logo
Mysore Shree, Aam Shree: Jaipur confectioners drop 'Pak' from sweet names

Mysore Shree, Aam Shree: Jaipur confectioners drop 'Pak' from sweet names

India Today23-05-2025
Confectioners in Jaipur have begun to remove the word 'Pak' from the names of sweets sold by them, amid tensions between India and Pakistan. The word 'Pak' in the names of some sweets is now being replaced with suffixes such as Shree or Bharat instead.Names of famous delicacies earlier known as Moti Pak, Aam Pak, Gond Pak and Mysore Pak will now be sold by the names Moti Shree, Aam Shree, Gond Shree, and Mysore Shree respectively.advertisementAlso, Bikaneri Moti Pak is now Bikaneri Moti Shree, Chandi Bhasm Pak is now Chandi Bhasm Shree and Swarn Bhasm Pak is being presented as Swarn Bhasm Shree.
Shopkeepers say that the change in sweet names was a result of continuous requests from customers, who said that the word 'Pak' reminded them of Pakistan and, given the current situation, it hurts their feelings.Notably, the literal meaning of 'Pak' in sweet is 'cooked' or Pakwan (delicacy). However, amid strained ties between India and Pakistan, people have started associating Pak with Pakistan.The shopkeepers say that the customers have welcomed the change in sweets' names and call it a patriotic move made in the nation's interest.advertisementSocial media users are also appreciating the sweet vendors' move. People are of the view that use of words like 'Shree' and 'Bharat' in names of sweets fills them with pride.Apart from customers, several members of the Sweets Association of Jaipur are also supporting this name change and soon the word 'Pak' can be removed from the traditional names of sweets across Rajasthan.Relations between India and Pakistan hit a new low after the April 22 Pahalgam attack, in which 26 civilians were killed. In response, India also launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, destroying nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and killing over 100 terrorists.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Kya Karun, Miyan Saab (Nawaz Sharif) ne joote khane ke liye akele bhej dia': When Pak DGMO came alone for crucial DGMO talks that led to end of Kargil War
‘Kya Karun, Miyan Saab (Nawaz Sharif) ne joote khane ke liye akele bhej dia': When Pak DGMO came alone for crucial DGMO talks that led to end of Kargil War

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

‘Kya Karun, Miyan Saab (Nawaz Sharif) ne joote khane ke liye akele bhej dia': When Pak DGMO came alone for crucial DGMO talks that led to end of Kargil War

Then Dy DGMO Brig Mohan Bhandari (standing 2nd left) while then COAS Gen VP Malik meeting soldiers at Batalik sector during Kargil conflict. DEHRADUN: As Pakistani troops started retreating under pressure in early July 1999 during the Kargil War , then-PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee called up his Pakistani counterpart, Nawaz Sharif , on July 4 to send his Director General Military Operations (DGMO) for talks with the Indian DGMO on a full pull-back beyond Line of Control (LoC). Subsequently, as per Vajpayee's direction, then-DGMO Lt Gen Nirmal Chander Vij (retd) accompanied by then-deputy DGMO Brig Mohan Bhandari (retd) met Pakistan DGMO Lt Gen Tauqir Zia (retd) at Attari on July 11. Recalling the developments of the first and only meeting of DGMOs of the two countries during the Kargil War, Bhandari, who later retired as Lt Gen and now lives in Ranikhet, told TOI a day before Kargil Vijay Diwas on Saturday, that to his surprise, Lt Gen Zia arrived alone - something highly unusual for DGMO meetings. "As per the schedule, we left Delhi at 6.30 am on July 11 for Amritsar, where we reached around 8.15 am. From there, we boarded a chopper to Attari. After reaching the meeting spot, when I went to check on the Pakistani side, I saw Zia standing by himself, smoking, his cap askew. As I met him earlier about 3-4 times during talks on Siachen, I asked him, 'Ye kya hai Tauqir... akele? (How come you are alone?)' He replied, 'Kya karun? Miyan Saab ne joote khane ke liye akele bhej diya'(What could I have done? Miyan saab sent me alone to take the blows)," said Lt Gen Bhandari, adding that 'Miyan Saab' was a reference to then-Pakistan PM Nawaz Sharif. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Then Dy DGMO Brig Mohan Bhandari (sitting crossed leg extreme left) with then COAS Gen VP Malik (sitting at the centre with baton in hand) and other senior Army officers in the shadow of Tiger Hill after freeing it from Pakistani troops. (Images shared by: Lt Gen Mohan Bhandari (retd)) Bhandari added that protocol did not allow that the Indian DGMO could meet the Pak counterpart without an accompanying delegation. "I asked Zia to call over personnel from the Pak Rangers, stationed at the border, for formality's sake. Three officers joined him. But despite that, we deliberately made them wait for 10 minutes as we all were angry with what they did in Kargil amid the ongoing peace talks between the two sides. " "The meeting went on for three hours", Lt Gen Bhandari recalled. "During the meeting, our DGMO gave them directions on the Dos and Don'ts while fully retreating beyond LoC. Zia and his three associates just took notes without saying anything, for obvious reasons as they were on the losing side... when our DGMO asked if they had any doubt, Zia just replied, 'No doubt'." Zia and the three officers from Rangers quietly left after having lunch organised by Indian side. On the conditions laid by Indian DGMO, the veteran , said the Pakistanis were asked not to lay landmines while retreating from Indian territory, but they "did the exact opposite".

Pakistan says it's close to US trade deal, Washington gives no timeline
Pakistan says it's close to US trade deal, Washington gives no timeline

Indian Express

time3 hours ago

  • Indian Express

Pakistan says it's close to US trade deal, Washington gives no timeline

Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said on Friday the United States and Pakistan were 'very close' to a trade deal that could come within days, but comments from the US after Dar met with Secretary of State Marco Rubio mentioned no timeline. 'I think we are very close to finalizing a deal with US Our teams have been here in Washington, discussing, having virtual meetings and a committee has been tasked by the prime minister to fine-tune now,' Dar said in a discussion at the Atlantic Council think tank in Washington. 'It's not going to be months, not even weeks, I would say (just) days,' he said. Under US President Donald Trump, Washington has attempted to renegotiate trade agreements with many countries that he threatened with tariffs over what he calls unfair trade relations. Many economists dispute Trump's characterization. The Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister, Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar @MIshaqDar50, met with the U.S. Secretary of State, Marco Rubio @SecRubio, today in Washington D.C. The two sides acknowledged the positive trajectory of the Pak-U.S. bilateral relations. They discussed and… — Ministry of Foreign Affairs – Pakistan (@ForeignOfficePk) July 25, 2025 The US State Department and Pakistan's foreign ministry, in separate statements after Rubio's meeting with Dar, said the two stressed in their discussion the importance of expanding trade and ties in critical minerals and mining. A post by Rubio on X after the meeting and the State Department's statement mentioned no timeline for finalizing a trade deal. Met with Pakistani Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister @MIshaqDar50 today to discuss expanding bilateral trade and enhancing collaboration in the critical minerals sector. I also thanked him for Pakistan's partnership in countering terrorism and preserving regional… — Secretary Marco Rubio (@SecRubio) July 25, 2025 The Pakistan foreign ministry also said Dar 'appreciated the pivotal role' by Trump and Rubio 'in de-escalating tensions between Pakistan and India by facilitating a ceasefire.' The State Department statement did not mention India. Trump has repeatedly taken credit for the India-Pakistan ceasefire he announced on social media on May 10 after Washington held talks with both sides. India disputes Trump's claims that the ceasefire resulted from his intervention and trade threats. India's position is that New Delhi and Islamabad must resolve problems directly with no outside involvement. The April 22 terrorist attack in Kashmir's Pahalgam claimed the lives of 26 civilians, sparling heavy cross-border fighting between the nuclear-armed neighbors in the latest escalation of a decades-old rivalry. India struck Pakistan on May 7 under 'Operation Sindoor' and the two nations exchanged hostilities, killing dozens across three days. The ceasefire was declared on May 10. New Delhi blamed the April attack on Pakistan, which denied responsibility and called for a neutral investigation. Washington condemned the attack but did not blame Islamabad.

'Constant watch on all developments': India slams China-Pakistan-Afghanistan meet, says CPEC expansion 'unacceptable'
'Constant watch on all developments': India slams China-Pakistan-Afghanistan meet, says CPEC expansion 'unacceptable'

Time of India

time2 days ago

  • Time of India

'Constant watch on all developments': India slams China-Pakistan-Afghanistan meet, says CPEC expansion 'unacceptable'

NEW DELHI: The government on Wednesday reiterated its strong objection to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor ( ) and termed any expansion or third-party involvement in the project "unacceptable." Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In a written reply in the Rajya Sabha, minister of state for external affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh confirmed that the Government of India is aware of a recent trilateral meeting between China, Pakistan, and Afghanistan held in Beijing. India-Pak Clash At UN Security Council: Cross-Border Terrorism Charge Triggers Diplomatic Firestorm "The government's position on CPEC is clear and consistent. We have consistently protested to the concerned parties over the inclusion of the so-called CPEC as a flagship project of One Belt One Road/ Belt and Road Initiative (OBOR/BRI), as it passes through parts of the Indian Union Territories of Ladakh and Jammu & Kashmir under illegal occupation by Pakistan," Singh said. On recent involvement of Afghanistan, Singh stressed that India has categorically opposed any proposed participation of third countries in the CPEC and has communicated its objections to the concerned parties. "Any proposed participation of third countries or expansion of the so-called CPEC projects to third countries is unacceptable. The government has consistently conveyed this position,' Singh reiterated. The minister also stated that India keeps a constant watch on all foreign developments that could impact its security and takes "all necessary measures" to safeguard its sovereignty and territorial integrity.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store