MP or PM? What New Brunswickers will be thinking about at the ballot box
Fredericton resident Brady Green says when he thinks about how he will vote in the upcoming election, his local candidates are top of mind.
"I think people should be voting for the person who matters more in their community — the person who's going to be doing more for … wherever they live," Green said.
But not everyone feels that way. Preston Harper, who lives in Oromocto, said he doesn't care who is on the ballot locally — his priority is seeing the federal government switch hands.
Barb Hammond Roy, who lives in Fredericton, wants the Liberals to stay in power, feels similarly about her local candidates and she thinks most others agree.
"People do identify more with Carney than the local people," she said.
Alex Marland, a political scientist at Acadia University, said that according to the research, the majority of Canadians will be thinking on a national level in a federal election campaign.
Voters will be most likely thinking about party leaders, the parties themselves and possibly party-specific issues and policies, he said.
WATCH | What some New Brunswickers say about voting local in a federal race:
Does the name on the ballot really matter?
24 minutes ago
Duration 2:00
Alex Marland, a Nova Scotia-based political scientist, says research shows voters tend to focus more on policies, the party and the party leader during a federal election. But there are some cases where a local candidate could make the difference.
But in terms of local candidates, Marland said it really only makes a difference in close races.
"The problem is, for political parties, they have no idea where the close races are," he said.
"Some you can tell. So it doesn't make a lot of sense, you know, for the Conservatives, or frankly, for any party, to spend a lot of resources in Alberta, where a lot of people are going to vote Conservative.
"But it does make sense to compete in New Brunswick, because ... election polling suggests that some of these seats could flip depending on the amount of local activity."
However, people won't be thinking about their local candidates without being activated to do so, said Marland.
If a local candidate is engaging with people — through lawn signs, donations, volunteering, door-knocking — that may motivate voters to start giving more thought to the candidate.
In Atlantic Canada, Marland said people often have deep attachments to their communities because ridings aren't necessarily as densely-populated as they are in big cities.
As a result, he said people may have more of a connection with their local candidates.
"If you're in a big city, let's say Toronto, and you're in a coffee shop, you can look around the coffee shop, and at any given time, most of those people are not your constituents," said Marland.
"On the other hand, if you were to go into a … community store in a rural area in Atlantic Canada, you're going to go in and you're going to know the person working behind the counter."
And Marland said research shows that personal communication has far more of an impact than communication through "mass media or electronic means."
Marland said it's not likely someone will shift their party allegiance in order to vote for a local candidate they like or know personally.
"If local candidate factors really mattered, we would see far more Canadians being predisposed to voting independent," said Marland.
"Because … even if you like the local candidate, if somebody is with a political party, they're still beholden to that party's kind of demands and restrictions on what they can do in terms of advocacy.
"So you might like playing darts with somebody, but if they get elected with a party, they can't really represent you the same way an independent can."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
3 hours ago
- CBC
Strong turnout as advance polls open for provincial byelections
Elections P.E.I. says there was a strong turnout on the first day of advance polling Saturday for provincial byelections in District 9 Charlottetown-Hillsborough Park and District 15 Brackley-Hunter River. In District 9, 482 votes were cast. That's approximately 11.52 per cent of the district's registered voters. The vote tally for District 15 was 306 votes, 7.73 per cent of registered voters. In alphabetical order, the District 9 candidates are: Dennis Jameson for the Progressive Conservatives. Dr. Janine Karpakis for the Green Party. Carolyn Simpson for the Liberals. Simone Webster for the New Democratic Party. In alphabetical order, the District 15 candidates are: Kent Dollar for the Progressive Conservatives. Nicole Ford for the Liberals. Philip Hamming for the Green Party. Michelle Neill for the New Democratic Party. There are advance polls scheduled for this Monday and Friday. Hours are 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. The ordinary polling date is Aug. 12 from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m.
Vancouver Sun
4 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
'Leave the oil in the ground': Same debates, different country
Guyana, a country of roughly one million people perched on the northeastern corner of South America, is one of the world's fastest growing economies thanks to a super-charged nation-building project: the accelerated development of gigantic offshore oil fields. In just six years, one of the continent's poorest nations has emerged as the world's newest petrostate. The discovery, though, has enraged Venezuela President Nicolas Maduro and revived his government's claims to Guyanese territory in a century-old boundary dispute. These issues of nation-building and sovereignty are familiar to Canadians, so I wanted to talk with a wise Guyanese colleague about their moment, as we contemplate ours. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Selwin Asafa George, a 52-year-old entrepreneur, is remarkably thoughtful about what it's going to take for Guyana to embrace this movement towards prosperity, without losing its soul in the process. While the catalyst for accelerating nation-building in our respective countries differs, there is something for Canadians in Guyana's journey. 'This is our moment in the sun,' Selwin readily acknowledges when we virtually connect. Guyanese by birth, Selwin worked as an investment banker in New York City, studied at New York University and then Harvard's Kennedy School of Public Policy, before returning to Guyana in 2005 to take care of the family business. A mid-size enterprise employing over 150 locals, W&T George and Company holds several franchises in the food services and hospitality sector, and owns a portfolio of commercial real estate in Guyana's capital, Georgetown, as well as prime land outside the capital. 'There have been locals suggesting we leave the oil in the ground,' Selwin shares, with a smirk. 'And there have been very influential locals who have at least said to slow the rate at which we are extracting the oil, to give use a better chance, a better deal, to give us time.' Familiar sentiments to an Albertan like me. In Canada, I explain, First Nations remain divided on the merits of some of the nation-building projects pitched by provincial premiers, including, for example, the mining of critical minerals in northern Ontario's Ring of Fire. And despite the obvious need to become less reliant on a single market for Canada's oil — America — the green lobby is unrelenting in its push against the construction of export pipelines to tidewater. In the last decade, I tell Selwin, advocacy campaigns have sucked the energy out of many projects. It's different in Guyana, Selwin reports: 'Where you have strong economic interests, that will prevail.' Between Exxon and Chevron, American companies 'now control the majority of Guyana's oil output … so it's heavily in the interest of the U.S. to protect their economic interests.' (Exxon, operator and owner of 45 per cent of Guyana's Stabroek block, forecasts its output there to nearly double to 1.3 million bpd by the end of 2027. And Chevron now owns 30 per cent of the block.) There's no denying Canada is economically tied to America's hip, yet this conversation with Selwin is a reminder of the choices Canada retains. Foreign companies do invest in Canada's extractive sectors, but domestic ownership remains strong and influential. And while Canadians are struggling to define First Nations treaty rights within Confederation, we don't have another nation actually challenging our sovereignty. Venezuela is actively disputing Guyana's control over the Essequibo region, territory that makes up two-thirds of Guyana's landmass and includes oil and other resources. Selwin has thought deeply about the issues that bubble in nation-building endeavours and he's savvy enough to know what's negotiable. Right now, he's especially focused on one question: Who benefits from Guyana's resource windfall? After the first significant oil discovery in offshore Guyana was made by ExxonMobil, Selwin argued his country should adopt something similar to the Alaska sovereign wealth fund model. 'I believe it is critical that the public remains vigilant,' Selwin wrote then in a Guyanese newspaper, 'and so I urge that we go the path of Alaska by adopting a model of dividends for all. The introduction of the Alaska model of paying dividends to every Alaskan from their oil and gas resources would work wonders to strengthen the good governance model and ensure an engaged populace.' Who benefits? It's a critical question that can stimulate public awareness and buy-in — and one Canadians could spend more time talking about. How many Canadians know oilsands projects contribute roughly 3 per cent of our country's total GDP? How many Canadians understand the mechanics of equalization payments, how wealth is transferred from have to have-not provinces to ensure non-renewable resource bounty is shared? Ultimately, a sovereign wealth fund was created in Guyana but, Selwin reports, the funds have largely been squandered. He did the math at the end of 2024, to see what the outcome could have been if the government of Guyana had heeded his advice. (He's a former investment banker, so his calculations are credible.) The fund would likely have grown to roughly $1.5 billion, he estimates, the equivalent of US$50,000 to $60,000 for every Guyanese citizen, and would continue to grow quickly, he adds. Selwin is encouraging leaders in Guyana to focus not just on the building of physical infrastructure, but on the building of a culture of productivity in the country as well. What's that, I ask. 'That's culture where it's not just about the pay,' he says, it's culture that 'respects the dignity of being productive.' Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our newsletters here .
Ottawa Citizen
4 hours ago
- Ottawa Citizen
'Leave the oil in the ground': Same debates, different country
Article content It's different in Guyana, Selwin reports: 'Where you have strong economic interests, that will prevail.' Between Exxon and Chevron, American companies 'now control the majority of Guyana's oil output … so it's heavily in the interest of the U.S. to protect their economic interests.' Article content (Exxon, operator and owner of 45 per cent of Guyana's Stabroek block, forecasts its output there to nearly double to 1.3 million bpd by the end of 2027. And Chevron now owns 30 per cent of the block.) Article content There's no denying Canada is economically tied to America's hip, yet this conversation with Selwin is a reminder of the choices Canada retains. Article content Foreign companies do invest in Canada's extractive sectors, but domestic ownership remains strong and influential. And while Canadians are struggling to define First Nations treaty rights within Confederation, we don't have another nation actually challenging our sovereignty. Venezuela is actively disputing Guyana's control over the Essequibo region, territory that makes up two-thirds of Guyana's landmass and includes oil and other resources. Article content Article content Selwin has thought deeply about the issues that bubble in nation-building endeavours and he's savvy enough to know what's negotiable. Right now, he's especially focused on one question: Who benefits from Guyana's resource windfall? Article content After the first significant oil discovery in offshore Guyana was made by ExxonMobil, Selwin argued his country should adopt something similar to the Alaska sovereign wealth fund model. Article content 'I believe it is critical that the public remains vigilant,' Selwin wrote then in a Guyanese newspaper, 'and so I urge that we go the path of Alaska by adopting a model of dividends for all. The introduction of the Alaska model of paying dividends to every Alaskan from their oil and gas resources would work wonders to strengthen the good governance model and ensure an engaged populace.' Article content Article content How many Canadians know oilsands projects contribute roughly 3 per cent of our country's total GDP? How many Canadians understand the mechanics of equalization payments, how wealth is transferred from have to have-not provinces to ensure non-renewable resource bounty is shared? Article content Ultimately, a sovereign wealth fund was created in Guyana but, Selwin reports, the funds have largely been squandered. He did the math at the end of 2024, to see what the outcome could have been if the government of Guyana had heeded his advice. (He's a former investment banker, so his calculations are credible.) The fund would likely have grown to roughly $1.5 billion, he estimates, the equivalent of US$50,000 to $60,000 for every Guyanese citizen, and would continue to grow quickly, he adds. Article content Selwin is encouraging leaders in Guyana to focus not just on the building of physical infrastructure, but on the building of a culture of productivity in the country as well. Article content What's that, I ask. 'That's culture where it's not just about the pay,' he says, it's culture that 'respects the dignity of being productive.'
