Iran says Trump shifting stance on sanctions amounts to 'psychological and media games'
DUBAI, June 30 (Reuters) - Iran criticised on Monday U.S. President Donald Trump's shifting stance on whether to lift economic sanctions against Tehran as "games" that were not aimed at solving the problems between the two countries.
"These [statements by Trump] should be viewed more in the context of psychological and media games than as a serious expression in favour of dialogue or problem-solving," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei told a press conference.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The Iranian threat already inside Britain
Iran's online disinformation has been paired with activism from sympathetic NGOs. The Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC) is a driving force behind these campaigns. They've arranged annual Quds rallies, which is a tradition that was established by the 1979 Iranian Revolution leader Ruhollah Khomeini, and brandished Hezbollah flags until the Lebanese group was designated as a terror organisation in 2019. Despite investigations corroborating the IHRC's links to the Islamic Republic, the group still operates and is facing scrutiny for allegedly backing the Palestine Action sabotage campaign against Israeli targets. These networks thrive in part because of the endurance of Iranian dark money in the British financial system. To advance the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action nuclear deal, Britain lifted sanctions on Melli Bank and Bank Saderat in 2016. Melli Bank has been implicated in financing Iran-aligned Kataib Hezbollah militias in Iraq and Bank Saderat has funded Palestinian terror groups Hamas and Islamic Jihad. As major Iranian financial institutions still operate London offices and do business within a stone's throw of the Bank of England, their activities have received parliamentary scrutiny. Dame Margaret Hodge, a Labour peer from Barking, and Sir Iain Duncan Smith, the former leader of the Conservative Party, both drew attention to this issue in 2024. Owing to mounting concerns about Iran's malign activities in Britain, the authorities have taken some concrete actions. In October 2024, MI5 chief Ken McCallum vowed to give his 'fullest attention to the risk of an increase in, or broadening of, Iranian state aggression in the UK' and highlighted the service's thwarting of 20 potentially lethal Iranian plots against British citizens. In March 2025 Dan Jarvis, the security minister, declared that unregistered Iranian state agents could face up to five years in prison. These half-measures are not nearly sufficient to neutralise the full scale of Iran's shadow war against Britain. Tighter sanctions on Iranian financial networks and curbs on malign influence operations are urgently needed.
Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The Left has no idea how dumb and bigoted ‘free Palestine' sounds
Is there a more maddening slogan than 'Free, free Palestine'? It's inescapable. Wander into a city centre on a Saturday and you'll see swarms of the smug belting it out from behind their keffiyehs. It hangs thick in the air of every campus quad. It's chanted like a godless prayer by the plummy white saviours of Palestine Action. And of course it rang out across Glastonbury at the weekend. The eejits of Kneecap said it from inside their tricolour tea cosies. And Bob Vylan too. When he wasn't hollering for the death of the IDF, or telling us gammon that we'll never get our country back, he was barking: 'Free, free Palestine!' The crowd went wild. Those three words induce a Pavlovian response in the faux-virtuous middle classes of the modern Left. No sooner does the grim cry hit their ear drums than they're out of seats and babbling along, making a spectacle of their moral rectitude. It's partly the omnipresence of this tuneless motto that makes it so grating. It's the new 'Trans women are women' – a neo-religious mantra that the woke blather on a loop to show the world how righteous they are. Its aim is less to raise awareness about Palestine than to raise awareness about the ethical perfection of the person saying it. They say 'free, free' but all I hear is 'me, me'. But there's a bigger problem with this noise pollutant masquerading as a rallying cry: it is historically ignorant. Stunningly so. Nothing better captures the cluelessness of the Israelophobes than their unthinking utterance of this daft slogan. Ask yourself: free Palestine from what? The impression given by this suffocating chant is that evil Israel has its jackboot on Palestine's throat. Palestinians' right to statehood is being frustrated by those bastards in Tel Aviv, the keffiyeh classes will say. And it's high time to 'free, free' the Palestinian nation from the Israelis' deranged lust for every inch of the Holy Land. This just isn't true. It's a caricature bordering on defamation. The truth is that the Palestinians have been offered their own free state many times. And each time, they've turned their noses up at it. In 1947, the UN General Assembly passed a resolution calling for a two-state solution: one state for the Jews and one for Arabs. But the Arab nations said No. And when Israel declared independence in 1948, seven Arab armies invaded the newborn nation. Remind people of this next time they wail that the two-state solution is dead. Yes, but it wasn't Israel that killed it – it was strangled at birth by Israel's enemies. In 1993, the Oslo Accords tried to resuscitate the two-state solution. The Palestinian Authority was created. It was to enjoy self-governance over parts of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip – a nascent Palestinian state that might live in peace with Israel. But it was scuppered, by the murderous antics of Palestinian militants and the autocratic tendencies of the Palestinian Authority itself. Hamas and Islamic Jihad launched a wave of suicide bombings inside Israel to signal their bloody rejection of peace with Jews. And the PA descended into the cesspit of corruption. It is the PA that denies liberty to Palestinians. This is summed up in the fact that Mahmoud Abbas is currently in the 20th year of his four-year term as President of Palestine. Free Palestine? I agree – from its own venal leaders. Israel tried again. In 2005, then PM Ariel Sharon conceded more of the West Bank to Palestinian rule and handed over the entire Gaza Strip. We know what happened next. Hamas seized control of Gaza in 2007 and turned it into a forever launch site for fascistic violence against the Jewish nation. This culminated in the pogrom of October 7 when a 6,000-strong army of Islamofascists invaded Israel to rape and murder Jews. It is an unforgivable inversion of truth and reason to depict Israel as the thwarter of Palestinian liberty. It was Palestine's leaders, often with apocalyptic violence, who rejected statehood next to the Jewish State. The Left's Israel-haters have no idea how dumb and bigoted their cheap sloganeering sounds. If Palestine is to be 'freed', it should be from the racist, misogynistic, homophobic militia that ruthlessly rules over Gaza, and the bent elites living it up in Ramallah.
.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Musk will ‘do everything to damage' Trump and is building political influence to rival MAGA, mogul's former friend reveals
A man who was once close with billionaire Elon Musk warned President Donald Trump that the tech CEO is unforgiving and will do 'everything' to hurt the president, even after the two seemingly made up. 'I've had my share of blowouts with Elon over the years,' Philip Low told POLITICO. 'Knowing Elon the way I know him, I do think he's going to do everything to damage the president.' Low, a neuroscientist who founded the company NeuroVigil, experienced Musk's grudges firsthand when he fired the Tesla CEO from the advisory board of his startup in 2021. He claimed that Musk joined the advisory board for NeuroVigil, which builds a non-invasive brain monitoring device that can be used to detect neurological conditions. But then attempted to leave NeuroVigil's board after starting his brain-implant company Neuralink. Low fired Musk from NeuroVigil's advisory board instead of allowing him to resign to prevent the tech billionaire from using his stock options to hurt NeuroVigil. Low, who has known the tech mogul for 14 years, said he's unconvinced that Musk has forgiven Trump for the verbal battle the two engaged in earlier this month across their respective social media platforms. Musk had a bitter end to his time as an adviser and de facto head of the Department of Government Efficiency after publicly criticizing Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' on X. Trump claimed he pushed Musk out for acting 'crazy' and threatened to revoke his lucrative government contracts. In return, Musk accused Trump of being named in the government's investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. Trump has not been accused of any formal wrongdoing or charged with a crime related to the Epstein investigation. Though the two had a bitter falling out on social media, they appear to have reconciled somewhat - something Low branded as 'purely cosmetic' and transactional. 'He (Musk) has been humiliated,' he said. 'The whole idea that Elon is going to be on his side and help woo Congress and invest in election campaigns for right-wing judges — Elon might do all of that, but deep down, it's over.' Indeed, Low is warning that Musk may use his influence to undermine Trump's as a form of revenge. 'It's not a question of if, it's a question of when,' Low said 'Elon has his own pattern of trying to destabilize companies. He wants to take over, and if he can't take them over, then he tries to create a rival entity to compete,' Low said, though Low once noted Neuralink and NeuroVigil are not rivals. 'They were absolutely on a collision course, and I think that Trump tried to gloss over it by making it look as if he wanted Elon to be as aggressive as he was,' Low told POLITICO. Musk used his finances to help Trump get elected last year and his influence to secure a spot in the White House temporarily. Low believes Musk could use that same influence and connections to threaten Trump politically. 'He doesn't realize the battle that he has on his hands, and one way to cut the support away from Elon is to actually adopt some of the things he is for,' Low said.
