
Trump Diagnosed With Vein Disorder. A Doctor Explains
President Trump was just diagnosed with venous insufficiency. He had noticed swelling in his legs, prompting an examination by his physician, Sean Barbabella. The doctor reported that Trump was otherwise well, with no serious cardiovascular problems or blood clots. Recurrent bruising of his hand was dismissed as simply due to handshaking.
Chronic venous insufficiency means that the veins that carry blood back to the heart aren't working well. One-way valves in the legs may become damaged with age, causing blood to pool in the legs and leading to visible swelling. CVI becomes more common as people get older and, according to the Cleveland Clinic, affects one in twenty adults.
Early on, people may have no symptoms or only a mild feeling of heaviness. The swelling may go down fairly readily if the legs are elevated. As the condition worsens, the legs may become more visibly discolored, with the development of 'spider veins,' or varicose veins. When the pressure in the legs increases further, tiny capillary vessels can rupture and leak fluid, resulting in a more woody texture and brown discoloration. At this stage, poorly healing ulcers can develop from minor abrasions. This is when an infectious disease physician, like myself, might get involved, as these ulcers can take months to heal. If the infection spreads further into the tissue, it is called cellulitis, and it can become life-threatening, especially with the rise in antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Who Is At Risk For Venous Insufficiency
The risk rises with age. Having a prior blood clot, which causes tissue damage and swelling, is the other major risk, as is obesity. These are also risk factors for other cardiovascular disease, so your doctor should check that your peripheral arteries aren't blocked and that you don't have heart disease. Physical examination and ultrasound can detect peripheral vascular disease (blood vessel disease in your extremities).
Prevention
Try to keep your legs from swelling if possible, by not sitting or standing all day. If you have a job that prevents that, then it's good to wear compression stockings. Some you can buy over the counter; others require a prescription and are custom fitted to you.
Obesity, smoking, wearing tight, restrictive clothes around your torso, and lack of exercise are the other risk factors you have some control over.
Swollen, edematous legs are more susceptible to infection. It's essential to pay attention to and care for your feet. Athlete's foot, in particular, is often overlooked by patients and physicians, but can lead to terrible cellulitis.
Treatment
Reducing swelling is critical in preventing ulceration and worsening disease. The first step is to elevate your legs at least several times a day, and as much as possible when not working.
Gentle leg exercises and walking can help pump blood back to your heart. Improving blood return is especially important if you are sitting for a long time, as on a plane. Exercise your legs, even while seated, by frequently flexing and extending your legs and feet.
Compression stockings should be put on before getting out of bed in the morning and worn all day.
If symptoms worsen, pneumatic compression stockings might be prescribed to mechanically pump fluid out of your legs. These are expensive and not available to many. At Mahidol Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, I observed patients using a 'twisting tourniquet' technique, which involves repetitively wrapping Ace wraps and around a broomstick to tighten the wrap, then releasing it. It was remarkably effective, but required very motivated patients who actively participated in their care.
If ulcers develop, the first step is often an Unna boot, a compression stocking impregnated with a zinc oxide gel.
Further progression to cellulitis likely involves treatment with oral or intravenous antibiotics.
Hand Bruises
WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 24: Makeup covers a bruise on the back of U.S. President Donald Trump's ... More hand as he hosts French President Emmanuel Macron for meetings at the White House on February 24, 2025 in Washington, DC. Macron is meeting with Trump in Washington on the third anniversary of Russia's full-scale military invasion of Ukraine. (Photo by)
Trump was seen again this week with a large bruise on his hand. Similar bruises were noted in December, February, April, and June. Bruising like this is not related to venous insufficiency.
A memo from Barbabella said, "This is consistent with minor soft tissue irritation from frequent handshaking and the use of aspirin, which is taken as part of a standard cardiovascular prevention regimen.' He concluded that the President 'is in excellent health.'
These explanations are highly unlikely. Normal handshaking does not typically cause bruising. It is doubtful that it would happen to him repeatedly. Trump is a self-described germaphobe, reluctant to engage in handshakes, though they are a political necessity. Trump has long been known for his aggressive handshakes, viewed 'as a struggle for dominance.' On one occasion, for example, he left French President Emmanuel Macron's knuckles white.
In photos, Trump's bruises look like those caused by intravenous catheters. Other possibilities include actinic purpura from excessive sun exposure or a vasculitis. His bruises look different than those latter two possibilities typically do.
Barbabella's memo is odd, stating that aspirin is 'standard cardiovascular prevention regimen.' That's not quite accurate. Daily aspirin is recommended for secondary prevention—that is, for someone who has known heart disease, to prevent a heart attack or stroke. If you don't have known disease, the benefits of aspirin is debated. Aspirin use carries significant risks. For example, aspirin use increases overall GI bleeding risk by 60%.
In fact, 'the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends against initiating low-dose aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD in adults 60 years or older.' This position against aspirin is also 'consistent with the most recent guidelines from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association, and the European Society of Cardiology.'
Why is Trump on aspirin?
Implications
It's unclear if the White House is minimizing problems with the President's health. The venous insufficiency is unsurprising given Trump's age, obesity, and sedentary lifestyle. If he stumbles again, as he did in June, and were to hit his head, he risks a brain bleed, which could leave him with serious neurologic deficits.
If he takes care of himself, his venous insufficiency could be controlled with things like compression stockings. If he doesn't, then he could face a host of complications, some
of which could be serious enough to compromise his presidency.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Planned Parenthood closes 5 Northern California clinics, citing Trump budget bill
President Donald Trump's budget cuts to Medicaid have forced Planned Parenthood Mar Monte to shutter five clinics across Northern California and the Central Coast, including one in South San Francisco, the group said Thursday. The GOP-led federal spending bill that Trump signed into law earlier this month eliminated federal Medicaid funding for any type of medical care to organizations that perform abortions. Mar Monte is the largest Planned Parenthood affiliate in the country, with health care centers from Bakersfield, the Bay Area, Stockton and Sacramento. The now-shuttered facilities also include San Mateo, Santa Cruz, Gilroy and Madera. The closures represent the first wave of how the recent federal budget cuts will have real-life consequences for health clinics across the country — particularly for low-income Americans. They are also a crushing blow to a state that set it up to be an abortion haven after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. In the year after the decision, political leaders in California — led by Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Democratic-controlled Legislature — passed more than a dozen new laws and invested more than $200 million to increase access across the state. Thursday's announcement drives home the extent of the federal government's tremendous power to impact abortion access. Roughly 80% of Mar Monte's patients received Medi-Cal, California's version of Medicaid. Ten million people are expected to lose their health insurance because of nearly $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts over the next decade in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Meanwhile, the wealthiest Americans will receive a disproportionate share of the tax cuts funded by those cuts, according to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. In just one week since Mar Monte stopped billing Medicaid, the Planned Parenthood affiliate with 35 locations said it saw 5,000 patients — amounting to about $1.7 million in care costs it covered without reimbursement — Mar Monte Chief of Staff Andrew Adams told the Chronicle Thursday. 'It's just not sustainable,' said Adams. 'We can't keep our doors open if we continue doing that.' Mar Monte said the funding law also forced it to end services in family medicine, behavioral health and prenatal care. The Planned Parenthood affiliate estimates it will lose $100 million in annual revenue from care that can no longer be reimbursed under the law because they provide abortion care. Americans tend to support abortion rights, according to public polling. A May 2025 Gallup Poll found that 51% of respondents described themselves as 'pro choice' while 43% described themselves as 'pro life.'Of those respondents who said they were 'dissatisfied' with the nation's abortion polices, 42% said they would like to see them made 'less strict' while 14% wanted them to be 'stricter.'


Buzz Feed
6 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
MAGA Voter Regrets Medicaid Stance After Family Impact
As you likely know, Donald Trump signed his One Big, Beautiful Bill into law earlier this month, which includes major reductions in federal support for Medicaid. Ultimately, as reported by NPR, this will lead to about 12 million more people being without health insurance by 2034. It doesn't take much brain power to understand why that would be a very, very bad thing. Regardless, some people still struggle with the concept. One such person is the focus of this text exchange that recently went viral on Reddit: In a retelling of a recent conversation between their brother and themself, this texter wrote, "I mentioned in the family chat that 300,000 kids in Iowa are on Medicaid - they will all lose coverage." "My brother is like: well it least it's not touching Hawk-i, that's what my kids are on," they continued. For those outside of Iowa, the state's Medicaid and children's health insurance program is largely known by its nickname: Healthy and Well-Kids in Iowa or... hawk-i. So, upon learning his children's healthcare is in jeopardy, the brother responds with, "What? They better not." This is all made worse by the fact that the brother, apparently, has been a big proponent of cutting Medicaid. "Dude has been banging the drum for this stupid spending bill for weeks and didn't even realize he was rooting for his own kids losing their insurance," the texter concludes. Mining through the nearly 1,500 comments, a common frustration came from those who have seen stories of people voting against their own interests too many times before. Others questioned the brother's morality and wondered aloud why he was OK with children losing their health insurance (as long as they weren't his kids). "He never had a single thought about other people. The whole thing was about himself," Prosthemadera agreed. "Whether someone else's family will suffer, how many people will die, he doesn't give a shit." Additionally, "I'm 57 years old, no children, not religious. I have never taken a dime in Medicaid, food stamps, Section 8, or any public programs. I've never even filed for unemployment. But I want my tax dollars to help that guy's kids get healthcare and schooling, and housing. Guess I'm a libtard," weenie2323 said. Elsewhere in the comments, people shared similar stories of dealing with their own MAGA family members: "This is my mom," cheongyanggochu-vibe said. "My disabled brother is on Medicaid, which is supplemented by her state. She thinks that because he gets it from the state, he will be fine (even though the funds are majority federal)." "A colleague of mine lives in Utah, and he meets the threshold for Medicaid; everything is covered. I asked him, 'Say, aren't you worried about this bill working its way through Congress? You could lose your healthcare.' He said, 'What, no, that's for waste fraud and abuse, I'm on the state health care, not Medicaid.'" Overall, little sympathy was expressed. "Medicaid literally saved my life. Fuck these people," MidnightNo1766 added. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration appeals to Supreme Court to allow $783 million research-funding cuts
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to allow it to cut hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of research funding in its push to roll back federal diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. The Justice Department argued a federal judge in Massachusetts was wrong to block the National Institutes of Health from making $783 million worth of cuts to align with President Donald Trump's priorities. U.S. District Judge William Young found that the abrupt cancellations ignored long-held government rules and standards. Young, an appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan, also said the cuts amounted to 'racial discrimination and discrimination against America's LGBTQ community.' The ruling came in lawsuits filed by 16 attorneys general, public-health advocacy groups and some affected scientists. His decision addressed only a fraction of the hundreds of NIH research projects that have been cut. The Trump administration's appeal also takes aim at nearly two dozen cases over funding. Solicitor General D. John Sauer pointed to a 5-4 decision on the Supreme Court's emergency docket from April that allowed cuts to teacher training programs to go forward. That decisions shows that district judges shouldn't be hearing those cases at all, but rather sending them to federal claims court, he argued. Lindsay Whitehurst, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data