Sexual harassment at temple: Beauty queen gets molested by Indian priest, says it's a blessing to ‘do it' with him
A priest who usually guided her through the rituals offered to bless her with holy water and a protective string. He asked her to wait as the temple was crowded.
After nearly 90 minutes, he told her to follow him to an office. Although she felt uneasy, she trusted him because of his past guidance.
In the office, the priest splashed her face with a strong-smelling liquid. He claimed it was a rare water from India. Then, he asked for something that made her totally uncomfortable.
'Then he asked me to lift my Punjabi suit. I refused. He kept insisting it was "for my good". But, I told him I couldn't because my blouse was tight. He got angry and scolded me asking what kind of person dresses tight like that,' Kanaran wrote on Instagram.
While he stood behind her, the priest continued chanting. Suddenly, he touched her inappropriately.
'He said it would be a "blessing" if I did "it" with him because he serves God,' she wrote.
'I won't go into more detail. But I was MOLESTED by that priest. And I couldn't react. When I finally managed to run, he said something like, 'This week will be a lucky week for you. I've done this for you',' she posted.
On July 4, she finally told her mother, who informed the rest of the family. That same day, they went to the police and filed a report.
When they visited the temple, the management seemed more concerned about the temple's name than her safety. She learned that someone had already complained about the same priest before, but no action had been taken.
The temple chairman claimed he knew little about the priest and even tried to downplay the matter. The investigating officer reportedly warned her not to post anything online. He said she would be blamed if she did.
'I'm not writing this to victimise myself. I'm writing this to voice out so that anyone else who has gone through something like this knows. You are not to blame. You did nothing wrong. And if you ever need someone, I'm here. You are not alone,' Lishalliny Kanaran posted.
Meanwhile, Malaysian police have started a manhunt for the accused, who is currently missing. According to Sepang district police chief Norhizam Bahaman, the suspect is an Indian who worked at the temple while the resident priest was absent.
'The suspect's modus operandi was allegedly to sprinkle holy water on the victim's face and body before proceeding to molest her,' the South China Morning Post quoted Norhizam as saying.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
40 minutes ago
- The Print
As bar associations go after courtroom imposters in black & white, concerns about ‘overreach'
'No clerk, litigant, or member of the general public is permitted to wear a white shirt and black pants,' the notice stated, declaring the attire 'strictly reserved' for advocates as a symbol of professional identity. In an effort to clamp down on the worrying trend of touts and fake lawyers misleading and defrauding litigants, the Rohini Court Bar Association (RCBA) issued a notice 15 July, prohibiting non-lawyers from wearing white shirts and black trousers within the court premises. New Delhi: From Shahdara to Gurugram, court bar associations are imposing attire restrictions after a surge in non-lawyers posing as advocates — triggering fresh debate on freedom, formality, and access to justice. 'A number of touts are falsely representing themselves as official advocates or clerks… These individuals are misleading and defrauding uneducated litigants under false pretence,' the RCBA said. A month earlier, the Gurgaon Bar Association passed a similar resolution, emphasising that only enrolled advocates or duly authorised law interns are permitted to wear the professional dress code — white shirt and black trousers, salwar suit, or sari—as per Bar Council of India (BCI) norms. According to the resolution dated 5 June, violators now face a Rs 5,000 penalty, and the rule is strictly enforced inside the district court complex. In November 2022, the Shahdara Bar Association of Delhi introduced a new dress code for interns—white shirt and blue coat and trousers. This was done keeping in mind the confusion and mix up between advocates and interns as a large number of interns visit the court. But this order was set aside by the Delhi High Court which said a standard uniform should be mandated across the board as varying dress codes set by different bar associations would create confusion and difficulties for interns. Thus, the uniform prescribed by the Bar Council of Delhi would be followed uniformly across Delhi. In November 2018, a Delhi High Court judge set aside a similar notice issued by the Rohini Bar Association directing interns not to wear black coats. Even though there have been debates about change in the formal attire due to the excessive summer heat—discussions about litigant's clothing have been uncommon. Also Read: Gurugram Bar cracks down on courtroom impersonators with a 'black & white' ban The colonial legacy The black-and-white dress code—black coat, white shirt, neckband—was inherited by the Indian legal system from the British colonial tradition. The tradition of wearing uniforms in courts is centuries-old. In England, judges began wearing wigs around 1650, although robes had already been in use even earlier. After Independence, India did away with the wig but retained black coats and robes as part of courtroom attire. Under the Advocates Act of 1961, it is compulsory for lawyers in India to wear a black coat or robe along with a white neckband. Wearing a gown is optional, except when appearing before the Supreme Court or high courts. Over the years, this uniform has become the visual shorthand for a lawyer in India — both inside courtrooms and in popular culture. But that symbolic power is now being undermined. The crisp black coat and white shirt are more than just fashion. In India, they're a badge of authority. In Bollywood or TV, anyone in black-and-white is instantly assumed to be a powerful lawyer character—think Jolly LLB or Damini. According to the Bar Council of India 'an advocate shall appear in court only in the dress prescribed and his appearance should always be presentable'. The Advocates Act, 1961, along with the Bar Council of India Rules, outlines the dress code for advocates in India. For male advocates , a black buttoned-up coat, chapkan, achkan (knee-length jacket), black sherwani, and white bands with an advocate's gown. Alternatively, a black open-breast coat, white collar (stiff or soft), and white bands with an advocate's gown. Long trouser —white, black, striped, or grey—or a dhoti. For female advocates, a black full- or half-sleeve jacket or blouse, white collar (stiff or soft), and white bands with an advocate's gown. Alternatively, sarees or long skirts in white, black, or any mellow or subdued colour without any print or design or flares in white, black, black-striped, or grey. But the rules, while clear for advocates, are silent on what litigants or the general public can or cannot wear. Who owns the black & white? Traditionally, litigants were expected to dress 'formally' in courts, out of respect for the proceedings. But now, some worry these colour restrictions could affect people simply trying to dress appropriately. The recent curbs raise questions about dress codes being enforced beyond legal professionals. 'While the RCBA's intention to prevent impersonation is understandable, enforcing a prohibition on basic attire—white shirts and black trousers — across all court visitors strays into arbitrary overreach,' Delhi-based advocate Urja Pandey told ThePrint. Furthermore, these are common everyday wear in India, worn by students, clerks, office workers, and even children, she explained. 'Banning them impinges on ordinary citizens' freedom of expression and right to access justice, especially when they may lack the means for elaborate wardrobe changes.' 'The Bar Council of India's authority under Section 49(1)(gg) of the Advocates Act empowers it to regulate advocates' dress, not the public's; extending such rules to litigants or clerks risks legal invalidation,' she added. Supreme Court advocate Shariq Ahmed Abbasi, however, said the Rohini Bar Association notice must be welcomed by the public at large. This move, he said, is only to 'save litigants from the menace of touts. It was repeatedly brought to the knowledge of the Bar body that several miscreants had falsely represented themselves as lawyers and defrauded the litigants.' 'The step should be seen in the right earnest with the objective of preserving the interests of litigants and as a mark of professional identity and dignity of the legal fraternity,' he told ThePrint. About alternatives, advocate Pandey explained how the issue of impersonation can be better addressed through 'targeted measures such as mandatory identity cards, better gate security, biometric checks, or visible signage — not blanket attire bans'. Ved Prakash Sharma, co-chairman of the Bar Council of India since 2019 and a former chairman of the Bar Council of Delhi, also criticised this move. He said a bar association is an association of advocates working at a particular court complex, and they have no right or authority to prescribe a dress code for members of the society. 'They (bar associations) have no legal or moral authority to do that, and (they) are exceeding their jurisdiction and authority by prescribing a dress code or penalising people wearing advocate attire,' he added. 'Even for advocates, the only statutory body—Bar Council of India—will prescribe a dress code.' He acknowledged the concerns about touts, security and safety as legitimate, but said 'these things are to be taken up with the law enforcement authorities, the police concerned or the district judge or the High Court.' 'And it is their business how to control and regulate the entry of unwarranted people in the court complex.' (Edited by Ajeet Tiwari) Also Read: Bangs, lipstick, low neckline—for Indian woman lawyers, merit evaluation steeped in misogyny
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Instagram 'Friend' Tries To Kill Bengaluru Woman's Cousin After She Refuses To Marry Him
Last Updated: On the afternoon of July 17, Karthik called the woman's father and insisted on meeting near the BMTC bus stand in Malleswaram. Chatting with a man on social media platform Instagram proved costly for a woman in Bengaluru as he attacked her relative after she refused his marriage proposal. The incident took place in Bengaluru's HAL area on July 17. Obsessed with the woman, the accused had repeatedly offered the woman, who is already married, to marry him. His obsession turned violent when he allegedly tried to kill the woman's cousin by slashing his throat while they were on a moving two-wheeler. The accused has been identified as Selva Karthik from Uthangarai town in Tamil Nadu's Krishnagiri district. Karthik had reportedly developed a one-sided romantic feelings for the woman he came across on Instagram. Despite her repeated refusals and warnings to keep away, Karthik allegedly continued harassing her, even threatening her and her family with death. The woman, living in Kaggadasapura with her husband Shiva, had gone to her parent's house in June. Two days after her arrival, Karthik appeared at her house and intimidated her in front of her family, demanding she speak to him and accept his proposal. When her father intervened, she clarified that Karthik was merely an Instagram acquaintance. Following further threats, including demands that she leave her husband and marry him or he would harm her father and relatives, her family grew alarmed and moved to Bengaluru to address the situation. On the afternoon of July 17, Karthik called the woman's father and insisted on meeting near the BMTC bus stand in Malleswaram. The father, accompanied by Prashanth, the woman's cousin, went to the location on a scooter. Karthik persuaded them to ride with him towards Vibhutipura to discuss matters. As they rode, with Prashanth seated in the middle and Karthik at the back, the accused allegedly pulled out a knife and slashed Prashanth's throat, threatening to kill both of them and escape. The father quickly pulled over and managed to avoid a second attack. The violent altercation drew the attention of locals who rushed to the spot. In the meantime, Karthik fled the scene. Prashanth was rushed to a nearby clinic for initial treatment and later transferred to Manipal Hospital, where he is currently in the ICU. Following the complaint, police have registered a case of attempted murder and other relevant charges against Selva Karthik, who is now in custody. Investigations are ongoing to determine the full extent of his actions and mental state. view comments First Published: July 20, 2025, 14:52 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
CoinDCX Suffers Major Cyberattack, $44 Million Stolen– All You Need To Know
New Delhi: India-based crypto exchange CoinDCX suffered a major cyberattack on July 20 with hackers stealing nearly 44 million dollars (around Rs 380 crore) from its internal accounts. The breach which occurred over 17 hours ago. It was first flagged within the community by ethical hacker ZachZBT. CoinDCX's co-founder later confirmed the incident in a post on X (formerly Twitter). As a precaution, the company has temporarily paused its Web3 operations but assured users that customer funds on CoinDCX Web3 remain safe. CoinDCX co-founder Neeraj Khandelwal confirmed that the hackers stole around 44 million dollars from the company's treasury funds, not from user accounts. He assured users that CoinDCX itself will cover the loss, and their top priority has been to secure all remaining assets and ensure user safety. The total amount lost was ~$44Mn out of our treasury assets. Coindcx Treasury will be bearing these losses. Our first and foremost objective throughout the day has been to first secure assets. — Neeraj Khandelwal (@neerajKh_) July 19, 2025 How did the breach happen? CoinDCX co-founder and CEO Sumit Gupta revealed that hackers targeted one of the company's internal accounts used for managing funds on a partner platform. The breach was described as 'sophisticated' and involved vulnerabilities in their server system. As soon as the issue was detected, the team quickly isolated the compromised account to contain the damage. Cybersecurity experts are now investigating the breach and working to fix the security gaps, and tracing the stolen funds.// CoinDCX CEO Sumit Gupta assured users that the situation was brought under control swiftly by isolating the affected operational account. He explained that since customer wallets are kept separate from internal accounts, the breach was limited to just one account. 'The incident was quickly contained by isolating the affected operational account. Since our operational accounts are segregated from customer wallets, the exposure is only limited to this specific account and is being fully absorbed by us - from our own treasury reserves. Our internal security and operations teams have been working through the day along with leading cybersecurity partners to investigate the matter, patch any vulnerabilities and trace the movement of funds,' Gupta said.// Hi everyone, At @CoinDCX, we have always believed in being transparent with our community, hence I am sharing this with you directly. Today, one of our internal operational accounts - used only for liquidity provisioning on a partner exchange - was compromised due to a… — Sumit Gupta (CoinDCX) (@smtgpt) July 19, 2025 India Sees Another Major Crypto Breach Within a Year CoinDCX has become the second major Indian crypto exchange to suffer a cyberattack in the past year. Back in July 2024, rival platform WazirX lost a staggering 234 million dollars in crypto assets after one of its wallets hosted on Liminal was hacked. The breach forced WazirX to halt trading and withdrawals, triggering panic among its 4.4 million users. The company filed an FIR and even launched a white hat bounty program, offering up to 23 million dollars to recover the stolen funds. However, a year later, only 3 million dollars has been recovered. International investigations later traced the hack to North Korean state-sponsored cybercriminals.
