could also cost huge amounts of manufacturing jobs in China, at a time when its economy is already struggling on several fronts. Further harm to US-EU commerce Analysis by the Finland-based Centre for Research and Clean Air shows that the EU and Turkey are also still amongst the biggest buyers of Russian 2022, the EU was the number-one export destination for Russia, although that has been vastly reduced since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Brussels recently agreed to buy a lot more energy from the US, but some imports from Russia remain. In June, the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, acknowledged the problem, saying "Russia has repeatedly attempted to blackmail us by weaponizing its energy supplies" as she laid out plans to end imports by the end of US-EU trade relationship is the biggest in the world, and the pair have just negotiated new trade terms which will see a 15% tariff be applied on most EU exports to the in the EU criticised that deal, saying the tariffs would harm European exporters. Now they also fear that secondary sanctions on the EU could do even more harm. Adding 100% tariffs for buying Russian energy could significantly reduce the amount of goods sold by the EU to the US. However the biggest sellers include pharmaceuticals and machinery, which may be hard to source from elsewhere - meaning Americans have little choice but to pay more. Potential Russian recession Russia's own economy has so far proven remarkably resilient since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine began, growing 4.3% last Economy Minister Maxim Reshetnikov recently warned that the country was "on the verge" of recession after a period of "overheating". The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is forecasting growth of just 0.9% this the secondary sanctions are successful in reducing demand for exports, they will push Russia closer to exact impact of the war on Russia's economy is hard to know, because Moscow has prevented a large amount of economic data from being published since the full-scale invasion - including on oil and gas a third of Russian government spending is funded by oil and gas money, but exports have been falling. Meanwhile, Putin is directing a bigger share of spending towards defence than at any time since the Cold War. Defence spending is believed to have reached 6.3% of contrast, Ukraine has been spending a huge 26% of the value of its far-smaller economy on the war. The difference explains why its president, Volodymyr Zelensky, has repeatedly asked for external help from his tariffs are intended to help Zelensky by cutting the amount of money flowing into Russia, and he hopes bring an end to the death, suffering and destruction in Ukraine.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Prince Harry unhappy after watchdog criticises all sides in charity row
Prince Harry has accused the Charity Commission of 'sitting on the fence' after it published a report that 'criticised all parties' at his charity for 'weaknesses' that 'risked undermining public trust in charities more generally'. The commission did not, however, find evidence of bullying at Sentebale as had been claimed by Sophie Chandauka, chair of the board of trustees. A source close to Harry criticised the Charity Commission report, saying that the prince was 'devastated that the chair has been allowed to succeed with a hostile takeover'. The source added that the commission was 'sitting so far on the fence that their feet are not even touching the ground but soon we'll see the charity accounts and will be able to tell how successful, or otherwise, she [Sophie Chandauka] has been'.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Reeves warned she must raise taxes or cut spending to plug £41bn black hole
Rachel Reeves must raise taxes or tear up her flagship borrowing rules to fill a £41bn black hole left by Labour U-turns, higher borrowing and sluggish economic growth, top economists have warned. The National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) – a leading economic think tank – said the chancellor could also look at spending cuts in the autumn Budget as a way to raise the money needed by 2029-30 to remedy a £41.2bn shortfall on her 'stability rule'. Its report said the chancellor has been left with an 'impossible trilemma' of trying to meet her fiscal rules while fulfilling spending commitments and upholding a manifesto pledge not to raise taxes on working people. But after a swathe of spending cuts squeezing departmental budgets at the last spending review, tax rises are the more likely option. The chancellor is under increasing pressure to raise income tax or consider a wealth tax on the rich. The think tank's forecast warned that the poorest 10 per cent of people – amounting to 2.8 million households – have seen their living standards fall 1.3 per cent under Labour, some 10 per cent lower than pre-Covid levels. Professor Stephen Millard, NIESR's deputy director for macroeconomics, said a 'credible, sustained increase in taxes' would be required due to the 'worsening fiscal outlook', not helped by Labour's U-turns on welfare cuts. He warned that a large part of this would need to happen in the first year to signal to the markets that the Treasury is committed to further increases down the line. Speaking at a press conference on Tuesday, Prof Millard warned that the £9.9bn buffer the chancellor has set out for herself is 'really way too thin', and a 'slight change in fiscal circumstances' would wipe it out entirely. 'With growth at only 1.3 per cent and inflation above target, things are not looking good for the chancellor who will need to either raise taxes or reduce spending or both in the October Budget if she is to meet her fiscal rules,' he added. It comes despite the think tank nudging up its economic outlook for the UK, with growth of 1.3 per cent expected for 2025, up from 1.2 per cent forecast in May. But it cut its prediction for next year – to 1.2 per cent, down from 1.5 per cent. Prof Millard also suggested the chancellor could rewrite her fiscal rules with a new framework that looks at the long-term direction of travel of debt, rather than judging debt based on a point five years in the future, as the current rules dictate. He told The Independent the government should base its financial projections on current levels of taxation and spending, rather than planned increases or decreases. The latest warnings come despite the chancellor's promise not to come back for more major tax rises after she unveiled a £40bn package of increases in her first budget last year. NIESR's findings will pile pressure on her to come up with innovative solutions ahead of her budget in the autumn. In July, Ms Reeves is said to have told the Cabinet that plugging gaps would be a 'big challenge' as there is no longer any 'low-hanging fruit'. Last month, the government's embarrassing climbdown on planned welfare cuts saw Labour's benefits reforms gutted almost entirely, with savings from the bill slashed from £5bn to nothing. Meanwhile, fresh figures from the Office for National Statistics published in July showed that borrowing – the difference between public spending and income from taxes – rose to a higher-than-expected £20.7bn as debt interest payments soared. Responding to the NIESR report, shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Experts are warning Labour's economic mismanagement has blown a black hole in the nation's finances which will have to be filled with more tax rises, despite Rachel Reeves saying she wouldn't be back for more taxes. 'Labour will always reach for the tax rise lever because they don't understand the economy. Businesses are closing, unemployment is up, inflation has doubled and the economy is shrinking. And Labour are refusing to rule out more damaging tax rises on investment. 'Only the Conservatives, under new leadership, believe in sound money and low tax.' The chancellor has set herself two fiscal rules – the 'stability rule', which ensures that day-to-day spending is matched by tax revenues so the government only borrows to invest, and the 'investment rule', which requires the government to reduce net financial debt as a share of the economy.
